Jump to content

Hillary Clinton is a toxic, crazy lady


Recommended Posts

1. Lies about Donnie colluding with Russia

2. Responsible for ordering mass killings abroad

3. Calls a person who mopped the floor with her in an election "illegitimate"

4. Now talks about "deprogramming" people who live in reality and call her out for being crazy

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

She is far LESS toxic and crazy than Trump. Duh

EG, she conceded when she "lost" despite clear evidence that Trump cheated with the illegal help of foreign election interference.

Of course, Trump is no dummy so he proceeded to GUT the FEC after the election so they could not penalize him for demanding help from Russia: "Russia if you're listening, please find Hillary's emails." And there is evidence that's what they did, that very day.

July 27, 2016: Trump publicly asked Russia to find Hillary’s emails. They acted within hours.

Quote

On the very same day in 2016 that Donald Trump urged Russia to find Hillary Clinton’s missing emails, Russian intelligence officers launched a new attack to hack his opponent’s personal emails, according to the latest indictments from special counsel Robert Mueller.

It is maybe the most eyebrow-raising detail in an indictment filled with them. Mueller on Friday indicted 12 Russian intelligence officers for crimes related to the hacking and public release of Democratic emails to influence the 2016 presidential campaign.

To be clear, the Russian hacking of people close to Clinton didn’t start on July 27, 2016, when Trump stood before the whole world and said he hoped Russia would “find the 30,000 emails that are missing ... I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Emails from the Democratic National Committee had already been hacked and leaked, and we would later learn that Clinton campaign chair John Podesta’s email account had already been compromised. As Vox’s Andrew Prokop has previously explained, the email phishing expeditions against Democrats were already well underway by March 2016. That’s around the time that Podesta’s emails, which would play such a prominent role in the final months of the campaign, were infiltrated.

So Trump’s comments can’t be claimed as the start of Russia’s digital attacks against American political parties and figures. But the timing is nevertheless uncanny. On July 27, Trump calls for Russia to find Clinton’s missing emails. That same day — “after hours” as the indictment notes, which strongly suggests this was after Trump’s statement — the hackers go after Clinton’s personal email.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, robosmith said:

She is far LESS toxic and crazy than Trump. Duh

EG, she conceded when she "lost" despite clear evidence that Trump cheated with the illegal help of foreign election interference.

Of course, Trump is no dummy so he proceeded to GUT the FEC after the election so they could not penalize him for demanding help from Russia: "Russia if you're listening, please find Hillary's emails." And there is evidence that's what they did, that very day.

July 27, 2016: Trump publicly asked Russia to find Hillary’s emails. They acted within hours.

 

Sounds like you are the one who needs a good deprogramming

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, West said:

1. Lies about Donnie colluding with Russia

2. Responsible for ordering mass killings abroad

3. Calls a person who mopped the floor with her in an election "illegitimate"

4. Now talks about "deprogramming" people who live in reality and call her out for being crazy

Also covered up her hubby raping one of the staff.

44 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I posted evidence. You posted YOUR PROGRAMMING.

You don't prefer evidence at all.

You just prefer your belief and your belief means nothing by your own admission

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

despite clear evidence that Trump cheated 

So she lost because of Russia? Is that what you're saying?

She didn't alienate a significant portion of potential voters? The latter being the exact same reason why Trump lost handily the second time around?

I mean from calling potential voters who happened to vote for opposition "deplorables", she even alienated stay at home moms in defending her career. Alienating women, is the epitome of not being able to read the room.

She stood by a man who not only cheated on her quite publicly, but was embroiled in sexual controversies. 

Many voters hated both candidates, but it is telling, when they felt she couldn't be trusted, put up against a career con man. 

Her being seen as robotic, that people struggled to relate to her, didn't do it?

Arrogance like the win was in the books, while Trump out hussled her, didn't do it?

Nobody will truly know how many votes were swayed by Russia, but one thing is certain, she underestimated her rival, and paid for it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

she conceded when she "lost"

Sure, but she never actually accepted the loss,  when you see how she conducted herself afterwards.

Props to her for not breaking the law, but when you question the results and can't even accept where you went wrong, you can't blame voters for being nervous about giving you the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

she conceded when she "lost"

Then proceeded to cry about Russia and launched a phony collusion investigation. Of course that was all just a front to comb over Donnie's entire existence and have crazy prosecutors bury him legal processes like true soviets because she couldn't handle the election defeat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, West said:

1. Lies about Donnie colluding with Russia

2. Responsible for ordering mass killings abroad

3. Calls a person who mopped the floor with her in an election "illegitimate"

4. Now talks about "deprogramming" people who live in reality and call her out for being crazy

What does her "deprogramming" involve? Here's a hint:

th?id=OIP.5IjKNCDFzVZED2rcOGBZSAHaFd&pid=Api&P=0&h=220

Hence the nickname Hitlary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, West said:

Then proceeded to cry about Russia and launched a phony collusion investigation. Of course that was all just a front to comb over Donnie's entire existence and have crazy prosecutors bury him legal processes like true soviets because she couldn't handle the election defeat

Hillary Clinton did not launch an investigation. Get your facts straight.  
 

Face it, you’ve got a bug up your ass because your false god is under indictment.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Hillary Clinton did not launch an investigation. Get your facts straight.  
 

Face it, you’ve got a bug up your ass because your false god is under indictment.  

The Obama administration did upon their exit at thd request of the unstable lunatic known as Hillary Clinton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

She is far LESS toxic and crazy than Trump. Duh

EG, she conceded when she "lost" despite clear evidence that Trump cheated with the illegal help of foreign election interference.

Of course, Trump is no dummy so he proceeded to GUT the FEC after the election so they could not penalize him for demanding help from Russia: "Russia if you're listening, please find Hillary's emails." And there is evidence that's what they did, that very day.

