Will trump subject himself to another debate humiliation?

[Matthew]

An October 23 CNN invite has been accepted by Harris. Will Trump put himself through that again?

[myata]

Short answer: no. Cowards don't do that. Just as he wouldn't step down, for the sake of the country and his party. Coward losers just don't do that.

But of course, I can be proven wrong. Let's see it.

[Fluffypants]

I don't think he will accept anything less than Fox News its only fair he went into enemy territory with moderators with their thumbs on the scales so I say the Fox New Moderator should be Hannity.

Edited September 21, 2024 by Fluffypants

[Matthew]

10 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

Moderator should be Hannity.

Doesn't Hannity openly support trump in an essentially pro-trump popoganda opinion show?

[Fluffypants]

5 minutes ago, Matthew said:

Doesn't Hannity openly support trump in an essentially pro-trump popoganda opinion show?

The moderators of the last debate is openly pro Kamala, they never follow up on an question when she went into her complete non answers and let her lie incessantly while fact checking Trump. On one of their news programs 100% positive coverage of Kamala and 93% negative for Trump.

Why should he risk going back to CNN when JD Vance was grilled by Dana Bash while Kamala and Tim and her will giggle sisters, complete softballs and again no follow up to questions she wouldn't answer.

Edited September 21, 2024 by Fluffypants

[Hodad]

29 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

I don't think he will accept anything less than Fox News its only fair he went into enemy territory with moderators with their thumbs on the scales so I say the Fox New Moderator should be Hannity.

A moderator with the vexing gall to tell America that no, Haitian immigrants aren't eating pets in Ohio. Definitely "enemy territory."🤣

[herbie]

1 hour ago, Matthew said:

Trump put himself through that again?

He's more than capable of humiliating himself at his own rallies. Only the ones stupid enough to attend don't know that.

[Matthew]

1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:

The moderators of the last debate is openly pro Kamala

Are they? I don't know them well. Could you cite an example of them speaking in support of Kamala Harris?

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:

I don't think he will accept anything less than Fox News its only fair he went into enemy territory with moderators with their thumbs on the scales so I say the Fox New Moderator should be Hannity.

No. Brett Bear...or however he spells it...

1 hour ago, Matthew said:

Doesn't Hannity openly support trump in an essentially pro-trump popoganda opinion show?

Sure. Don't the ABC mods do the same for Kamala?

[gatomontes99]

17 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No. Brett Bear...or however he spells it...

Sure. Don't the ABC mods do the same for Kamala?

The problem with Brett is that Brett would be fair.

I say they do a debate with partisan moderators picked by the candidate. The R mod asks a question of each, then the D mod. Back and forth until it is over. Oh, and no mod fact checks. Let the candidates do that. No notes. No interrupting.

[Matthew]

19 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Don't the ABC mods do the same for Kamala?

I dunno, you tell me. What's the name of David Muir's opinion show where he blasts republicans as evil and openly promotes democrats?Likewise, what's the name of sean hannity's show where he does actual objective nonpartisan journalism?

[gatomontes99]

28 minutes ago, Matthew said:

I dunno, you tell me. What's the name of David Muir's opinion show where he blasts republicans as evil and openly promotes democrats?Likewise, what's the name of sean hannity's show where he does actual objective nonpartisan journalism?

World news Tonight is Muir's opinion show. It supported Harris 100% of the time and was against Trp over 90% of the time. It is masked as a news show but it is just infotainment.

[herbie]

3 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

The moderators of the last debate is openly pro Kamala

She didn't spew blatant lies so they didn't have to fact check her. They only fact checked so that only the stupidest, most feeble minded fools would still believe Trump. Like the ones so stunned and desperate they think that is bias.

[gatomontes99]

16 minutes ago, herbie said:

She didn't spew blatant lies so they didn't have to fact check her. They only fact checked so that only the stupidest, most feeble minded fools would still believe Trump. Like the ones so stunned and desperate they think that is bias.

This is why I say the left lives in a fantasy world.

 

[Hodad]

23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

This is why I say the left lives in a fantasy world.

