Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

When was the last time you saw an actual assassination attempt against any one of those people?

Some nutjob tried to drive a truck into the White House in the spring in an attempt to kill Biden last year. 

Quote

There have been two assassination attempts against Trump now, both with rifles, plus the shooter at the congressional baseball game who fired a bunch of shots at Republicans, and a guy that came to a Biden-sanctioned protest at a SCJ's home to kill him. 

Wait how come you didn't include Rand Paul getting choke slammed by his neighbour? That usually makes your greatest hits list.

Quote

What's worse is you guys support all of that. You even say that you'd just drink your a beer if Trump got killed. 

Yeah and you'd say the same thing about Trudeau or Harris and we all know it.

Quote

If you're that serious about it, man up, balk chicken.

Is this some expression from the '20s or something, what the f*ck.

Posted
3 hours ago, Deluge said:

But many of you would just rather have him shot dead. 

We mourn his loss and get to the next candidate - preferably Vivek Ramaswamy or even JD Vance. 

Well no you won't. You'll get the vice president and frankly kamala will win the election  before he can get his crap together and she'll spend 8 years looking for new ways to rig the elections. 

Honestly i think it'd spread to a lot more violence. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well no you won't. You'll get the vice president and frankly kamala will win the election  before he can get his crap together and she'll spend 8 years looking for new ways to rig the elections. 

Honestly i think it'd spread to a lot more violence. 

Why's that?

Posted
7 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Some nutjob tried to drive a truck into the White House in the spring in an attempt to kill Biden last year. 

Wait how come you didn't include Rand Paul getting choke slammed by his neighbour? That usually makes your greatest hits list.

Yeah and you'd say the same thing about Trudeau or Harris and we all know it.

Is this some expression from the '20s or something, what the f*ck.

I guess you don't know what balk means, limited intellect and all. 

I try not to be condescending when I talk to you people (that means 'talk down to people'), but it's not easy to limit oneself to your 300-word vocabulary. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
Just now, WestCanMan said:

I guess you don't know what balk means, limited intellect and all. 

I try not to be condescending when I talk to you people (that means 'talk down to people'), but it's not easy to limit oneself to your 300-word vocabulary. 

"Balk chicken" is not a phrase that scans, back to the drawing board grandpa.

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Why's that?

Because of something Kennedy once said:  "If you make peaceful revolution impossible you make violent revolution inevitable' .

It will be seen that the democrats had removed the republican supporters right to resolve their grievances peacefully by election. Most will believe that this only allows for a violent response in order to get their rights back.

Republican supporters will inevitably turn to violence, and it will escalate from there. The thing is Republicans actually know how to shoot.

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I try not to be condescending when I talk to you people (that means 'talk down to people'),

I'm awarding you ten internet points for that :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Because of something Kennedy once said:  "If you make peaceful revolution impossible you make violent revolution inevitable' .

It will be seen that the democrats had removed the republican supporters right to resolve their grievances peacefully by election. Most will believe that this only allows for a violent response in order to get their rights back.

Republican supporters will inevitably turn to violence, and it will escalate from there. The thing is Republicans actually know how to shoot.

IDK the last two guys who tried to kill Trump were Republicans so there goes that theory.

Maybe an actual leftist would have better luck?

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

IDK the last two guys who tried to kill Trump were Republicans so there goes that theory.

 

Well we both know they weren't.  Both are democrat supporters, and lying about it won't impress the republicans. 

Quote

Maybe an actual leftist would have better luck?

The fact the missed proves they were actual leftists -  rightists can shoot :) 

Here's the thing - the left likes to pretend it can change the truth if it lies hard enough.  Just like they're trying to convince the people that the last 4 years were actually amazingly good economic times. 

But people aren't that stupid. They know how much money they have left at the end of the month now compared to the past. And they become a little resentful when all you do is lie. 

So if yet another democrat supporter tries and SUCCEEDS in killing trump there will be no way to lie their way out of it for the dems, and republicans will almost certainly repay violence with violence. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Well we both know they weren't.  Both are democrat supporters, and lying about it won't impress the republicans. 

One was a registered Republican and the other a past Trump voter. And no one cares about impressing republicans, you guys think AI is cool.

 

Quote

 

Here's the thing - the left likes to pretend it can change the truth if it lies hard enough.  Just like they're trying to convince the people that the last 4 years were actually amazingly good economic times. 

But people aren't that stupid. They know how much money they have left at the end of the month now compared to the past. And they become a little resentful when all you do is lie. 

 

People aren't stupid, but Trump voters aren't people.

Quote

So if yet another democrat supporter tries and SUCCEEDS in killing trump there will be no way to lie their way out of it for the dems, and republicans will almost certainly repay violence with violence. 

Republicans will do that anyway because republicans are violent beasts.

Posted
25 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well no you won't. You'll get the vice president and frankly kamala will win the election  before he can get his crap together and she'll spend 8 years looking for new ways to rig the elections. 

Honestly i think it'd spread to a lot more violence. 

