30+ Days and Kamala Still Hasn't Met with Anyone from the Media, but She Did an "Interview" with Tim Walz

[Rebound]

12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

It's no secret that there are hundreds of members of the mainscum media who would give Kamala an interview on the friendliest of terms, with the easiest softball questions ever, even pre-scripted and agreed upon beforehand.

Still, she outright refuses. 

The woman is adamantly against walls, but there's a wall around her personally, which reporters can't get through.

So instead of talking with anyone, anywehere, from the media, she sat down and did an interview with Tim:

• Vice President Kamala Harris and Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN) have not given a full press conference or media interview since entering the presidential campaign, but they did sit down and interview each other in Detroit.

  In the 10-minute spot, the pair discussed music, football, and “white guy tacos” at Aretha’s Jazz Cafe. The engagement was edited into a video, which the Harris campaign released Thursday.

So, not only did they pre-script all their questions and answers, they still had to edit it before they presented it to the public.

It's clear that Kamala answers to no one. The teleprompter is all we get. When she goes off-script, she talks about bringing Kammunism to America. 

She’s spoken with reporters and answered their questions a bunch of times in the past three weeks, she just didn’t sit down with one for an hour.  
 

Meanwhile, Trump’s press meetings go like this:

Reporter: “Mr. Trump, what will you do about health care if you’re elected?”

Trump: “Well, as everyone knows, Kamala is really awful.  If she’s elected, America will be destroyed, just as Biden destroyed it.  Destroyed. Did I mention that windmills kill birds? Millions of dead birds everywhere. My uncle taught at MIT. Very smart. I know nuclear.  Kim Jong Un. Very smart. Would you rather be eaten by a shark or electrocuted?”

[WestCanMan]

19 minutes ago, Rebound said:

She’s spoken with reporters and answered their questions a bunch of times in the past three weeks, she just didn’t sit down with one for an hour.  

No, she has answered one or two questions, in a couple of instances, that's it. 

Her and Walz also ran and hid in their airplane when big, scary JD Vance crossed the tarmac towards them. 

Some monumental things are happening in the world right now and Kamala isn't there to answer any questions. President KJP seems to be at the helm right now. 

Kamala taking over Joe's spot is ONE OF THE BIGGEST THINGS TO HAPPEN IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF AMERCA'S DEMOCRACY and Kamala hasn't said a word about that yet.

Since Kamala has been installed by party brass as the DNC nominee, we've found out that her running mate lied about being a combat vet, he was completely wasted driving 96 mph an got arrested, and that Kamala spent months pretending that Joe was mentally sound when he was actually in NO CONDITION to be running the country, and neither she nor Timmy Tampon has answered to ANY of it. They just get to keep on creating propaganda and the MSM blows it up our asses. 

Have you ever heard of democracy, dipshit? Do you know how it's supposed to work? Did you know that the media has a very important role to play in it? Well right now they're not. The US has media cheerleaders now. That's it. 

[CdnFox]

23 minutes ago, Rebound said:

She’s spoken with reporters and answered their questions a bunch of times in the past three weeks, she just didn’t sit down with one for an hour.  
 

 

No, she didn't.  She didn't answer any questions other than the one time when asked when she was going to asnwer questions and her answer was 'by the end of the month'.   

[impartialobserver]

what would be great is if we could fast forward to November 5 and bypass all of the pointless ads and white noise. 

[WestCanMan]

Just now, CdnFox said:

No, she didn't.  She didn't answer any questions other than the one time when asked when she was going to asnwer questions and her answer was 'by the end of the month'.   

That's basically it. The only question she answered was "Will you answer questions at some point?"

YAY! DEMOCRACY!!!!! 

[CdnFox]

41 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

What's this? Answering questions from a reporter! And she makes some excellent points about return on investment and how that can generate more revenue and more than pay for itself.

 

 

LOL - well it's nice to see her answer at least one question even if it's from a friendly source

None of those points were good tho.  She was asked how she'd pay for it and had no answer. you get get away with that once or twice but you're just giving your opponents ammo when you can't answer a simple quesiton like how will you pay for it. 

And then she says 'we'll get returns like we already did when we tried this earlier" -  people HATE the economy right now, claiming that you'll deliver more of this isn't going to play well. 

but at least she answered a question so it's a start  

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

what would be great is if we could fast forward to November 5 and bypass all of the pointless ads and white noise. 