 

Yeah, and the fantasy world is going to hell lately. Immigrants are eating our pets and performing post-birth abortions. 🙄 

Nobody actually "fact checked" Trump. He didn't have a single fact right all night. They reacted to the really insane shit he said like 4 times. It was an exercise in restraint.

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Yeah, and the fantasy world is going to hell lately. Immigrants are eating our pets and performing post-birth abortions. 🙄 

Nobody actually "fact checked" Trump. He didn't have a single fact right all night. They reacted to the really insane shit he said like 4 times. It was an exercise in restraint.

I proved all the NBC fact checks were wrong. But some how every lefty ignored them. Yet, Harris got away with the bloodbath lie, the Charlottesville lie, the jobs lie, the Inflation lie and so much more.

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Matthew said:

Are they? I don't know them well. Could you cite an example of them speaking in support of Kamala Harris?

They are. And there's no need to cite, it's just the way it is in trump will say no. 

And there's no point to a debate when people have already been going to the polls.

If she's so sure that people will be impartial then she can meet him at fox news like he originally offered. But she turned that down. And we're already seeing employees of ABC coming forward and admitting that there was fraud and foul play in the last one.

If you catch someone cheating at cards why would you sit down at the table with him for another round?

2 hours ago, herbie said:

She didn't spew blatant lies so they didn't have to fact check her. They only fact checked so that only the stupidest, most feeble minded fools would still believe Trump. Like the ones so stunned and desperate they think that is bias.

They were 100% blatant lies. Even better they were blatant lies which had already been completely debunked. And still are.

Plus she seems to have had advanced warning of the questions to help prepare and got to say what questions wouldn't be asked

Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me

[Hodad]

42 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I proved all the NBC fact checks were wrong. But some how every lefty ignored them. Yet, Harris got away with the bloodbath lie, the Charlottesville lie, the jobs lie, the Inflation lie and so much more.

Lol. No, you didn't. They were correct. You can't find a single credible report of pets being eaten in Springfield, nor is "post-birth abortion" legal in a single state. Those claims are just plain stupid. 

And the debate was on ABC.🙄

 

[herbie]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

This is why I say the left lives in a fantasy world.

Fantasy worlds like the USA where there's people dumb enough to believe they even have a "left".

still hiding under the bed from the Red scare since 1950...

[CdnFox]

40 minutes ago, herbie said:

Fantasy worlds like the USA where there's people dumb enough to believe they even have a "left".

still hiding under the bed from the Red scare since 1950...

Absolutely - AOC for example is basically a Laissez-faire capitalist. 

[Deluge]

8 hours ago, Matthew said:

An October 23 CNN invite has been accepted by Harris. Will Trump put himself through that again?

With the Communist News Network? I wouldn't. 

It's Fox or F*CK off. 

[Matthew]

6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

World news Tonight is Muir's opinion show.

I don't watch tv news. But if we did a side-by-side of literally any network's evening news broadcast vs the hyperpartisan dumb shit hannity does, the difference would be extreme and obvious.

[Matthew]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

there's no need to cite, it's just the way it is

That's lazy and sloppy thinking.

[robosmith]

10 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

The moderators of the last debate is openly pro Kamala, they never follow up on an question when she went into her complete non answers and let her lie incessantly while fact checking Trump. On one of their news programs 100% positive coverage of Kamala and 93% negative for Trump.

Why should he risk going back to CNN when JD Vance was grilled by Dana Bash while Kamala and Tim and her will giggle sisters, complete softballs and again no follow up to questions she wouldn't answer.

Your ^OPINION does not make ^this true.

Trump was fact checked BECAUSE he was a fire hose of LIES.

[robosmith]

9 hours ago, Nationalist said:

No. Brett Bear...or however he spells it...

Sure. Don't the ABC mods do the same for Kamala?

Short answer Baier and NO. And you can't even cite ANY example of them doing that.

8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

The problem with Brett is that Brett would be fair.

I say they do a debate with partisan moderators picked by the candidate. The R mod asks a question of each, then the D mod. Back and forth until it is over. Oh, and no mod fact checks. Let the candidates do that. No notes. No interrupting.

You're asking the mod's org to provide a platform for LIES. No reason to do that.