Jump to content

BOOM!!! Mark Meadows FLIPS! Testifies Against Trump to Grand Jury!!!


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

allegations of significant voting fraud coming to them were baseless

So? This was his OPINION at the time. 

Not evidence of his GUILT. Because Trump himself believed that the election was rigged. And he was RIGHT. 

1. The FBI LIED about the collusion delusion

2. Cover ups of Biden's laptop which showed nasty stuff

3. Changing voting procedures under the guise of Covid.

DUH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, West said:

So? This was his OPINION at the time. 

Not evidence of his GUILT. Because Trump himself believed that the election was rigged. And he was RIGHT. 

1. The FBI LIED about the collusion delusion

2. Cover ups of Biden's laptop which showed nasty stuff

3. Changing voting procedures under the guise of Covid.

DUH

Dumbutt, it doesn’t matter if he thinks the election was stolen or not, he isn’t allowed to break the law.  If somebody THINKS you’re a mass murderer, can they walk up to you and shoot you dead? Of course not.  

Edited by Rebound
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, West said:

So? This was his OPINION at the time. 

Not evidence of his GUILT. Because Trump himself believed that the election was rigged. And he was RIGHT. 

1. The FBI LIED about the collusion delusion

2. Cover ups of Biden's laptop which showed nasty stuff

3. Changing voting procedures under the guise of Covid.

DUH

Donald and his co-conspirators hatched and implemented a plan to install fraudulent electors in multiple states.

That's felony election interference.

It doesn't matter whether he thought he was right or not you halfwit.

Keep telling yourself it's gunna all work out.

With 91 felony charges, Donalds not going to escape this unscathed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

install fraudulent electors in multiple states.

There's NO EVIDENCE

32 minutes ago, Rebound said:

doesn’t matter if he thinks the election was stolen or not

In this case, it 100% does matter because even if he's wrong that's NOT A CRIME. There needs INTENT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, West said:

There's NO EVIDENCE

Just how f__ki g stupid can you be?

"The 45-page indictment states that when Trump could not persuade state officials to illegally swing the election in his favor, he and his Republican allies began recruiting a slate of fake electors in seven battleground states — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, New Mexico, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — to sign certificates falsely stating that he, not Democrat Joe Biden, had won their states."

1 hour ago, West said:

In this case, it 100% does matter because even if he's wrong that's NOT A CRIME. There needs INTENT

There is ample proof Donald and his co-conspirators hatched and implemented a plan to install fraudulent electors. A grand jury saw the evidence and indicted him because of said evidence.

Doesn't matter what he thought pinhead.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

45-page indictment

Democrats write alot of pages. 

Just like the BULLSHIT Steele Dosier

1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

A grand jury

A GRAND JURY only determines if there's "evidence" to move ahead with an indictment. 

It DOES NOT mean they are guilty. 

And YOU CAN INDICT A HAM SANDWICH in the US. The entire system is moronic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, West said:

You have made several predictions that have yet to come to fruition. Duh

So did Powell. Seen any Krakens yet? LMAO

Unlike her previous claims not under oath, they've got a sworn deposition from Powell for the trial, so she can't wiggle out of what she's said she will testify to get the FELONIES DROPPED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, West said:

So? This was his OPINION at the time. 

Not evidence of his GUILT. Because Trump himself believed that the election was rigged. And he was RIGHT. 

1. The FBI LIED about the collusion delusion

2. Cover ups of Biden's laptop which showed nasty stuff

3. Changing voting procedures under the guise of Covid.

DUH

EVERYTHING in ^this post is a LIE including your quote of my post. No response for you, LIAR.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, West said:

There's NO EVIDENCE

In this case, it 100% does matter because even if he's wrong that's NOT A CRIME. There needs INTENT

The intent will be well established by testimony from the insiders who have flipped.

If they decide to back out of their sworn deposition testimony, the FELONY charges will be reinstated and the deposition testimony will be read to the court. EZPZ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even now he continues to boldfacedly peddle his blatant lie about "Rigged and Stolen [sic]" election.

This is the level of African and Latin American dictators. Nothing less. Yes, here.

History shows and tells us very clearly that compromises with grotesque lies of this kind come only at the expense of an absolute loss of all morality and principles. Republican party can reject the pathological clown liar; or sink to shameful depths with him, as a cast iron anchor. Their choice. No: there will be no excuses or explanations. Way past that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2023 at 4:33 PM, Nationalist said:

I've read several articles about it. But if they can't prove Trump doesn't believe the election was stolen, the whole premise begins to fall apart.

