West Posted Monday at 03:15 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 03:15 PM https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-immunity-case-supreme-court-rules-ex-presidents-substantial-protection-prosecution This isn't good as Joe has been committing many human rights violations while President Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannuck Posted Monday at 03:32 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 03:32 PM (edited) If Presidents or other cabinet members could be held accountable legally for their decisions, the whole business of government would fall apart. Think about Pearl Harbour, for instance: should Roosevelt have been charged with lying to the public and death of 3500 or so in the attack? (worth remembering that US could and DID translate almost every encoded transmission by the Japanese Navy for many months before Dec 42), For that matter decisions by other Presidents to send troops into Vietnam where the US had no real business in being there? I would love to see the entire cabinet accountable for the incredible level of greed and criminality involved in the whole system of money coming and going via favour and privilege granted by government, and think that SHOULD be done, but hard to draw the line on where doing things by cabinet decree becomes criminal vs. expedient politics. Above all else: the US Constitution was upheld, and that is very much the duty of the SCOTUS to support. Wish we actually had such a piece of legislation. Edited Monday at 03:37 PM by cannuck 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted Monday at 03:45 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 03:45 PM 27 minutes ago, West said: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-immunity-case-supreme-court-rules-ex-presidents-substantial-protection-prosecution Immunity ONLY for official acts. Unofficial PRIVATE acts have NO IMMUNITY. Campaign acts for which Trump is charged, are PRIVATE. 27 minutes ago, West said: This isn't good as Joe has been committing many human rights violations while President ^Your amateur OPINION means NOTHING in court. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 03:47 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 03:47 PM The left loses their sh1t today. The Jack Smith trial re:J6 is effectively over. Now, we just need some reasonable court to throw out the b.s. lawsuit in NY and the b.s. conviction in NY and we are back to a democratic republic again. For now, tyranny lives. But it's taken a severe blow. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted Monday at 03:54 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 03:54 PM 5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: The left loses their sh1t today. The Jack Smith trial re:J6 is effectively over. Now, we just need some reasonable court to throw out the b.s. lawsuit in NY and the b.s. conviction in NY and we are back to a democratic republic again. For now, tyranny lives. But it's taken a severe blow. It RIDICULOUS that you believe attempting to overthrow an election is NOT tyranny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted Monday at 03:54 PM Author Report Share Posted Monday at 03:54 PM 8 minutes ago, robosmith said: Immunity ONLY for official acts. Unofficial PRIVATE acts have NO IMMUNITY. Campaign acts for which Trump is charged, are PRIVATE. ^Your amateur OPINION means NOTHING in court. Donnie declassified the docs. Jack Smith is illegitimate as he wasn't approved by congress therefore he's probably gonna end up in jail 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legato Posted Monday at 03:55 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 03:55 PM 7 minutes ago, robosmith said: Immunity ONLY for official acts. Unofficial PRIVATE acts have NO IMMUNITY. Campaign acts for which Trump is charged, are PRIVATE. ^Your amateur OPINION means NOTHING in court. It's not a good idea to take onions into court, also minions only appear in movies. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legato Posted Monday at 03:57 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 03:57 PM 2 minutes ago, West said: Donnie declassified the docs. Jack Smith is illegitimate as he wasn't approved by congress therefore he's probably gonna end up in jail Jack Smith is just another low life criminal from a Dickens novel. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted Monday at 04:05 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:05 PM 10 minutes ago, West said: Donnie declassified the docs. Jack Smith is illegitimate as he wasn't approved by congress therefore he's probably gonna end up in jail Of course you have ZERO EVIDENCE for ^this BULLSHIT, as USUAL. 10 minutes ago, Legato said: It's not a good idea to take onions into court, also minions only appear in movies. Same as ^TROLLS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legato Posted Monday at 04:08 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:08 PM 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Of course you have ZERO EVIDENCE for ^this BULLSHIT, as USUAL. Same as ^TROLLS. Troll hide all the onions to keep them out of court. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted Monday at 04:12 PM Author Report Share Posted Monday at 04:12 PM (edited) 18 minutes ago, robosmith said: Of course you have ZERO EVIDENCE for ^this BULLSHIT, as USUAL. Same as ^TROLLS. You are melting down today there bot boy. Maybe it's time to update your programming? Thomas wrote: "If this unprecedented prosecution is to proceed, it must be conducted by someone authorized to do so by the American people." Edited Monday at 04:23 PM by West 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted Monday at 04:36 PM Author Report Share Posted Monday at 04:36 PM Biden's Hitler Youth are now calling on him to assassinate Donnie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 04:37 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:37 PM 42 minutes ago, robosmith said: It RIDICULOUS that you believe attempting to overthrow an election is NOT tyranny. It's ridiculous that you believe that anyone tried to over turn the election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted Monday at 04:57 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:57 PM 1 hour ago, robosmith said: It RIDICULOUS that you believe attempting to overthrow an election is NOT tyranny. Who tried to overthrow the election? Trump no more tried to overthrow the election than Gore did and you supported. You STILL think what happened to Gore was not legitimate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted Monday at 04:59 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 