Jump to content

Georgia State Senators move to impeach PFW (Phony Fani Willis)


Recommended Posts

On 8/18/2023 at 8:28 PM, Rebound said:

That definition varies by jurisdiction.  Generally, coercion is the factor.  No coercion, no entrapment.  

You're so wrong it's just stupid.

Coercion is way beyond the requirement for a successful entrapment defence, even in Michigan, which we were talking about, and California, which the village Demwit was talking about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/17/2023 at 10:46 PM, robosmith said:

Even AFTER the latest price increase HERE, gas is only up by a $1 / gal and prices at the grocery stores are back to pre-pandemic levels for what & where I buy. Of course as always, I shop the sales. 

Pricing still sucks. The old pedophile needs to get off this climate scare bullshit and release the oil. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Pricing still sucks. The old pedophile needs to get off this climate scare bullshit and release the oil. ;)

1. US oil production is at record levels already.

2. Are you one of the ones who also complained when Biden released oil from the strategic reserve?

When will you people learn that oil is a global commodity?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Hodad said:

1. US oil production is at record levels already.

2. Are you one of the ones who also complained when Biden released oil from the strategic reserve?

When will you people learn that oil is a global commodity?

 

Nope. I'm one of the ones who got pissed off over this: 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Nope. I'm one of the ones who got pissed off over this: 

 

He's 100% right on that. There's no longer scientific debate about the fact of anthropogenic global warming. Just you folks who are burying your heads in the sand rather than facing an existential challenge head on. 

And it's completely irrelevant to the fact that US oil production is at record levels. The price of gasoline is not high because of Joe Biden or his accurate assessment of the need for clean energy. We have more domestic supply than we've ever had before, so why are you complaining about Biden? Force of habit?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Hodad said:

He's 100% right on that. There's no longer scientific debate about the fact of anthropogenic global warming. Just you folks who are burying your heads in the sand rather than facing an existential challenge head on. 

And it's completely irrelevant to the fact that US oil production is at record levels. The price of gasoline is not high because of Joe Biden or his accurate assessment of the need for clean energy. We have more domestic supply than we've ever had before, so why are you complaining about Biden? Force of habit?

He's 100% full of shit. He's parroting that same "we only have 12 years" nonsensical bullshit that the UN was spewing in 2018, and he's had to walk all that shit back since his statement about us still needing to use oil. 

There is no Global Warming. There is no Global Cooling. There is no Climate change. There is, however, scumbag globalist tyrants who want to control everything, and the US will not put up with it. 

Bring on the oil until something cheaper and more efficient is ready for market. 

Edited by Deluge
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/20/2023 at 4:46 AM, Rebound said:

Quote the law from the relevant jurisdiction. You keep whining about entrapment in a certain Federal case, but the fact is the entrapment defense failed.  
 

Of course, this has nothing to do with removal of a DA, which Georgia’s Legislature cannot do. So this is yet another ineffective GOP publicity stunt. Instead of working to improve society for the people of Georgia, they’re conducting stunts which won’t do anything. 

That's already done. Try to keep.

I've cited the law in Michigan, then Robo cited a link which he claimed showed that in California coercion was required and he was hoisted on his own petard. 

DA's can be removed from office, and a judge can definitely remove anyone form their trial. Crooked activist judges would never do that though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Anyone who thinks it's ethical for a POTUS to ask a foreign leader to find dirt on a political opponent, has no ethics themselves.

Therefore I deem your caustic conclusions as nothing more than unethical fanboy gibberish.

No need to "find" dirt... we already knew it existed. 

Anybody who defends selling out the vice presidents office to the highest bidder has no ethics themselves. Don't hate the people who expose your questionable ethics

23 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

What an incredibly stupid comment.

Why do they allow 10 year olds to post here?

Prices across the board went up because of Worldwide activity after the pandemic eased.

That's why prices rose globally, and were not relegated to the U.S. only you dolt.

 

The Biden administration decided to destroy projects which would've drastically increased north America oil supply and stabilized the price of gasoline. 

All because he's likely getting kickbacks from the Saudis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

That's already done. Try to keep.

I've cited the law in Michigan, then Robo cited a link which he claimed showed that in California coercion was required and he was hoisted on his own petard. 

DA's can be removed from office, and a judge can definitely remove anyone form their trial. Crooked activist judges would never do that though. 

Nope. Wrong. 
You didn’t cite law, and since the kidnapping attempt of Whitmer was a federal case, it fell under Federal law, not state law.  Try to keep up with the adults. 

3 minutes ago, West said:

No need to "find" dirt... we already knew it existed. 

Anybody who defends selling out the vice presidents office to the highest bidder has no ethics themselves. Don't hate the people who expose your questionable ethics

No evidence that something was sold.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Nope. Wrong. 
You didn’t cite law, and since the kidnapping attempt of Whitmer was a federal case, it fell under Federal law, not state law.  

Yup, I'm right, as usual.

I know what entrapment is, and coercion far exceeds what is required for a successful entrapment defence. 

Of course if the cops "FORCE/COERCE" you to commit a crime it's not a crime. It's ridiculous to even consider that's a possibility.

