Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Trump using veiled threats and the dog whistles for a call to violence again just like he did on his failed coup on Jan 6.

I doubt any of the weekend warrior patriotic militia men will get off the couch or leave their breakfasts at IHOP for this one but I do have hope they will.

Word has it if the Proud Gay Boys or anyone else shows they will be thoroughly trounced unlike Jan 6 where our military gave them a pass. Nothing I'd rather see then phoney patriot,Neo Nazis get a good ass whoopin..

Posted
3 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Any day now, all of those "principled" Republicans will come out and condemn Trump for this.

I believe they are dying to cut him loose but just don't know how or when. 

Posted

Mob or true patriots who won't allow their country to be overrun by a banana republic type justice system such as thebone these psychopath democrats are trying to implement

Posted
4 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Any day now, all of those "principled" Republicans will come out and condemn Trump for this.

I'm sure the 'principled' democrats will be right behind them to condemn the violence and destruction of the riots the year before.  :)

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
55 minutes ago, West said:

Mob or true patriots who won't allow their country to be overrun by a banana republic type justice system such as thebone these psychopath democrats are trying to implement

The mob is afraid for Trump to stand before a judge he appointed?

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I'm sure the 'principled' democrats will be right behind them to condemn the violence and destruction of the riots the year before.  :)

I’m sure you’ll stop repeating that lie over and over once someone proves to you it’s a lie, right?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/13/fact-check-democrats-have-condemned-violence-linked-protests/3317862001/

  • Like 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
6 hours ago, NYLefty said:

Trump using veiled threats and the dog whistles for a call to violence again just like he did on his failed coup on Jan 6.

I doubt any of the weekend warrior patriotic militia men will get off the couch or leave their breakfasts at IHOP for this one but I do have hope they will.

Word has it if the Proud Gay Boys or anyone else shows they will be thoroughly trounced unlike Jan 6 where our military gave them a pass. Nothing I'd rather see then phoney patriot,Neo Nazis get a good ass whoopin..

Word has it? What word?  Where?  and where are these threats and dog whistles.

No offense but for that kind of thing you'd usually post a source just because there's nothing factual for us to look up. Looking up trump dog whistles threats indictment aren't turning up any recent results.

At the very least you would post them here.

I have a funny feeling you're full of shit but hey - prove me wrong

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Word has it? What word?  Where?  and where are these threats and dog whistles.

No offense but for that kind of thing you'd usually post a source just because there's nothing factual for us to look up. Looking up trump dog whistles threats indictment aren't turning up any recent results.

At the very least you would post them here.

I have a funny feeling you're full of shit but hey - prove me wrong

If you feel that democrats should have more forcefully condemned the BLM rioting, then wouldn’t that mean you also think Republicans should condemn the January 6 rioting?

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Rebound said:

The mob is afraid for Trump to stand before a judge he appointed?

I’m sure you’ll stop repeating that lie over and over once someone proves to you it’s a lie, right?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/13/fact-check-democrats-have-condemned-violence-linked-protests/3317862001/

if it ever happens i will.

They've said they don't approve of the violence but they support it. Which is what i said.

Kamala Harris raised cash for them.

https://nypost.com/2021/09/08/bail-fund-backed-by-kamala-harris-freed-man-charged-with-murder/

And seeing as youre using USA today which is OUTRAGEOUSLY partisan, i'll counter with this:

https://thefederalist.com/2021/01/08/10-times-democrats-urged-violence-against-trump-and-his-supporters/

Lets look at some quotes

“Please, get up in the face of some congresspeople,” Booker said at a conference.

Hillary Clinton said civility was only an option if the Democrats controlled the legislative branch. “You can’t be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for and what you care for,” she said in 2018.

Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder encouraged a group of “liberal activists,” to fight back, a sentiment that was met with applause and laughter. “Michelle [Obama] always says, ‘When they go low, we go high,’” Holder began. “No. No. When they go low, we kick them.”

In 2019, Rep. Joaquin Castro said Democrats would “fight [Trump] and challenge him in every way that we can in the Congress, in the courts, and in the streets and protests,” if the president declared a national emergency about a government shutdown.

More recently, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said that, in politics, “when you’re in the arena, you have to be ready to take a punch, and you have to be ready to throw a punch … for the children.”

