Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
55 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

1. Your response is uncalled for.

2. There are many wealthy non caucasian fathers that boinked and left the mothers.

3. Fact is, the black and indigenous males are the majority of the problem (with permission of their women of course)

1. Huh ?  I just asked a question.
2. Lots of poor white folks.. probably more than rich blacks folks are single-parent
3. You seem absolutely aghast when poverty comes into the discussion.  Very odd.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Huh ?  I just asked a question.
 

Its truly sad how disingenuous you are. Of course, you didn't "just ask a question". 

But like many on the left you must dishonestly pretend otherwise.  You don't debate, you obfuscare, dodge, and play stupid bait and switch tactics that must seem very impressive to other elementary school children but just make you look weak here.

All the while feigning that you're above such 'cheap and tawdry things', while in reality your behavior is more low brow than 95 percent of the people here.

You, sir, are a joke and a coward.  But of course you'll pretend not to read this.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

I choose to understand but cannot read minds or intent.

Clarity is not a aptitude you demonstrate :)

Odd...something made me successful. Ya know...I'm a thinkin' ur just tossin' darts now.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

You've chosen to believe that I was glued to a bunch of personalities I've never quoted, referenced or promoted once on this forum.  ??

That's a perfect encapsulation of your worldview, isn't it?  Evidence-be-damned, this is what you want to believe so this is what's true.  

No you'll be damned.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

For the poor ones.. lots. Are you one of these eugenics people who wants to deny parents the right to procreate based on race and or income?

Aren't you the chump that's ok with denying parents the right to pull children from the LBGQWTF cesspool that schools have become?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, CdnFox said:

But like many on the left you must dishonestly pretend otherwise.  You don't debate, you obfuscare, dodge, and play stupid bait and switch tactics that must seem very impressive to other elementary school children but just make you look weak here.

Is that what you think you're doing here?  Debating? ?

Spamming the board all day every day in battlemode and projecting your insecurities on anyone who disagrees with you doesn't count as "debating".  That's just a desperate cry for help and attention.  This forum has literally never seen a bigger no-life than you.  ?

  • Like 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
14 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Huh ?  I just asked a question.
2. Lots of poor white folks.. probably more than rich blacks folks are single-parent
3. You seem absolutely aghast when poverty comes into the discussion.  Very odd.

1.Your comment "Are you one of these eugenics people who wants to deny parents the right to procreate based on race and or income? " is more a comment than a question. If it is supposed to be a question, then it is backhanded.

2.

3. I am hardly "aghast", I was stating the obvious. Black (in the US) and indigenous (here in Canada) are the ones that foster the most single parent issues. D9d not once mention financial status, that is you trying to put the blame on money.

13 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Odd...something made me successful. Ya know...I'm a thinkin' ur just tossin' darts now.

Successful?? Now that is a comedic comment LOL

Don't do darts.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
13 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Successful?? Now that is a comedic comment LOL

Don't do darts.

Yes...successful.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

1. is more a comment than a question. If it is supposed to be a question, then it is backhanded.

2.  Black (in the US) and indigenous (here in Canada) are the ones ... 

1. I wanted to find out the basis for singling out race in this instance.  I guess it sounded backhanded.
2. This is a common belief but i like to challenge beliefs especially when they cross cultural lines.   It's pretty hard for a blind person to say someone clothes clash, as a lame analogy.

We're good.

  • Like 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. I wanted to find out the basis for singling out race in this instance.  I guess it sounded backhanded.
2. This is a common belief but i like to challenge beliefs especially when they cross cultural lines.   It's pretty hard for a blind person to say someone clothes clash, as a lame analogy.

We're good.

1. I was not "singling out", I was making observable comment.

2. We don't keep good  statistics in Canada but about 40% of indigenous kids live with single parent.

https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/as-sa/98-200-x/2016020/98-200-x2016020-eng.cfm

The US keeps better stats and up to 66% black kids live in single parent situations

https://datacenter.aecf.org/data/tables/107-children-in-single-parent-families-by-race-and-ethnicity#detailed/1/any/false/2048,1729,37,871,870,573,869,36,868,867/10,11,9,12,1,185,13/432,431

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Yes...successful.

