Rasmussen Poll Finds Illegal Votes In Mass

[impartialobserver]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I hate the mm-dd-yyyy format, it is incredibly stupid and confusing. 

"Best before date: 01/11/2024"... Is that January or November? Did this expire 6 months ago or is it good for 5 more months?

Common sense dictates that would be 01 Nov, with the units getting larger as you go the right, or 2024/11/01, with units getting smaller as you move right, but having the smallest unit in the middle makes no sense to me. "Look for another can with a 13-to-31 on it somewhere..."

Dates and date formats are the bane of any person that works with databases existence. It really gets messy when you have June 06, 2024 or 06 June, 2024. The text items have to be converted and if there is any hidden characters or programming (which there is in excel) then it scrambles it up and the puzzle begins. 

[ironstone]

51 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

I am giving you the nuts and bolts, boots on the ground viewpoint of my state, Nevada. If you want to read subjective articles and have no idea where the numbers come from.. that is up to you 

Voter ID is a contentious issue. To me it is perfectly reasonable to ask someone to present some form of acceptable ID in order to vote. Which of the two main parties is claiming that requiring ID is a form of voter suppression? Which of the two main parties is starting to push for allowing non citizens to vote in elections?

[impartialobserver]

Just now, ironstone said:

Voter ID is a contentious issue. To me it is perfectly reasonable to ask someone to present some form of acceptable ID in order to vote. Which of the two main parties is claiming that requiring ID is a form of voter suppression? Which of the two main parties is starting to push for allowing non citizens to vote in elections?

That is beside my point. My point was about the voter rolls. Being that in NV.. you can vote in person or by mail-in, the issues/realities that I laid come into play. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I thought that Trump should have chosen Rubio, DeSantis, or Cruz, just to keep gaining momentum with the hispanic voters. 

Vance is probably the smartest of the lot, but brilliance doesn't always equate to votes, or Biden would only have received 11 votes in 2020. 

In reality, it is YOU believing ^this which proves it is your intelligence which is lacking.

And also your believing that not being able to detect wet hair on a video means it didn't rain. Esp on very thin and lacquered hair. LMAO

[WestCanMan]

33 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Dates and date formats are the bane of any person that works with databases existence. It really gets messy when you have June 06, 2024 or 06 June, 2024. The text items have to be converted and if there is any hidden characters or programming (which there is in excel) then it scrambles it up and the puzzle begins. 

I used to love creating with Excel (not so much Numbers), I still use numbers once or twice a week, but I've never had to extract anything more than the data from one table. 

Back when I was using PC, I even used excel to edit photos sometimes, because the "remove one colour from a photo" feature wasn't in a lot of programs. 

47 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Voter ID is a contentious issue. To me it is perfectly reasonable to ask someone to present some form of acceptable ID in order to vote. Which of the two main parties is claiming that requiring ID is a form of voter suppression? Which of the two main parties is starting to push for allowing non citizens to vote in elections?

You need ID to buy cigs, booze, rent library books, drive, etc, but not to decide the fate of your democracy lol. 

[impartialobserver]

46 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I used to love creating with Excel (not so much Numbers), I still use numbers once or twice a week, but I've never had to extract anything more than the data from one table. 

Back when I was using PC, I even used excel to edit photos sometimes, because the "remove one colour from a photo" feature wasn't in a lot of programs.

Did not know that anyone used Excel for editing photos. Learn something new everyday. 

I do what's called a join (usually left_join) all of the time. Left simply means that the items that you are trying to match on are on the left side of the table. Dates are usually on the left. The usual pattern in government data sets is time, area, ownership (federal gov, state gov, local gov, or private), and industry or occupation. For something to join.. the format has to be exactly the same and the number of characters (visible or invisible) to be exactly the same. 

[gatomontes99]

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

What strikes me odd is that you believe those who want to "clean up" voter rolls will do it honestly when RepubliCONS have a LONG HISTORY of VOTER SUPPRESSION. "Secure election" means suppressing minority voters in many RepubliCON states.

We OFTEN hear misrepresentations about dead people voting from RepubliCONS when people vote early and then die before the vote is COUNTED. They will beat any dead horse to sow election distrust.

AKA, you are so naive and a rube to believe representations just because it's YOUR PARTY with an agenda which sounds good to you.

Ok, so exactly how does your fantasy world work?

There is no cheating but there are lots of bad ballots and states are to blame but Republican efforts to correct it are corrupt? Wtf?

Edited July 25, 2024 by gatomontes99

[WestCanMan]

27 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Did not know that anyone used Excel for editing photos. Learn something new everyday. 

There used to be a feature on it where you could click on a photo and it would turn everything that was one single colour invisible. Like the green-screen effect that they use in movies. 

