Budweiser hires trans spokesperson and the right loses their mind

[CrakHoBarbie]

Just now, Nationalist said:

Because they partnered with a sexual deviant, 

The left will never stop moving forward with the acceptance and normalization of trans folk and homosexuals in American society.

This has been happening, incrementally, for quite some time. 

I think it's absolutely adorable how you think you can stop the wheels of progress with your bigoted religious zealot garbage.

Your ilk is like a leaf in a hurricane.

 

 

[Nationalist]

3 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

The left will never stop moving forward with the acceptance and normalization of trans folk and homosexuals in American society.

This has been happening, incrementally, for quite some time. 

I think it's absolutely adorable how you think you can stop the wheels of progress with your bigoted religious zealot garbage.

Your ilk is like a leaf in a hurricane.

 

 

Acceptance? Or imposition?

Like I said...I don't care how this person LARPs or who he fcks. But putting him on their ad, only hurt their business. It was a poor decision made to appease the various Holier Than Thou Tweenkies.

Edited April 18, 2023 by Nationalist

[Americana Antifa]

25 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I never liked Bud Light. Now I don't like it even more.

How you gonna have Bugs Bunny in your avatar and hate gender non-conforming people?

[Nationalist]

6 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

How you gonna have Bugs Bunny in your avatar and hate gender non-conforming people?

Bugsy-Boy was a BOY. The greatest cartoon ever created...IMO.

And I don't "hate" gender-benders. Frankly I feel sympathy for them. They must be such tortured souls. Paraded around like puppets for the "privilaged", like some zoo animal.

Ya know who I "hate"? Jack asses and Tweeknies who think they can impose and normalize psychologically warped personalities. Showcase them. Have them read to our children...in drag. Promote sexual deviance.

Them and ANTIFA and BLM. Hate 'em all.

Edited April 18, 2023 by Nationalist

[CrakHoBarbie]

8 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Acceptance? Or imposition?

Like I said...I don't care how this person LARPs or who he fcks. But putting him on their ad, only hurt their business. It was a poor decision made to appease the various Holier Than Thou Tweenkies.

Please explain in detail how InBevs use of a trans spokesperson has imposed on you.

[Nationalist]

2 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Please explain in detail how InBevs use of a trans spokesperson has imposed on you.

Do I want to watch sexual deviance on parade? Do I want children to view this ad?

NO!

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 prove my point for me

 

So you have no  source -  so you actually proved my point for me

You seem like a nice person, but you are absolutely a hypocrite.

[CrakHoBarbie]

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

 

 I don't "hate" gender-benders. 

Them and ANTIFA and BLM. Hate 'em all.

I see you're a tad confused.

Some psychologists think that folks who hate homosexuals are actually closeted homosexuals themselves.

You see, they fear the way homosexuals make them feel arousal. This makes them lash out in shame.

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/homophobes-might-be-hidden-homosexuals/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiYqMeW77P-AhVWOkQIHVq9Dl0QFnoECAQQAg&usg=AOvVaw2CNZ-fPfjzEzj-p0nAAFiw

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/roots/franklin.html&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiYqMeW77P-AhVWOkQIHVq9Dl0QFnoECAkQAg&usg=AOvVaw0DP-IG5wqNuJfxh-rESF8y

[CrakHoBarbie]

6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Do I want to watch sexual deviance on parade? Do I want children to view this ad?

NO!

Do you want every group that you don't like to be hidden so your not offended?

That's unrealistic. Gays and trans folk exist. Straight up fact.

The Nazis hated gays as well. Do you know what their "final solution" to get rid of them was?

You are spreading the same brand of hate all because of ignorance.

[CrakHoBarbie]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So you have no  source -  so you actually proved my point for me

You seem like a nice person, but you are absolutely a hypocrite.

You claimed that you should be forced to confirm my point for me.

You have Google, right?

I guess your just to lazy to prove me right.

I'm just throwing your moronic contention back in your face.

How do you like them apples? Or, in this case, them Adams apples....

Edited April 18, 2023 by CrakHoBarbie

[robosmith]

19 hours ago, Legato said:

A phobia is an anxiety disorder defined by a persistent and excessive fear of an object or situation.

Anyone here frightened of trans people. No, didn't think so

Trans and homo phobes are generally UNAWARE of their fears (AKA subliminal), which generally refers to THEM BECOMING trans of homo, not physical fear of the person.

The fear is of the INFLUENCE of NORMALIZATION. 

You're welcome.

