ironstone Posted July 9 Report Posted July 9 2 Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
WestCanMan Posted July 10 Author Report Posted July 10 (edited) On 7/8/2024 at 4:04 PM, gatomontes99 said: Oh no. They said he was as fit as ever. That was in March. Joe didn't suddenly fall of a cliff. We've seen the decline since 2020. Scarborough lied. He flat lied. And you still believe people like him. People that knew better. And you post things like you did above under the air that you are better. The reality is, you are far worse. 👍 ***Vermont Primary was MARCH 5 2024, almost exactly 4 months ago*** So he was the best Biden ever in March 2024, and by Jun 28 he was no longer fit to run again. Less than 4 months to go from hero to zero 🤣 Leftard cultists are the biggest joke in the history of politics. Edited July 10 by WestCanMan Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
WestCanMan Posted July 10 Author Report Posted July 10 1 1 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
WestCanMan Posted July 10 Author Report Posted July 10 What's the best thing about being Joe Biden? Waking up every day and finding out that you're the president. 2 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
impartialobserver Posted July 10 Report Posted July 10 On 7/9/2024 at 8:57 AM, impartialobserver said: Average home price in my neck of the woods.. $525k. So $750 mortgage is a bit unrealistic but still its funny. Quote
Fluffypants Posted July 10 Report Posted July 10 15 hours ago, WestCanMan said: What's the best thing about being Joe Biden? Waking up every day and finding out that you're the president. I would think it was just waking up without suffering through CPR and a defib. 1 Quote
Fluffypants Posted July 10 Report Posted July 10 15 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Joe Scarborough is either the biggest political sell out ever or woke leftism is a STD. He was buddies with Trump and a Republican until he started cheating on his wife with Mica and suddenly he hates Trump, loves Biden and takes every Democrat position. 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted July 10 Author Report Posted July 10 40 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: woke leftism is a STD. And they only get it from being cuckolded. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
impartialobserver Posted July 10 Report Posted July 10 for those of us who live out West.. this should be our hero from May to late Sept. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted July 10 Report Posted July 10 18 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: for those of us who live out West.. this should be our hero from May to late Sept. He's so cooool.... 2 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted July 11 Report Posted July 11 3 hours ago, Legato said: For real though, I can get on board with 66. 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted July 12 Author Report Posted July 12 1 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
WestCanMan Posted July 12 Author Report Posted July 12 (edited) Zelenski at Palm Beach. Edited July 12 by WestCanMan 1 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
impartialobserver Posted July 12 Report Posted July 12 2 hours ago, impartialobserver said: Patience is on low today. Had to explain to a certain politician today the difference between preliminary and final data. going to need a drink tonight Quote
WestCanMan Posted July 12 Author Report Posted July 12 34 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: Patience is on low today. Had to explain to a certain politician today the difference between preliminary and final data. going to need a drink tonight TBH, I think everyone would have an understanding of what's implied by that, but I'd also ask about what's specifically meant by each of those terms, and even how they apply to different topics. "Preliminary data" might be worth citing in some instances (9 of 11 counties for 10/12 months), where in others it's not (the 2 major urban centres aren't included in that data, nor the worst months of flu season or car crash season). Sometimes even "final data" is not worth citing. Eg, when the FBI's "percent of terrorist incidents by population demographic" includes graffiti on synagogues alongside things like 9/11 and the Boston bombing. I'd definitely ask the question that politician asked. You know that 76.2% of all stats are intentionally misleading or made up, right? Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
impartialobserver Posted July 12 Report Posted July 12 (edited) 10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: TBH, I think everyone would have an understanding of what's implied by that, but I'd also ask about what's specifically meant by each of those terms, and even how they apply to different topics. "Preliminary data" might be worth citing in some instances (9 of 11 counties for 10/12 months), where in others it's not (the 2 major urban centres aren't included in that data, nor the worst months of flu season or car crash season). Sometimes even "final data" is not worth citing. Eg, when the FBI's "percent of terrorist incidents by population demographic" includes graffiti on synagogues alongside things like 9/11 and the Boston bombing. I'd definitely ask the question that politician asked. You know that 76.2% of all stats are intentionally misleading or made up, right? In short, they want 3 values that we produce; unemployment