Get Ready for the Biggest Wave of Propaganda in the History of the World

[Five of swords]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Says the guy who's been literally wrong about everything   AND managed to provide sources that prove he was wrong, bonus points for that  

Also, 1)  - that WAS actually coherent, you're just not familiar with what 'coherent' looks like apparently  and 2)  That was a discussion with someone else.  You don't "Make an argument"  in a discussion, it's just a discussion. 

As it happens it was a discussion about how stupid you are and look!! You showed up to prove the point   well done   

The evidence for the holocaust far exceeds "beyond a reasonable doubt".   Sorry kiddo, your hero Hitler was a bad dude and killed a lot of people out of pure evil. 

Lol. Please. I have never seen you say anything that is even relevant. You have no reading comprehension and nothing you say matters or ever will matter. 

[Black Dog]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I know that's exactly what people think and it's exactly what the dems will have to sell. "TRUMP KNOWS THE PLAN, TRUMP SUPPORTS THE PLAN, TRUMP BASICALLY WROTE THE PLAN!!"

Then you're extremely dumb.

Quote

But as it becomes clear that he's barely even heard of it  then that goes out the window. Watch- the left media will become more and more desperate trying to sell this   Pretty soon it'lll be "the fact he doesn't know about the plan is proof he's going to do the plan"   

It wouldn't surprise anyone if Trump never heard about it, the guy is demented, he probably can't remember his own kid's names. But the point of the political attack is to tie it to Trump (easily done when you consider how many past and present members of his inner circle were involved in creating it and that his own VP pick has endorsed its ideas). An  dit's working.

Quote

 

It's hilarious how many of your arguments end in childish and desperate statements like this when you realize you were wrong yet again   

Anyway the big point is that trump getting shot has already strengthened his position and it will continue to do so over time. 

Which its the only reason you're insisting it won't. Denial is like a way of life for you  

 

Check the polls dude, the bullet bump is gone.

[CdnFox]

14 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Yup. I will keep doubling down on that. And your inability to understand that train stations would exist whether or not gas chambers existed is your own problem, not mine.

Kid the only thing you're 'doubling down' on is how stupid you look.   The only thing @User looks bad for in this conversation is that he's clearly picking on the re tarded kid   LOL

The holocaust happened, between 1.2 and 1.6 million people were killed, gas chambers existed and were used, and hilter was a violent scumbag who started ww2 

Now you go have your cookie and your nap. 

[Legato]

On 7/24/2024 at 4:15 PM, Five of swords said:

Wrong. Nothing wad 'implied' at all. I said quite directly that no forensics was allowed to be done on any bodies that would provide actual physical evidence that they are in fact jews who died at the correct time. Without that, you got nothing. Even if you find bodies there, you cannot claim they were jews...because no forensics will be done.

 

So your 'physical evidence' for thr holocaust remains at a big fat zero. No murder weapon, no body, and not even a motive because all the suggestions for a motive rely on nsdap high command using 'coded language'. So nothing. Just eyewitness accounts. And eyewitness accounts do not actually count as 'physical evidence.

 

Furthermore, you have the mystery that rabbis insist on not doing forensics and settling this case once and for all. Is it because they know the science won't go their way? It's an obvious question...

 

So you can just keep lying and strawmanning and I will just keep on pointing it out 

Methinks you read and thoroughly understand Occam's Razor.

[User]

33 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Yup. I will keep doubling down on that. And your inability to understand that train stations would exist whether or not gas chambers existed is your own problem, not mine.

That is not all I said. You keep ignoring the evidence. 

You tried to claim gas chambers did not exist, you then tried to claim what I showed you was not one, contradicting yourself, and then you didn't even read the source you provided trying to claim gas chambers did not exist. 

You have been a liar the whole way here and continue to be dishonest. 

[CdnFox]

28 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Then you're extremely dumb.

