Matthew Posted September 21, 2024 Report Posted September 21, 2024 An October 23 CNN invite has been accepted by Harris. Will Trump put himself through that again? Quote
myata Posted September 21, 2024 Report Posted September 21, 2024 Short answer: no. Cowards don't do that. Just as he wouldn't step down, for the sake of the country and his party. Coward losers just don't do that. But of course, I can be proven wrong. Let's see it. 2 Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
Fluffypants Posted September 21, 2024 Report Posted September 21, 2024 (edited) I don't think he will accept anything less than Fox News its only fair he went into enemy territory with moderators with their thumbs on the scales so I say the Fox New Moderator should be Hannity. Edited September 21, 2024 by Fluffypants Quote
Matthew Posted September 21, 2024 Author Report Posted September 21, 2024 10 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: Moderator should be Hannity. Doesn't Hannity openly support trump in an essentially pro-trump popoganda opinion show? 1 Quote
Fluffypants Posted September 21, 2024 Report Posted September 21, 2024 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Matthew said: Doesn't Hannity openly support trump in an essentially pro-trump popoganda opinion show? The moderators of the last debate is openly pro Kamala, they never follow up on an question when she went into her complete non answers and let her lie incessantly while fact checking Trump. On one of their news programs 100% positive coverage of Kamala and 93% negative for Trump. Why should he risk going back to CNN when JD Vance was grilled by Dana Bash while Kamala and Tim and her will giggle sisters, complete softballs and again no follow up to questions she wouldn't answer. Edited September 21, 2024 by Fluffypants Quote
Hodad Posted September 21, 2024 Report Posted September 21, 2024 29 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: I don't think he will accept anything less than Fox News its only fair he went into enemy territory with moderators with their thumbs on the scales so I say the Fox New Moderator should be Hannity. A moderator with the vexing gall to tell America that no, Haitian immigrants aren't eating pets in Ohio. Definitely "enemy territory."🤣 3 Quote
herbie Posted September 21, 2024 Report Posted September 21, 2024 1 hour ago, Matthew said: Trump put himself through that again? He's more than capable of humiliating himself at his own rallies. Only the ones stupid enough to attend don't know that. Quote
Matthew Posted September 21, 2024 Author Report Posted September 21, 2024 1 hour ago, Fluffypants said: The moderators of the last debate is openly pro Kamala Are they? I don't know them well. Could you cite an example of them speaking in support of Kamala Harris? Quote
Nationalist Posted September 21, 2024 Report Posted September 21, 2024 1 hour ago, Fluffypants said: I don't think he will accept anything less than Fox News its only fair he went into enemy territory with moderators with their thumbs on the scales so I say the Fox New Moderator should be Hannity. No. Brett Bear...or however he spells it... 1 hour ago, Matthew said: Doesn't Hannity openly support trump in an essentially pro-trump popoganda opinion show? Sure. Don't the ABC mods do the same for Kamala? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
gatomontes99 Posted September 21, 2024 Report Posted September 21, 2024 17 minutes ago, Nationalist said: No. Brett Bear...or however he spells it... Sure. Don't the ABC mods do the same for Kamala? The problem with Brett is that Brett would be fair. I say they do a debate with partisan moderators picked by the candidate. The R mod asks a question of each, then the D mod. Back and forth until it is over. Oh, and no mod fact checks. Let the candidates do that. No notes. No interrupting. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Matthew Posted September 21, 2024 Author Report Posted September 21, 2024 19 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Don't the ABC mods do the same for Kamala? I dunno, you tell me. What's the name of David Muir's opinion show where he blasts republicans as evil and openly promotes democrats?Likewise, what's the name of sean hannity's show where he does actual objective nonpartisan journalism? 2 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 21, 2024 Report Posted September 21, 2024 28 minutes ago, Matthew said: I dunno, you tell me. What's the name of David Muir's opinion show where he blasts republicans as evil and openly promotes democrats?Likewise, what's the name of sean hannity's show where he does actual objective nonpartisan journalism? World news Tonight is Muir's opinion show. It supported Harris 100% of the time and was against Trp over 90% of the time. It is masked as a news show but it is just infotainment. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
herbie Posted September 21, 2024 Report Posted September 21, 2024 3 hours ago, Fluffypants said: The moderators of the last debate is openly pro Kamala She didn't spew blatant lies so they didn't have to fact check her. They only fact checked so that only the stupidest, most feeble minded fools would still believe Trump. Like the ones so stunned and desperate they think that is bias. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 22, 2024 Report Posted September 22, 2024 16 minutes ago, herbie said: She didn't spew blatant lies so they didn't have to fact check her. They only fact checked so that only the stupidest, most feeble minded fools would still believe Trump. Like the ones so stunned and desperate they think that is bias. This is why I say the left lives in a fantasy world. