ABC news settled with Donnie after accusing him of raping E Jean Carroll

[West]

https://www.foxnews.com/media/george-stephanopoulos-abc-apologize-trump-forced-pay-15-million-settle-defamation-suit

 

[User]

This is amazing. Making them help pay for his Presidential Library. ROFL

 

[Dougie93]

so much winning

[NAME REMOVED]

Apparently Trump has a new nickname, that World leaders call him behind his back: "smelly."

 

 

 

[User]

5 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

Apparently Trump has a new nickname, that World leaders call him behind his back: "smelly."

The only thing smelly or related to crap going on here is your lame attempt to shit all over this thread, like you tend to do all over this forum, with the garbage you post. 

[NAME REMOVED]

5 minutes ago, User said:

The only thing smelly or related to crap going on here is your lame attempt to shit all over this thread, like you tend to do all over this forum, with the garbage you post. 

lol....now tell me what you really think. 

You seem a little too attached to your Orange God.

Edited December 14, 2024 by DUI_Offender

[Fluffypants]

22 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

More about Trump:

Malignant #narcissists get intensely threatened by genuinely honest, intelligent, moralistic people to the point of anger and hatred and the only way for them to relieve those feelings is by sabotaging and smear campaigning those genuinely good people. Why? The narcissist PRETENDS to be good or kind or moralistic. It is all completely a show to manipulate people.

So the the narcissist is afraid the genuinely good and honest person will reveal what a genuine, honest nature looks like which also threatens to expose the narcissist’s disingenuous nature by comparison. The narcissist is afraid of exposure and they won’t hesitate to destroy the genuinely good person to protect their facade.

Narcissists always see themselves as victims, no matter how horribly they've treated someone else. To them the problem is not their lying, cheating, manipulation and abuse. The problem is that you started to notice those things.

I didn't realize that liberals are all Narcissists, it makes sense now.

[NAME REMOVED]

 

This is not a new issue with Trump. Apparently producers of "The Apprentice" were well aware that Trump could not control his bowels, and had to wear diapers. 

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:

 

This is not a new issue with Trump. Apparently producers of "The Apprentice" were well aware that Trump could not control his bowels, and had to wear diapers. 

My friend who knows someone that worked with someone that was brother of someone famous said so.

This is so pathetic. Ok, you guys play your stupid games. The adults have work to do.

[SpankyMcFarland]

From the article quoted above:

Quote

After the federal jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse, but not rape, Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote in a later ruling that just because Carroll failed to prove rape "within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’"

Hardly a ringing endorsement of any citizen, yet alone a person standing for the highest office in the land. 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

From the article quoted above:

Hardly a ringing endorsement of any citizen, yet alone a person standing for the highest office in the land. 

Sure, but there's a few problems:

1) Many anti-trump people tried to use this as proof that trump was convicted of rape. He absolutely was not so it made the rest of the claims look less serious and even fraudulent given the fact that they lied about him being convicted of rape. Have they really hammered home the idea of sexual assault it would have looked a lot better and been more accurate and stood up to scrutiny.

2) The left made so many accusations about trump, a very large percentage of which were utterly nonsensical, that what began to happen is exactly what I predicted would happen at the beginning of the year and people started to tune out literally everything. They could have caught trump eating a live baby and people would have been like "Yeah whatever". If you inundate people 24 hours a day 7 days a week with that kind of nonsense they become completely blinded and indifferent

If the democrats and their supporters had stuck to a small handful  of actual provable defensible accusations that spoke strongly to character it would have had a much more devastating effect. Instead we were subject to endless days listening to Tinkerbell laws that nobody believed in, fake fraud cases, Fake Russian collusion theories, constant claims of rape that never happened. In the end nobody cared

[robosmith]

 

Trump just can't handle the truth like all the other right wing snowflakes.

Stephanopoulos just told the truth about what the trial judge said:

 

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. ...

Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com › Politics › The Fix

 

 

 

 

Jul 19, 2023 — What the jury found Donald Trump did to E. Jean Carroll was in fact rape, as commonly understood, even if it didn't fit New York law's ...

 

 

Judge says E Jean Carroll allegation Trump raped her is ' ...

The Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › aug › donald...

 

 

 

 

Aug 7, 2023 — Ex-president claimed that writer defamed him when saying he raped her, but judge said term is commonly 'used and understood' in context.

 

Did Donald Trump rape E. Jean Carroll? Here's what a jury ...

USA Today

https://www.usatoday.com › news › politics › 2024/01/29

 

 

 

 

Jan 29, 2024 — Nine jurors found Donald Trump had sexually abused E. Jean Carroll, but they didn't call it "rape." Here's why a judge said that word still ...

 

Donald Trump Raped E. Jean Carroll, Not Just Sexual Abuse

Business Insider

https://www.businessinsider.com › Politics

 

 

 

 

Jul 19, 2023 — The jury didn't find Trump "raped" Carroll only because of a quirk in New York state law, according to the judge who oversaw the trial.

 

[West]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

 

Trump just can't handle the truth like all the other right wing snowflakes.

Stephanopoulos just told the truth about what the trial judge said:

 

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. ...

Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com › Politics › The Fix

 

 

 

 

Jul 19, 2023 — What the jury found Donald Trump did to E. Jean Carroll was in fact rape, as commonly understood, even if it didn't fit New York law's ...

