Tim Walz Lied About His Military Service

[WestCanMan]

5 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

Please elaborate....

The whole point of NATO is a mandate to join with like-minded countries to counter Russian aggression. Do you even know anything about NATO?

Again, you are a trailtor, who is more sympathetic to an organization who has done more for peace in North America and Europe, than  beliggerant nation that attacks it's weaker neighbours, and commits atrocities against them.

If there was ever a war against Russia, I would hope that these comments would be preserved, and you would be on a CSIS watch list for possible espionage. 

No

So does Russia.

America has big problems with neo-Nazis, and Canada had incidents that made international news (Somalia 1992-93), where soldiers were allowed to fly swastikas in their barracks. Yet, for some strange reason, you single out Ukraine for having one battalion that harbours neo-Nazi beliefs.

Ironic, since many would consider you to have fascist beliefs. 

Funny, Putin has done all that and worse. He also invaded Ukraine, causing this war.

You sure showed us that you are not a Putin stooge.

No, like most Canadian, I like democracy. 

I also notice, that the more you type, the more you reveal your true feelings toward the Russia-Ukraine war.  Is it any wonder that people are starting to refer to you as "WestKremlinMan?"

Bullies admire other bullies.

You're just a stupid little cultist gaslighter. 

I was IN NATO dummy. I still have friends in NATO. The last thing I want to see is NATO troops getting killed. But when I signed up for the military, Ivan and Igor were the bad guys. Now NATO is all up in Russia's grille. 

WE poked the bear. WE. Canada didn't say sh1t when NATO was f'ing around. We're as guilty as anyone for starting the Ukraine war. We were Biden's b1tch, and now we're donating to Biden's war,.

Tractors and food production in Ukraine are down because tanks and bombs are up there now you dumb little turd. Food costs money, and when there's a shortage of food, food costs MORE money. 

[NAME REMOVED]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

I am a traitor to Canada.

Yes you are, WestKremlinMan.

Yes you are. 

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, DUI_Offender said:

And a fine job Musk has done with Twitter once he acquired it. The platform has lost over 50 million users in the past 2 years. It also is now pretty horrible compared to what it once was in 2022. 

Bots. Bot accounts.

When @RealDitsyDemiDummy sent out a tweet and it got 40,000 likes and 10,000 re-tweets, that was all BS.

TNI used bot accounts to pump up Twitter likes the same way that the MSM uses fake polls.

"LOOK WHO THE COOL KIDS ARE VOTING FOR!!!"

"LOOK WHO'S GETTING LIKES ON TWITTER!!!"

See?In 2022 @RealDitsyDemiDummy could say "Hillary is the best because she saved the lives of everyone in Benghazi and Trump is a Nazi" that shit got pushed on people. When conservatives replied with the truth they were shadow-banned. They could see their own posts right there but no one else could, so no one replied and no one clicked like or re-tweeted it.

Then CNN could say "WOW! LOOK HOW MANY LIKES @RealDitsyDemiDummy got!!! She's popular because Hillary's cool. Be like @RealDitsyDemiDummy kids. Repeat the things that she says. People will like you too!!!!

At first 'shadow banning' was a conspiracy, now we know it to be true. 

But you loved shadow-ban twitter. You even said that 2022 was the glory days for you, and that's true, because you adore fascism little boy. 

Do people like you DUI? I think not. I think you don't have a strong, independent, beautiful partner. I think you need a mob with you. You seek approval. You're a simp, so no woman will ever respect you. 

[NAME REMOVED]

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

 

Do people like me? I think not. I think I don't have a strong, independent, beautiful partner. I think I need a mob with you. I seek approval. I'm a simp, so no woman will ever respect me. 

I agree.  I think that ship has sailed, and you are in your 60s. Shorter of breath, and one day closer to death. 

[Rebound]

5 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

I agree.  I think that ship has sailed, and you are in your 60s. Shorter of breath, and one day closer to death. 

His cats don’t even like him. 

[CouchPotato]

[CdnFox]

11 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

It takes a lot for a guy to publicly turn on his squadmates, or anyone from their unit. I just mean publicly though.

In-house is different. Within a unit people are a lot rougher on each other. 

You could brawl with people on your own ship and people are fine with it two days later. I never remember a grudge being held at all TBH.