 

Sen. Jon Tester of Montana took it one step further, encouraging people to “punch Trump in the face.”

“I don’t think even in states where Donald Trump won big that it does you any good running away from [him],” Tester said. “I think you need to go back and punch him in the face. I mean, the truth is, is this guy is bad for this country.”

 

How about this?

https://nypost.com/2021/04/19/dems-abandoned-all-principle-by-signaling-approval-of-some-rioting/

Some, such as the excitable Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), are cheering the prospect of another round of Black Lives Matter riots, er, “peaceful protests,” if the Derek Chauvin trial doesn’t go their way. They’re also up in arms about a new Florida law that strengthens punishment for those who take to the streets to commit violence.

Waters told demonstrators to “get more confrontational” with law enforcement if the Chauvin jurors decide wrongly (by her political lights). Not long after she uttered those words, some “mostly peaceful” protesters committed a drive-by shooting of National Guardsmen, there to protect against riots.

(She never condemned that btw).

 

 

 

I could go on for days. Bottom line is one highly paritisan 'fact check' from a source known for misinformation doesn't change the truth - NUMEROUS times the dems have actively supported the rioters and called for more violence.

 But hey - thanks for the opportunity to point out their hypocrisy again :) 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
13 minutes ago, Rebound said:

If you feel that democrats should have more forcefully condemned the BLM rioting, then wouldn’t that mean you also think Republicans should condemn the January 6 rioting?

Republicans DID condemn the jan 6 rioting and i absolutely do agree that they were entirely right to do so. There's no excuse for that behavior, those people should be deeply ashamed and those who committed crimes should go to jail.

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

I'm sure the 'principled' democrats will be right behind them to condemn the violence and destruction of the riots the year before.  :)

They already did. And either way, this is...

whataboutism-v0-kxsyn8xrc7z81.webp

2 hours ago, NYLefty said:

I believe they are dying to cut him loose but just don't know how or when. 

Oh yeah, the entire right-wing establishment absolutely hates Trump. They're just too chickenshit to publicly denounce him.

Unsere Stadt, merk euch das, für euch ist kein Platz da. Alerta, Alerta, Antifascista!

Posted

Aha. You should know by now he's a Canadian, who if he really did support Trump after all this, he'd be way beyond bat shit insane..

But he's not as you pointed out in using yet another fallacy to keep the posts gong on and on... merely a compulsive troll.

I think, to ensure equal justice for all, that anyone charged with anything should be interviewed on the major networks, given a reality show and have a Gofundme page set up so millions of complete dimwits can pay for their defense.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

05989795-2231.jpg&w=960

it is important to note that the level of opposition varied among individuals within the party.

Like I said before, the Republicans that oppose Trump are such a small minority that they don't matter.

Also, how many of these Republicans will still be opposing Trump when he wins the primary? William Barr denounced Trump, but said he'll still support Trump if he becomes the nominee. That's how spineless these cucks are.

Unsere Stadt, merk euch das, für euch ist kein Platz da. Alerta, Alerta, Antifascista!

Posted
14 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

05989795-2231.jpg&w=960

it is important to note that the level of opposition varied among individuals within the party.

Here are 5 Republican figures who spoke out against Trump:

Paul Ryan: Paul Ryan, who served as Speaker of the House from 2015 to 2019, had a complicated relationship with Trump. While he initially endorsed Trump's candidacy in 2016, he did criticize some of his controversial statements and policy proposals. In October 2016, after the release of the Access Hollywood tape, Ryan condemned Trump's remarks.  Additionally, during Trump's presidency, Ryan occasionally pushed back against some of his policy decisions, such as his approach to immigration. During the midterms, Paul Ryan also spoke up first saying that the American people gave their verdict on MAGA. 

John Kasich: John Kasich, the former governor of Ohio, was a vocal critic of Trump both during the 2016 Republican primary and throughout his presidency. Kasich refused to endorse Trump in 2016 and did not attend the Republican National Convention that nominated him. He openly expressed concerns about Trump's temperament, divisive rhetoric, and policy positions. Kasich even ran against Trump in the 2020 Republican primary, though he did not gain much traction and ultimately dropped out.

