Sleazy Fox News Can’t Stop Misleading

[CdnFox]

37 minutes ago, Rebound said:

She’s been criticized by right wing asshats. Big whoop.  

Uhhh noooo.... no this was democrat voters leading into the 2019 primaries where she wound up dropping out due to an extreme lack of support. 

Seems she has a record of locking poor black people up on minor drug charges amongst other things. 

[Hodad]

6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

My gawd you're stupid.

FYI that title doesn't imply that he has the lead in the entire state, it says "with surprising group in blue state". 

The meaning of that title is that Trump has taken a lead 1. with a group 2. in a blue state that Republicans don't usually do well with.

Your f'ed up brain thinks it means that Trump has taken a surprising lead in an entire blue state and it doesn't say that at all.

Your reading comprehension has let you down again, dummy. 

Actually, no. That's your your interpretation informed by the article. The headline is ambiguous at best. Taking the lead "with" one group is more likely to communicate that the use, addition or application of one group has given the overall lead. 

A better editor would have used clearer language. Rather than "with" they might have used "among," for example. Or rephrased altogether to avoid ambiguity. 

[Nationalist]

4 hours ago, Rebound said:

She’s been criticized by right wing asshats. Big whoop.  

Those "right wing asshats" are about to teach you Libbies a lesson.

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Those "right wing asshats" are about to teach you Libbies a lesson.

That’s just ridiculous. What will we learn that we don’t already know? 
Like the past several races, it’s extremely close, and will be decided by 10-30,000 votes in a few swing states. Nobody will know the winner until at least Election Day. So whether the election goes one way or another, there’s no big lesson to be learned, Spanky. 

[Nationalist]

4 hours ago, Rebound said:

That’s just ridiculous. What will we learn that we don’t already know? 
Like the past several races, it’s extremely close, and will be decided by 10-30,000 votes in a few swing states. Nobody will know the winner until at least Election Day. So whether the election goes one way or another, there’s no big lesson to be learned, Spanky. 

 

[WestCanMan]

12 hours ago, Rebound said:

Kamala Harris is a former Prosecutor and Attorney General. She is the good guy. 
Donald Trump is a convicted felon. A fraud. A rapist.  An adulterer.  He is the bad guy. 
 

Curious — Do you think the judge will give Trump prison time when he’s sentenced for his 34 felonies next month?

At the height of the rioting in 2020, when bad guys were actively destroying cities, Kamala Harris was a California senator raising bail money to get violent rioters back on the streets on Minneapolis. She was gleefully calling it "a movement" and saying it should last until after Christmas. 

She couldn't wait to wake up on Christmas morning to see what had been destroyed the past night.

Then Kamala Harris went around saying that the US needed to DEFUND POLICE. 

KAMALA "DEFUND POLICE" HARRIS IS NOT THE GOOD GUY IN ANY SCENARIO. The last time she was useful in her political career was under Willie Brown's desk. 

 

Trump did something legal - write off the cost of an NDA agreement - and the Biden/Kamala DoJ patched together a kangaroo court to turn that into 34 felonies. 34 felonies for one NDA which was entirely legal. 

That's not an example of Trump being a felon, it's an example of the DNC being a neo-Nazi party. 

[Deluge]

16 hours ago, Rebound said:

The Headline:

Trump takes stunning lead over Harris with surprising group in blue state
 

The truth, buried in the body of their story:

Vice President Harris leads former President Trump by 14 points overall in New York

Why you bring this nonsensical shit about Fox in here is beyond me when CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, NPR are the real sleazeballs. 

Edited August 7, 2024 by Deluge

[CdnFox]

7 hours ago, Rebound said:

That’s just ridiculous. What will we learn that we don’t already know? 

How to read would be a start....

[impartialobserver]

As with any story especially politics.. one has to read the full story (and usually many other sources) over a span of a few weeks in order to really get the true story. 

[Nationalist]

36 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

As with any story especially politics.. one has to read the full story (and usually many other sources) over a span of a few weeks in order to really get the true story. 

Good thing we all lived through it all and have experienced the true story.

[impartialobserver]

Just now, Nationalist said:

Good thing we all lived through it all and have experienced the true story.

This is why I have such little patience and respect for political news. Regardless of topic or which side is being talked about.. it is 99% of the time a hot steaming mess or of no value. 

[Nationalist]

1 minute ago, impartialobserver said:

This is why I have such little patience and respect for political news. Regardless of topic or which side is being talked about.. it is 99% of the time a hot steaming mess or of no value. 

I would agree. Which is why I regularly go through the online news casts. I also employ the "sniff test" to everything.

[impartialobserver]

Just now, Nationalist said:

I would agree. Which is why I regularly go through the online news casts. I also employ the "sniff test" to everything.

