Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

I said I will film them, I don't want them to follow me. Why would I want a drag around like you, brother? You are a follower low life that was raised with a communist mommy and an absent father and here you are taking you frustration with the keyboard. Have you no shame for this board?! You have no respect for authority, troll..

the psychopathic troll grasps at straws

 

Posted
Just now, Contrarian said:

Listen, this man that runs this board, I checked him out, he is a good man, and is the only reason an element like you stands. 

Now, watch my next 10 posts, only aimed at productivity. No matter what you write back to me, here, I know you will, will respond to each and every single message of yours, You bullied, threatened, and spit on every civilized reasonable conversation in the past. Is just physics man, always, things are coming back to haunt one. It will probably happen to me too,  oh man, I have flaws, it will happen to me, too. But now, it is happening to you, and the more you open your mouth the more anger I grew towards you and the more will push me to expose you. Is just a matter of time, bully troll. And, remember, I am not Argus to be an Uncle Sam boy.I am a private anarcho-capitalist that will walk through any boundaries to reach towards your manipulation. I have no limits, bully troll. 

the psychopath rants & raves

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

Does not matter man, even though you, ok fine, we destroyed another thread, the fact that nobody gives you the likes, and the fact that nobody is here to stand up for you, tells me that people are good people, they sit and think for themselves. 

In the end either you shape up or you will end up alone. Is that easy, bully troll. Sugar is over here.

This board had over 100 users online and will keep growing, that rule will shut your spam down, and what else you have left?!

Shape up and contribute or talk to the mirror, bully troll.  

the psychopath is backpedalling now

Posted
1 minute ago, Contrarian said:

"Sucking up to me". My friend, this is not your South Toronto Detention time. Come to reason. ? 

Have big plans for you, customer, from what I've read, think a strike at the core of troilism, you might be a good specimen. 

in the detention centre, you would be sucking up to me big time, no doubt

but I would just out you as being a psychopath to the other prisoners

Posted
43 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

Exactly, my point, now you are in your environment, in your language, the criminal record came out. My friend, do you understand some of us went to school and can trace a rap song to where it comes from, and if someone can not hide their age, is not my fault? I know more about you than this whole board knows. The only reason an element like you still stands, is because of what we share, the struggle for the booze, in other circumstances, would think of various way to not be that sympathetic. 

Please, go back there and hide that age is embarrassing, RapMan. 

I have no criminal record

I just know a lot of ex-military cops & prison guards

so I know how it works in jail

Posted
3 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

My friend, your sugar is almost over, in a few days, remember, no matter how many consecutive posts you send, it will be condensed into one. Your trolling is over, nobody will be bothered by your nonsense and the discussion can move towards innovation. You are an ignorant angry man, and personally, I did not come across such psychopaths until you. Gets to show you how one needs to keep the system strong, I would not want to allow such low IQ towards the reign of power. 

again, alternating between sucking up and issuing threats

this is classic psychopath behaviour

Posted
Just now, Contrarian said:

Well, I will look at the final product. That's what matters, "Dougie93", tdot, RapMan. ? Oh, brother, you just might be my ticket to the mainstream. Every minute you swirl, may Almighty bless your soul. ?

delusions of grandeur

psychopath 101

Posted
1 minute ago, Contrarian said:

Good evening, 

My understanding is that this board had over 100 users online today. 

For anyone tunning in, this person above, please see below 

Troll.png

?

 

I was an infantryman, that role is to kill for the state

the Commonwealth is not a military alliance

when someone insists that I would have to fight for the Commonwealth against America

I say f*ck that, I would fight for America against any Commonwealth country who attacked her

so what ?

Posted
10 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

I don’t even know what to say this drivel. He can’t take away our rights because he supposedly swore an oath to god that he wouldn’t?

