CdnFox Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 (edited) 21 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: That is beyond hilarious "we're calling turkey chicken. What? If they don't like it we'll call them beef!" Edited February 5 by CdnFox 1 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Popular Post gatomontes99 Posted February 5 Popular Post Report Posted February 5 1 4 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
ironstone Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 1 1 Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
gatomontes99 Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 5 hours ago, Legato said: There's more truth to the second one there than people might think. Trump is literally getting away with a ton of this stuff because it's going so fast that the media and the democrats barely start even responding to one and then all of a sudden there's another to distract. If you're going to do controversial things the best thing you can possibly do is do them fast enough that the new cycle, which has the memory of a goldfish, can't remember what they were mad about 5 minutes ago Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted February 9 Report Posted February 9 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 3 hours ago, Legato said: Dude. That last one is so freaking true. I would love to hear the physics behind it. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
BeaverFever Posted February 12 Report Posted February 12 (edited) On 2/10/2025 at 6:06 PM, gatomontes99 said: Dude. That last one is so freaking true. I would love to hear the physics behind it. Fire draws in air from every direction INWARDS towards the fire. Basically airfloW gently swirling TOWARDS the fire in a circular pattern like a drain. If there are objects (or people) blocking that flow, the largest one can become the path of least resistance for smoke emitting OUTWARDS from the fire If there is a breeze don’t sit on the upwind or downwind end of the fire, sit on the either side, perpendicular to the breeze, ie your shoulders facing the upwind and downwind. If no breeze, some suggest piling rocks or setting up some other obstacle to airflow on the edge of the fire pit where you want the smoke to go and the smoke will tend to flow towards the obstacle Edited February 12 by BeaverFever Quote
CdnFox Posted February 12 Report Posted February 12 9 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: Fire draws in air from every direction INWARDS towards the fire. Basically airfloW gently swirling TOWARDS the fire in a circular pattern like a drain. If there are objects (or people) blocking that flow, the largest one can become the path of least resistance for smoke emitting OUTWARDS from the fire If there is a breeze don’t sit on the upwind or downwind end of the fire, sit on the either side, perpendicular to the breeze, ie your shoulders facing the upwind and downwind. If no breeze, some suggest piling rocks or setting up some other obstacle to airflow on the edge of the fire pit where you want the smoke to go and the smoke will tend to flow towards the obstacle All true, and you can eliminate the problem by building up one side of the fire pit so that it becomes the 'outward flow block' so to speak. Doesn't have to be high or anything,Just a little wall on side that's built up can do it or you can even use sticks sometimes. The smoke will favour that direction and nobody sit there. Also you can eliminate the problem by digging 4 holes under the rocks forming the pit to allow air in which creates a bit of a cyclone and the smoke will go up as a rule till its too high to bug anyone. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.