While i'd hate to disagree with someone who's got far more experience at being stupid than anyone else here, what i said was the absolute truth   But of course you can't prove otherwise so ... hissy fit 

Quote

It wouldn't surprise anyone if Trump never heard about it,

Well that's going to make it hard to sell the idea that he's fully committed to it   LOLOLOL

 Like... you can't even see how stupid you're being, you just charge right into the stupid... 

 

Quote

But the point of the political attack is to tie it to Trump (easily done when you consider how many past and present members of his inner circle were involved in creating it and that his own VP pick has endorsed its ideas).

You can't tie him to something he doesn't believe in.  People will just ignore it. 

Quote

Check the polls dude, the bullet bump is gone.

It's still there.  Harris is getting a 'new leader' bump right now but is still behind trump.  But the bullet benefit will keep coming back down the road for fundraising, getting the vote out, etc. It'll be an edge right up till voting day. 

Harris is going to be starting off from a difficult position. She is not a great candidate and certainly not the candidate that the democrats would have chosen had they had a choice. Unless they make her president she is going to have to find a way to deflect the conversation from her to trump and she ain't going to get there with project 2025

[WestCanMan]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

While i'd hate to disagree with someone who's got far more experience at being stupid than anyone else here, what i said was the absolute truth   But of course you can't prove otherwise so ... hissy fit 

Well that's going to make it hard to sell the idea that he's fully committed to it   LOLOLOL

 Like... you can't even see how stupid you're being, you just charge right into the stupid... 

 

You can't tie him to something he doesn't believe in.  People will just ignore it. 

It's still there.  Harris is getting a 'new leader' bump right now but is still behind trump.  But the bullet benefit will keep coming back down the road for fundraising, getting the vote out, etc. It'll be an edge right up till voting day. 

Harris is going to be starting off from a difficult position. She is not a great candidate and certainly not the candidate that the democrats would have chosen had they had a choice. Unless they make her president she is going to have to find a way to deflect the conversation from her to trump and she ain't going to get there with project 2025

You took that troll out behind the woodshed 🤣.

These guys are used to it though. They're masters of pigeon chess. 

[Black Dog]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

While i'd hate to disagree with someone who's got far more experience at being stupid than anyone else here, what i said was the absolute truth   But of course you can't prove otherwise so ... hissy fit 

Again, it's on you to prove that people think president's read every single policy document they get cover to cover before they are implemented since you made the claim.

Quote

Well that's going to make it hard to sell the idea that he's fully committed to it   LOLOLOL

 Like... you can't even see how stupid you're being, you just charge right into the stupid... 

Again not really, most people know Trump is quite stupid. It's a question of "will this brainless buffoon rubber stamp the policies this slimeball fascist think tank crafted for him to rubber stamp?"

Quote

You can't tie him to something he doesn't believe in.  People will just ignore it. 

Donald Trump is living proof you can get people to believe just about anything regardless of whether it's true. Now, do I think Trump has read Project 2025 or had anything to do with it's creation? No. Do I think he believes in what it says? Not really, he only believes in eating big Macs and getting pu$$y. But that doesn't matter at all.

Quote

It's still there.  Harris is getting a 'new leader' bump right now but is still behind trump. 

New polls have Harris ahead, worst case she's ahead of where Biden was. If there was a bump, it didn't open any sort of gap.

Quote

But the bullet benefit will keep coming back down the road for fundraising, getting the vote out, etc. It'll be an edge right up till voting day. 

Bet's still on the table. choose your method.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Again, it's on you to prove that people think president's read every single policy document they get cover to cover before they are implemented since you made the claim.

No, i've never made that claim.  So it would not be on me at all  

Go back and look.  You always to this  you lie about what people have said. 

 

Quote

Again not really, most people know Trump is quite stupid. It's a question of "will this brainless buffoon rubber stamp the policies this slimeball fascist think tank crafted for him to rubber stamp?"

No, sorry. Donald Trump is living proof you can get people to believe just about anything regardless of whether it's true. of gap.