At some point between now and then, journalists should be allowed to ask her some questions.

She was handed the nomination without getting a single vote from anyone, anywhere, with just 100 days to go before the election. 30% of that time has now passed without her answering to anyone. 

[impartialobserver]

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

At some point between now and then, journalists should be allowed to ask her some questions.

She was handed the nomination without getting a single vote from anyone, anywhere, with just 100 days to go before the election. 30% of that time has now passed without her answering to anyone. 

Well, of course. If she does not.. then there should be a consequence such as her losing and then fading to obscurity. And then that gives us all the chance to whine about the next candidate. 

Edited August 19, 2024 by impartialobserver

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Well, of course. If she does not.. then there should be consequence such as her losing and then fading to obscurity. And then that gives us all the chance to whine about the next candidate. 

You've just spent your time on two threads screaming about how we shouldn't have to listen to these people and how it's utterly pointless to discuss them for more than a day. Now suddenly it would be a bad thing if she didn't answer questions.

I think you need to make up your mind

[CdnFox]

11 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Well, of course. If she does not.. then there should be a consequence such as her losing and then fading to obscurity. And then that gives us all the chance to whine about the next candidate. 

you're going to downvote me because i said something 100 percent truthful and you don't like it?

what a pathetic weasel.  You're just proving me right.  Have a few in return, 

Edited August 19, 2024 by CdnFox

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

What's this? Answering questions from a reporter! And she makes some excellent points about return on investment and how that can generate more revenue and more than pay for itself.

 

FYI what she said wasn't "brilliant", it was stupid. 

When you get more people into home ownership within a community you don't increase the tax base at all. Not even by 1%. In fact, In Canada, you DECREASE the tax base.  

1. Someone owned that house before she gave her DEI constituents free money to buy it, so they were paying taxes on it anyways... In that instance, net increase to the tax base = $0.00
2. If it was an investor that owned it, they usually pay more taxes than people who use it as a primary residence. That's 100% certain where I live. In BC we get a "Homeowner's Grant" from the provincial gov't if our home is a primary residence. If you're a senior, or a vet, you get an even bigger tax break. IE, the gov't gets less tax revenue when it's an owner living in a house, not more. 

I can't speak for every state in the US, but if a senior citizen who was also a veteran (Walz: you'll notice that they don't say 'combat veteran', but only combat vets qualify for this) owned in this house (in BC), and used it as a primary residence, the home owner save more than $1,000 per year in property taxes compared to an investor. That means "lower tax base". It doesn't make a lick of difference if the tenant here is a senior and a veteran, the investor would still pay the full tax rate. 

If we had a Kamala here, and she gave away enough tax dollars to get 1,000 homes out of the hands of investors and into the hands of home-owners, that would cost our gov't $1,000,000 per year in tax revenue.

So not only would taxpayers be footing the bill for "select citizens" to get a new home, the tax base would decrease dramatically.  

Now, to be fair, the decrease in taxes collected due to all the homeowner grants would be partially (not fully) offset by the fact that property values would rise when all that free loot came on the market, but the overall tax base would still be down. 

And guess what happens when property values go up..... Rents increase. Even if you are just renting out a suite within your own home, if you pay more for the huse, you need to collect more money from your tenants. 

As usual, Kamala's plan is just layers of stupid on top of stupid. 

Her plan would help to get American citizens into the door, but banks would be the ones to really profit from the free loot and the increased cost of houses. 

Edited August 19, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Legato]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

No he didn't. Blade Runner was written by Hampton Fancher and David Peoples and was based on Dick's novel "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" He had nothing to do with Scott's movie. Cretin.

Thought you had something there, huh dipshit. Loser.

So without the original book there would not have been the blade runner movies. Gindlewald.

[WestCanMan]

Did you notice that all Kamala's cultists have to talk about is fake polling data right now? 

That's it. 

The Dems and NYT are admitting to the Joe/Hunter scandal as we speak, news of Walz's brutal drunk driving is making the rounds, he still hasn't apologized for lying about being a combat veteran, and the Dems' own voters are about to riot at the DNC, so the Dems are busy erecting racist walls and hiring racist "oughta be defunded" pigs to keep their own activists from attacking them 🤣. The cultists can't even defend themselves against everything that's being said about their dear leaders today. All they can do is ay "Yay, fake polls!" 

