AOC Calling For Violence

[gatomontes99]

Speaks for herself. She trying to cause violence.

 

Edited June 25, 2024 by gatomontes99

[Deluge]

AOC is desperate for a visit from her dear friends, the illegal aliens. 

[ironstone]

Didn't Trump draw a bigger crowd in the Bronx?

 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Speaks for herself. She trying to cause violence.

 

Speaks for yourself: ^it's called LYING.

[gatomontes99]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Speaks for yourself: ^it's called LYING.

Erratic, aggressive movement. She called for them to fight. She said she wanted to take back the borro, state and country and she wanted to fight for it.

How is that not an intent to incite violence but saying people should march peacefully and patriotically was a clear call to take over the government?

BTW, I thought yall said it was a racist dog whistle to say you want to take back your country? Is that not true any more?

[robosmith]

11 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Erratic, aggressive movement. She called for them to fight. She said she wanted to take back the borro, state and country and she wanted to fight for it.

Here's what you posted:

Quote

 

We rallied 1200 people in the Bronx to take on dark money, get fired up, and send busloads of volunteers to canvass and phone bank. It’s called organizing. And it’s fun as hell.

Nothing about  violence.

 

11 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

How is that not an intent to incite violence but saying people should march peacefully and patriotically was a clear call to take over the government?

Trump's DOUBLE TALK has fooled you. 

He's promising the pardon them and that means they did exactly what he wanted.

11 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

BTW, I thought yall said it was a racist dog whistle to say you want to take back your country? Is that not true any more?

Not what Trump said: "Fight like hell And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," he said.

It makes a difference when HE'S talking to an armed mob wearing body armor and sending them to the Capitol to "stop the steal" on the exact day they are certifying the EC vote count.

Only an lDIOT can't understand what that means. See Mitch McConnell: 

Quote

In a speech after that vote, McConnell said “there is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day,” and that “a mob was assaulting the Capitol in his name. These criminals were carrying his banners, hanging his flags, and screaming their loyalty to him.”

 

[gatomontes99]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Here's what you posted:

Nothing about  violence.

 

Trump's DOUBLE TALK has fooled you. 

He's promising the pardon them and that means they did exactly what he wanted.

Not what Trump said: "Fight like hell And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," he said.

It makes a difference when HE'S talking to an armed mob wearing body armor and sending them to the Capitol to "stop the steal" on the exact day they are certifying the EC vote count.

Only an lDIOT can't understand what that means. See Mitch McConnell: 

 

Lmao...oh the twisting you do to tell me a duck is not a duck.

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lmao...oh the twisting you do to tell me a duck is not a duck.

Your duck is not quoted in your post.

[gatomontes99]

14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your duck is not quoted in your post.

Yes it is. You should read about your word of the day yesterday, cognitive dissonance. You've displayed classic signs of denial every day since I've joined.

[Matthew]

Fighting against someone's "influence in our politics" is not a call to violence.

Edited June 25, 2024 by Matthew

[Nationalist]

6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Speaks for herself. She trying to cause violence.

 

She wants violence...I say give it to the little sh1t.

[West]

4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Erratic, aggressive movement. She called for them to fight. She said she wanted to take back the borro, state and country and she wanted to fight for it.

How is that not an intent to incite violence but saying people should march peacefully and patriotically was a clear call to take over the government?

BTW, I thought yall said it was a racist dog whistle to say you want to take back your country? Is that not true any more?

Wow. She did incite violence. 

[User]

9 minutes ago, Matthew said:

Fighting against someone's "influence in our politics" is not a call to violence.

It is mocking the lefts claims that Trump was inciting violence because he used similar figures of speech, like she did here. 

 

[impartialobserver]

This is too funny... When politicians use the word, "fight", rarely do they mean armed combat or fist of cuffs. It equates to impassioned, purposeful action against someone or something. That action could be words, court cases, legislation, protesting, etc. 

[Legato]

1 minute ago, impartialobserver said:

This is too funny... When politicians use the word, "fight", rarely do they mean armed combat or fist of cuffs. It equates to impassioned, purposeful action against someone or something. That action could be words, court cases, legislation, protesting, etc. 

Except if your name's Trump. Ask our resident robot and those who occupy the same bubble.