rate, total nonfarm jobs, and average weekly wage. Each data set (LAUS(unemployment rates), CES (jobs number). and QCEW (employment by industry) respectively ) has preliminary and final values. For example.. July 12, 2024.. the preliminary LAUS values for June 2024 come out. Alongside that, may 2024 final values come out. In the politician's case, he wanted to know the LAUS data for May 2024 (which is now final). It changed.. may 2024 prelim data is not the same as may 2024 final data. The reason for the different numbers is unemployment insurance claims data that takes time to come about. He asked why they were different.. and I explained it much the same way as I am doing now. The response was, "So you are fudging the numbers.. change it to make things look better". I am not going to transcribe the rest of his comments but in short, it became clear that he did not know the difference between preliminary and final. Edited July 12 by impartialobserver 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted July 12 Author Report Posted July 12 (edited) 1 hour ago, impartialobserver said: The response was, "So you are fudging the numbers.. change it to make things look better". TBH, the numbers cited for unemployment stats are often 'intentionally misleading', which isn't to say that you put them out that way. It's just how people choose to share (or not share) all the data they get. Classic examples of a gov't's fudged unemployment numbers are just stating 'jobs', and leaving people to assume that they're all full-time jobs when they're mainly part-time, or adding a massive number of gov't jobs pre-election. In Biden's case, that meant pretending that bounce-back jobs, after the economy re-opened, were new jobs. Quote I am not going to transcribe the rest of his comments but in short, it became clear that he did not know the difference between preliminary and final. If I had to guess what % of people truly understand stats, and/or can't be easily misled, I'd say 2%. That guy sounds about avg imo. If anything he sounds more skeptical of the integrity of it. That's not necessarily what you're putting out there, maybe he thinks something's being withheld from you or by you, or has doubts about how accurately avg wages are being calculated (for sure there will be a lot of under-the-table jobs there from migrant workers which aren't included), etc. Everyone deals with guys like that at their work though lol. It sucks when you have to explain things to dumb people who have a bit of power over you. Edited July 12 by WestCanMan Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
impartialobserver Posted July 12 Report Posted July 12 25 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: TBH, the numbers cited for unemployment stats are often 'intentionally misleading', which isn't to say that you put them out that way. It's just how people choose to share (or not share) all the data they get. Classic examples of a gov't's fudged unemployment numbers are just stating 'jobs', and leaving people to assume that they're all full-time jobs when they're mainly part-time, or adding a massive number of gov't jobs pre-election. In Biden's case, that meant pretending that bounce-back jobs, after the economy re-opened, were new jobs. If I had to guess what % of people truly understand stats, and/or can't be easily misled, I'd say 2%. That guy sounds about avg imo. If anything he sounds more skeptical of the integrity of it. That's not necessarily what you're putting out there, maybe he thinks something's being withheld from you or by you, or has doubts about how accurately avg wages are being calculated (for sure there will be a lot of under-the-table jobs there from migrant workers which aren't included), etc. Everyone deals with guys like that at their work though lol. It sucks when you have to explain things to dumb people who have a bit of power over you. Just so you can nail someone on this later... LAUS (the unemployment rate) is a count of people. So one person with 4 jobs is counted once. If you are working and are paying into the unemployment insurance system.. then you are counted as employed. CES (the jobs number) is the opposite. One person with 3 jobs is counted 3 times. LAUS does not take below the age of 16, the incarcerated, those attending university. CES on the other hand does not take agriculture into account. As for QCEW and the wages number.. this is more convoluted. The Q is for quarterly and there is a serious lag in its production. 2024 q1 data will come out in Oct. 2024. Every employer that pays into the UI system is required to fill out wage reports. From these wage reports, we found out how much they are paying their employees in total. We do not get hours or any occupational stuff. So for 2024 q1, company x paid 34 employees a total of 1 million in wages (easy math). From there, we get an average weekly wage by doing the following 34/1,000,000 = 29,411 per employee. From there, 29411/12 = 2,450 per week. and then 2450/40 = 61.274. So, we would say that this employer pays an average weekly wage 61.28. From there, we aggregate to all employees. Lastly, we break it down by geography, industry, and ownership. 1 Quote
ironstone Posted July 12 Report Posted July 12 We have an unfair advantage over the left in that we have way more material to work with. 1 Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
Goddess Posted July 12 Report Posted July 12 2 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.