Jump to content

The left wing revolution led by guys who smell like Doritoes and are unable to do a sit up


West

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, West said:

Why are we to be scared of left wingers unable to do sit ups and smell like a bag of Doritos. I'm thinking of guys like Cenk Ugyr or whatever his name is. 

Their targets? Soccer moms. 

What a sad group of people

What

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, West said:

Why are we to be scared of left wingers unable to do sit ups and smell like a bag of Doritos. I'm thinking of guys like Cenk Ugyr or whatever his name is. 

Their targets? Soccer moms. 

What a sad group of people

Cenk Uyger is a self-proclaimed liberal, so his show lays claim to everything good in the world and blames all evils on conservatives, but his show is called "The Young Turks", which is like if a guy of German descent here had a show called "The Nazis". It's a "terrible" choice, to say the least. 

The Young Turks was actually the name of one of the main groups involved in the Armenian Genocide. 

All of the leftards who go there to watch his drivel are none the wiser. It's as if it's his own little private joke on them. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Armenian Genocide. 

Ya but he will have you believe you are racist for pointing that out and denies the connection (moronic I know)  

He also claims to be a "revolutionary" but last time he could see his ding dong John F Kennedy was still president

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

called "The Young Turks", which is like if a guy of German descent here had a show called "The Nazis". It's a "terrible" choice, to say the least. 

The Young Turks was actually the name of one of the main groups involved in the Armenian Genocide. 

 “Young Turk” is also a figure of speech loosely referring to radical reformers, particularly if they’re part of a new group or generation 

Also while it’s not untrue that the Young Turks have an association with the Armenian Genocide it’s not the whole truth either. The original Young Turks was a social and intellectual movement formed in the late 1800s that (briefly) ended the Turkish autocracy in a  bloodless coup and instituted a multiparty constitutional democracy and they were a secular multiethnic society that included Greeks, Armenians, Jews, Arabs, Albanians, and others. But as the Ottoman empire’s power and influence continued to decline especially after losing the Balkan War in 1912 they fractured into different factions, one of which was the ultranationalist group led by the “Three Pashas” who seized control of the main political party founded by the Young Turks in a coup in 1913. Thus ending Turkish democracy after only about 5 years. Armenian genocide then begins shortly after Turkey’s loss in WW1, in 1915
 

So some of the people responsible for the genocide were connected to or had been part of the Young Turk movement, which is not the same as saying people who participated in the young turk movement participated in the genocide 

Edited by BeaverFever
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Also while it’s not untrue that the Young Turks have an association with the Armenian Genocide it’s not the whole truth either.

This post is so offensive it's not even funny. 

Would be like saying you can "reform" the Khmer Rouge  

It's certainly distasteful to call your network that

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, West said:

This post is so offensive it's not even funny. 

Would be like saying you can "reform" the Khmer Rouge  

It's certainly distasteful to call your network that

LOL...The Beave and his little Libbie posse are scraping the bottom of the barrel now.

Moral high ground...pfft.

Common sense...representation FOR the people...and some well deserved retribution...coming soon to a theater near you.

Edited by Nationalist
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, West said:

This post is so offensive it's not even funny. 

Would be like saying you can "reform" the Khmer Rouge  

It's certainly distasteful to call your network that

What?  I don’t know what you are referring to when you reference “capable of reform” think you even understood my post. Your commentary don’t really seem to relate to what I actually said. Once again reading comprehension is not your strong suit l. 
 

Nothing offensive about stating FACTUALLY that some of the people in the Armenian genocide were from the Young Turks movement while also pointing out FACTUALLY that by that time, the YT which was decades old by then had splintered and evolved into many different groups, only one of which had seized power from the others in a coup. 
 

Nothing offensive about stating FACTUALLY that in English the term “young Turks” is an expression used to describe a reform-oriented newcomer.   Don’t blame me I didn’t invent the term.  

Edited by BeaverFever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

LOL...The Beave and his little Libbie posse are scraping the bottom of the barrel now.

