gatomontes99 Posted January 12 Report Posted January 12 Did anyone else watch this? I almost forgot just how freaking awesome this guy is. He's absolutely the best politician that I've ever seen at articulating his position in a way that is unimpeachable. I don't see how he could be stopped in 4 years. It really feels like he will be the next President. 2 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted January 12 Report Posted January 12 Probably. I 've said that before, he's got a lot of charisma as a politician and a lot of skill. Handles questions well, knows his material, can find his way off a stage unaided There's a very good chance he'll win in 4 years. Which probably means he'll get 8 years in power, for a total of 12 republican years in a row, with 16 out of 20 in total. The dems really really need to sit down and think about what they've got to offer and who they are as a party. They're going to be walking in the snow for quite a while if they don't become relevant again. 1 Quote
herbie Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: best politician that I've ever seen at articulating With the bar being set so low with Donnie's incoherent ramblings you've forgotten just about every other politician that ever existed. 1 Quote
godzilla Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 he said that those who committed violence on Jan 6th obviously shouldn't get pardoned. thats good to know. hang on... was there violence on Jan 6th? what Jan 6th is he talking about? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 13 Author Report Posted January 13 1 minute ago, herbie said: With the bar being set so low with Donnie's incoherent ramblings you've forgotten just about every other politician that ever existed. Name one that does a better job or articulating his position. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 3 minutes ago, godzilla said: he said that those who committed violence on Jan 6th obviously shouldn't get pardoned. thats good to know. hang on... was there violence on Jan 6th? what Jan 6th is he talking about? Who are you talking to here? Was there someone in particular that has denied there was any violence on January 6th? 1 Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
CdnFox Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 10 minutes ago, herbie said: With the bar being set so low with Donnie's incoherent ramblings you've forgotten just about every other politician that ever existed. LOL let me introduce you to Kamala and we'll see who's forgetful 2 Quote
robosmith Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Did anyone else watch this? I almost forgot just how freaking awesome this guy is. He's absolutely the best politician that I've ever seen at articulating his position in a way that is unimpeachable. I don't see how he could be stopped in 4 years. It really feels like he will be the next President. Not with the ball and chain of Curtis Yarvin around his neck Quote Vance’s rhetoric and ideology align closely with the “late republic” theory — a concept championed by far-right thinkers like Curtis Yarvin, advocating for the collapse of democratic systems to make way for a dictatorial regime. Yarvin proposed installing a dictator who would be the “CEO” of the country. Quote
User Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Not with the ball and chain of Curtis Yarvin around his neck Um... how is Curtis Yarvin around his neck? Also, where did you get your quote from? Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
gatomontes99 Posted January 13 Author Report Posted January 13 29 minutes ago, robosmith said: Not with the ball and chain of Curtis Yarvin around his neck Yarvin isn't a problem. He's a solution. Quote https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/07/18/jd-vance-world-view-sources-00168984 Like Deneen, Yarvin and his NRx followers reject the quest for “progress” as the core of political life. As Yarvin told Vanity Fair in 2022, “The fundamental premise of liberalism is that there is this inexorable march toward progress. I disagree with that premise.” Instead, Yarvin believes that American democracy has denigrated into a corrupt oligarchy, run by elites who strive to consolidate their power rather than serve the public interest. The solution, Yarvin argues, is for the American oligarchy to give way to a monarchical leader styled after a start-up CEO — a “national CEO,” [or] what’s called a dictator,” as Yarvin has put it — who can de-bug the American political order like a computer programmer de-bugging some bad code. Vance has said he considers Yarvin a friend and has cited his writings in connection with his plan to fire a significant number of civil servants during a potential second Trump administration. “There’s this guy Curtis Yarvin, who has written about some of these things,” Vance said on a conservative podcast in 2021, adding: “I think Trump is going to run again in 2024 [and] I think that what Trump should do, if I was giving him one piece of advice: Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people.” He's absolutely right. People are policy. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: Yarvin isn't a problem. He's a solution. He's absolutely right. People are policy. Ah, another faux "conservative" saying the quiet part out loud, eager to toss the American experiment in the dumpster and prostrate himself before a dictator. 1 Quote
User Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 5 minutes ago, Hodad said: Ah, another faux "conservative" saying the quiet part out loud, eager to toss the American experiment in the dumpster and prostrate himself before a dictator. What exactly did you listen to? It certainly wasn't the video you are here responding to. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
Legato Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 12 minutes ago, Hodad said: Ah, another faux "conservative" saying the quiet part out loud, eager to toss the American experiment in the dumpster and prostrate himself before a dictator. Did anyone tell you that knee jerking is not better than spinning? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 13 Author Report Posted January 13 4 minutes ago, User said: What exactly did you listen to? It certainly wasn't the video you are here responding to. In his mind, he did. He responded to the emotions he felt at DB identifying how to use personell to drive policy. Does it matter that DB was imploring DJT to institute such a policy rather than "prostrating himself"? No. The emotions he felt are all that mattered. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 Just now, Legato said: Did anyone tell you that knee jerking is not better than spinning? Did anyone tell you that circle jerking is gross? Maybe try to contribute something relevant to any conversation--ever--rather than wasting our time with gibber. I know you guys aren't much into reading, but KSU literally quoted Yarvin calling for dictatorship and applauded it, calling Yarvin "a solution." No spin needed. Quote