Quote

 Now, do I think Trump has read Project 2025 or had anything to do with it's creation? No. Do I think he believes in what it says? Not really, he only believes in eating big Macs and getting pu$$y. But that doesn't matter at all. 

Kid - nobody is going to think he read it, and nobody is going to think it's his plan. Only die hards who would never vote for him and will believe ANYTHING bad said about him will bobble their heads up and down, but that's not who matters this election. 

SO what that means is that it's not going to be sticky. So if harris thinks she can deflect the conversation away from herself with that....  that's probably not a winning strategy. 

It might not be her strategy moving forward, she's only had a few days to think of how to deal with trump and she might get expert advice that helps her pick a better attack angle.  But so  far it's what she's played and it's not a winning strategy at all. 

[Black Dog]

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No, i've never made that claim.  So it would not be on me at all  

Go back and look.  You always to this  you lie about what people have said. 

See, you're lying again. You just don't seem to understand people can look this stuff up.

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

 Do you think people believe Presidents read each an every single policy document in depth before he approves it, let alone Trump, a guy who doesn't read anything he's given?

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

I know that's exactly what people think and it's exactly what the dems will have to sell. "TRUMP KNOWS THE PLAN, TRUMP SUPPORTS THE PLAN, TRUMP BASICALLY WROTE THE PLAN!!"

 

Quote

No, sorry. Donald Trump is living proof you can get people to believe just about anything regardless of whether it's true. of gap.

Oof you're choking so hard you've been rendered incoherent.

Quote

Kid - nobody is going to think he read it, and nobody is going to think it's his plan.

Again, it doesn't matter if people think he read it or not, are you simply illiterate too?

Quote

Only die hards who would never vote for him and will believe ANYTHING bad said about him will bobble their heads up and down, but that's not who matters this election. 

I encourage you and the GOP to maintain this self-delusion.

[CdnFox]

Just now, Black Dog said:

See, you're lying again. You just don't seem to understand people can look this stuff up.

Well why don't you make it easy for them and post it. 

Oh you can't, i never said that  

It's 24 7 with you - you just make shit up and claim people said it. 

 

Quote

Oof you're choking so hard you've been rendered incoherent.

I guess that's your way of saying i'm right and you have no rebuttal but you hate it.   

 

Quote

Again, it doesn't matter if people think he read it or not, are you simply illiterate too?

Totally does. If you're trying to sell the idea that it's trump's personal plan and ambition, you have to convince people he at least knows what it is. 

Quote

I encourage you and the GOP to maintain this self-delusion.

LOL -  only a dem would call simple truth 'self delusion'    See you on polling day Jr.   

[Black Dog]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well why don't you make it easy for them and post it. 

Oh you can't, i never said that  

It's 24 7 with you - you just make shit up and claim people said it. 

I literally just did in the post you're quoting. Retarded or blind, which are you?

Quote

I guess that's your way of saying i'm right and you have no rebuttal but you hate it.   

No seriously wtf does this mean:

Quote

 

No, sorry. Donald Trump is living proof you can get people to believe just about anything regardless of whether it's true. of gap.

 

Quote

Totally does. If you're trying to sell the idea that it's trump's personal plan and ambition, you have to convince people he at least knows what it is. 

Definitely not worried.

Quote

 

A few weeks ago, the Republican nominee published an odd item to his social media platform claiming to “know nothing” about Project 2025. He went on to claim he has “no idea who is behind it,” he disagrees with some of its provisions, and he has “nothing to do with” the initiative.

Democrats were delighted: Trump’s denial helped bring attention to the Project 2025 plan, which is exactly what the party was hoping for. The former president nevertheless issued a similar statement a week later, which again helped to push the radical blueprint into the national spotlight.

At a rally in Michigan this past weekend, the GOP candidate not only tried to distance himself from Project 2025, he also described its authors as part of the “severe right,” adding that some of the agenda’s provisions are “seriously extreme.” Trump reiterated his position online again yesterday.