If I called someone out on FB where other people could see and their families might see it I'd be kicked off the page. 

Makes sense.  The gist of the issue as I understand it wasn't that he left so much as he had promised repetitively that he would be there for them when they deployed. They were counting on him to do his job which I assume involves leadership and logistics and then just before they get deployed he buggers off and they've got someone inexperienced trying to figure it out. I could see where that would honk people off.

[CdnFox]

11 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

When I lived in Alberta, it was mainly rural areas and small cities that were sympathetic to trump. It was almost non-existent in the Edmonton area, and a small minority of people in Calgary. 

 

 

OH LOOK -  He's lying again  LOLOLOL

SO you admit the canadian public doesn't like trump but is definitely voting for the conservatives and the trump-like policies next time  

Honestly dude, I would be truly embarrassed if I were you for the number of times you've been called out for being a dumber than a stamp hammer.    

The media and the liberals have been saying Polievre is just like trump for a year now. And yet his popularity grows  

Is Pierre Poilievre the Canadian version of Donald Trump? | Vox

Here's the polls  and amazingly they all say about the same thing and have for months:

Conservatives 42, Liberals 25, NDP 17

PowerPoint Presentation (nanos.co)

 

That is a massive majority gov't for PP.  Like - huge.  It's possible the libs and dips may have a kim campbell moment. 

338Canada Canada | Poll Analysis & Electoral Projections

So -  PP is proposing 'Trump like" policy according to the left - but the people of Canada LOVE it and will give him  a massive majority next election according to the polls. 

Just like i said. They don't like trump but the love the policies     You lose again kiddo  

10 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

I agree.  I think that ship has sailed, and you are in your 60s. Shorter of breath, and one day closer to death. 

Coming from a kid in his teens, drunk and a perfect example of why women shouldn't do drugs while pregnant he's still smarter than you  

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Makes sense.  The gist of the issue as I understand it wasn't that he left so much as he had promised repetitively that he would be there for them when they deployed. They were counting on him to do his job which I assume involves leadership and logistics and then just before they get deployed he buggers off and they've got someone inexperienced trying to figure it out. I could see where that would honk people off.

A Command Sergeant Major would be a highly respected (or at least should be) leader, and the highest-ranking non-commissioned officer in your unit.

He should always be a guy with some major clout who would go to bat for you in a heartbeat if you had just cause. 

Believe it or not, in our military, there's always a Base Chief Warrant Officer appointed to every base or ship (Cox'n), and they're appointed by no less than the Queen herself (theoretically... I doubt that she does it herself, but it is done with her seal). 

The only reason that I even know that is that while I was on the Qu'Appelle we had a huge blow-up between the Captain and the Cox'n, and the Captain tried to fire him. The Captain literally kicked the Cox'n off the ship - he had to physically leave the boat (in the US navy they NEVER call a ship a 'boat', but we said boat all the time). When the dust had settled, our captain, executive officer, and cox'n were all let go. Apparently even the Captain isn't allowed to unilaterally fire a BCWO. Who knew? 

It was the only time in the whole history of the Canadian forces - land air and sea - where the top 3 from a base were let go. 

The whole truth of that story wasn't even known to me until recently. I didn't even know the Cox'n was gone for a few days after it happened, and at the time we were all left to guess. I didn't know the Captain fired him, I just thought they were all let go at the exact same time in one big meeting (I didn't try to get the deets at the time, we all just celebrated like a mofo - we all hated every single one of them). I just found out the deeper truth of it all in our FB group a year or two ago. 

Anyways, that's probably about how big of a deal Walz was within his unit when he left them. It's more like a Gretzky trade than a Kurri trade. BCWO is a Demi-God.

Edited August 10, 2024 by WestCanMan

[WestCanMan]

11 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

I agree.  I think that ship has sailed, and you are in your 60s. Shorter of breath, and one day closer to death. 

56, shorter of breath, happily married, with dogs. Sorry. 

[gatomontes99]

Walz now admits he "mispoke".

Aka he lied

“In making the case for why weapons of war should never be on our streets or in our classrooms, the Governor misspoke. He did handle weapons of war and believes strongly that only military members trained to carry those deadly weapons should have access to them, unlike Donald Trump and JD Vance who prioritize the gun lobby over our children.”

