Budweiser hires trans spokesperson and the right loses their mind

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Actually he could own the panties his wife wears without actually wearing them or using them himself.

Yes, he COULD buy panties for his wife AND retain ownership, IF she was his slave.

REAL men give their wife ownership of a GIFT.

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So your statement was incorrect.

HIS statement is AMBIGUOUS. Mine chose one of the OBVIOUS meanings.

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

If you're going to try to 'ding' someone on a technicality - try to think it through first?

Back atcha.

[Nationalist]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It's OK that your wife wears YOUR panties. Just not at the same time as you. LMAO

Of course its OK. They fit her better than they would me...I'd think.

Wouldn't you?

[robosmith]

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Oh BS. if I say fat girls make shitty runway models, would you think I meant fat girls should stay at home hiding?

Don't be such a liar.

You didn't say trans make shitty spokesmen, you said they shouldn't be visible in public. AKA, in the spotlight. 

[Nationalist]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Yes, he COULD buy panties for his wife AND retain ownership, IF she was his slave.

REAL men give their wife ownership of a GIFT.

HIS statement is AMBIGUOUS. Mine chose one of the OBVIOUS meanings.

Back atcha.

Real men? You're gonna lecture on what a real man is?

OK hang on while I get comfy-cozy. I don't wanna miss a syllable of this.

[Nationalist]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

You didn't say trans make shitty spokesmen, you said they shouldn't be visible in public. AKA, in the spotlight. 

I didn't say that either robo-bot.

Please at least try? You make making you out to be a twit...way too easy.

Edited April 18, 2023 by Nationalist

[CrakHoBarbie]

21 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

LOL.

Meh...of all the Tweenkies in here, I still like Barb. She's reasonable...once in a while. I just think she's a victim of a slanted media.'and a see-through head...

The issue here is so simple. Gays and trans deserve to enjoy the exact same rights that we all enjoy.

In America, "all men are created equal". 

Therefore, everybody deserves to enjoy the same rights.

And all you and Canadian Fox are doing here is proving that both y'all do not want everyone to enjoy the same rights.

And then y'all have hissy fits when people outside your echo chamber disagree with you.

Edited April 18, 2023 by CrakHoBarbie

[Legato]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Trans and homo phobes are generally UNAWARE of their fears (AKA subliminal), which generally refers to THEM BECOMING trans of homo, not physical fear of the person.

The fear is of the INFLUENCE of NORMALIZATION. 

You're welcome.

You speaking from personal experience?

[Aristides]

9 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 

In America, "all men are created equal". 

We are seeing that in the anti women, anti LGBTQ legislation.

[CrakHoBarbie]

11 minutes ago, Aristides said:

We are seeing that in the anti women, anti LGBTQ legislation.

Alt-right homophobic miscreants and religious zealots will try anything to get their way.

The left still fights for all people to have the same rights as everyone else.

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

I'm not the one lashing out at trans folk. You are.

I'm not lashing out at anybody. You on the ohter hand are lashing out at EVERYBODY  

Chill girl - it's just the internet.

[Nationalist]

56 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

The issue here is so simple. Gays and trans deserve to enjoy the exact same rights that we all enjoy.

In America, "all men are created equal". 

Therefore, everybody deserves to enjoy the same rights.

And all you and Canadian Fox are doing here is proving that both y'all do not want everyone to enjoy the same rights.

And then y'all have hissy fits when people outside your echo chamber disagree with you.

They do enjoy the same rights as everybody.

Since when did that mean the right to star in an ad?

They can apply to star in an ad. But the company has the right to hire or reject.

In this case, they hired and got a face full of dropping sales.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

ROFLMAO.

Fox...don't do that while I'm drinking pop.

Got fckin' Pepsi all over my screen...

You were drinking pepsi while we're talking about trans people?!?!?!!?

Boycott in 3....2...1.....

(this is LITERALLY how some of the people here seem to think it works )

[CrakHoBarbie]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I'm not lashing out at anybody. You on the ohter hand are lashing out at EVERYBODY  

Chill girl - it's just the internet.

Oh? So now you've accepted the fact that trans folk deserve to enjoy the same rights as everyone else?

You are such a giving soul.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Yes, he COULD buy panties for his wife AND retain ownership, IF she was his slave.