If someone had a photo taken in front of a white wall, you could click on the wall in the photo and it would turn invisible, just leaving the person there. I used to use Corel Draw quite a bit, and even Corel didn't do that. 

Excel wasn't a replacement for photoshop or anything, but it comes in handy when you need that one thing done.

I haven't used excel for about 15 years now, so I don't know if it still even has that feature. 

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

That's because RepubliCONS have a long history of voter suppression, esp in the South. You are naive.

FYI the people who lynched "n1gg3rs" (that's a hard "r" sound at the end), used force to prevent them from going to polling stations, or stole their ballots after they were handed in, were Demonrats. 

The Demonrats were always the party of slavery and deprivation of the minority vote.

Even in recent history, Republicans were the party in favour of civil rights. In fact, THE CIVIL RIGHTS BILL, from 1964 or '67 or whatever it was, IS THE ONLY BILL IN THE HISTORY OF DEMOCRACY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHICH RECEIVED MORE SUPPORT FROM THE OPPOSITION PARTY THAN FROM THE PARTY WHICH TABLED THE BILL. It did that in both congress and the senate. 

Furthermore, the only party which has repeatedly been caught cheating on elections in recent years is the Dems. They even had the FBI committing crimes for them (COURT DOCUMENTED FACT). 

Naivete isn't even an excuse you for you, you're just a vile, lying piece of crap. 

Edited July 25, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Hodad]

17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

They even had the FBI committing crimes for them (COURT DOCUMENTED FACT). 

It's a "documented fact" that you're a pathological liar. 

Nowhere, in any court, nor anywhere else outside of your fictional narrative, does it say that Trump's FBI or Trump's DoJ did anything on behalf of Democrats. 🙄

[WestCanMan]

52 minutes ago, Hodad said:

It's a "documented fact" that you're a pathological liar. 

Nowhere, in any court, nor anywhere else outside of your fictional narrative, does it say that Trump's FBI or Trump's DoJ did anything on behalf of Democrats. 🙄

Sorry, stupid, here's the proof that I was talking about, right from your own cultist leaders, of the FBI's court-documented criminality: https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/29/politics/kevin-clinesmith-sentencing-durham/index.html

Quote

FBI lawyer from Russia investigation sentenced to probation for Carter Page FISA warrant false statement

It's weird that you'd choose to lie about something that's so easy to prove. 

The FBI's conduct was so egregious that a FISA court judge issued the following PUBLIC statement:

• "The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable," Judge Rosemary Collyer wrote in an order published Tuesday.

Not only did the FBI say things that were untrue, they had the evidence that it was untrue when they said it, that means that they lied. 100%. 

Not only did they lie, they withheld that evidence from the court, and then they lied. Over and over. They even signed off on those lies, and every time they did that, it was another crime. 

The FBI committed several crimes. Fact.

Rosemary Collyer said that the FBI's lies and crimes were so frequent that it casts a shroud of doubt over every other investigation the FBI has ever done. FYI that's bad. 

Here's the part of her quote that explains the "shroud of doubt" mentioned above:

• calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,

The FBI were found to be such frequent and serious liars during the collusion witch hunt that they lost ALL credibilty.

[Hodad]

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Sorry, stupid, here's the proof that I was talking about, right from your own cultist leaders, of the FBI's court-documented criminality: https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/29/politics/kevin-clinesmith-sentencing-durham/index.html

It's weird that you'd choose to lie about something that's so easy to prove. 

The FBI's conduct was so egregious that a FISA court judge issued the following PUBLIC statement:

• "The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable," Judge Rosemary Collyer wrote in an order published Tuesday.

Not only did the FBI say things that were untrue, they had the evidence that it was untrue when they said it, that means that they lied. 100%. 

Not only did they lie, they withheld that evidence from the court, and then they lied. Over and over. They even signed off on those lies, and every time they did that, it was another crime. 

The FBI committed several crimes. Fact.

Rosemary Collyer said that the FBI's lies and crimes were so frequent that it casts a shroud of doubt over every other investigation the FBI has ever done. FYI that's bad. 

Here's the part of her quote that explains the "shroud of doubt" mentioned above:

• calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,

The FBI were found to be such frequent and serious liars during the collusion witch hunt that they lost ALL credibilty.

Again, you degenerate farking liar. NOTHING there to indicate that Trump's FBI and Trump's DOJ did anything whatsoever at the behest of or on behalf of the Democrats. If you want to criticize the FBI or DOJ of the Trump administration, that's a conversation, but lying about some preposterous conspiracy is just stupid.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Again, you degenerate farking liar. NOTHING there to indicate that Trump's FBI and Trump's DOJ did anything whatsoever at the behest of or on behalf of the Democrats. If you want to criticize the FBI or DOJ of the Trump administration, that's a conversation, but lying about some preposterous conspiracy is just stupid.