 

Aside from totally mixing up the meaning of “can’t” and “won’t” and the dubious claims that one man’s private religious beliefs are known and don’t change and somehow so iron-clad that they are a scientific fact of the universe, it is just wrong

 

 Canadians have rights be because we have a Charter of Rights and Freedoms not because we lucked out that the inbred monarch on a foreign throne is kind enough to let us have them. Interestingly there are no constitutional rights in the UK amd the monarchy doesn’t have the power to unilaterally strip them away 

 

Brits on the other hand have no constitutional rights or freedoms.  They have long standing freedoms granted to them by acts of parliament and the legal precedent of various court decisions but none are ironclad inalienable constitutional rights. 

_80366080_kingjohn.jpg

We have had a constitution since at least 1215.

Tell me what is the difference between a right granted by law, parliament or convention and one granted in a single rigid document?

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Iceni warrior said:

_80366080_kingjohn.jpg

We have had a constitution since at least 1215.

Tell me what is the difference between a right granted by law, parliament or convention and one granted in a single rigid document?

it's really about Christianity

there is a rising tide of hatred being whipped up against Christians

and the Trudeau government is using that as a base of support

they used the pandemic lockdowns to vilify Christians

they use the residential school "genocide"

the Trudeau crown is just the latest attack on Christianity

this is becoming like something out of the 1930's

a rising totalitarianism employing religion as a rubric to whip the masses up

so this is not the Liberal party anymore, this has become a totalitarian party

Posted
19 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

⬆️ Extremism above. 

Such a statement is not only unfounded and baseless, but it is also a dangerous form of radicalism itself.

this is the Trudeau strategy

anybody who opposes Trudeau's creeping totalitarianism

is accused of being a "dangerous radical"

to include someone as moderate as Pierre Poilievre

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

Is this the part where you call me a liberal? I like PP and my platform is behind him against the liberal ideologues that took over in almost every institution, in my opinion. At the same time, fringes like you need to be called upon, as PP did when ilk like you decided to post a radical German flag. He came on the TV and told them they are not welcome. He is a man of integrity, now you claim to be on his side. You switch roles more than socks. 

I started out arguing that Trudeau was not a fascist

I argued that point vehemently, it became quite heated

but I was simply proven wrong, I had to concede that this is what fascism looks like

Edited by Dougie93
Posted
1 minute ago, Contrarian said:

My opinion is to concede in online trolling and bring something. Lots of new Canadians come to this country and have no idea about this history as you claim. Instead of spending your time educating people about British culture, and talking about the positives in the Orange Order, talk about the history of the British Monarchy, you could even start a thread and relate it with other monarchies in the world so you can educate folks, all you are doing are the same attacks until I come around, we go back and forth for 2-3 pages, ruining the conversation, then you show some reason.

Canada is the Monarchy

arguing in favour of the Monarchy in Canada is now "dangerous radicalism"

the Loyalist Orangemen literally built Canada

this is the history of Canada

and in terms of the Constitution Act, the monarchy is the bulwark against fascism

you don't have to be loyal to the government, only the monarch

thus why the King is above the fray, apolitical

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

Radicalism? I support the Monarchy in this country and would love to see who can stop me from posting my opinion. Who?

Where are these forces? I also took great pleasure to see anti-monarchy forces getting arrested in the UK, most of them new British citizens, probably old communists.  Don't care if that is me being controversial, The British build the civilized world, some can take a break from protesting. ?

I don't go around the forum attacking people for their views

people are welcome to their views, it doesn't bother me

I simply defend the monarchy as being the Constitution of Canada itself

Edited by Dougie93
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Iceni warrior said:

Btw they were released without charge and the Met' apologised to them.

neither the United Kingdom nor the Confederation of Canada could function as republics

both would simply break up into multiple republics

neither Scotland nor Quebec are sticking around to be in a British Republic

Edited by Dougie93
Posted (edited)

FIRST READING: Did Trudeau turn the Canadian Crown into a woke icon?