[sharkman]

Okay, back to the idea of a wave of propaganda. 

 

It's been two weeks now since Trump was shot.  To those who can think critically, can you remember the progression of the propaganda reporting on this event?  There were liberal/dem MSM organizations reporting that loud noises were heard at a Trump rally and Trump was removed.  I kid you not.  Then similar types of rags were stating that he was probably hit with a piece of the teleprompter, not a bullet.  And on and on it's gone.  Very little scrutiny for some parts of the event, and of course some of these got into trouble for wishing the bullets had found success.

Now I hear that certain organizations have been quietly offering money to people who took pics or video at the event, media that showed what happened to Trump at the rally.  They are buying the rights to these pics and videos, and then slapping copyright infringement to people retweeting them or posting them anywhere in the digital world.  People are getting their videos on youtube taken down, and a strike issued to them for containing any of this content.  No warnings given. 

If the truth doesn't suit their purposes, they are buying it and burying it.

[Michael Hardner]

6 hours ago, sharkman said:

Okay, back to the idea of a wave of propaganda. 

 

It's been two weeks now since Trump was shot.  To those who can think critically, can you remember the progression of the propaganda reporting on this event?  There were liberal/dem MSM organizations reporting that loud noises were heard at a Trump rally and Trump was removed.  I kid you not.  Then similar types of rags were stating that he was probably hit with a piece of the teleprompter, not a bullet.  And on and on it's gone.  Very little scrutiny for some parts of the event, and of course some of these got into trouble for wishing the bullets had found success.

Now I hear that certain organizations have been quietly offering money to people who took pics or video at the event, media that showed what happened to Trump at the rally.  They are buying the rights to these pics and videos, and then slapping copyright infringement to people retweeting them or posting them anywhere in the digital world.  People are getting their videos on youtube taken down, and a strike issued to them for containing any of this content.  No warnings given. 

If the truth doesn't suit their purposes, they are buying it and burying it.

So?  What's behind it? Is it a conspiracy? 

The idea that somebody initially reported there were shots and Trump was taken away.. seems pretty consistent that the video I've seen. 

If you already think everything's under some kind of Master control, then of course this will all seem suspicious. 

 

[WestCanMan]

6 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

So?  What's behind it? Is it a conspiracy? 

The idea that somebody initially reported there were shots and Trump was taken away.. seems pretty consistent that the video I've seen. 

If you already think everything's under some kind of Master control, then of course this will all seem suspicious. 

 

TBH, there are good enough reasons for buying and burying footage.

Maybe there are undercover secret service members in the crowd behind the president, and the SS doesn't want them to be outed by showing footage of how they reacted at that moment. Maybe they don't want video of their exit strategy to be studied. Maybe they don't want hi-def footage of all the faces of all their SS members on youtube. 

There's plenty of footage out there showing just how pathetic their coverage of that event was. They basically rolled out the red carpet for snipers. I doubt that there's anything left to hide. 

[sharkman]

27 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

So?  What's behind it? Is it a conspiracy? 

The idea that somebody initially reported there were shots and Trump was taken away.. seems pretty consistent that the video I've seen. 

If you already think everything's under some kind of Master control, then of course this will all seem suspicious. 

 

No, that’s not what I am referring to.  I saw 2 reports of loud noises at a Trump rally.  Not shots.  Loud noises.  They wouldn’t even report shots fired, though it was all over the internet immediately.

This is a thread about bad MSM reporting, so I thought this would be the thread to post it in.  

[WestCanMan]

6 hours ago, sharkman said:

Okay, back to the idea of a wave of propaganda. It's been two weeks now since Trump was shot.  To those who can think critically, can you remember the progression of the propaganda reporting on this event?  There were liberal/dem MSM organizations reporting that loud noises were heard at a Trump rally and Trump was removed.  I kid you not. 