[WestCanMan]

22 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Walz now admits he "mispoke".

Aka he lied

“In making the case for why weapons of war should never be on our streets or in our classrooms, the Governor misspoke. He did handle weapons of war and believes strongly that only military members trained to carry those deadly weapons should have access to them, unlike Donald Trump and JD Vance who prioritize the gun lobby over our children.”

Nero didn't do that. Are you kidding?

That worthless fugging maggot didn't even say those words himself, the demonrats "released a statement" for him while he hid somewhere again.  

• Vice President Harris’ presidential campaign admitted Friday that her running mate, Gov. Tim Walz “misspoke” about his past military service as a growing chorus of critics accuse him of “stolen valor.”

ARE THOSE FUGGING LOSERS KIDDING RIGHT NOW?

Nero needs to   a p o l o g i z e  , and a proper apology 1. completely and honestly addresses the offensive incident, 2. displays a full understanding of how and why it was wrong, and then 3. offers a sincere and humble promise to never reoffend. That's it.

Trying to use that statement as an attack on someone else just shows that it's not even sincere. They just know that they have to say words so they do, but they just can't help themselves, they have to make it snotty. First rule of apologies: never give a snotty apology.

• “In making the case for why weapons of war should never be on our streets or in our classrooms, the Governor misspoke. He did handle weapons of war and believes strongly that only military members trained to carry those deadly weapons should have access to them, unlike Donald Trump and JD Vance who prioritize the gun lobby over our children.”

Bottom line: the dems completely fail to realize is that there's a level of accountability among military personnel - and especially towards actual veterans - that goes way beyond "I'll sit in the corner, hiding from everyone, while someone else releases an official statement with an unrelated ad-hominem attack at the end to atone for my disgusting, shameful lies."

What they said might 'make amends' from a lowlife-with-no-scruples POV, but this is now an even more unresolved issue. Nero the Maggot Tampon Twit needs to apologize like an actual man, or actual men have just cause to punch him in the face. 

[zzbulls]

@WestCanMan  They all tell lies  you will  know the reason why you reach  search.  If you a truthful politician you won't be in office long or not at all. 

Edited August 11, 2024 by zzbulls

[Black Dog]

On 8/9/2024 at 11:15 PM, DUI_Offender said:

If you actually served in the military, you would know that it is frowned upon to comment on other veterans service.

Are you kidding me? Slagging off other veterans to boost your own reputation is a time-honoured military tradition. You could go to a taverena in ancient Greece and find some hoplite cutting down some other guy for serving at the back of the phalanx instead of the front. When you keep that in mind, this Walz stuff is just part of that same backbiting and jockeying for status endemic to veterans only with a couple hyperpartisan a**holes leading the charge.

[Rebound]

On 8/10/2024 at 9:09 PM, WestCanMan said:

Nero didn't do that. Are you kidding?

That worthless fugging maggot didn't even say those words himself, the demonrats "released a statement" for him while he hid somewhere again.  

• Vice President Harris’ presidential campaign admitted Friday that her running mate, Gov. Tim Walz “misspoke” about his past military service as a growing chorus of critics accuse him of “stolen valor.”

ARE THOSE FUGGING LOSERS KIDDING RIGHT NOW?

Nero needs to   a p o l o g i z e  , and a proper apology 1. completely and honestly addresses the offensive incident, 2. displays a full understanding of how and why it was wrong, and then 3. offers a sincere and humble promise to never reoffend. That's it.

Trying to use that statement as an attack on someone else just shows that it's not even sincere. They just know that they have to say words so they do, but they just can't help themselves, they have to make it snotty. First rule of apologies: never give a snotty apology.

• “In making the case for why weapons of war should never be on our streets or in our classrooms, the Governor misspoke. He did handle weapons of war and believes strongly that only military members trained to carry those deadly weapons should have access to them, unlike Donald Trump and JD Vance who prioritize the gun lobby over our children.”

Bottom line: the dems completely fail to realize is that there's a level of accountability among military personnel - and especially towards actual veterans - that goes way beyond "I'll sit in the corner, hiding from everyone, while someone else releases an official statement with an unrelated ad-hominem attack at the end to atone for my disgusting, shameful lies."

