Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 hours ago  The Only Patriotic Choice for President. Listen to Kathleen Kingsbury, the Times Opinion Editor, make the case for Kamala Harris. Sept. 30 ...
12 hours ago  For these reasons, the outlet continued, Harris is “the only patriotic choice for president,” regardless of “any political disagreements voters ...
13 hours ago  The New York Times editorial board on Monday endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris, calling her “the only patriotic choice for president” ...
 
2 days ago  The New Yorker's editors on why, although Harris made extraordinary inroads with the electorate, no responsible assessment of the contest ...
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Oh yes Kamala was soooo patriotic as people in the SE suffered she was at Hollywood fundraisers and Biden was on vacation.

Trump showed up with Semis filled with aid. Biden talked on the phone for 2 whole hours and Kamala did nothing.

So the guy not in office actually did something while the people in office did jack.

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

Oh yes Kamala was soooo patriotic as people in the SE suffered she was at Hollywood fundraisers and Biden was on vacation.

Trump showed up with Semis filled with aid. Biden talked on the phone for 2 whole hours and Kamala did nothing.

So the guy not in office actually did something while the people in office did jack.

I'm sure there's a reason you have ^POSTED NO EVIDENCE

Posted

Brought to you by the party who's current president is too demented to be allowed to run for president! 

14 minutes ago, Mathieub said:

Real U.S is to maintain the U.S not destroying it.

Vote Kamala.

I thought you said you DIDN"T want to destroy the us :) 

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
8 hours ago, Mathieub said:

Real U.S is to maintain the U.S not destroying it.

Vote Kamala.

Uberishtypobble.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Yakuda said:

You want right wing evidence to counter balance your left wing "evidence"?

Why? You clowns never post evidence, you post YouTubes of people talking and memes and insults about how people laugh. 
 

You wouldn’t know what evidence is if it bit you in the ass… which you prove by taking evidence being “right wing” or “left wing.”  
 

You pompous ldiot… EVIDENCE means FACTS.  And FACTS aren’t “liberal” or “conservative,” they’re just facts, that’s all. 

Edited by Rebound

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
55 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Why? You clowns never post evidence, you post YouTubes of people talking and memes and insults about how people laugh. 
 

You wouldn’t know what evidence is if it bit you in the ass… which you prove by taking evidence being “right wing” or “left wing.”  
 

You pompous ldiot… EVIDENCE means FACTS.  And FACTS aren’t “liberal” or “conservative,” they’re just facts, that’s all. 

Kiddo, the right wing types here post tons of facts and information. In fact I have seen more from them than I have seen from the left. Although both Are sparse and that's okay because this isn't a research paper and people should be doing their own research.

But many of the left posters here absolutely ignore facts and figures when they are put in front of them. In fact they will go on to repeat their claims which have now been proven to be utter lies again and again despite massive amounts of evidence to the contrary.

The right might not be perfect in that respect but I think that you are definitely throwing stones while living in a glass house to claim that the left isn't worse

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Why? You clowns never post evidence, you post YouTubes of people talking and memes and insults about how people laugh. 
 

You wouldn’t know what evidence is if it bit you in the ass… which you prove by taking evidence being “right wing” or “left wing.”  
 

You pompous ldiot… EVIDENCE means FACTS.  And FACTS aren’t “liberal” or “conservative,” they’re just facts, that’s all. 

Well at least you admit you're a hapless leftist buffoon. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

FOS LIES has no credibility because they're LIARS.

4 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

I saw videos of Kamala on AF2 consulting on the phone about the hurricane relief as she was headed towards it.

Both her and Joe were staying away for a couple of days, cause their security resources would ONLY get in the way of relief efforts.

I guess it's too difficult for you to THINK instead of just eating the shit served by right wing media.

Posted
1 minute ago, Yakuda said:

At least he has a job

How do you know he has a job?

1 minute ago, Yakuda said:

and isnt on welfare like you 

My SS and pensions are paid for BY ME. IOW, you don't know what you're talking about.

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, robosmith said:

How do you know he has a job?

My SS and pensions are paid for BY ME. IOW, you don't know what you're talking about.

 

If he is an uber driver he has one 

Your pension might be but your SS sure as hell isnt. You have no ideas how that works do you?????? Why am I not surprised. 

Posted

 

1 minute ago, Yakuda said:

Your pension might be but your SS sure as hell isnt. You have no ideas how that works do you?????? Why am I not surprised. 

No, it's YOU who has no idea how it works. Look at your pay stub (if you have a job).

It includes a deduction which is YOUR PAYMENT for YOUR SS. Duh

IF you make no payments for SS, you DON'T GET ANY.

Posted
42 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Looks like you're an Uber driver. LMAO

Make up your mind, you said I was a troll.. Now you're going a bridge too far.

  • Haha 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Legato said:

Make up your mind, you said I was a troll.. Now you're going a bridge too far.

And he's being gruff to boot ;) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
38 minutes ago, Legato said:

Make up your mind, you said I was a troll.. Now you're going a bridge too far.

Trolls can drive Uber. I had one Uber driver who was 15 miles away and just drove around in circles never making progress toward my location. Perfect example of a TROLL.

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Trolls can drive Uber.

The daded Uber Troll! :) 

Quote

I had one Uber driver who was 15 miles away and just drove around in circles never making progress toward my location. Perfect example of a TROLL.

Or he knew what kind of person you are :)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

 

No, it's YOU who has no idea how it works. Look at your pay stub (if you have a job).

It includes a deduction which is YOUR PAYMENT for YOUR SS. Duh

IF you make no payments for SS, you DON'T GET ANY.

You think the money you paid all those years was in an account waiting for you to retire? You can't be that dumb or can you? Most people get more money from social security than they paid into it over the years especially since life expectancy has increased dramatically since social security began. Wake the hell up it's a ponzi scheme bozo. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Yakuda said:

 Most people get more money from social security than they paid into it over the years especially since life expectancy has increased dramatically since social security began. Wake the hell up it's a ponzi scheme bozo. 

Do most people get more out of Ponzi schemes than they put in? 

That would be something. 🤔

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Do most people get more out of Ponzi schemes than they put in? 

That would be something. 🤔

Everyone not getting Social Security right now, who is paying into it, is losing money to the people getting more now. At the current rates of borrowing and spending, the people paying into the Ponzi scheme right now will not get anything when they retire. 

It's the very concept of a Ponzi scheme. You do, in fact, payout to the initial "investors" while you keep the scheme going by borrowing and stealing from the new investors, who will never see any of their money back. 

The other problem is that it isn't that you get more money back than you put in it or not... it is the opportunity cost of how much money you have lost that could have been invested far better. 

Edited by User

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...