Mitt Romney: Mitt Romney, the senator from Utah and former Republican presidential nominee in 2012, has been one of the most consistent critics of Trump within the Republican Party. He delivered a scathing speech in March 2016, calling Trump a "phony" and a "fraud." Romney has repeatedly criticized Trump's character, behavior, and policy decisions, including his handling of the Russia investigation. He also voted to convict Trump during both impeachment trials.

Jeff Flake: Jeff Flake, the former senator from Arizona, openly clashed with Trump during his time in office. Flake announced in 2017 that he would not seek re-election, and he became a vocal critic of Trump's rhetoric and policies. He frequently denounced the president's attacks on the media and his divisive behavior. Flake even published a book titled "Conscience of a Conservative: A Rejection of Destructive Politics and a Return to Principle," which criticized Trump and called for a return to traditional conservative values.

Liz Cheney: Liz Cheney, the daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney and a congresswoman from Wyoming, became a prominent critic of Trump within the Republican Party. As a member of the House Republican leadership, she consistently spoke out against Trump's false claims about the 2020 election, leading to her removal from her leadership position in May 2021. Cheney has been a strong advocate for truth and has publicly stated that Trump does not have a rightful claim to the Republican Party's principles.

And look what the Republicans have done to them. Only Mitt Romney has been able to carry on, and that's down to religion and unique circumstances of Utah politics. Ouch.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, West said:

Mob or true patriots who won't allow their country to be overrun by a banana republic type justice system such as thebone these psychopath democrats are trying to implement

It you want to see the true psychopath ^here, look in the MIRROR.

Watching FOS LIES all the time will do that to YOU. LMAO

Edited by robosmith
Posted
3 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

They already did. And either way, this is...

whataboutism-v0-kxsyn8xrc7z81.webp

Oh yeah, the entire right-wing establishment absolutely hates Trump. They're just too chickenshit to publicly denounce him.

ROFLMAO - a meme to make your argument? Jeezzz - did i break you AGAIN? What is that, third day in a row or the like?

Pointing out your lies and hypocrisy isn't whataboutism. It's just pointing out your lies and hypocrisy :)  

I thought you'd be a little tougher than that!

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Pointing out your lies and hypocrisy isn't whataboutism. It's just pointing out your lies and hypocrisy :)  

It's not hypocrisy. I've always condemned rioting. But you have to use whataboutism because you're too cucked to admit you like that Trump is a criminal.

  • Like 1

Unsere Stadt, merk euch das, für euch ist kein Platz da. Alerta, Alerta, Antifascista!

Posted
10 hours ago, CdnFox said:

if it ever happens i will.

They've said they don't approve of the violence but they support it. Which is what i said.

Kamala Harris raised cash for them.

https://nypost.com/2021/09/08/bail-fund-backed-by-kamala-harris-freed-man-charged-with-murder/

And seeing as youre using USA today which is OUTRAGEOUSLY partisan, i'll counter with this:

https://thefederalist.com/2021/01/08/10-times-democrats-urged-violence-against-trump-and-his-supporters/

Lets look at some quotes

“Please, get up in the face of some congresspeople,” Booker said at a conference.

Hillary Clinton said civility was only an option if the Democrats controlled the legislative branch. “You can’t be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for and what you care for,” she said in 2018.

Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder encouraged a group of “liberal activists,” to fight back, a sentiment that was met with applause and laughter. “Michelle [Obama] always says, ‘When they go low, we go high,’” Holder began. “No. No. When they go low, we kick them.”

In 2019, Rep. Joaquin Castro said Democrats would “fight [Trump] and challenge him in every way that we can in the Congress, in the courts, and in the streets and protests,” if the president declared a national emergency about a government shutdown.

More recently, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said that, in politics, “when you’re in the arena, you have to be ready to take a punch, and you have to be ready to throw a punch … for the children.”

 

Sen. Jon Tester of Montana took it one step further, encouraging people to “punch Trump in the face.”

“I don’t think even in states where Donald Trump won big that it does you any good running away from [him],” Tester said. “I think you need to go back and punch him in the face. I mean, the truth is, is this guy is bad for this country.”

 

How about this?

https://nypost.com/2021/04/19/dems-abandoned-all-principle-by-signaling-approval-of-some-rioting/

Some, such as the excitable Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), are cheering the prospect of another round of Black Lives Matter riots, er, “peaceful protests,” if the Derek Chauvin trial doesn’t go their way. They’re also up in arms about a new Florida law that strengthens punishment for those who take to the streets to commit violence.