04:59 PM (edited) 55 minutes ago, robosmith said: Of course you have ZERO EVIDENCE for ^this BULLSHIT, as USUAL. Same as ^TROLLS. Lol...OOPS...There goes the other shoe. Now what Libbies? We now know that should any cases against Trump get to the SCOTUS, they will die at the SCOTUS. LOL! Ahhh...you tried and tried. You broke laws...you lied...you cheated...you even declared war on half your own nation...and for what? Sweet Fck All! That's what. Enjoy the election... Edited Monday at 05:00 PM by Nationalist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffypants Posted Monday at 05:55 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 05:55 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, West said: Biden's Hitler Youth are now calling on him to assassinate Donnie That dude is worse than Robo, but of course he is paid to be by the Biden campaign. He probably got his how to spin training from Raggedy Ann. Edited Monday at 07:04 PM by Fluffypants Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverFever Posted Monday at 07:13 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 07:13 PM 3 hours ago, West said: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-immunity-case-supreme-court-rules-ex-presidents-substantial-protection-prosecution This isn't good as Joe has been committing many human rights violations while President Trump is publicly celebrating the ruling as it limits his exposure in some of the criminal cases against him. It’s also on the Republican wish list as they have an extensive agenda to execute if Trump is elected, much of which might otherwise be criminal I hop republicans realize this ruling means Biden can now simply order the military to assassinate Trump and would have full immunity since that would be an official act and therefore immune from prosecution? The USSC under republican domination has simply become a partisan machine-gun of MAGA “project 2025” wish list items Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 07:19 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 07:19 PM 2 hours ago, West said: Biden's Hitler Youth are now calling on him to assassinate Donnie Oh hell no. You don't say this about a sitting or ex-president. This should lead to charges. It is way to close to calling for Trump to be assassinated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted Monday at 07:33 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 07:33 PM 18 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: I hop republicans realize this ruling means Biden can now simply order the military to assassinate Trump and would have full immunity since that would be an official act and therefore immune from prosecution? Yet again, you are a victim of your own purposeful ignorance. Read the ruling. Nowhere did any of it allow for the President to order the military to assassinate someone... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted Monday at 07:34 PM Author Report Share Posted Monday at 07:34 PM 20 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: Trump is publicly celebrating the ruling as it limits his exposure in some of the criminal cases against him. It’s also on the Republican wish list as they have an extensive agenda to execute if Trump is elected, much of which might otherwise be criminal I hop republicans realize this ruling means Biden can now simply order the military to assassinate Trump and would have full immunity since that would be an official act and therefore immune from prosecution? The USSC under republican domination has simply become a partisan machine-gun of MAGA “project 2025” wish list items No a sitting president cannot just order the assassination of a US citizen 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted Monday at 07:46 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 07:46 PM With no law capable of constraining the executive, the last barrier to dictatorship has fallen, along with all of John Roberts hopes for legacy. Instead, should the country survive to remember, this court will live in infamy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffypants Posted Monday at 08:17 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 08:17 PM 23 minutes ago, Hodad said: With no law capable of constraining the executive, the last barrier to dictatorship has fallen, along with all of John Roberts hopes for legacy. Instead, should the country survive to remember, this court will live in infamy. They haven't put limits in yet, all these things will come before the court and the court will decide whether they are immune or not. Not that you can just do whatever you want. All they are saying that there has to be some level of immunity or every election the former President would be brought up on charges. This has never been brought up by the courts but this is the first time you had a current administration going after a former President legally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted Monday at 08:32 PM Author Report Share Posted Monday at 08:32 PM 13 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: They haven't put limits in yet, all these things will come before the court and the court will decide whether they are immune or not. Not that you can just do whatever you want. All they are saying that there has to be some level of immunity or every election the former President would be brought up on charges. This has never been brought up by the courts but this is the first time you had a current administration going after a former President legally. I would imagine the democrats insider trading is illegal, as is the illegitimate Jack Smith investigation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 08:37 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 08:37 PM 49 minutes ago, Hodad said: With no law capable of constraining the executive, the last barrier to dictatorship has fallen, along with all of John Roberts hopes for legacy. Instead, should the country survive to remember, this court will live in infamy. Oh bullspit. First, There still is and always has been checks and balances. Second, impeachment is a thing. Third, stop being such a baby. Just stop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legato Posted Monday at 08:42 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 08:42 PM 54 minutes ago, Hodad said: With no law capable of constraining the executive, the last barrier to dictatorship has fallen, along with all of John Roberts hopes for legacy. Instead, should the country survive to remember, this court will live in infamy. I see you've quit being a fish monger to become a fear monger. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.