That's like the "60-pedestrian car crash" at Waukesha. 

Quote

Then similar types of rags were stating that he was probably hit with a piece of the teleprompter, not a bullet. 

Chrissy said it was teleprompter glass on this forum just a couple of days ago.

Quote

Now I hear that certain organizations have been quietly offering money to people who took pics or video at the event, media that showed what happened to Trump at the rally.  They are buying the rights to these pics and videos, and then slapping copyright infringement to people retweeting them or posting them anywhere in the digital world.  People are getting their videos on youtube taken down, and a strike issued to them for containing any of this content.  No warnings given. 

If the truth doesn't suit their purposes, they are buying it and burying it.

The only footage that I'd be particularly interested in in video of how that guy got on the roofs with all the cops around there. It seems pretty far-fetched.

If you saw a movie about an assassination attempt, and in the movie a shooter managed to get on that building, which was so close and basically the main thing worth worrying about there, you'd reject it as BS and stop watching. 

 

Secret Service Agent 1: "There's a bell tower right across the street. Do you think a sniper might go up in there to shoot at the president?"

Secret Service Leader: "Nah. Probably not. It's too cliche. Just practice holstering your guns. Some of you suck at it." 

[WestCanMan]

On 7/26/2024 at 10:05 AM, Black Dog said:

the bullet bump is gone.

You're a vile piece of crap. 

[gatomontes99]

Is this the propaganda you predicted?

https://rumble.com/v59339x-jd-vance-makes-dems-regret-calling-him-weird-drops-bada-response-to-kamala-.html

 

[WestCanMan]

On 7/26/2024 at 8:30 AM, CdnFox said:

Says the guy who's been literally wrong about everything   AND managed to provide sources that prove he was wrong, bonus points for that  

I love it when the leftards hoist themselves on their own petard. Classic.

[CdnFox]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

I love it when the leftards hoist themselves on their own petard. Classic.

And it's so frequent!  That's like the 4th  one that's posted something that absolutely proves they're in the wrong. If they'd read a little before actually posting that stuff...  and they wonder why people don't respect their opinion!

[WestCanMan]

15 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And it's so frequent!  That's like the 4th  one that's posted something that absolutely proves they're in the wrong. If they'd read a little before actually posting that stuff...  and they wonder why people don't respect their opinion!

It's like when Hodad says: "The vaccines work! Look at this cite! It shows that the deaths are only up by 24% because there are so many extra infections now that everyone's vaxed!  "

[Hodad]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's like when Hodad says: "The vaccines work! Look at this cite! It shows that the deaths are only up by 24% because there are so many extra infections now that everyone's vaxed!  "

The fact that you keep bringing this up is hilarious. It's like you can't help but remind people of how dim you are. 

You needn't go to the trouble. Trust me, nobody needs reminding. 

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Hodad said:

The fact that you keep bringing this up is hilarious. It's like you can't help but remind people of how dim you are. 

You needn't go to the trouble. Trust me, nobody needs reminding. 

Awwww, poor little Hodad. Do you want another crack at that one?

Do you have a new excuse for deaths going up by 30% after 86% of the population is jabbed? And for hospitalizations tripling? And for the fact that more multi-vaxed Candians died in 2022 than the total number of Candians that died in 2020 or 2021?

You gotta admit that your "Lower CFR but several times as many more infections = VAX SUCCESS!!" story was a flop. 

[Hodad]

20 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Awwww, poor little Hodad. Do you want another crack at that one?

Do you have a new excuse for deaths going up by 30% after 86% of the population is jabbed? And for hospitalizations tripling? And for the fact that more multi-vaxed Candians died in 2022 than the total number of Candians that died in 2020 or 2021?

You gotta admit that your "Lower CFR but several times as many more infections = VAX SUCCESS!!" story was a flop. 

No, not really. If you were incapable of understanding the relationship between rates and raw numbers the first 20 times, you're not likely to understand it the 21st time.