It doesn't matter what he believes, it matters what he did. Just because you believe something, doesn't mean you can do it without consequences.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Aristides said:

It doesn't matter what he believes, it matters what he did. Just because you believe something, doesn't mean you can do it without consequences.

Actually I think it does matter. I also think he might very well be POTUS before this ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main thrust of this thread:

"ONE GUY told Trump THREE TIMES on Nov 4th that he didn't really win, but Trump ignored him for 2 days! THIS IS A REALLY BIG DEAL!!!!"

The people who think that Trump should have believed Meadows right on the spot don't want you to remember how the Russian collusion smear campaign went down:

1) Van Jones acknowledged that he knew "Russian collusion was a big nothingburger", but he kept on saying "RUSSIAN COLLUSION IS THE BIGGEST DEAL IN THE WORLD!" for another 1.5 years. Leftists didn't blink. They just kept on gobbling his propaganda when they knew he was lying. 2 days vs 1.5 years...

2) The FBI were lying, committing crimes and spying on Americans under false pretences for at least 2 years (FISA warrant was acquired by FBI crimes) in the Russian collusion investigation. Leftists say "Awwww, shucks, but those crimes were cute."

3) Hillary knew that Russian collusion was false for more than 3 years, because it was mainly based on her own false intel, which she acquired from Russians, and she kept on pushing it as legitimate on TV that whole time. 

 

After just going with all of that for years, leftists think that Trump should just take Meadows' word right on the spot. There's no limit to the hypocrisy of the leftards losers. 

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, West said:

There's NO EVIDENCE

In this case, it 100% does matter because even if he's wrong that's NOT A CRIME. There needs INTENT

There is evidence. That’s the issue. 
You’re very twisted up in what’s going on here. You keep saying that it’s all ok because Trump is allowed to believe that the election was stolen, but he’s not being charged over his thoughts.  He’s being charged with committing crimes.  
 

Trump operates like a mobster and gets others to commit crimes on his behalf, which is why he’s being charged under RICO laws.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, West said:

Democrats write alot of pages. 

Just like the BULLSHIT Steele Dosier

A GRAND JURY only determines if there's "evidence" to move ahead with an indictment. 

It DOES NOT mean they are guilty. 

And YOU CAN INDICT A HAM SANDWICH in the US. The entire system is moronic

First, you cannot indict food nor any inanimate objects. You're such a low IQ fool, you don't realize that.

Second, There is ample proof Donald and his co-conspirators hatched and implemented a plan to install fraudulent electors. A grand jury saw the evidence and indicted him because of said evidence.

On a happy note, maybe you can become Donald's pen pal when he's incarcerated 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Second, There is ample proof Donald and his co-conspirators hatched and implemented a plan to install fraudulent electors

Just like you said there was proof of collusion with Russia, for which there was none, this too will be yet another in a long list of LEFTIST CONSPIRACY THEORIES that do not anchor themselves in reality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, West said:

Just like you said there was proof of collusion with Russia, for which there was none, this too will be yet another in a long list of LEFTIST CONSPIRACY THEORIES that do not anchor themselves in reality

If there is no evidence then his three attorneys would not have please guilty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, myata said:

Even now he continues to boldfacedly peddle his blatant lie about "Rigged and Stolen [sic]" election.

This is the level of African and Latin American dictators. Nothing less. Yes, here.

History shows and tells us very clearly that compromises with grotesque lies of this kind come only at the expense of an absolute loss of all morality and principles. Republican party can reject the pathological clown liar; or sink to shameful depths with him, as a cast iron anchor. Their choice. No: there will be no excuses or explanations. Way past that.

He just got extreme MAGA CULT member Johnson elected Speaker by rejecting Emmer.

They are not "way past" anything, yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Actually I think it does matter. I also think he might very well be POTUS before this ends.

Fortunately your vote cannot be cast. Intent is key, and numerous insiders have and will provide the sworn testimony that he knew he was LYING about "the steal."

One obvious CLUE FOR YOU, is the testimony that was the PLAN BEFORE THE ELECTION.

Bannon even announced it on his podcast. It seems that sort of normalization charade works with you. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...