60 Minutes Did Not Go Well For Kamala

[Deluge]

On 10/7/2024 at 9:13 PM, applegrove said:

Kamala was a pro. 60Minutes showed her sharp and thoughtful and not a pathological liar. Sure she avoided taking responsibility for undocumented immigration. Come on. All poliricians spin. But she was not afraid of being fact checked. Trump had agreed to the debate and asked that there be no fact checking and was told no. So a week before he pulled out.

Kameltoe is a professional m*ron, and a fraud, and she knows it. You can tell the moment she gets hit with a hardball  question. She looks rattled - almost guilty - it's like oh, f*ck, they're on to me! But then she recovers once her pea brain kicks into survival mode and tosses her a word salad. lol

Harris is a fraud and everyone knows it. The only way she wins this thing is if the democrats cheat again. 

 

 

[Legato]

On 10/7/2024 at 11:13 PM, applegrove said:

Kamala was a pro. 

Yes a pro. She's prostituting herself trying to cover for the fact that she knows not what she is.

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

CdnFox has a tiny weiner. I know the type well. 😂 

Well if it's a problem in your life maybe stop dating your dad  

And once again a leftie on the board with no argument or rebuttal starts having weird sexual fantasies about me  

[myata]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Or...he could

In wet dreams? Why wouldn't you admit it: you folks are just thug admirers, little if anything more than that. You see a big nasty thug with biceps and something goes soft in you. You watch them step on a hatchling or a chipmunk and it just unwinds in you, from inside out, can't say an (intelligible) word. Kim, Vlad, Xi, ayatollas and why not only buried deep inside. The more brutal, the softer.

C'mon, just let it out, relieve yourself. No need to pretend anymore, stressing.

[Venandi]

1 hour ago, myata said:

 You see a big nasty thug with biceps and something goes soft in you. You watch (him) them step on a hatchling or a chipmunk and it just unwinds in you, from inside out, can't say an (intelligible) word. Kim, Vlad, Xi, ayatollas and why not only buried deep inside. The more brutal, the softer.

C'mon, just let it out, relieve yourself. No need to pretend anymore, stressing.

Well done,

First glimmer of anything close to being viable lyrics I've seen here...  needs work but it's worthy of getting the  guitar out and playing around with. Regardless of context or intention, head and shoulders over normal forum offerings

OK, say something profound Herb; smugly arrogant would work too... I need a chorus.

 

 

Edited October 9, 2024 by Venandi

[CdnFox]

8 hours ago, myata said:

He barely needs it. Has his orange crush of a lifetime and how could anyone think of anything else? Of course, not a huge chance of shared affection there but they can still salivate on Kim's smile or Vlad's biceps so not an entirely sad story.

Awww little guy   Once again whenever a leftie gets pissed somehow they start having sexual fantasies  

Can't debate me on issues, can't even say my name, can't address me directly, but can Definitely share your weird sex fetishes with everyone if someone brings up my penis  

What a broken little man you are  

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, myata said:

In wet dreams? Why wouldn't you admit it: you folks are just thug admirers,

Did you see Kamala on 60 minutes? 🤣

Are you some kind of id10t admirer?

I guess that would make you a narcissist 😉

[WestCanMan]

On 10/7/2024 at 8:13 PM, applegrove said:

Kamala was a pro.

🤣 That's the dumbest, most biased BS I've ever seen.

Are you 12?

Quote

60Minutes showed her sharp and thoughtful and not a pathological liar.

Even the interviewer pointed out that she wasn't answering the questions, dummy. How did you not notice that?

The best defence they could come up with on CNN was "Her strongest topics are abortion and women's rights". 

Quote

Sure she avoided taking responsibility for undocumented immigration.

So you're admitting that she completely failed, and then she lied about it. She was asked directly and omitted the truth from her answer... that's called 'lying by omission'.

Quote

Come on. All poliricians spin. But she was not afraid of being fact checked.

By friendly media, dingus. The people who have been lying for her for over two months now.

In almost 80 days this is her first real interview.

All that you know about Kamala right now is what she read off the teleprompter, because before she started doing that (before she was tagged as Biden's VP) she always sang a completely different tune. 

• She was against ICE back when she was only 55, now that she's 59 she wants more border agents.
• She was for 'defund police' back when she was only 55, now she's not.
• She was supporting rioting and arson and looting back when she was only 55 - she even pimped a Minnesota bail fund to get rioters back on the street -  then suddenly she only supports peaceful protests.
• Walls were "racist", and she was saying "Trump's wall is a waste of money and not even 1 foot should be built" back when she was only 55, now she wants to add border walls.

Has Kamala really grown up that much in 4 years, and why does "growing up" for Kamala look so much like "adopting Trump's policies"? 

 

 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, applegrove said:

Trump spent half an hours refusing to go on stage with black journalists when he found out they would be fact checking. 

because they lie a lot when they're fact-checking and it's one sided. If the fact checking occurs afterwards everything still gets fact checked, but now the fact checking is open to scrutiny and if they lie then it gets addressed immediately.

As we saw from both of the debates the supposed fact checkers are dishonest extremely and are willing to misrepresent the facts and do their own misinformation in order to further their cause. Why would anybody in their right mind agree to that?

[Nationalist]

16 hours ago, myata said:

In wet dreams? Why wouldn't you admit it: you folks are just thug admirers, little if anything more than that. You see a big nasty thug with biceps and something goes soft in you. You watch them step on a hatchling or a chipmunk and it just unwinds in you, from inside out, can't say an (intelligible) word. Kim, Vlad, Xi, ayatollas and why not only buried deep inside. The more brutal, the softer.