Hodad Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: In his mind, he did. He responded to the emotions he felt at DB identifying how to use personell to drive policy. Does it matter that DB was imploring DJT to institute such a policy rather than "prostrating himself"? No. The emotions he felt are all that mattered. I'm not going to watch a video of some asshat. You quoted the man calling for dictatorship and called him "a solution." You're welcome to bend the knee to some tyrant if a daddy is what you need, but go do it in some other country instead of trying to destroy this one. 1 Quote
User Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 10 minutes ago, Hodad said: I know you guys aren't much into reading, but KSU literally quoted Yarvin calling for dictatorship and applauded it, calling Yarvin "a solution." No spin needed. Um... that is not anywhere near what he said or applauded. You are in fact, 100% spinning. 6 minutes ago, Hodad said: I'm not going to watch a video of some asshat. You quoted the man calling for dictatorship and called him "a solution." You're welcome to bend the knee to some tyrant if a daddy is what you need, but go do it in some other country instead of trying to destroy this one. Nowhere was he calling for a dictatorship. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
gatomontes99 Posted January 13 Author Report Posted January 13 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Hodad said: I'm not going to watch a video of some asshat. You quoted the man calling for dictatorship and called him "a solution." You're welcome to bend the knee to some tyrant if a daddy is what you need, but go do it in some other country instead of trying to destroy this one. The guy may or may not support dictatorship. But this idea replacing liberals, at the administrative levels, with conservatives is 100% dead on. That's what JD quoted and that's what I quoted. Your attempt at changing the topic is pathetic. If you can't address the topic, why bother? Really, you are just reenforcing my views by showing you don't have a viable counter argument. Edited January 13 by gatomontes99 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 17 minutes ago, Hodad said: Did anyone tell you that circle jerking is gross? Maybe try to contribute something relevant to any conversation--ever--rather than wasting our time with gibber. I know you guys aren't much into reading, but KSU literally quoted Yarvin calling for dictatorship and applauded it, calling Yarvin "a solution." No spin needed. You're not just figuring ^this out. You KNOW he's nothing but a TROLL. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 2 hours ago, Hodad said: Did anyone tell you that circle jerking is gross? Every single leftie on this board. "i'm losing, i should make a random but specific homosexual reference." Every. Single. One. 1 Quote
Hodad Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: The guy may or may not support dictatorship. But this idea replacing liberals, at the administrative levels, with conservatives is 100% dead on. That's what JD quoted and that's what I quoted. Your attempt at changing the topic is pathetic. If you can't address the topic, why bother? Really, you are just reenforcing my views by showing you don't have a viable counter argument. May or may not? WTF? Are you pretending that you didn't read the quote you posted and applauded as "a solution"? The strategy he PROPOSES to achieve the aim of dictatorship is a farking footnote to the goal of ending a democratic America. Jeebus. 2 Quote
User Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 35 minutes ago, Hodad said: The strategy he PROPOSES to achieve the aim of dictatorship is a farking footnote to the goal of ending a democratic America. You are completely off the deep end just making crap up now to fearmonger about. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
robosmith Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Yarvin isn't a problem. He's a solution. You're wrong. Vance's adherence to Yarvin DOGMA dooms his prospects for ever getting elected POTUS. Just like NO ONE would have ever re-elected Hitler, if he'd run on his INTENTIONS to become a dictator and destroy democracy. Don't know if he's a good enough Trump level LIAR to convince the MAGA CULT to follow HIM into dictatorship. 🤮 CULTS often collapse when der leader becomes irrelevant. 10 minutes ago, User said: You are completely off the deep end just making crap up now to fearmonger about. YOU FAIL TO UNDERSTAND the implications of adherence to Yarvin DOGMA. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 13 Author Report Posted January 13 5 hours ago, Hodad said: May or may not? WTF? Are you pretending that you didn't read the quote you posted and applauded as "a solution"? The strategy he PROPOSES to achieve the aim of dictatorship is a farking footnote to the goal of ending a democratic America. Jeebus. If you bothered to read what is quoted and understand it, you would understand that his point is that the President should sct unilaterally to replace liberals at all levels in the government. Just replacing the heads of departments isn't good enough. My "may or may not" is in reference to the fact that this article paraphrased him as saying he wanted a dictator. It was not a direct quote. The direct quote uses the word CEO. 4 hours ago, robosmith said: You're wrong. Vance's adherence to Yarvin DOGMA dooms his prospects for ever getting elected POTUS. Just like NO ONE would have ever re-elected Hitler, if he'd run on his INTENTIONS to become a dictator and destroy democracy. Don't know if he's a good enough Trump level LIAR to convince the MAGA CULT to follow HIM into dictatorship. 🤮 CULTS often collapse when der leader becomes irrelevant. YOU FAIL TO UNDERSTAND the implications of adherence to Yarvin DOGMA. Oh, that's right. Hitler wasn't like Hitler and Trump isnt like Hitler so that makes Trump just like Hitler. I forgot. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 7 hours ago, robosmith said: YOU FAIL TO UNDERSTAND the implications of adherence to Yarvin DOGMA. You have failed to provide any kind of argument here as to what dogma is being adhered to of his that is a problem. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.