Quick question for leftard cultists: If a rioting leftard attacks a cop with a fire extinguisher, will that mean that the rioting constitutes "an attempt to overthrow the US gov't"?

[Black Dog]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

It's still Phillip Dick's story, you stupid c*nt. Fancher and Peoples just adapted into the screenplay. 

In other words he didn't write "Blade Runner" lol you retarded ape.

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

In other words he didn't write "Blade Runner" lol you retarded ape.

That's right, manpon. He just wrote pretty much everything else. lol

[Rebound]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

No, she has answered one or two questions, in a couple of instances, that's it. 

Her and Walz also ran and hid in their airplane when big, scary JD Vance crossed the tarmac towards them. 

Some monumental things are happening in the world right now and Kamala isn't there to answer any questions. President KJP seems to be at the helm right now. 

Kamala taking over Joe's spot is ONE OF THE BIGGEST THINGS TO HAPPEN IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF AMERCA'S DEMOCRACY and Kamala hasn't said a word about that yet.

Since Kamala has been installed by party brass as the DNC nominee, we've found out that her running mate lied about being a combat vet, he was completely wasted driving 96 mph an got arrested, and that Kamala spent months pretending that Joe was mentally sound when he was actually in NO CONDITION to be running the country, and neither she nor Timmy Tampon has answered to ANY of it. They just get to keep on creating propaganda and the MSM blows it up our asses. 

Have you ever heard of democracy, dipshit? Do you know how it's supposed to work? Did you know that the media has a very important role to play in it? Well right now they're not. The US has media cheerleaders now. That's it. 

You forgot that the “press interviews” that Trump is giving are the rantings of a lunatic. Actual quotes from a single interview below:

 

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, Rebound said:

You forgot that the “press interviews” that Trump is giving are the rantings of a lunatic. Actual quotes from a single interview below:

 

If you cried like that on a snail, it would curl up and die instantly from the salt  

[WestCanMan]

6 minutes ago, Rebound said:

You forgot that the “press interviews” that Trump is giving are the rantings of a lunatic. Actual quotes from a single interview below:

 

1. We will have a crash like 1929 if Kamala actually implements price controls and gives everyone $25k. 

2. Trump could be retired, but instead he is getting abused by the MSM.

3. Other countries actually are sending their criminals across the US border. Do you know how much money it costs to ship a prisoner to the US, vs the cost to keep them incarcerated for 15 years? 

4. The Dems actually lie about everything, they use the FBI like a personal attack dog, and they cheat on elections all the time. You'd have to be completely retarded to think that the dems didn't cheat on the 2020 election, and TBH, all the lying the FBI did actually does constitute "election cheating". The laptop story was not Russian disinformation, that fiction came directly from the FBI itself, and the FBI knew the laptop was legit because they had it in their possession for 11 months at that point. 

5. Sleeping wth a porn star isn't commendable, but it's not illegal either, and election officials have already determined that Trump was allowed to write that NDA off. There was no crime.  

[impartialobserver]

there is no actual specifics as to what these price controls will be exactly. That would give you a clue as to their impact. Really depends on the good. This is an example of a price ceiling. Price can't go above x. If the market price is $2 and you set a price ceiling of $1.85 then it will have impact. 

[Black Dog]

4 hours ago, Deluge said:

That's right

See loser that wasn't so hard.

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

See 

See what, dumbf*ck? 

See this? 

 

[Reg Volk]

 

[Black Dog]

11 hours ago, Deluge said:

See what, dumbf*ck? 

See this? 

 

Are you called Deluge because that's what happens when your forget your Depends?

[Deluge]

39 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Are you called Deluge because that's what happens when your forget your Depends?

"when your forget your" lol

Have you made your donation yet, jackass?

https://kamalaharris.com/

 

[Black Dog]

5 minutes ago, Deluge said:

"when your forget your" lol

Have you made your donation yet, jackass?

https://kamalaharris.com/

 

Oh no a minor typo on my phone, that's much worse than getting a basic fact wrong, doubling down, and then cravenly admitting your original mistake. Loser pants-pisser.