Maybe that is my problem. I can't put the BS sniffer away. My BS sniffer is cranked up on high every day. Some of it is that its my job. My primary job is to construct computer code that picks someone's work apart. They have to be perfect and so being mostly right is not good enough. 

[Nationalist]

14 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Maybe that is my problem. I can't put the BS sniffer away. My BS sniffer is cranked up on high every day. Some of it is that its my job. My primary job is to construct computer code that picks someone's work apart. They have to be perfect and so being mostly right is not good enough. 

Good Lord! What do you do? Write AI routines for headhunters?

[Deluge]

On 8/6/2024 at 5:01 PM, Rebound said:

The Headline:

Trump takes stunning lead over Harris with surprising group in blue state
 

The truth, buried in the body of their story:

Vice President Harris leads former President Trump by 14 points overall in New York

Kamelface and Tampon Tim should be leading by over 20 points in New York. Even New Yorkers are starting to pull their heads out of the Left's ass. 

Edited August 9, 2024 by Deluge

[WestCanMan]

52 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Maybe that is my problem. I can't put the BS sniffer away. My BS sniffer is cranked up on high every day. Some of it is that its my job. My primary job is to construct computer code that picks someone's work apart. They have to be perfect and so being mostly right is not good enough. 

C'mon io. Where was your BSometer when Fauci was talking?

The guy funded the creation of a bat coronavirus that was transmissible between humans in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and then when a bat coronavirus that was transmissible between humans broke out right at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, he said "that came from the wetmarket in Wuhan, from transmission of the virus from a bat, through an intermediary species such as a pangolin, and then went to humans. We don't think it's transmissible H2H". 

How much BS was in that statement, io? On a rating from 0-100, how legit was it? I'd contend that it is 0% legit. IE, 100% BS. I've never seen you question Fauci at all. I can't coax you into even considering that he's a God-damned fraudster.

Aren't you just a little embarrassed that you didn't see through his BS, or the vax BS? 

From what I've seen, you've fully backed Fauci and the jabs this whole time. 

Can you comment, or do you just not care about it? 

[Rebound]

On 8/7/2024 at 11:49 AM, WestCanMan said:

At the height of the rioting in 2020, when bad guys were actively destroying cities, Kamala Harris was a California senator raising bail money to get violent rioters back on the streets on Minneapolis. She was gleefully calling it "a movement" and saying it should last until after Christmas. 

She couldn't wait to wake up on Christmas morning to see what had been destroyed the past night.

Then Kamala Harris went around saying that the US needed to DEFUND POLICE. 

KAMALA "DEFUND POLICE" HARRIS IS NOT THE GOOD GUY IN ANY SCENARIO. The last time she was useful in her political career was under Willie Brown's desk. 

 

Trump did something legal - write off the cost of an NDA agreement - and the Biden/Kamala DoJ patched together a kangaroo court to turn that into 34 felonies. 34 felonies for one NDA which was entirely legal. 

That's not an example of Trump being a felon, it's an example of the DNC being a neo-Nazi party. 

You agree that Fox News is a bunch of sleazy liars, so you’re trying to change the subject to Black Lives Matter.  
 

Fox News lies to their viewers so much and so extremely that they had to pay over $785 million to settle a defamation lawsuit. Because that’s how much Fox News lies to their viewers.  

[WestCanMan]

18 minutes ago, Rebound said:

You agree that Fox News is a bunch of sleazy liars,

I already took you out behind the woodshed on that claim, son. Within a short time of your OP too.

Remember this?

• FYI that title doesn't imply that he has the lead in the entire state, it says "with surprising group in blue state". 

  The meaning of that title is that Trump has taken a lead 1. with a group 2. in a blue state that Republicans don't usually do well with.

  Your f'ed up brain thinks it means that Trump has taken a surprising lead in an entire blue state and it doesn't say that at all.

  Your reading comprehension has let you down again, dummy. 

And did you honestly take this whole time to come up with that pathetic comeback? 🤣

Just take the "L" next time for Pete's sake. It's not as if you aren't used to it.

Quote

so you’re trying to change the subject to Black Lives Matter.  

I think you're coming unglued now, Rebound.

I said that as a reply to your loony claim that "Kamala is a good guy" or whatever it was you wrote.

I just showed you that Kamala was dumb enough to gush about the beauty of riots, and to pimp a bail fund that was getting violent rioters out of jail. No decent person would egg on rioting, looting, assaults and murders. No decent person would bail those people out. Kamala is NOT a decent person. Full stop. 

 

/lesson

[CouchPotato]

30 minutes ago, Rebound said:

You agree that Fox News is a bunch of sleazy liars, so you’re trying to change the subject to Black Lives Matter. 

No. It's just your original post has already been addressed. Nothing inaccurate there. Big nothing burger. Unless FOX News is supposed to anticipate every way you could misinterpret anything they say, there is nothing nefarious about that headline.