Ha Ha Ha...me too then LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
20 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

1. I was not "singling out", I was making observable comment.

2. We don't keep good  statistics in Canada but about 40% of indigenous kids live with single parent.

 

1. All comments on here are observable.
2. Social Science and Statistics is a deep and complex topic.  Observations and causality are two aspects of that... First of all, they shouldn't be mixed up or used interchangeably.  I'm not really interested in an extended discussion on that topic as they tend to go nowhere.  People see a group and make conclusions based on what they see - that's normal.  The "problem with that cultural group over there" isn't a conversation that I feel is productive or enjoyable however.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. All comments on here are observable.
2. Social Science and Statistics is a deep and complex topic.  Observations and causality are two aspects of that... First of all, they shouldn't be mixed up or used interchangeably.  I'm not really interested in an extended discussion on that topic as they tend to go nowhere.  People see a group and make conclusions based on what they see - that's normal.  The "problem with that cultural group over there" isn't a conversation that I feel is productive or enjoyable however.

Not going to argue with you or play word games.

My points were and are valid.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

Not going to argue with you or play word games.

My points were and are valid.

Valid and true aren't the same thing.  "I saw a black man stealing a bike, therefore black men are thieves"

A valid observation.  Is the conclusion right ?  

As I said, I don't find such discussions productive or enjoyable.  It's not a matter of "word games" but  Aristotelian logic

Posted
12 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Is that what you think you're doing here?  Debating? ?

Spamming the board all day every day in battlemode and projecting your insecurities on anyone who disagrees with you doesn't count as "debating".  That's just a desperate cry for help and attention.  This forum has literally never seen a bigger no-life than you.  ?

OHhh noooesss - The 'fox-made-me-cry' support group showed up :)

Awww little guy - did i make you read too much again and your brain hurts? I mean - there WERE more than three sentences, not very fair of me was it :)

I debate and discuss with lots of people here - then there's bitter and ignorant leftie losers who get insanely butthurt when they find out they're no where near as smart as they thought they were.  Those losers i just enjoy emotionally damaging.

You know - till they do hilarious things like jump in out of the blue and complain i'm making them read too much :) 

LOL -  don't hate me just because i'm smarter than you.  There's a LOT of people smarter than you, you'll spend all your time being bitter.  :) 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

As I said, I don't find such discussions productive or enjoyable.  It's not a matter of "word games" but  Aristotelian logic

Colossians 2:8 KJV: Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

Posted
3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Valid and true aren't the same thing.  "I saw a black man stealing a bike, therefore black men are thieves"

A valid observation.  Is the conclusion right ?  

As I said, I don't find such discussions productive or enjoyable.  It's not a matter of "word games" but  Aristotelian logic

Never said that Michael. Never concluded that either.

You are playing word games again. I gave you links to validate my comments.

Just because you don't enjoy such discussion does not mean it does not or could not or should not occur.

As I said, I gave you links to validate my comments, no attempt at syllogism.

Just now, blackbird said:

Colossians 2:8 KJV: Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

Oh geezus...here you go again!!!!

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted

"

James 3:10 - Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be.

Proverbs 18:21 - Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.

2 Timothy 2:16 - But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.

Exodus 20:7 - Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

Matthew 12:36 - But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.

Posted
10 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Thinly disguised profanity.

Sorry, did not mean to disguise it. It was pure intent.

Another religious rant by a religious fanatic. LOL

  • Like 1

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. I have explained twice now why I hate these discussions, and your comments are so wrongheaded to me as to validate my reasons there.

Wrongheaded? Michael, because you do not accept the statistics I provided, it is wrongheaded? I did not make up the statistics.

If you no longer wish to discuss this, you commenting and not expecting retort is confusing :)

  • Like 2

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

I debate and discuss with lots of people here - then there's bitter and ignorant leftie losers who get insanely butthurt when they find out they're no where near as smart as they thought they were.  Those losers i just enjoy emotionally damaging.

If we're talking about emotional damage, let's consider the obvious and gaping hole in your life that has you sitting at your computer all day, every day, shitting up every corner of the forum and insisting to people how you're making them "insanely butthurt."  

Go get a job, or at least a hobby...just something...anything.  ?

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,858
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    onegroupholiday
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • A Freeman went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Tony Eveland earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dick Green earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...