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted September 22, 2024 Report Posted September 22, 2024 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: This is why I say the left lives in a fantasy world. Yeah, and the fantasy world is going to hell lately. Immigrants are eating our pets and performing post-birth abortions. 🙄 Nobody actually "fact checked" Trump. He didn't have a single fact right all night. They reacted to the really insane shit he said like 4 times. It was an exercise in restraint. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 22, 2024 Report Posted September 22, 2024 1 hour ago, Hodad said: Yeah, and the fantasy world is going to hell lately. Immigrants are eating our pets and performing post-birth abortions. 🙄 Nobody actually "fact checked" Trump. He didn't have a single fact right all night. They reacted to the really insane shit he said like 4 times. It was an exercise in restraint. I proved all the NBC fact checks were wrong. But some how every lefty ignored them. Yet, Harris got away with the bloodbath lie, the Charlottesville lie, the jobs lie, the Inflation lie and so much more. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted September 22, 2024 Report Posted September 22, 2024 4 hours ago, Matthew said: Are they? I don't know them well. Could you cite an example of them speaking in support of Kamala Harris? They are. And there's no need to cite, it's just the way it is in trump will say no. And there's no point to a debate when people have already been going to the polls. If she's so sure that people will be impartial then she can meet him at fox news like he originally offered. But she turned that down. And we're already seeing employees of ABC coming forward and admitting that there was fraud and foul play in the last one. If you catch someone cheating at cards why would you sit down at the table with him for another round? 2 hours ago, herbie said: She didn't spew blatant lies so they didn't have to fact check her. They only fact checked so that only the stupidest, most feeble minded fools would still believe Trump. Like the ones so stunned and desperate they think that is bias. They were 100% blatant lies. Even better they were blatant lies which had already been completely debunked. And still are. Plus she seems to have had advanced warning of the questions to help prepare and got to say what questions wouldn't be asked Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Hodad Posted September 22, 2024 Report Posted September 22, 2024 42 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: I proved all the NBC fact checks were wrong. But some how every lefty ignored them. Yet, Harris got away with the bloodbath lie, the Charlottesville lie, the jobs lie, the Inflation lie and so much more. Lol. No, you didn't. They were correct. You can't find a single credible report of pets being eaten in Springfield, nor is "post-birth abortion" legal in a single state. Those claims are just plain stupid. And the debate was on ABC.🙄 1 1 Quote
herbie Posted September 22, 2024 Report Posted September 22, 2024 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: This is why I say the left lives in a fantasy world. Fantasy worlds like the USA where there's people dumb enough to believe they even have a "left". still hiding under the bed from the Red scare since 1950... 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted September 22, 2024 Report Posted September 22, 2024 40 minutes ago, herbie said: Fantasy worlds like the USA where there's people dumb enough to believe they even have a "left". still hiding under the bed from the Red scare since 1950... Absolutely - AOC for example is basically a Laissez-faire capitalist. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Deluge Posted September 22, 2024 Report Posted September 22, 2024 8 hours ago, Matthew said: An October 23 CNN invite has been accepted by Harris. Will Trump put himself through that again? With the Communist News Network? I wouldn't. It's Fox or F*CK off. 1 Quote
Matthew Posted September 22, 2024 Author Report Posted September 22, 2024 6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: World news Tonight is Muir's opinion show. I don't watch tv news. But if we did a side-by-side of literally any network's evening news broadcast vs the hyperpartisan dumb shit hannity does, the difference would be extreme and obvious. 2 1 Quote
Matthew Posted September 22, 2024 Author Report Posted September 22, 2024 3 hours ago, CdnFox said: there's no need to cite, it's just the way it is That's lazy and sloppy thinking. 2 Quote
robosmith Posted September 22, 2024 Report Posted September 22, 2024 10 hours ago, Fluffypants said: The moderators of the last debate is openly pro Kamala, they never follow up on an question when she went into her complete non answers and let her lie incessantly while fact checking Trump. On one of their news programs 100% positive coverage of Kamala and 93% negative for Trump. Why should he risk going back to CNN when JD Vance was grilled by Dana Bash while Kamala and Tim and her will giggle sisters, complete softballs and again no follow up to questions she wouldn't answer. Your ^OPINION does not make ^this true. Trump was fact checked BECAUSE he was a fire hose of LIES. Quote
robosmith Posted September 22, 2024 Report Posted September 22, 2024 9 hours ago, Nationalist said: No. Brett Bear...or however he spells it... Sure. Don't the ABC mods do the same for Kamala? Short answer Baier and NO. And you can't even cite ANY example of them doing that. 8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: The problem with Brett is that Brett would be fair. I say they do a debate with partisan moderators picked by the candidate. The R mod asks a question of each, then the D mod. Back and forth until it is over. Oh, and no mod fact checks. Let the candidates do that. No notes. No interrupting. You're asking the mod's org to provide a platform for LIES. No reason to do that. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.