herbie Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 Did not one of you baglickers even notice Vance walked back Trump's pardon proposal for the Jan 6th thugs? He said the ones that committed violent acts should not be pardoned. Therefore admitting violence did occur and it wasn't an outbreak of peace and love like The Big Liar claims. That the rule of law should apply, not the laws of Der Fuhrer/ Zoom... right over your empty heads! 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 1 hour ago, robosmith said: ftfy... You have NO IDEA how much vetting was done. 🤮 They used the full capacity of the SYSTEM in place. ROFLMAO!!! Hey guys! Get this one. Fcking hilarious. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
User Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 42 minutes ago, herbie said: Did not one of you baglickers even notice Vance walked back Trump's pardon proposal for the Jan 6th thugs? He said the ones that committed violent acts should not be pardoned. Therefore admitting violence did occur and it wasn't an outbreak of peace and love like The Big Liar claims. That the rule of law should apply, not the laws of Der Fuhrer/ Zoom... right over your empty heads! Show us the exact statement where Trump said he was going to pardon ALL of the J6 people? Where did Trump say that there was no violence at all that day? Quote
Legato Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 5 hours ago, DUI_Offender said: I just reviewed his posting history, and you are correct. @Legato contributes absolutely nothing to this forum. I will go back further, to see if he has made any constructive contributions to this forum. Wow thanks for that. That's the most attention I've had since robo ran out of caps and he insisted I give him the map co-ordinates for a CAPS mine. Thanks again your attention is appreciated. If you're a little vague on constructive contributions here's a good primer. https://themissingpiecepuzzle.com/blogs/jigsaw-puzzle-talk/how-to-assemble-a-jigsaw-fast?srsltid=AfmBOopmyXtX6960vHFgtjuC-ad6vRjGHyKJxtsrYsDhQ1sQa0MycLjH 1 Quote
robosmith Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Yes I know you love your slaves. I know when you're not BANKRUPT, ^YOU'RE LYING. Unfortunate that you have NO CASE and LYING is the BEST YOU GOT. 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: ROFLMAO!!! Hey guys! Get this one. Fcking hilarious. ^BANKRUPT AGAIN. LMAO Quote
Nationalist Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 9 hours ago, robosmith said: I know when you're not BANKRUPT, ^YOU'RE LYING. Unfortunate that you have NO CASE and LYING is the BEST YOU GOT. ^BANKRUPT AGAIN. LMAO Just try not whipping and raping them today. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 11 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: I quoted him. Don't like it? Tough. He said it. Take it up with him. Now you are just blatantly lying. Yes, the quote is there for everyone to read. You don't seem to care that everyone can see you are a liar. That's odd. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 14 Author Report Posted January 14 9 minutes ago, Hodad said: Now you are just blatantly lying. Yes, the quote is there for everyone to read. You don't seem to care that everyone can see you are a liar. That's odd. Did he disagree? 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: Quote I know when you're not BANKRUPT, ^YOU'RE LYING. Unfortunate that you have NO CASE and LYING is the BEST YOU GOT. ^BANKRUPT AGAIN. Just try not whipping and raping them today. If his nerves were guitar strings, you'd be jimmy hendricks. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Hodad Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Did he disagree? 🤣Sure, "did he disagree?" is EXACTLY the same as "He said it and I quoted him." Jeebus... Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 14 Author Report Posted January 14 2 hours ago, Hodad said: 🤣Sure, "did he disagree?" is EXACTLY the same as "He said it and I quoted him." Jeebus... He doesn't seem to think my summary was wrong. I don't think my summary was wrong. No one else has jumped in to say my summary was wrong. So what makes you think you are correct? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: He doesn't seem to think my summary was wrong. I don't think my summary was wrong. No one else has jumped in to say my summary was wrong. So what makes you think you are correct? Well that's only 2 people on your side and there's 7 who agree with him, if you count the voices. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
herbie Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 On 1/13/2025 at 1:57 PM, WestCanMan said: Are you forgetting about Joe, who can't even articulate that he needs to go potty? And Kamala, who's world famous for sputtering meaningless drivel? The squad, who can only talk about their lust for seeing "PalestinianWT justice"? WTF to Biden and Kamala got to do with Trump's dementia? You roadies will come up with any nonsensical excuse you think defends the scumbag, 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 9 minutes ago, herbie said: WTF to Biden and Kamala got to do with Trump's dementia? You roadies will come up with any nonsensical excuse you think defends the scumbag, You literally said: "With the bar being set so low with Donnie's incoherent ramblings..." A number of people have now pointed out that the bar was set far lower by others, so it's not trump's "ramblings" that set the bar But i love that you can't remember what you've said. Do we need to get you a teleprompter? Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Hodad Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: He doesn't seem to think my summary was wrong. I don't think my summary was wrong. No one else has jumped in to say my summary was wrong. So what makes you think you are correct? You can ask @DUI_Offender directly if you like. But it's not a reasonable assumption to make, nor a reasonable inference from what was actually posted. And it's certainly not true in my own experience. Quote
WestCanMan Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 2 hours ago, herbie said: WTF to Biden and Kamala got to do with Trump's dementia? You roadies will come up with any nonsensical excuse you think defends the scumbag, We all know that you're stupid, but no one's dumb enough to think that Trump has dementia and Biden doesn't 😂 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
gatomontes99 Posted January 15 Author Report Posted January 15 (edited) Remember how I said People are Policy? Vance understands that the administrative class has to go. Edited January 15 by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 (edited) 38 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Remember how I said People are Policy? Vance understands that the administrative class has to go. That's right. You can't have a dictator if there are procedural checks or obstacles to unfettered power. Trump must eliminate the time-honored tradition of non-partisan civil service. Edited January 15 by Hodad Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 15 Author Report Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, Hodad said: That's right. You can't have a dictator if there are procedural checks or obstacles to unfettered power. Trump must eliminate the time-honored tradition of non-partisan civil service. If they were nonpartisan, they wouldn't be trying to sabotage his administration. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 5 minutes ago, Hodad said: That's right. You can't have a dictator if there are procedural checks or obstacles to unfettered power. Trump must eliminate the time-honored tradition of non-partisan civil service. The executive branch agencies do not exist as a check and balance on the President's powers. It is not non-partisan to say you are going to resist implementing the policies of the President. Quote
Hodad Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: If they were nonpartisan, they wouldn't be trying to sabotage his administration. Following the law and doing their jobs is not sabotage. And what you are supporting is the creation of an entirely and deliberately partisan civil service. You are SUPPORTING what you claim to be a problem. Spare me the faux outrage. You don't have principles, just goals. Quote
User Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 11 hours ago, Hodad said: Following the law and doing their jobs is not sabotage. You are so beyond dishonest. These bureaucrats didn't say they were following the law, they said they were going to resist Trump. 11 hours ago, Hodad said: And what you are supporting is the creation of an entirely and deliberately partisan civil service. You are SUPPORTING what you claim to be a problem. Spare me the faux outrage. You don't have principles, just goals. We are the ones saying it is bad for this civil service to say they are going to resist Trump, a purely partisan thing... you are the one defending it. 2 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 15 Author Report Posted January 15 3 minutes ago, User said: You are so beyond dishonest. These bureaucrats didn't say they were following the law, they said they were going to resist Trump. We are the ones saying it is bad for this civil service to say they are going to resist Trump, a purely partisan thing... you are the one defending it. In lefty eyes, resisting the right is nonpartisan. Because resisting and nonpartisan are words that make them feel good. It doesn't matter what the words mean. 2 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.