 

 

Judge says E Jean Carroll allegation Trump raped her is ' ...

The Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › aug › donald...

 

 

 

 

Aug 7, 2023 — Ex-president claimed that writer defamed him when saying he raped her, but judge said term is commonly 'used and understood' in context.

 

Did Donald Trump rape E. Jean Carroll? Here's what a jury ...

USA Today

https://www.usatoday.com › news › politics › 2024/01/29

 

 

 

 

Jan 29, 2024 — Nine jurors found Donald Trump had sexually abused E. Jean Carroll, but they didn't call it "rape." Here's why a judge said that word still ...

 

Donald Trump Raped E. Jean Carroll, Not Just Sexual Abuse

Business Insider

https://www.businessinsider.com › Politics

 

 

 

 

Jul 19, 2023 — The jury didn't find Trump "raped" Carroll only because of a quirk in New York state law, according to the judge who oversaw the trial.

 

ABC news just settled for peddling this LIE ^^^

[BeaverFever]

The judgment is because ABC said he was convicted of rape instead of sexual assault.
 

The conservative moral high ground:  “how dare you call me a rapist, I am a sexual assaulter, good sir!”

 

pffft

[West]

7 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

The judgment is because ABC said he was convicted of rape instead of sexual assault.
 

The conservative moral high ground:  “how dare you call me a rapist, I am a sexual assaulter, good sir!”

 

pffft

Yeah well the media led us to believe that a group of white lacrosse players raped a black women when it didn't happen 

[WestCanMan]

17 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Apparently Trump has a new nickname, that World leaders call him behind his back: "smelly."

 

 

 

Anonymous sources again, huh? 👍

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

The judgment is because ABC said he was convicted of rape instead of sexual assault.

Trump wasn't convicted of rape, period.

Trump never raped anyone, dummy. At worst he had a sleazy sexual encounter with a promiscuous tart. 

Grab a dictionary and look u "libel" and "slander", dummy. 

[SpankyMcFarland]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Sure, but there's a few problems:

1) Many anti-trump people tried to use this as proof that trump was convicted of rape. He absolutely was not so it made the rest of the claims look less serious and even fraudulent given the fact that they lied about him being convicted of rape. Have they really hammered home the idea of sexual assault it would have looked a lot better and been more accurate and stood up to scrutiny.

This is largely a semantic debate that I’m surprised ABC didn’t pursue given the numerous completely false QAnon-style allegations made against public figures in the US every day.
 

Strictly speaking, Trump wasn’t convicted of anything in a civil lawsuit but the jury agreed he did commit ‘sexual abuse’ rather than ‘rape’ in the peculiar legal definitions used by New York State. In common parlance, most people would agree that the jury considered him to have committed at least what one would call sexual assault here, very serious misconduct that one would not expect from a presidential candidate. It’s not like they thought he was completely innocent - in their opinion, he committed a serious act of misconduct. 

Edited December 15, 2024 by SpankyMcFarland

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, West said:

Yeah well the media led us to believe that a group of white lacrosse players raped a black women when it didn't happen 

Those guys spent the best 20 years of their lives defending themselves from rape allegations because of her and some vile media scum.

Edited December 15, 2024 by WestCanMan

[SpankyMcFarland]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

Trump wasn't convicted of rape, period.

Trump never raped anyone, dummy. At worst he had a sleazy sexual encounter with a promiscuous tart. 

Grab a dictionary and look u "libel" and "slander", dummy. 

The jury certainly did not conclude this ‘sexual encounter’ was consensual. 

[WestCanMan]

Just now, SpankyMcFarland said:

The jury certainly did not conclude this ‘sexual encounter’ was consensual. 

E Jean Carroll said it was consensual, and that's all that matters. 

[SpankyMcFarland]

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

The judgment is because ABC said he was convicted of rape instead of sexual assault.
 

The conservative moral high ground:  “how dare you call me a rapist, I am a sexual assaulter, good sir!”

 

pffft

How dare you, Sir! He should sue you too because the jury determined he committed ‘sexual abuse’ rather than ‘sexual assault’. Once more a good man is being defamed. 

Edited December 15, 2024 by SpankyMcFarland

[SpankyMcFarland]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Those guys spend the best 20 years of their lives defending themselves from rape allegations because of her and some vile media scum.

Why do some people attract such allegations throughout their lives and others barely ever get accused? Is it just malice on the part of the media that Bill Clinton, for example, suffered more accusations of various types of impropriety and actual crimes than Mitt Romney? I don’t think so. 

[WestCanMan]

Just now, SpankyMcFarland said:

Why do some people attract such allegations throughout their lives and others barely ever get accused? Is it just malice on the part of the media that Bill Clinton, for example, suffered more accusations of various types of impropriety and actual crimes than Mitt Romney? I don’t think so. 

Bill Clinton was an actual rapist. 

You're comparing him to some college kids who never raped anyone, yet were wrongly accused and very publicly shamed by the mainscum media without any actual evidence. 

[User]

2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

The judgment is because ABC said he was convicted of rape instead of sexual assault.
 

The conservative moral high ground:  “how dare you call me a rapist, I am a sexual assaulter, good sir!”

 

pffft

He was not "convicted" of either. 

 

54 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

How dare you, Sir! He should sue you too because the jury determined he committed ‘sexual abuse’ rather than ‘sexual assault’. Once more a good man is being defamed. 

The jury found him liable in a civil trial.