Univ Prof Calls For Men That Don't Vote For Harris To Be Executed

[Legato]

6 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Maybe you should advocate for a law to keep guns away from young Republicans?

Spindizzy.

[Fluffypants]

5 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Maybe you should advocate for a law to keep guns away from young Republicans?

You are just clinging to that hope that he was a real Republican.

I find it funny we still haven't learned jack about the kid and we know way more about the second and that was because the DOJ wanted to let everyone know that there is a 150K bounty on Trumps head

[gatomontes99]

19 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Maybe you should advocate for a law to keep guns away from young Republicans?

Still going woth that fantasy world?

[CdnFox]

9 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

He said what all libs are thinking. They can't win the intellectual battle so they want to eliminate competition.

Libs will take us to idiocrisy.

VIOLENCE IS NEVER THE ANSWER AND ANYONE WHO DISAGREES SHOULD BE SHOT!!!!

 -democrats, probably.

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

Quote

 

 1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Maybe you should advocate for a law to keep guns away from young Republicans?

 

 

Still going woth that fantasy world?

LOL!   TWO DEMOCRAT SUPPORTERS HAVE TRIED TO KILL A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE  -  CLEARLY WE NEED MORE GUN LAWS TO KEEP GUNS AWAY FROM REPUBLICANS!

-Hodad

[Hodad]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Still going woth that fantasy world?

 

2 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

You are just clinging to that hope that he was a real Republican.

I find it funny we still haven't learned jack about the kid and we know way more about the second and that was because the DOJ wanted to let everyone know that there is a 150K bounty on Trumps head

No fantasy, weirdos. He was a Republican. And there's quite a bit of information available. Interviews with classmates and co-workers. FBI reports about his social media activity, etc.

You guys are so nutty, thinking an 18-year old is playing 16D chess, registering as a republican to conduct false flag operations if Trump decided to run again. 🤪

 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

That Corey Comperatore is still dead because your side keeps calling us fascists, telling people to build a crowd and get in their face, Trump is Hitler/threat to democracy/felen and so on. How many examples of violent rhetoric from the left do you need tonsee that you support violence and people are getting shot because of you?

The violent rhetoric comes from Trump and that's why HIS MAGA CULT  was rioting at the Capitol and his MAGA GOONS are threatening election workers as well as physically attacking HIS "ENEMIES" like David DePape attacked Paul Pelosi with a hammer. 

No one would be calling Trump a fascist if he wasn't acting like one and cozying up to the WORLD'S FASCISTS like Putin, Kim, and Orban.

I swear you don't know jack shit about what is happening here. Proly cause you only  believe FOS LIES or equivalent NYP.

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Still going woth that fantasy world?

Why not? You ARE. Take off you partisan BLINDERS.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

You are just clinging to that hope that he was a real Republican.

I find it funny we still haven't learned jack about the kid and we know way more about the second and that was because the DOJ wanted to let everyone know that there is a 150K bounty on Trumps head

Sure. A $150K "bounty" that would be paid by a dead guy. LMAO

Only you MAGA CULT could believe that tripe.

[gatomontes99]

40 minutes ago, Hodad said:

 

No fantasy, weirdos. He was a Republican. And there's quite a bit of information available. Interviews with classmates and co-workers. FBI reports about his social media activity, etc.

You guys are so nutty, thinking an 18-year old is playing 16D chess, registering as a republican to conduct false flag operations if Trump decided to run again. 🤪

 

So, by your logic, the guy supports conservstive ideals and would rather give up his life in an attempt to kill a presidential candidate that supports lower taxes, less spending, fewer wars and protection of constitutional rights so the candidate that works in the admin that got us into two wars, wants to increase taxes, is spending more money than any government in history, is actively working against first amendment rights on social media and openly supports eliminating second amendment rights?

Explain that logic Skippy.

[CdnFox]

49 minutes ago, Hodad said:

 

No fantasy, weirdos. He was a Republican. And there's quite a bit of information available. Interviews with classmates and co-workers. FBI reports about his social media activity, etc.