If their actions support the democrat's - that's close enough and they did

[WestCanMan]

5 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Again, you degenerate farking liar. NOTHING there to indicate that Trump's FBI and Trump's DOJ did anything whatsoever at the behest of or on behalf of the Democrats. If you want to criticize the FBI or DOJ of the Trump administration, that's a conversation, but lying about some preposterous conspiracy is just stupid.

WTF do you mean by "there's nothing to indicate that the FBI DOJ did anything whatsoever at the behest of or on behalf of the Democrats"? Are you retarded?

Hey dipshit: The FBI and Dems had a "secure workspace" at Perkins Coie, and Hillary's lawyer had a key card to FBI HQ when all this was going down.  

Perkins Coie had received over $40M from the Dems, and that FBI office might have been there as long as ten years. 

The whole collusion farce was started by Hillary/Sussman (Perkins Coie lawyer) lies, which came from Russians, of all people, right in that "secure FBI workplace".

[CouchPotato]

4 hours ago, ironstone said:

Voter ID is a contentious issue. To me it is perfectly reasonable to ask someone to present some form of acceptable ID in order to vote.

Voter ID laws are racist!! Unless you are in Canada or any other modern democracy.

[impartialobserver]

It appears that the secretary of state is enacting a measure to clean up the voter registration database. While I applaud the effort.. it will not be enough to appease the conspiracy theorists. Besides, it is going to be costly. Hiring 3 or 4 folks would be pricey as well but then you would have ongoing maintenance and not just putting out fires

https://www.nevadaappeal.com/news/2024/jul/25/nevada-election-officials-carry-out-voter-roll-maintenance-ahead-of-november-election/

[Rebound]

On 7/24/2024 at 7:00 PM, gatomontes99 said:

It is unusual for a polling outfit to ask if likely voters are legal citizens. In its analysis, Rasmussen said that nationally, “more than five percent (5%) say they are not U.S. citizens and a little less than four percent (4%) are not sure if they’re citizens or not.” Added together, that 9% translates into nearly 14 million votes.

Time to start campaigning to illegal aliens. Republicans need a Spanish language ad on Telemundo that highlights how Democrats did nothing to stop them from being raped, their children being sold into slavery and their family members being indebted for life or killed.

 

So, dipshlt, that is not evidence of a single illegal vote.  
 

FACT CHECK: Gatomontes is a Big Fat Liar.

[gatomontes99]

6 minutes ago, Rebound said:

So, dipshlt, that is not evidence of a single illegal vote.  
 

FACT CHECK: Gatomontes is a Big Fat Liar.

Are you conflating evidence with proof? Why do you get so mad when evidence of illegal votes is presented? Do you want people to vote illegally so you get mad when it is found?

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

It appears that the secretary of state is enacting a measure to clean up the voter registration database. While I applaud the effort.. it will not be enough to appease the conspiracy theorists. Besides, it is going to be costly. Hiring 3 or 4 folks would be pricey as well but then you would have ongoing maintenance and not just putting out fires

https://www.nevadaappeal.com/news/2024/jul/25/nevada-election-officials-carry-out-voter-roll-maintenance-ahead-of-november-election/

Of course not - it's gone on too long, it's too hapazard and it's done here but not there etc. 

Clean it ALL up - make it a requirement to show federal voter id and be done with it.  Register to vote or don't vote. 

[Rebound]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Of course not - it's gone on too long, it's too hapazard and it's done here but not there etc. 

Clean it ALL up - make it a requirement to show federal voter id and be done with it.  Register to vote or don't vote. 

We’ll need that Federal ID to buy and register our guns too, right? How bout if we bring back literacy tests and poll taxes too?

Edited July 26, 2024 by Rebound

[impartialobserver]

14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Of course not - it's gone on too long, it's too hapazard and it's done here but not there etc. 

Clean it ALL up - make it a requirement to show federal voter id and be done with it.  Register to vote or don't vote. 

You neglect the reality of mail in voting which is legal and will be happening. Your approval of this reality is not necessary for it to exist. Hiring staff would be far more thorough than the current method being done. 

When you show up in person.. you have to show ID.

[CdnFox]

24 minutes ago, Rebound said:

We’ll need that Federal ID to buy and register our guns too, right?

Only if you're going to get into a shoot out at the election i guess.   (????) 

If you feel like making sense at some point I won't get mad at you for it. 

[CdnFox]

22 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

You neglect the reality of mail in voting which is legal and will be happening.

Hardly, we have mail in voting in canada too.  but you have to be registered and request a ballot, they don't just send you one. 

 

Quote

Your approval of this reality is not necessary for it to exist. Hiring staff would be far more thorough than the current method being done. 

Doesn't matter.  It's about the optics as much as the reaity.  Make it federal, make it apply to everyone, be done  with it. 

W

Quote

hen you show up in person.. you have to show ID.

Good start.