C'mon, just let it out, relieve yourself. No need to pretend anymore, stressing.

Lol...you sure are desperate. What's the matter little guy? Are you afraid Kamala is gonna lose?

[myata]

21 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Are you afraid Kamala is gonna lose?

So want to hide your funny fetishes behind a token, a label? Only to avoid having to think about it and maybe even admit? Ohoh... a tough case. Yet everyone or almost can do it. Let it go, say it. Come out. We love and admire our beloved fetish-Idols: Kim, Vlad and we all know who. Easy. There's nothing to be shy about, or is it? You can do it, we believe in you.

[Nationalist]

13 minutes ago, myata said:

So want to hide your funny fetishes behind a token, a label? Only to avoid having to think about it and maybe even admit? Ohoh... a tough case. Yet everyone or almost can do it. Let it go, say it. Come out. We love and admire our beloved fetish-Idols: Kim, Vlad and we all know who. Easy. There's nothing to be shy about, or is it? You can do it, we believe in you.

Lol...what a goof.

[myata]

21 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

what a goof.

Just think about it. It can be easier than you came to convince yourself. And then, nothing to be ashamed of, just bliss and nirvana of unrestrained admiration. Worth a try, no?

[gatomontes99]

7 hours ago, CdnFox said:

because they lie a lot when they're fact-checking and it's one sided. If the fact checking occurs afterwards everything still gets fact checked, but now the fact checking is open to scrutiny and if they lie then it gets addressed immediately.

As we saw from both of the debates the supposed fact checkers are dishonest extremely and are willing to misrepresent the facts and do their own misinformation in order to further their cause. Why would anybody in their right mind agree to that?

Don't believe that lie. They had a technical problem that delayed the start.

[Nationalist]

9 minutes ago, myata said:

Just think about it. It can be easier than you came to convince yourself. And then, nothing to be ashamed of, just bliss and nirvana of unrestrained admiration. Worth a try, no?

Think about this...goof.

Brandon and Kamala ushered in millions of illegals, insane levels of inflation, 1 surrender to terrorists and 2 new wars.

Enjoy the election.

Edited October 10, 2024 by Nationalist

[myata]

43 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Brandon and Kamala ushered

Note how carefully he sidesteps the point in question: do we adore, then worship Kim and Vlad, the thugs? Does it have to be so hard, really?

Look no farther than here and understand: playing with the cult will affect your brain. The damage can be permanent. Sure, we knew.

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, myata said:

Note how carefully he sidesteps the point in question: do we adore, then worship Kim and Vlad, the thugs? Does it have to be so hard, really?

Look no farther than here and understand: playing with the cult will affect your brain. The damage can be permanent. Sure, we knew.

That's not a question numb-uterus. It's an accusation meant to demean. But alas...your limp diatribes only exhibit your hatred and desperation.

Meh...Libbies...

[myata]

4 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Meh...Libbies..

So hard to face oneself in the mirror. For some of us that is. Don't look any further: cult thinking will do that to your brain, and in no time.

[gatomontes99]

Wow. 60 Minutes tried to make her look good. But they didn't have enough good material to make it happen. Just wow!

[CdnFox]

10 hours ago, applegrove said:

It was pathetic when Vance said "we agreed there would be no fact chequing".

It was hard hitting and his reply showed the very bias that he was talking about.  The left tries to spin it as 'pathetic' because of course it was one of their worst moments but it was proof of why "real time fact checking' by bias moderators is complete nonsense. 

Trump got a little bump in the polls in the swing states following the debate.  It was quite obvious to everyone that the moderators were bias and lying in favour of the dems and that always turns a lot of people off. 

The more dams lie more they ruin their chances

3 hours ago, myata said:

Just think about it. It can be easier than you came to convince yourself. And then, nothing to be ashamed of, just bliss and nirvana of unrestrained admiration. Worth a try, no?

Dear diary....

[CdnFox]

49 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Wow. 60 Minutes tried to make her look good. But they didn't have enough good material to make it happen. Just wow!

Joking aside and even setting aside his usual over the top trumpiness, he does have a bit of a point about election interference.

If you as a Media Group have stated that you will have a presidential debate and it will be honest and fair and you knowingly and willingly tip the scales in favor of one candidate or another then that ceases to become a debate and becomes electioneering. Not only should it then be treated as any other election if interference because you have been dishonest about a key election element, but the company itself should face a very serious penalty

[Nationalist]

10 hours ago, applegrove said:

It was pathetic when Vance said "we agreed there would be no fact chequing". His every answer was a longwinded lie. Trump saved the ACA? please. He tried to repeal it many times. He tried to tank it by changing how it was constructed. Had there been fact chequing Vance would have pulled out of the debate. Please! Fact checking is 'misinformation'. KellyAnn Conway much?

Have an apple. You'll feel better.

[CdnFox]

9 hours ago, applegrove said:

So if there are two names on the ballot the one not Trump is not allowed to win without being accused of fixing the vote? 

I have no idea what that means. Unfortunately your anger and hatred has left you slightly illiterate at this moment. Take five and Rephrase that in a way that makes more sense. 

[CouchPotato]

It's interesting that she identified Iran as America's greatest adversary after they gave billions to Iran.

[WestCanMan]

8 hours ago, myata said:

Note how carefully he sidesteps the point in question: do we adore, then worship Kim and Vlad, the thugs? Does it have to be so hard, really?

Look no farther than here and understand: playing with the cult will affect your brain. The damage can be permanent. Sure, we knew.

You could honestly just admit to being stupid instead of writing all that.