Entrapment is when cops entice a person to commit a crime that they had no previous interest in committing. 

Just learn that.

Quote

Try to keep up with the adults. 

The adults knew what entrapment was before the Whitmer case even started. You're decades behind.

Quote

No evidence that something was sold.  

Influence was sold, by Joe's own admission.

He bragged that he fired a prosecutor that Zlochevsky wanted fired, he appointed a prosecutor that dropped the charges against Zlochevsky, and the Biden family was richly rewarded.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Deluge said:

They're climate activists, just like you. 

Global marxism has no place in America, and you will learn that eventually. 

^^It's honestly difficult to characterize how dumb this is.

It's your theory that thousands of intellectually gifted people (who could have done many more lucrative things), located around the world and across cultures and political systems, invested 10ish years each pursuing specialized higher education, so that they could abandon all of that science and play a long-running trick on us for the last 40 years? And with no monetary incentive, no less. Just lulz.

None of them want the Nobel prize, or money or global acclaim that would come with debunking the "climate hoax."

GTFO. Can you even grasp how crazy that idea is? It's like you showed up to say that there the link between cholesterol and heart disease is just doctors perpetrating a massive hoax because they are "medical activists." 

If it's just political noise, do better. If you honestly believe it, seek professional help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Hodad said:

^^It's honestly difficult to characterize how dumb this is.

You're just pissed off because I don't cower before your faux scientists. 

You wokejobs have been crying about the climate for over a hundred years, and not a f*cking thing has happened. We're all still here, living our lives, but you moonbats simply can't stfu. Why can't you freaks just stfu? 

Reach out to me when New York is up to its ass in sea water. We'll hold a candle light vigil for it. ;)

 

Edited by Deluge
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Hodad said:

-->It's honestly difficult to characterize how dumb this is <--

1) I fixed the arrows there for you ?

2) Not hard at all: it's an average post for a leftist

Quote

It's your theory that thousands of intellectually gifted people (who could have done many more lucrative things), located around the world and across cultures and political systems, invested 10ish years each pursuing specialized higher education, so that they could abandon all of that science and play a long-running trick on us for the last 40 years?

1) You're starting from an imaginary point and working fwd from there: your supposition that "ALL CLIMATOLOGISTS AGREE 100%" is dead wrong.

2) Are you trying to say that shaman and witch doctors wasted their time and education when they sold climate change fear to their peons? 

Quote

And with no monetary incentive, no less. Just lulz.

Who said that there was no monetary incentive?

The main criteria that you need on your resume if you want to work in the field of climatology is "knowing which way the wind blows". And of course that's figuratively, not literally. You don't even need to know what a compass is, you just need to nod your head at the right time with a serious look on your face. 

Quote

None of them want the Nobel prize, or money or global acclaim that would come with debunking the "climate hoax."

What you would get for doing that is "censured". "Cancelled". "Black-Listed". 

Quote

GTFO. Can you even grasp how crazy that idea is? It's like you showed up to say that there the link between cholesterol and heart disease is just doctors perpetrating a massive hoax because they are "medical activists." 

Do you think that there are no Drs out there prescribing Lipitor and other statins to people who don't really need it, or who'd be better off getting more exercise and changing their diet?

Science is for sale, dude. Drs are for sale. 

Quote

If it's just political noise, do better. If you honestly believe it, seek professional help.

You may be a good person at heart, but you're honestly too naive and too credulous for your own good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Deluge said:

You're just pissed off because I don't cower before your faux scientists. 

You wokejobs have been crying about the climate for over a hundred years, and not a f*cking thing has happened. We're all still here, living our lives, but you moonbats simply can't stfu. Why can't you freaks just stfu? 

Reach out to me when New York is up to its ass in sea water. We'll hold a candle light vigil for it. ;)

 

Sure, the world is full of "faux scientists."?‍? 

You pretend that nothing has happened, while every we've started setting records for surface, ocean and atmospheric temperatures year after year. You're aggressively in denial, which is not a valid or helpful response to bad news.

The world's scientists are not playing tricks on you. They're making you aware of inconvenient facts.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

Nope. Wrong. 
You didn’t cite law, and since the kidnapping attempt of Whitmer was a federal case, it fell under Federal law, not state law.  Try to keep up with the adults. 

No evidence that something was sold.  

This one will end up like the previous Donnie delusions. Impeachment hoax, Impeachment hoax 2, collusion hoax, stormy hoax... 

 

May be time to this bad low budget film to rest? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1) I fixed the arrows there for you ?

2) Not hard at all: it's an average post for a leftist

1) You're starting from an imaginary point and working fwd from there: your supposition that "ALL CLIMATOLOGISTS AGREE 100%" is dead wrong.

2) Are you trying to say that shaman and witch doctors wasted their time and education when they sold climate change fear to their peons? 

Who said that there was no monetary incentive?

The main criteria that you need on your resume if you want to work in the field of climatology is "knowing which way the wind blows". And of course that's figuratively, not literally. You don't even need to know what a compass is, you just need to nod your head at the right time with a serious look on your face. 

What you would get for doing that is "censured". "Cancelled". "Black-Listed". 