[CdnFox]

10 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 

Some psychologists think that folks who hate homosexuals are actually closeted homosexuals themselves.

That is not even a little bit true. Some think that ONE reason SOME people have hostility is confusion over there own sexuality. There is NOT ONE who thinks that people are like that in general.

From your own link:

"Sometimes people are threatened by gays and lesbians because they are fearing their own impulses, in a sense they 'doth protest too much,'"

From the second link.

From this perspective, assaults on homosexuals and other individuals who deviate from sex role norms are viewed as a learned form of social control of deviance rather than a defensive response to personal threat.

Neither article claims that the reason folks who hate homosexuals is closeted feelings - they both mention there are MANY reasons for it.

And you are literally trying to gay shame him here.  "Oh you don't like gays? you must be gay!  You should feel terrible about yourself because you're gay".

That's the gist of your message.  What the hell are you doing? You think it's ok to gay shame people like that? Why not just call him a 'f*ggot' and be done with it?

Yeash - do better.

[robosmith]

53 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

My panties are worn by my wife and I'll ruffle them all I like...thank you very much.

I never liked Bud Light. Now I don't like it even more.

So either you or your wife is a cross dresser. Congrats on being woke.

[CdnFox]

27 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

How you gonna have Bugs Bunny in your avatar and hate gender non-conforming people?

How you gonna call everyone a nazi and sub human and complain about people hatin''?

[robosmith]

40 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Because they partnered with a sexual deviant, a very very small portion of any population, in order to virtue-signal.

How the freak dresses and who he fcks, is none of my concern. That Bud Light deemed it necessary to shine a spotlight on him is...Tweenkie as hell.

So they're OK with you as long as they remain in the closet. Too bad it sucks to be you. ?

[CrakHoBarbie]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

That is not even a little bit true. Some think that ONE reason SOME people have hostility is confusion over there own sexuality. There is NOT ONE who thinks that people are like that in general.

From your own link:

"Sometimes people are threatened by gays and lesbians because they are fearing their own impulses, in a sense they 'doth protest too much,'"

From the second link.

From this perspective, assaults on homosexuals and other individuals who deviate from sex role norms are viewed as a learned form of social control of deviance rather than a defensive response to personal threat.

Neither article claims that the reason folks who hate homosexuals is closeted feelings - they both mention there are MANY reasons for it.

And you are literally trying to gay shame him here.  "Oh you don't like gays? you must be gay!  You should feel terrible about yourself because you're gay".

That's the gist of your message.  What the hell are you doing? You think it's ok to gay shame people like that? Why not just call him a 'f*ggot' and be done with it?

Yeash - do better.

Do you think that denying the validity of empirical evidence is going to help you?

Wallow in ignorance.

It's all you know.

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8772014/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiYqMeW77P-AhVWOkQIHVq9Dl0QFnoECAEQAg&usg=AOvVaw1TMT4kxuPra0vS9qxMgENM

[CrakHoBarbie]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

How you gonna call everyone a nazi and sub human and complain about people hatin''?

Please show where I called you a Nazi. I said your actions coincided with a hatred of gays shared by the Nazis.

You are such a delicate flower, huh....

Edited April 18, 2023 by CrakHoBarbie

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

You claimed that you should be forced to confirm my point for me.

Yes, But that's not what you claim.

Yet when asked for a source you freak out and try to blame others. If you believe what you say you should be happy to provide one.

But you won't, because you know i was right.

9 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

You have Google, right?

I guess your just to lazy to prove me right.

That WOULD be true, but i wasn't trying to prove you were right or wrong. I was trying to prove you're a hypocrite. Which is exactly what happened.  I already knew you were wrong.

9 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

I'm just throwing your moronic contention back in your face.

LOL - no, you're not. You're proving you didn't believe your own contention and are a hypocrite. Which is what i suspected would happen. Hence the smiley face below the request   I knew you woudln't live up to your own standards.

9 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

How do you like them apples? Or, in this case, them Adams apples....

They're hilarious  

Now that we've firmly established your  hypocrisy and that you don't believe what you yourself demanded, i think we can do away with pretending you care about sources   You were just sealioning from the start.

[Nationalist]

19 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

I see you're a tad confused.

Some psychologists think that folks who hate homosexuals are actually closeted homosexuals themselves.

You see, they fear the way homosexuals make them feel arousal. This makes them lash out in shame.