I think you'll find ownership doesn't require actual indentured servitude to be a thing

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

REAL men give their wife ownership of a GIFT.

So - just to be clear, you're saying you gave YOUR panties to  your wife as a gift?

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

HIS statement is AMBIGUOUS. Mine chose one of the OBVIOUS meanings.

Uuhhh yeahhhhh - definitely obvious. Well. LIke i said - not here to judge.

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Back atcha.

That's what she said i bet LOLOLOL

(probably followed by 'do your own laundry!')

[CrakHoBarbie]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

 

Since when did that mean the right to star in an ad?

 

Doesn't everyone have the right to be hired?

When you say stuff like this, it makes me wonder when you lost the ability to reason.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Oh? So now you've accepted the fact that trans folk deserve to enjoy the same rights as everyone else?

You would be the one who insisted they didn't.  I've said that all along - in fact i've said i'm not sure this is even about that.

So why are you trying to push others into believing that this ISN"T the case?

Also - her rights weren't affected. Nobody has done anything to her - Bud light is the one who's getting pounded on.

Are you saying somehow Bud Lite is 'trans'?   I could buy the idea that they're water that identifies as beer i guess.

1 minute ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

You are such a giving soul.

True.  Whereas you're a bit of a hypcrite and very dishonest 

 

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Doesn't everyone have the right to be hired?

No! Good lord - where the hell did you get that idea? Nobody has a 'right' to be hired

2 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

When you say stuff like this, it makes me wonder when you lost the ability to reason.

Pot, meet kettle. Kettle - this is pot.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

You speaking from personal experience?

Not ONLY a lifetime of PERSONAL experience observing and THINKING, but ALSO READING and LISTENING to what EXPERTS have to say.

One observation is that conservatives have a very simple minded way of believing ONLY the MOST OBVIOUS interpretation of phrases.

[Nationalist]

4 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Doesn't everyone have the right to be hired?

When you say stuff like this, it makes me wonder when you lost the ability to reason.

Not really Barb. In essence...we humans have the right to be born and the right to die. The rest we "gift" ourselves. Everyone has the "right" to apply...unless you post jobs with a line that says something that discriminates against some people...which has happened. Nobody has a "right" to get hired.

[robosmith]

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I think you'll find ownership doesn't require actual indentured servitude to be a thing

NO ONE said it was REQUIRED. 

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So - just to be clear, you're saying you gave YOUR panties to  your wife as a gift?

I own them BEFORE I give them. Afterwards they are NO LONGER MINE.

 

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Not ONLY a lifetime of PERSONAL experience observing and THINKING, but ALSO READING and LISTENING to what EXPERTS have to say.

Give us a break. We know you can't really read

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

One observation is that conservatives have a very simple minded way of believing ONLY the MOST OBVIOUS interpretation of phrases.

ROFLMAO -

YOuR ClAiM is JUST an OPINION without FACTS!!!!!

Dude you're a joke, constantly insisting that eveyrone else provide proof of their statements and refusing to do so with your own.  And nobody believes for half a second you've 'observed' anything other than whatever your confirmation bias will let you.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Man - you sure are fixated on the idea of him wearing panties.  Something you want to tell the class? We're not here to jugde.

No, but I am curious as to why his wife is wearing HIS panties. I don't even own "panties." LMAO

Unless tidy whities or equivalent colors qualify. I generally think "panties" are made with skimpier fabrics.

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

NO ONE said it was REQUIRED. 

Well you did.

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I own them BEFORE I give them. Afterwards they are NO LONGER MINE.

Oh - ok, so they're your panties and then when you're done with them you gift them to her.  My what a gentleman you are.  I hope you at least wash them first?

[CdnFox]

Just now, robosmith said:

No, but I am curious as to why his wife is wearing HIS panties.

Well you just said your wife wears YOUR panties, after you're done with them.

Are you looking to start a club or something? Guys who wear panties before their wife does? You could be president!

[Nationalist]

8 minutes ago, robosmith said:

NO ONE said it was REQUIRED. 

I own them BEFORE I give them. Afterwards they are NO LONGER MINE.

 

Do you rifle through her closet and sniff the panties you gave her?

Just wondering...