Moral high ground...pfft.

Common sense...representation FOR the people...and some well deserved retribution...coming soon to a theater near you.

Lmao you have no idea what you’re even talking about, probably couldn’t find Turkey on a map let alone offer any kind of informed opinion on one of its political movements that existed over a century ago. You’re just here because you sense an opportunity to pile on an“libbie” ….let’s not forget you’re the guy who apologizes for and defends Putin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Lmao you have no idea what you’re even talking about, probably couldn’t find Turkey on a map let alone offer any kind of informed opinion on one of its political movements that existed over a century ago. You’re just here because you sense an opportunity to pile on an“libbie” ….let’s not forget you’re the guy who apologizes for and defends Putin

You're a loser Beave. 

Who started the violence in Ukraine? That's right...the Ukrainians and their neo-nazi dogs.

Who started the violence in Israel? That's right...Hamas, the ELECTED leaders of Gaza.

Who tried to justify association with genocidal freaks? That's right...you did Beave.

Happy Monday.

Edited by Nationalist
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

What?  I don’t know what you are referring to when you reference “capable of reform” think you even understood my post. Your commentary don’t really seem to relate to what I actually said. Once again reading comprehension is not your strong suit l. 
 

Nothing offensive about stating FACTUALLY that some of the people in the Armenian genocide were from the Young Turks movement while also pointing out FACTUALLY that by that time, the YT which was decades old by then had splintered and evolved into many different groups, only one of which had seized power from the others in a coup. 
 

Nothing offensive about stating FACTUALLY that in English the term “young Turks” is an expression used to describe a reform-oriented newcomer.   Don’t blame me I didn’t invent the term.  

This is so disgusting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

 “Young Turk” is also a figure of speech loosely referring to radical reformers, particularly if they’re part of a new group or generation 

Also while it’s not untrue that the Young Turks have an association with the Armenian Genocide it’s not the whole truth either. The original Young Turks was a social and intellectual movement formed in the late 1800s that (briefly) ended the Turkish autocracy in a  bloodless coup and instituted a multiparty constitutional democracy and they were a secular multiethnic society that included Greeks, Armenians, Jews, Arabs, Albanians, and others. But as the Ottoman empire’s power and influence continued to decline especially after losing the Balkan War in 1912 they fractured into different factions, one of which was the ultranationalist group led by the “Three Pashas” who seized control of the main political party founded by the Young Turks in a coup in 1913. Thus ending Turkish democracy after only about 5 years. Armenian genocide then begins shortly after Turkey’s loss in WW1, in 1915
 

So some of the people responsible for the genocide were connected to or had been part of the Young Turk movement, which is not the same as saying people who participated in the young turk movement participated in the genocide 

1) An association? That's not what I've heard from actual Armenians. Read this

2) Buddy, regardless of whether or not their holds the actual title of "bringers of genocide" they can't be just "a little bit associated with a genocide in the millions so it's ok".

FYI the swastika is basically a symbol of peace by your standards - it was for centuries before the Nazis used it. Are you saying that using the swastika would be "ok" now? People should just forget about that one little decade?

You are such a diehard, soulless leftist it's ridiculous. If Biden and Trudeau start the Satanic Nazi Club of The Americas and start drone-striking schools in rural areas you'd call it a success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

In your clownworld reality only.  ?

 

Quote

The next phase of conflict escalation focused on the following two issues of contention: the extent of Russia’s involvement in inciting the anti-government protests in March-April 2014 and in the subsequent violent conflict, and the decision by the Ukrainian government to criminalize the protests and to use force against the anti-government protests with the launch of the “Anti-Terrorist Operation” on 13 April 2014. Russia and the de facto authorities in the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics framed the conflict as the “Ukrainian aggression against the people of Donbas” and the Russian military, political and humanitarian intervention, when recognized by Russia, as “assistance” and “protection”.

https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/communications/news/understanding-roots-russia-ukraine-war-and-misuse-history

Again...who started the violence???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...