You guys are so nutty, thinking an 18-year old is playing 16D chess, registering as a republican to conduct false flag operations if Trump decided to run again. 🤪

 

They found his social media posts. He was very very clearly a democrat. And of course you have to lie about it to make yourself feel better

[Hodad]

2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

So, by your logic, the guy supports conservstive ideals and would rather give up his life in an attempt to kill a presidential candidate that supports lower taxes, less spending, fewer wars and protection of constitutional rights so the candidate that works in the admin that got us into two wars, wants to increase taxes, is spending more money than any government in history, is actively working against first amendment rights on social media and openly supports eliminating second amendment rights?

Explain that logic Skippy.

You people aren't rational. Who knows why you do what you do? Perhaps he was one of those old fashioned republicans who was pissed about the coup attempt?

Nevertheless, he was certainly a Republican, and by reports seemingly sincere about it. 

 

[gatomontes99]

38 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The violent rhetoric comes from Trump and that's why HIS MAGA CULT  was rioting at the Capitol and his MAGA GOONS are threatening election workers as well as physically attacking HIS "ENEMIES" like David DePape attacked Paul Pelosi with a hammer. 

No one would be calling Trump a fascist if he wasn't acting like one and cozying up to the WORLD'S FASCISTS like Putin, Kim, and Orban.

I swear you don't know jack shit about what is happening here. Proly cause you only  believe FOS LIES or equivalent NYP.

Why not? You ARE. Take off you partisan BLINDERS.

Forgive me if I don't buy the vicyim blaming from you when your side spied on his transition team, invented an intelligence dossier, lied about a pee pee tape, tried to get Trump dirt from a Russian radio host, tried to impeach him for a treaty mandated phone call, made baseless claims he violated the emoluments clause, called him Hitler, fascist, a threat to docracy and so on and so on.

3 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You people aren't rational. Who knows why you do what you do? Perhaps he was one of those old fashioned republicans who was pissed about the coup attempt?

Nevertheless, he was certainly a Republican, and by reports seemingly sincere about it. 

 

Lmao...so you don't have to explain your flawed logic because reasons? Pathetic.

[Hodad]

4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Forgive me if I don't buy the vicyim blaming from you when your side spied on his transition team, invented an intelligence dossier, lied about a pee pee tape, tried to get Trump dirt from a Russian radio host, tried to impeach him for a treaty mandated phone call, made baseless claims he violated the emoluments clause, called him Hitler, fascist, a threat to docracy and so on and so on.

Lmao...so you don't have to explain your flawed logic because reasons? Pathetic.

Dude, how much "logic" do you need to understand that he was a Republican? That's a plain fact. A matter of record. 

You know not all Republicans like Trump, right?  If you want to speculate about why this particular Republican took a shot at Trump, you're welcome to speculate. 

 

[robosmith]

46 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

1. Forgive me if I don't buy the vicyim blaming from you when your side spied on his transition team,

2.invented an intelligence dossier, lied about a pee pee tape,

3.tried to get Trump dirt from a Russian radio host,

4.tried to impeach him for a treaty mandated phone call,

5. made baseless claims he violated the emoluments clause,

6. called him Hitler, fascist, a threat to docracy and so on and so on.

1. The CIA spies on everyone who is talking to Russian spies or top officials. Duh

2. The only "inventor" was Steele. Of course there is still NO EVIDENCE it was false (except Cohen going to Prague).

3. SOP. Everyone does opposition research and there's NOTHING illegal about that. Duh

4. Really? What "treaty" mandated blackmailing a foreign leader to start an investigation into his political opponent. You're not making ANY sense. There was no "TRIED," Trump was IMPEACHED. Duh

5. Have you read the emoluments clause? Do you know about all the money that Trump personally pocketed from foreigners? LMAO

6. Fascist is what fascist does. And he did threaten "docracy" when he tried to overturn the election, whether you are completely IGNORANT about that PLAN or not. 

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

You people aren't rational. Who knows why you do what you do? Perhaps he was one of those old fashioned republicans who was pissed about the coup attempt?