Do you think that there are no Drs out there prescribing Lipitor and other statins to people who don't really need it, or who'd be better off getting more exercise and changing their diet?

Science is for sale, dude. Drs are for sale. 

You may be a good person at heart, but you're honestly too naive and too credulous for your own good. 

How's that ignore list going for you? Do you need detailed instructions? 

Yes, there is overwhelming--utterly overwhelming--consensus among climatologists. It may not be 100% but it is certainly close. 

And no, there was no financial incentive to invent the concept of anthropogenic warming (which would have made the originators laughingstocks without data to support) nor has there been incentive to fake 40+ years of science--which is an absurd premise in the first place. All the money was and is on the other side of the fence. But even oil company scientists acknowledged warming. 

If you've got expertise and data to disprove the scientific consensus, go claim your Nobel prize. The world is waiting for anyone to deliver that good news if they can back it up.

The level of conspiracy craziness you're wallowing in is just insane. Literally none of it makes sense. It's so out of touch with rationality and reason it's hard to know how you function in daily life. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Hodad said:

How's that ignore list going for you? Do you need detailed instructions? 

Yes, there is overwhelming--utterly overwhelming--consensus among climatologists. It may not be 100% but it is certainly close. 

And no, there was no financial incentive to invent the concept of anthropogenic warming (which would have made the originators laughingstocks without data to support) nor has there been incentive to fake 40+ years of science--which is an absurd premise in the first place. All the money was and is on the other side of the fence. But even oil company scientists acknowledged warming. 

If you've got expertise and data to disprove the scientific consensus, go claim your Nobel prize. The world is waiting for anyone to deliver that good news if they can back it up.

The level of conspiracy craziness you're wallowing in is just insane. Literally none of it makes sense. It's so out of touch with rationality and reason it's hard to know how you function in daily life. 

 

New poll out shows 71% of the MAGA CULT believes & trusts Trump compared to only 63% for their friends and family members.

So, they've been preselected to BELIEVE ANYTHING. Also, they have virtually NO UNDERSTANDING of the laws of physics which is the BASIS for understanding how GHG climate change works.

Pretty sure that's why they believe AGW is no more believable than magic. Hard to convince them when it costs them money in the short term with only gradual longer-term benefits.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

How's that ignore list going for you? Do you need detailed instructions? 

Yes, there is overwhelming--utterly overwhelming--consensus among climatologists. It may not be 100% but it is certainly close. 

And no, there was no financial incentive to invent the concept of anthropogenic warming (which would have made the originators laughingstocks without data to support) nor has there been incentive to fake 40+ years of science--which is an absurd premise in the first place. All the money was and is on the other side of the fence. But even oil company scientists acknowledged warming. 

If you've got expertise and data to disprove the scientific consensus, go claim your Nobel prize. The world is waiting for anyone to deliver that good news if they can back it up.

The level of conspiracy craziness you're wallowing in is just insane. Literally none of it makes sense. It's so out of touch with rationality and reason it's hard to know how you function in daily life. 

 

Climate science is basically the far left leaning political pseudoscience wing of the leftist crime cartel. 

Basically the only way to get any of the leftist money they rob from tax payers is to publish a "study" for propaganda purposes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, West said:

This one will end up like the previous Donnie delusions. Impeachment hoax, Impeachment hoax 2, collusion hoax, stormy hoax... 

 

May be time to this bad low budget film to rest? 

Bathroom full of boxes of classified documents hoax… that wasn’t a hoax hoax. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, West said:

Climate science is basically the far left leaning political pseudoscience wing of the leftist crime cartel. 

Basically the only way to get any of the leftist money they rob from tax payers is to publish a "study" for propaganda purposes. 

That's pure rubbish. It's been politicized and you've chosen your bizarre dogma over actual science. You're no better equipped to evaluate a climate model than you are to discuss quantum entanglement, but still you believe politicians over actual scientists. It's lunacy.

Edited by Hodad
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, West said:

No need to "find" dirt... we already knew it existed. 

Anybody who defends selling out the vice presidents office to the highest bidder has no ethics themselves. Don't hate the people who expose your questionable ethics

 

Your boy Donald is an unethical pos.

Anyone who supports him is an unethical pos.

 

7 hours ago, West said:

All because he's likely getting kickbacks from the Saudis. 

 

Yes. You wear your over simplified partisan garbage like a badge.

And you top it off with a CT.

You are a simpleton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Sure, the world is full of "faux scientists."?‍? 

It would be pretty ridiculous to think that there weren't a lot of scientists who'd sell out to the highest bidder. 

Quote

You pretend that nothing has happened, while every we've started setting records for surface, ocean and atmospheric temperatures year after year. You're aggressively in denial, which is not a valid or helpful response to bad news. 

There's 500M+ sq km of earth's surface. We've been keeping records of daily temperatures for a few decades now. Of course records are being broken. It would be weird if there weren't.

Stop acting like the term "natural disaster" was unnecessary until 2018. 

Quote

The world's scientists are not playing tricks on you. They're making you aware of inconvenient facts. 

They're doing the same thing that witch doctors and shamans have done for 50,000 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,750
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Betsy Smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...