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/homophobes-might-be-hidden-homosexuals/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiYqMeW77P-AhVWOkQIHVq9Dl0QFnoECAQQAg&usg=AOvVaw2CNZ-fPfjzEzj-p0nAAFiw

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/roots/franklin.html&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiYqMeW77P-AhVWOkQIHVq9Dl0QFnoECAkQAg&usg=AOvVaw0DP-IG5wqNuJfxh-rESF8y

Psst...let's see the whole quote.

Quote

And I don't "hate" gender-benders. Frankly I feel sympathy for them. They must be such tortured souls. Paraded around like puppets for the "privilaged", like some zoo animal.

Ya know who I "hate"? Jack asses and Tweeknies who think they can impose and normalize psychologically warped personalities. Showcase them. Have them read to our children...in drag. Promote sexual deviance.

Them and ANTIFA and BLM. Hate 'em all.

Oh my! Sort o' changes the meaning, doesn't it.

Don't be a CrakHo and a liar Barb. Its unbecoming.

[CrakHoBarbie]

Just now, CdnFox said:

Yes, But that's not what you claim.

Yet when asked for a source you freak out and try to blame others. If you believe what you say you should be happy to provide one.

But you won't, because you know i was right.

That WOULD be true, but i wasn't trying to prove you were right or wrong. I was trying to prove you're a hypocrite. Which is exactly what happened.  I already knew you were wrong.

LOL - no, you're not. You're proving you didn't believe your own contention and are a hypocrite. Which is what i suspected would happen. Hence the smiley face below the request   I knew you woudln't live up to your own standards.

They're hilarious  

Now that we've firmly established your  hypocrisy and that you don't believe what you yourself demanded, i think we can do away with pretending you care about sources   You were just sealioning from the start.

Gish gallop nonsense.

It's fine.... You've already lost any respect I may have had for you.

So you may as well ride to town on your donkey named ignorance.

Ye haw

[CrakHoBarbie]

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Psst...let's see the whole quote.

Oh my! Sort o' changes the meaning, doesn't it.

Don't be a CrakHo and a liar Barb. Its unbecoming.

Your denial of empirical evidence is telling.

Are you feeling tingly thinking about Ms. Mulvaney?

Is that what this is all about?

Edited April 18, 2023 by CrakHoBarbie

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Do you think that denying the validity of empirical evidence is going to help you?

 

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8772014/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiYqMeW77P-AhVWOkQIHVq9Dl0QFnoECAEQAg&usg=AOvVaw1TMT4kxuPra0vS9qxMgENM

Do you think lying about the impirical evidence is going to help YOU? I quoted from your own source that you were wrong.

The paper you cited, which is almost 30 years old, has been debunked already some time ago

Here's something a little more 'modern'

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/pop-psych/201608/homophobia-isnt-repressed-homosexuality

So all you do is search the web for things that feed your confirmation bias. If the resaerch has to be 30 years out of date before you find something that confirms it - then so be it as long as it agrees with you and to hell with anything newer.

Swing and a miss kiddo.

[Nationalist]

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

So either you or your wife is a cross dresser. Congrats on being woke.

You really do have to stretch things to find some solace...don't you.

[CrakHoBarbie]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Do you think lying about the impirical evidence is going to help YOU? I quoted from your own source that you were wrong.

The paper you cited, which is almost 30 years old, has been debunked already some time ago

Here's something a little more 'modern'

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/pop-psych/201608/homophobia-isnt-repressed-homosexuality

So all you do is search the web for things that feed your confirmation bias. If the resaerch has to be 30 years out of date before you find something that confirms it - then so be it as long as it agrees with you and to hell with anything newer.

Swing and a miss kiddo.

Said the guy who's losing his shit over a beer ad featuring a transgendered person on their social media account where the only people seeing it are those who follow that account. 

You are such a delicate flower.... A transparent delicate flower.

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Gish gallop nonsense.

oh look, we learned a new word did we

Its the simple truth.

You - "if you make an asertion you MUST back it up with source!  I assert something!
Me: "well then back it up with a source - you're supposed to right?"

You - 'uhhhh welll , ,er no on -I- don't .. .er... gish gallop!!!!  (runs away)

6 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

It's fine.... You've already lost any respect I may have had for you.

ohhhh nooooeeesss - the hypocrite lefty who can't even live up to her own statements doesn't respect me any more Whatever will i do

So you're one of those kinds who can't respect anyone who doesn't absolutely agree with them. How sad. Common on the left, but still sad to see.

6 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

So you may as well ride to town on your donkey named ignorance.

My donkey is just named donkey

Would you like me to have him respond to you in the future? He might like talking to another ass