The kids social posts are all democrat, his donations were to a democrat super pac and he shot at a republican, and your claim is that REPUBLICANS aren't rational?

Kid     You're really not fighting that stereotype of lefties having more mental health issues  

[Rebound]

11 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

So, by your logic, the guy supports conservstive ideals and would rather give up his life in an attempt to kill a presidential candidate that supports lower taxes, less spending, fewer wars and protection of constitutional rights so the candidate that works in the admin that got us into two wars, wants to increase taxes, is spending more money than any government in history, is actively working against first amendment rights on social media and openly supports eliminating second amendment rights?

Explain that logic Skippy.

Who knows what the shooter’s state of mind was? You’re just imaging that you know what he was thinking. The guy who shot John Lennon was a Beatles fan. Which doesn’t prove anything. You’re grasping at straws and making things up and pretending you can read the mind of a dead person. Makes you look pretty nutty, TBH.  

[Fluffypants]

56 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Who knows what the shooter’s state of mind was? You’re just imaging that you know what he was thinking. The guy who shot John Lennon was a Beatles fan. Which doesn’t prove anything. You’re grasping at straws and making things up and pretending you can read the mind of a dead person. Makes you look pretty nutty, TBH.  

You don't know his state of mind either. Just like the second shooter he could of heard all the Trump is Hitler BS and how he is a threat to our Democracy to try to take out Trump hell he even went as far as offering a bounty for his head.

For all we know this guy could of done solely to get headlines for killing a former President. They did say he was looking at both where Trump and Biden were going to be. Maybe Trump was just targeted because he was in a less secure location.

My biggest fear is that our government is trying to get Trump taken out. Hell you had them release the unredacted letter from the second shooter where he offered 150k to anyone who kills Trump. The first shooter was able to get a clear shot relatively close to Trump and was in clear view on a roof and the SS snipers was watching him from their scope and waited for him to take a shot before doing anything.

[Rebound]

26 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

You don't know his state of mind either. Just like the second shooter he could of heard all the Trump is Hitler BS and how he is a threat to our Democracy to try to take out Trump hell he even went as far as offering a bounty for his head.

For all we know this guy could of done solely to get headlines for killing a former President. They did say he was looking at both where Trump and Biden were going to be. Maybe Trump was just targeted because he was in a less secure location.

My biggest fear is that our government is trying to get Trump taken out. Hell you had them release the unredacted letter from the second shooter where he offered 150k to anyone who kills Trump. The first shooter was able to get a clear shot relatively close to Trump and was in clear view on a roof and the SS snipers was watching him from their scope and waited for him to take a shot before doing anything.

What I understand is that with Trump supporters like you, conspiracy theory is fact and facts are fake.

FACT: The Secret Service STOPPED this shooter and they stopped the second guy.  If the SS hadn’t intervened, one of these guys probably would have succeeded.  The other fact is that Democrats were just as eager to fire the head of the Secret Service after the first shooting.  They didn’t defend her at all. 
 

[Legato]

3 minutes ago, Rebound said:

What I understand is that with Trump supporters like you, conspiracy theory is fact and facts are fake.

FACT: The Secret Service STOPPED this shooter and they stopped the second guy.  If the SS hadn’t intervened, one of these guys probably would have succeeded.  The other fact is that Democrats were just as eager to fire the head of the Secret Service after the first shooting.  They didn’t defend her at all. 
 

That was not eagerness but inevitability.

[Rebound]

2 minutes ago, Legato said:

That was not eagerness but inevitability.

Fact: This university professor did not call on men who don’t vote for Harris to be executed.  
 

Fact Two: He ought to be fired, or at least severely disciplined, for doing this. Calling for someone’s death is not protected speech.  

[Legato]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Fact: This university professor did not call on men who don’t vote for Harris to be executed.  
 

Fact Two: He ought to be fired, or at least severely disciplined, for doing this. Calling for someone’s death is not protected speech.  

I was talking about eager democrats as per the post I responded to.

[User]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

FACT: The Secret Service STOPPED this shooter and they stopped the second guy.  If the SS hadn’t intervened, one of these guys probably would have succeeded.  The other fact is that Democrats were just as eager to fire the head of the Secret Service after the first shooting.  They didn’t defend her at all. 