Waters told demonstrators to “get more confrontational” with law enforcement if the Chauvin jurors decide wrongly (by her political lights). Not long after she uttered those words, some “mostly peaceful” protesters committed a drive-by shooting of National Guardsmen, there to protect against riots.

(She never condemned that btw).

 

 

 

I could go on for days. Bottom line is one highly paritisan 'fact check' from a source known for misinformation doesn't change the truth - NUMEROUS times the dems have actively supported the rioters and called for more violence.

 But hey - thanks for the opportunity to point out their hypocrisy again :) 

All cherry picked hogwash. But nice try

Posted

Comparing BLM protests for a man murdered by the very people who are supposed to be here to protect and serve so that it might not happen again to a fat spoiled privileged Manhattanitte who wanted to turn over everything America stands for because he got beaten in an election is a bit of a stretch, wuncha say????

Posted
4 hours ago, NYLefty said:

All cherry picked hogwash. But nice try

All factually accurate and there's tonnes more.  But nice try :)

I know i know - it just breaks your cold black little hearts when someone correctly and accurately points this stuff out.  But - sorry, it's the truth.

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
8 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

It's not hypocrisy. I've always condemned rioting.

You literally support a group that participates in rioting.

Quote

But you have to use whataboutism because you're too cucked to admit you like that Trump is a criminal.

And again you use big words that you don't understand :) whataboutism isn't when you point out that someone else does the SAME thing - it's when you try to excuse one thing by saying someone else did something else that's also bad. 

For example - if i said the republicans dont' have to denounce violence because biden has illegally taken money for influence by using his son, that would be whataboutism.

When i say the lefties can't complain about the republicans until they condemn their own violence - that's pointing out hypocrisy.

Sorry sweetie - you got it wrong.  It's your hypocrisy that's the problem here. But i suppose that's easier than dealing with the issue at hand :)

4 hours ago, NYLefty said:

Comparing BLM protests for a man murdered by the very people who are supposed to be here to protect and serve so that it might not happen again to a fat spoiled privileged Manhattanitte who wanted to turn over everything America stands for because he got beaten in an election is a bit of a stretch, wuncha say????

I think everyone would find your comparison a bit of a stretch - but i think that kind of goes WITHOUT saying :) 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
22 hours ago, NYLefty said:

Trump using veiled threats and the dog whistles for a call to violence again just like he did on his failed coup on Jan 6.

I doubt any of the weekend warrior patriotic militia men will get off the couch or leave their breakfasts at IHOP for this one but I do have hope they will.

Word has it if the Proud Gay Boys or anyone else shows they will be thoroughly trounced unlike Jan 6 where our military gave them a pass. Nothing I'd rather see then phoney patriot,Neo Nazis get a good ass whoopin..

You're so full of shit.

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

You literally support a group that participates in rioting.

Every movement has a violent fringe. If we're going to purity spiral, then no movement can ever have support.

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

And again you use big words that you don't understand :) whataboutism isn't when you point out that someone else does the SAME thing - it's when you try to excuse one thing by saying someone else did something else that's also bad. 

Yes, that's what you're doing. You're deflecting from Trump being a criminal by saying that other people riot.

  • Like 3

Unsere Stadt, merk euch das, für euch ist kein Platz da. Alerta, Alerta, Antifascista!

Posted
On 6/12/2023 at 9:37 AM, NYLefty said:

Trump using veiled threats and the dog whistles for a call to violence again just like he did on his failed coup on Jan 6.

I doubt any of the weekend warrior patriotic militia men will get off the couch or leave their breakfasts at IHOP for this one but I do have hope they will.

Word has it if the Proud Gay Boys or anyone else shows they will be thoroughly trounced unlike Jan 6 where our military gave them a pass. Nothing I'd rather see then phoney patriot,Neo Nazis get a good ass whoopin..

Donald failed because only a handful of his peculiar cultists showed up... Many dressed in cosplay to support their cult leader.

Donald wanted a mob..... He got a giant nothing burger.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/6/13/trump-arraignment-the-scene-outside-the-miami-courthouse

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,022
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...