[WestCanMan]

32 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

No. It's just your original post has already been addressed. Nothing inaccurate there. Big nothing burger. Unless FOX News is supposed to anticipate every way you could misinterpret anything they say, there is nothing nefarious about that headline.

TBH, the Fox headline was 100% accurate. 

This is just another case of leftists misquoting Trump so that they can call him names, like when he called MS-13 'animals' and dishonest reporters said: " Trump referred to immigrants as animals 🤥 ". 

[Rebound]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I already took you out behind the woodshed on that claim, son. Within a short time of your OP too.

Remember this?

• FYI that title doesn't imply that he has the lead in the entire state, it says "with surprising group in blue state". 

  The meaning of that title is that Trump has taken a lead 1. with a group 2. in a blue state that Republicans don't usually do well with.

  Your f'ed up brain thinks it means that Trump has taken a surprising lead in an entire blue state and it doesn't say that at all.

  Your reading comprehension has let you down again, dummy. 

And did you honestly take this whole time to come up with that pathetic comeback? 🤣

Just take the "L" next time for Pete's sake. It's not as if you aren't used to it.

I think you're coming unglued now, Rebound.

I said that as a reply to your loony claim that "Kamala is a good guy" or whatever it was you wrote.

I just showed you that Kamala was dumb enough to gush about the beauty of riots, and to pimp a bail fund that was getting violent rioters out of jail. No decent person would egg on rioting, looting, assaults and murders. No decent person would bail those people out. Kamala is NOT a decent person. Full stop. 

 

/lesson

Did I mention that Fox News lies to their viewers so much that they had to pay $785 million to settle a single lawsuit for lying to their viewers? 
 

Thats not an honest mistake or a little white lie. $785 million happens when it’s proven that you knowingly, deliberately and repeatedly lied.  And they did.  

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Did I mention that Fox News lies to their viewers so much that they had to pay $785 million to settle a single lawsuit for lying to their viewers? 

HOw is that different than the hundreds of millions NBC and CNN had to pay for lying to THEIR viewers?

Forgot about that didn'tcha  

 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Did I mention that Fox News lies to their viewers so much that they had to pay $785 million to settle a single lawsuit for lying to their viewers? 
 

Thats not an honest mistake or a little white lie. $785 million happens when it’s proven that you knowingly, deliberately and repeatedly lied.  And they did.  

That was a story, not without merit, which lasted all of two or three weeks.

The lies that CNN told about Russian collusion alone completely dwarf anything that was ever said about Dominion. CNN lied about Russian collusion thousands of times a day for 3 years.

Even if CNN only lied about collusion 360x a day (15x/hr) that would still be 130,000 lies a year, on collusion alone. It's not unlikely that they told more than 400,000 lies about collusion. 

I honestly don't even remember any of the Dominion coverage. All I remember is the one place where they hand count didn't match the machine tally, and that's it. That story lasted less than 2 months. Maybe 2 weeks. It was just one of many. 

[Reg Volk]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

That was a story, not without merit, which lasted all of two or three weeks.

The lies that CNN told about Russian collusion alone completely dwarf anything that was ever said about Dominion. CNN lied about Russian collusion thousands of times a day for 3 years.

Even if CNN only lied about collusion 360x a day (15x/hr) that would still be 130,000 lies a year, on collusion alone. It's not unlikely that they told more than 400,000 lies about collusion. 

I honestly don't even remember any of the Dominion coverage. All I remember is the one place where they hand count didn't match the machine tally, and that's it. That story lasted less than 2 months. Maybe 2 weeks. It was just one of many. 

Then there was the hundreds of millions CNN had to pay for defaming Nick Sandmann...of course the Dem cultists conveniently always forget about that.

[impartialobserver]

On 8/9/2024 at 11:03 AM, WestCanMan said:

C'mon io. Where was your BSometer when Fauci was talking?

The guy funded the creation of a bat coronavirus that was transmissible between humans in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and then when a bat coronavirus that was transmissible between humans broke out right at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, he said "that came from the wetmarket in Wuhan, from transmission of the virus from a bat, through an intermediary species such as a pangolin, and then went to humans. We don't think it's transmissible H2H". 

How much BS was in that statement, io? On a rating from 0-100, how legit was it? I'd contend that it is 0% legit. IE, 100% BS. I've never seen you question Fauci at all. I can't coax you into even considering that he's a God-damned fraudster.

Aren't you just a little embarrassed that you didn't see through his BS, or the vax BS? 

From what I've seen, you've fully backed Fauci and the jabs this whole time. 

Can you comment, or do you just not care about it? 

unlike you, I do not watch or read political news nonstop. Early on.. I would see the press conferences held by Fauci and tune it out. I decided early on that it was not worth my time to follow the story. Only exception would be at work where I regularly had to compare employment and wage levels pre-covid vs. during covid.

No, I am not embarrassed that I am not as obsessed as you. I am not going to tell you what you want to hear... simple enough?