FACT: The SS did not stop the first shooter until AFTER he shot Trump. He succeeded in shooting the former President and the only reason Trump is not dead is because of dumb luck of turning his head at the last moment. 

 

[Rebound]

21 minutes ago, User said:

FACT: The SS did not stop the first shooter until AFTER he shot Trump. He succeeded in shooting the former President and the only reason Trump is not dead is because of dumb luck of turning his head at the last moment. 

 

So the fact that the Secret Service shot the shooter AND put themselves between the gunman and Trump didn’t do a thing? Like… the guy took a few shots, missed, and he would have just stopped?

See, with you, it’s just ALL TRUMP. Your entire brain is just saturated with “Trump the good guy and he’s Superman and every single other thing is bad unless the LOVE Trump unconditionally.” 

Mike Pence sucked Trump’s weenie for four solid years, was as faithful as can be, but refused to go along with an illegal scheme to pretend the electors were fake, so he’s been cast into Trump Hell. You are part of a cult and you’re too immersed in your cult to realize it. 

See, I’m not. Democrat Senator Menendez got convicted. I didn’t rush to support him, or invent conspiracy theories. The guy broke the law. Democrat NY Mayor gets indicted for accepting gifts. I don’t defend that. MAGA Supreme Court Justice accepts over 10X more in “gifts” than the NY Mayor, and you defend that. Ohhh…. But if Clarence Thomas ever utters one single bad word about Trump, you’ll call him crooked and demand his impeachment. It’s because you are part of a cult, dude.

[User]

8 minutes ago, Rebound said:

So the fact that the Secret Service shot the shooter AND put themselves between the gunman and Trump didn’t do a thing? Like… the guy took a few shots, missed, and he would have just stopped?

AFTER he already shot Trump. It is a miracle Trump is alive right now and that had ZERO to do with how amazing the SS was or anything they did that day. 

These are basic facts. 

9 minutes ago, Rebound said:

See, with you, it’s just ALL TRUMP. Your entire brain is just saturated with “Trump the good guy and he’s Superman and every single other thing is bad unless the LOVE Trump unconditionally.” 

No, with you it is all Trump Derangement Syndrome. You are so obsessed with this that you can't admit the SS screwed up royally here, and Trump narrowly escaped death and he was shot. 

10 minutes ago, Rebound said:

You are part of a cult and you’re too immersed in your cult to realize it. 

No cult here, I routinely criticize Trump on here and I am almost certain in discussions with you even. You are the one who is so delusional obsessed with hating Trump you are taking my response to point out clear and obvious facts about what happened that day and melting down in this phony tirade about how I am in a cult. 

12 minutes ago, Rebound said:

I didn’t rush to support him, or invent conspiracy theories.

Pointing out the facts of what happened is not a conspiracy theory. 

12 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Ohhh…. But if Clarence Thomas ever utters one single bad word about Trump, you’ll call him crooked and demand his impeachment. It’s because you are part of a cult, dude.

How pathetic are you that you can't just admit to basic facts that happened that day?

[Yakuda]

On 10/10/2024 at 12:47 PM, robosmith said:

Yeah, but it's fun to watch you take that seriously because you're so naive, when NOBODY is going to be shot.

Thing is, it IS a serious matter for men in power to discriminate against women due FALSE ASSumptions about intelligence of women.

What kind of punishment do you believe is appropriate for the STUPIDITY of discrimination against women? 

So you're suggesting its always stupid to discriminate against a woman? You cant conceive of a circumstance where it might be intelligent to discriminate against woman? 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

Who knows what the shooter’s state of mind was? You’re just imaging that you know what he was thinking. The guy who shot John Lennon was a Beatles fan. Which doesn’t prove anything. You’re grasping at straws and making things up and pretending you can read the mind of a dead person. Makes you look pretty nutty, TBH.  

Is social media profile supported Biden, he donated to Biden, he shot trump.

It's true we'll never know for certain what he was thinking but at this point it's not hard to guess