Author of the article:
Tristin Hopper
Published May 09, 2023  •  Last updated 1 hour ago  •  5 minute read
 
The new design for the Canadian Royal Crown, featuring a stylized snowflake at its top.The new design for the Canadian Royal Crown, featuring a stylized snowflake at its top. Photo by Rideau Hall

Within hours of Canada unveiling a new royal crown topped with a snowflake instead of a cross, the going joke was that the change was “appropriate” given the country’s current political situation.

“The new snowflake crown seems sadly appropriate,” reads a tweet by retired CTV News investigator Alan Fryer. It was one of countless Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and Reddit posts to make the same observation over the weekend.

The right-wing activist group Canada Proud dubbed the new crown a symbol of what “this government is about.” “Trudeau’s new crown redesign has replaced the top cross with a literal snowflake,” they wrote on Facebook.

“As the cross has been replaced by a snowflake, surely it’s better suited for the Snowflake-in-Chief: Justin Trudeau, the Emperor of Woke,” reads a review by the U.K.-based royal commentator Rafe Heydel-Mankoo.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/did-trudeau-turn-the-canadian-crown-into-a-woke-icon

Edited by Dougie93
Posted
29 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

My ignorance -> and multiple reports of Russian (my definition of old communists) interference in British affairs.

One example is the protests over the suspension of the UK parliament, in which a Twitter account linked to the Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA) promoted the hashtag #StopTheCoup, according to a report by the social media analytics company Graphika.

Ah, so you pulled it out of your arse.

Posted
1 minute ago, Contrarian said:

Yes, you are correct, I used my BIAS towards anti-monarchy forces to draft a perception. I just did not like the loudmouths at the megaphone. 

Amazing when people challenge me on my nonsense, it improves the conversation. Good man. 

Just the facts ma'am.

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

You see Dougie, you fight clean as @Iceni warrior, and you get to insult fairly. The man caught me in manipulation because I despise anti-monarchy agitators on a day like that day, and he is entitled to make his victory laps. 

As a warrior in the Colosseum of this debate, there is nothing more but to concede on this point. 

@Iceni warrior - @Contrarian 1 - 0

Misinformation should be treated like the citizens of Colchester and burned.

Posted
36 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

You see Dougie, you fight clean as @Iceni warrior, and you get to insult fairly. The man caught me in manipulation because I despise anti-monarchy agitators on a day like that day, and he is entitled to make his victory laps. 

As a warrior in the Colosseum of this debate, there is nothing more but to concede on this point. 

@Iceni warrior - @Contrarian 1 - 0

I don't pick fights, I'm not interested in doing victory laps, I don't initiate personal attacks

I criticize the government, not members of the forum

Posted
15 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

So nobody invoked the notwithstanding clause or a constitutional amendment during that pandemic. Also it’s a lot harder to do any of those things than in the uk. The rights amd freedoms brits are naturally entitled to are more limited than in Canada and its much easier for Brit authorities to take those away. 

I'm no expert on British rights, but if they are enshrined in law, then how are they so much different than ours, How British rights limited compared to ours ?... all it takes is for parliament to sit and decide what to cancel or add on in Britian... while in Canada it takes an act of god to get anything amended, lets not forget that Quebec has not signed on to the constitution, so ours is not complete, while British rights cover the entire country. 

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

 lets not forget that Quebec has not signed on to the constitution, so ours is not complete,

Quebec has its own relationship with the monarchy

so Quebec simply continues to be governed under the British North America Act 1867

in a republic, that would not be possible, so Quebec would have to separate

it is the monarchy which is keeping the Confederation together

that is how the Confederation works, each province has a direct relationship to the monarchy

Quebec is actually still be governed by the British Common Law

ironically making Quebec the most British part of Canada

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,830
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TRUMP2016
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • BlahTheCanuck earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • BlahTheCanuck earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • CDN1 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • oops earned a badge
      One Year In
    • DUI_Offender went up a rank
      Grand Master
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...