July 27, 2016: Trump publicly asked Russia to find Hillary’s emails. They acted within hours.

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Also covered up her hubby raping one of the staff.

You don't prefer evidence at all.

You just prefer your belief and your belief means nothing by your own admission

 

Either YOU'RE A LYING TROLL or UNABLE TO READ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

So she lost because of Russia? Is that what you're saying?

She didn't alienate a significant portion of potential voters? The latter being the exact same reason why Trump lost handily the second time around?

I mean from calling potential voters who happened to vote for opposition "deplorables", she even alienated stay at home moms in defending her career. Alienating women, is the epitome of not being able to read the room.

She stood by a man who not only cheated on her quite publicly, but was embroiled in sexual controversies. 

Many voters hated both candidates, but it is telling, when they felt she couldn't be trusted, put up against a career con man. 

Her being seen as robotic, that people struggled to relate to her, didn't do it?

Arrogance like the win was in the books, while Trump out hussled her, didn't do it?

Nobody will truly know how many votes were swayed by Russia, but one thing is certain, she underestimated her rival, and paid for it.

The thing that is certain is, Trump "won" by a razor thin margin of <<1% in 3 states.

Know what that means? 

It means that every advantage he had, including ILLEGAL help from Russia, was CRUCIAL to his margin of "victory."

AKA, he would have LOST WITHOUT IT. That's why it was a big surprise that he "won."

4 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

Sure, but she never actually accepted the loss,  when you see how she conducted herself afterwards.

Props to her for not breaking the law, but when you question the results and can't even accept where you went wrong, you can't blame voters for being nervous about giving you the job.

But I can blame Russia for giving Trump the job with their ILLEGAL election interference. Putin's IRA is still under indictment for their illegal interference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, West said:

Then proceeded to cry about Russia and launched a phony collusion investigation. Of course that was all just a front to comb over Donnie's entire existence and have crazy prosecutors bury him legal processes like true soviets because she couldn't handle the election defeat

Hillary had NO POWER to launch an FBI investigation. Duh

Stop LYING.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, robosmith said:

AKA, he would have LOST WITHOUT IT.

Proof of the amount of votes that caused this?

Otherwise, it's hearsay.

You would certainly be able to quantify it if bringing the accusations forward, no?

32 minutes ago, robosmith said:

But I can blame Russia for giving Trump the job with their ILLEGAL election interference.

I would put the blame where it belonged. Clinton being seen as unfit by a significant portion of the population. 

Had she fixed that, this would have been a cake walk.

Refusing to acknowledge her inefficiencies that made people weary of her, make her a horrible leader. That's a lack of self awareness.

34 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Putin's IRA is still under indictment for their illegal interference

So again, Putin is why Trump won, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, West said:

4. Now talks about "deprogramming" people who live in reality and call her out for being crazy

My favourite thing is how leftards pretend that questioning election results is suddenly crazy now, as if they didn't just get busted for spending the previous 4 years lying and committing crimes to make the case that the 2016 election was illegitimate.

Hillary herself is a confirmed election cheater twice over, and that's if you don't even count the Russian collusion show trial.

Anyone who takes Hillary seriously in 2023 actually does need deprogramming.

I'm being 100% serious when I say that the "Hillary the lizard person" theory makes more sense now than the "Hillary the respectable politician with valuable opinions" delusion that's coming from the MSM. At least the lizard person theory still has a 1/centillion chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Perspektiv said:

Proof of the amount of votes that caused this?

Otherwise, it's hearsay.

You would certainly be able to quantify it if bringing the accusations forward, no?

I already quantified the razor thin margin by which Trump "won" the EC vote count: <<1% in 3 states.

Of course, he LOST the popular vote count.

1 hour ago, Perspektiv said:

I would put the blame where it belonged. Clinton being seen as unfit by a significant portion of the population.

And Trump was even more, since HE LOST the popular vote.

1 hour ago, Perspektiv said:

Had she fixed that, this would have been a cake walk.

Had Russians not helped Trump, she most likely would have won the EC vote, too.

1 hour ago, Perspektiv said:

Refusing to acknowledge her inefficiencies that made people weary of her, make her a horrible leader. That's a lack of self awareness.

So is refusal to acknowledge Trump was an amateur AND a horrible leader.

1 hour ago, Perspektiv said:

So again, Putin is why Trump won, correct?

Putin obviously ILLEGALLY helped Trump's campaign and that was crucial to "winning" with his RAZOR THIN MARGIN.

Putin stated on national TV that he wanted Trump to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

I already quantified the razor thin margin by which Trump "won" the EC vote count

That doesn't prove the amount of influence Putin had in that result. It just shows a margin.

"But it must have", without evidence, is hearsay. Your opinion at best, false at worst.

Also, putting his victory in quotation marks or marking it with an asterisk, doesn't change the fact that he was your POTUS for 4 years.

Thats like telling someone "I could have beat you if I ran harder" after a loss during a sprint. Or the "the wind was affecting me more because am taller".

The same denial from Clinton just made her seem that much more as someone that couldn't be trusted. 

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Of course, he LOST the popular vote count.

Doesn't matter. People don't recall runners up. He won the election.

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Had Russians not helped Trump, she most likely woul have won the EC vote, too.

Sadly, history will remember it differently. She lost the election, according to it.

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

So is refusal to acknowledge Trump was an amateur AND a horrible leader.

I felt Clinton was a horrible leader as well, so people had from bad to worse to pick from.

Aside from his drama and immaturity, he was good on policy, which is what most will care about.

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Putin stated on national TV that he wanted Trump to win.

And thats proof that this alone is why he won, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronaldo_ earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...