What they said might 'make amends' from a lowlife-with-no-scruples POV, but this is now an even more unresolved issue. Nero the Maggot Tampon Twit needs to apologize like an actual man, or actual men have just cause to punch him in the face. 

Face it, you guys are not going to win the argument by supporting a 5-time draft dodger over a 24 year US military veteran.  

[User]

14 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Face it, you guys are not going to win the argument by supporting a 5-time draft dodger over a 24 year US military veteran.  

We are already winning. 

Trump is a known monster. If all you can do is play whataboutism, you have already lost here. 

 

[NAME REMOVED]

21 minutes ago, User said:

We are already winning. 

Trump is a known monster. If all you can do is play whataboutism, you have already lost here. 

 

He sure is a monster to all the women he has r@ped.

[WestCanMan]

23 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Face it, you guys are not going to win the argument by supporting a 5-time draft dodger over a 24 year US military veteran.  

There's no argument. None at all. Wtf are you even talking about?

Vance is a valour thief, plain and simple, and Trump didn't go to war nor did he ever claim that he did. Are we good here?

By your standards, valour theft by a man who is in his 60s is ok: he shouldn't have known any better. I totally get it. I never expected any more from you. No one does. 

By my standards, Trump's excuse to get out of the Viet Nam war as a young man is not in any way an impediment to my support of him. 

There's nothing for us to argue about.

But from the point of view of any military or ex-military person, valour theft is unconscionable. 

[Black Dog]

36 minutes ago, User said:

We are already winning. 

This is as much of a non-issue to independents and undecided voters as Trump surviving an assassination attempt. They don't care.

Edited August 12, 2024 by Black Dog

[Reg Volk]

 

Quote

 

Don't Let The Camo Hat Distract You From Walz's Radical Record (thefederalist.com)

Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., was largely unknown to voters across the country when Vice President Kamala Harris selected him as her running mate, so his record is coming under national scrutiny for the first time. Unfortunately for Walz and the Democrats, his record as governor of Minnesota is every bit as bad as that of the Biden-Harris administration, if not worse.

When the George Floyd riots began in Minneapolis in May 2020, Walz dithered. For four days, while Minneapolis and other cities burned, Walz refused to call out the National Guard. By the time the riots were finally brought under control, the Minneapolis Police Department’s Third Precinct station had been stormed by rioters and burned, along with many other buildings.

 

Walz is a commie piece of shit.

[User]

14 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

He sure is a monster to all the women he has r@ped.

So... zero?

[Rebound]

13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

There's no argument. None at all. Wtf are you even talking about?

Vance is a valour thief, plain and simple, and Trump didn't go to war nor did he ever claim that he did. Are we good here?

By your standards, valour theft by a man who is in his 60s is ok: he shouldn't have known any better. I totally get it. I never expected any more from you. No one does. 

By my standards, Trump's excuse to get out of the Viet Nam war as a young man is not in any way an impediment to my support of him. 

There's nothing for us to argue about.

But from the point of view of any military or ex-military person, valour theft is unconscionable. 

Like I said, trying to smear somebody’s 24 year service record is going to backfire on the Republicans, plain and simple.  You hate him because he’s a D but there’s nothing wrong with his service record. 

[User]

25 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

This is as much of a non-issue to independents and undecided voters as Trump surviving an assassination attempt. They don't care.

Which is why the campaign is cleaning up their website and Walz/Campaign is out there doing damage control... 

 

24 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Like I said, trying to smear somebody’s 24 year service record is going to backfire on the Republicans, plain and simple.  You hate him because he’s a D but there’s nothing wrong with his service record. 

They are not smearing his 24 year service record. They are rightly pointing out he has lied about his last year and embellished on how he served many times. 

[Black Dog]

Just now, User said:

Which is why the campaign is cleaning up their website and Walz/Campaign is out there doing damage control... 

Yeah it's generally not a great idea to let Repug lies and misinformation go unchecked and spread because then you run the risk of normal people believing the same dumb garbage as people like you.

[User]

4 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Yeah it's generally not a great idea to let Repug lies and misinformation go unchecked and spread because then you run the risk of normal people believing the same dumb garbage as people like you.

If they have to clean up and remove the information they put out, say they misspoke... they are the ones pushing lies and misinformation.