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

Except if your name's Trump. Ask our resident robot and those who occupy the same bubble.

Trump said the same thing and it meant  the same thing. Just because a relatively few nutcases took it a bit too far does not mean that he was explicitly calling for armed, violent revolution. 

[User]

28 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

This is too funny... When politicians use the word, "fight", rarely do they mean armed combat or fist of cuffs. It equates to impassioned, purposeful action against someone or something. That action could be words, court cases, legislation, protesting, etc. 

I don’t recall if I’ve been in a discussion with you on this before, so you also agree Trumps speech on January 6th wasn’t any call to violence? 

[gatomontes99]

IT didn't work. No violence and Jamaal Bowman went down in flames.

[Matthew]

3 hours ago, User said:

It is mocking the lefts claims that Trump was inciting violence because he used similar figures of speech, like she did here.

That's fair. A lot of faux battle rhetoric like that is used in politics and should not be assumed to be calls for violence.

Context-wise comparing to Trump,  combine that "take back the country" line with directions to a crowd to walk to the capital and to not show weakness, followed by hours of refusal to condemn the subsequent violence and murder, and then I'm honestly not sure whether Trump was being figurative  or not. Apparently trumps fans that day must have been a little fuzzy on the matter as well.

[CdnFox]

11 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Speaks for herself. She trying to cause violence.

 

AOC acting crazy and supporting violence is news is the same way that the sun rising in the east is news

Edited June 26, 2024 by CdnFox

[User]

1 hour ago, Matthew said:

That's fair. A lot of faux battle rhetoric like that is used in politics and should not be assumed to be calls for violence.

Context-wise comparing to Trump,  combine that "take back the country" line with directions to a crowd to walk to the capital and to not show weakness, followed by hours of refusal to condemn the subsequent violence and murder, and then I'm honestly not sure whether Trump was being figurative  or not. Apparently trumps fans that day must have been a little fuzzy on the matter as well.

She literally said the same thing. "ARE YOU READY TO TAKE THIS (sounds like burrow) BACK?!"

Trump literally told them go march peacefully. There is no question what he was saying and that is exactly what the vast majority of folks did. 

There was no murder and he did tell folks to be peaceful several times during the subsequent violence. 

The worst offenders that day had come prepared and planning for violence, so no, it was not any incitement from his speech that caused that. 

[Hodad]

7 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

Trump said the same thing and it meant  the same thing. Just because a relatively few nutcases took it a bit too far does not mean that he was explicitly calling for armed, violent revolution. 

No, he took it several steps further. He told them where to go: the Capitol. He told them when to go: right now. He told them that they had won the election, but that it was being stolen at the Capitol right now. He told them they can't take back their country through weakness, but only through strength. He told them they had to fight had to fight 23 times, and fight like hell to "stop the steal" (at the Capitol, right now) it they wouldn't have a country anymore. 

He lied to them for months about a stolen election, and then on Jan 6 he spent an hour spinning them up into an existential crisis. And damn if those looks didn't take the bait and try with all their urgency to stop what he told them they must stop in order to preserve the nation. 

The fig leaf is that at the beginning he used the word "peaceful" a single time. But people had rather forgotten that after an hour of provocation. 

They heard what he wanted them to hear..

[Nationalist]

Lol...ok sooo...

The Token male Squad Tweenkie got ousted by Latimer. Poor Bowman.

And poor Tweenkette AOC. She wanted to "fight" but what she got was a bloody nose and the loss of her token male.

Meh...at least the fire alarms are safe in the Capital.

[impartialobserver]

15 hours ago, User said:

I don’t recall if I’ve been in a discussion with you on this before, so you also agree Trumps speech on January 6th wasn’t any call to violence? 

not explicitly it was not. Now was he upset that some took it too far.. not one bit. 

[User]

2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

not explicitly it was not. Now was he upset that some took it too far.. not one bit. 

Based on what?

His public comments after indicate otherwise. 

“The demonstrators who infiltrated the Capitol have defiled the seat of American democracy,” he said. “To those that engage in the acts of violence and disruption, you do not represent our country. To those that broke the law, you will pay.”

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/07/politics/trump-biden-us-capitol-electoral-college-insurrection/index.html