I think Harris loses, regardless. The media and all the other lunatics won't be enough. 

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Republicans will do that anyway because republicans are violent beasts.

Says the abortion slut...

Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

One was a registered Republican and the other a past Trump voter. And no one cares about impressing republicans, you guys think AI is cool.

We both know you're lying about their support and why you're lying about it.  The first had been posting pro biden for years and never voted republican and the second renounced the republicans and wished for trump 'to be gone' 

 The fact you have to lie shows you know that the dems are in the wrong here. 

I guess it's all your side has left. They'll get trump killed with their rhetoric and then they'll pay their own price in blood and you'll sit in your mom's basement wondering how it ever happened.  Sigh.  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I think Harris loses, regardless. The media and all the other lunatics won't be enough. 

Vance wouldn't have the time to put together a proper campaign, and you can bet the dems will be encouraging violence against him as well.  it's not that he couldn't win as a candidate if he had time - it's just a simple matter of logistics. He would be at a severe disadvantage. 

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I'm pro abortion because while it might be too late for you but we can still stop the next generation of conservatives from being born.

The conservatives don't have as many abortions, they tend to be more pro life.  It's the democrats who have abortions. 

So that's YOUR people you're hoping to kill :)   I wish you all the success in the world at your endeavors :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
21 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I'm pro abortion because while it might be too late for you but we can still stop the next generation of conservatives from being born.

No, you're pro abortion because you're a stunted pervert. 

Let's not get that confused. ;) 

Posted
22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Vance wouldn't have the time to put together a proper campaign, and you can bet the dems will be encouraging violence against him as well.  it's not that he couldn't win as a candidate if he had time - it's just a simple matter of logistics. He would be at a severe disadvantage. 

I think it would unite everyone that isn't a left-wing psychopath, with or without a well organized and funded campaign. I could see it being to Vance's advantage. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

We both know you're lying about their support and why you're lying about it.  The first had been posting pro biden for years and never voted republican and the second renounced the republicans and wished for trump 'to be gone' 

 The fact you have to lie shows you know that the dems are in the wrong here. 

Nothing I said was a lie, dummy. One was a registered Republican (there's no evidence of him posting pro Biden content) and the other was Trump 2016 voter who was a fan of Ramswamy and Gabbard (so at best a never-Trumper, but still a Republican).

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

The conservatives don't have as many abortions, they tend to be more pro life.  It's the democrats who have abortions. 

So that's YOUR people you're hoping to kill :)   I wish you all the success in the world at your endeavors :) 

There's no evidence that pro-life beliefs translate into fewer abortions. Conservatives are pretty morally flexible when these things affect them personally, they only are pro-life when it comes to sticking their noses into other people's business.

Edited by Black Dog
Posted (edited)

How about just give him a pistol and a cyanide tablet and lock him in a bunker right now, spare waiting for him to beat Hitler's 42 assassination attempts.

Eve better, maybe while spewing his firehose of lies and hate from behind the bulletproof glass he will be struck down by lightning and his so called 'Christian' supporters will need to have a serious rethink.

Edited by herbie
Posted
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

What do we do WHEN (not if) the left is finally successful in killing DJT?

Not going to happen cause "the left" is not involved. The latest shooter voted for Trump in 2016 and was sorely disappointed.

 

4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

You aren't acquainted with reality on this topic.

You wouldn't know reality if it bit you in the ass.

Posted
4 hours ago, Yakuda said:

Eye for an eye 

Trump's goons already got their eye(s) on Jan 6th

3 hours ago, ironstone said:

Comments like those speak volumes about your moral compass.

You making excuses for Trump's transgressions speaks volumes about yours.

Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

"Balk chicken" is not a phrase that scans, back to the drawing board grandpa.

WCM is fluent in chicken....

At Some of These We Balked Balk - Chicken Farmer Farming - Aesthetic  Sublimation Digital File - Defying the Norms

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

Not sure. If someone was to successfully kill DJT.. it would be a sad day. I have no respect for the man but always thought that America was above political violence. Lets hope that this is the last assassination attempt 

You mean "always" until Jan 6th 2021?

Posted
26 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Not going to happen cause "the left" is not involved. The latest shooter voted for Trump in 2016 and was sorely disappointed.

 

You wouldn't know reality if it bit you in the ass.

He was an anti thumper that supports Ukraine with a blind passion. As ive already illustrated.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Gonna cry?

Conservatives tend to have a much thicker skin when it comes to insults and the like.

You guys on the other hand....

screaming-liberal.jpg

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
1 hour ago, Deluge said:

I think it would unite everyone that isn't a left-wing psychopath, with or without a well organized and funded campaign. I could see it being to Vance's advantage. 

On a theoretical level that's true, but there are certain practical considerations when it comes to running a campaign. It's possible he could win, but he would be at a severe disadvantage. I'm not even sure there would be time to redo the ballots. 

The most likely scenario is harris would win, republicans would feel that the democrats had shot their chances at having a democratic say in the country, and there would be blood

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...