ExFlyer Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 3 hours ago, Dougie93 said: Trudeau is just one guy and the office of Prime Minister is not that powerful it's millions of Canadians who drink this Jonestown Kool-Aid Trudeau is just pandering to the Woke Green masses in Canada And Trudeau is just one in a long line of PM's garage selling Canada. Go back to Mulroney with NAFTA and even further back than that. Some say it started with Diefenbaker and the destruction of the Arrow. Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
ExFlyer Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 On 7/28/2022 at 3:59 PM, Zeitgeist said: No. The government set up arbitrary limits on cattle production which the courts enforced that are now bringing down the farming sector in the Netherlands. The EU is gutting the agricultural economy in the Netherlands and the people are powerless to stop it because democracy is so eroded in Europe. Britain is thankfully out of that deal but still facing international pressures to commit economic suicide. You underestimate the size of the problem. Netherlands has 3 major cities of more then a million (an many smaller ones) and 50,000 farmers in an area smaller than Nova Scotia. That is a lot of cow shit and fertilizer spread in the remaining gland. It is not the EU or WEF , it is the Dutch themselves that are seeing what is happening to their ecological systems. Of course farmers are going to be upset, their livelihood is being threatened but, They have ot take care of the whole country. Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 (edited) 14 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: And Trudeau is just one in a long line of PM's garage selling Canada. Go back to Mulroney with NAFTA and even further back than that. Some say it started with Diefenbaker and the destruction of the Arrow. nah, the Arrow was a dumb idea the F-15 Eagle was coming in 1972 the Arrow was already obsolete in 1959 they had no chance of competing with the Americans, that was a silly idea Diefenbaker tho did incite the schism between the government and the military he tried to tell the military to stand down in the Cuban Missile Crisis and the military mutinied on him, they just ignored the Canadian government and reported to the Americans this then made the Liberals decide that the military was a political threat thus they commenced the dismantling of the Canadian military with Amalgamation in 1968 in terms of Mulroney & Free Trade ? the alternative was to stay outside the American economy and try to beat them head to head and Canada was getting its ass kicked in that competition so it was basically an "if you can't beat them, join them" scenario Edited July 30, 2022 by Dougie93 Quote
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 also bear in mind, you're not actually losing jobs to the Americans the jobs in Canada are going to Mexico so it wasn't that the Canada -USA Free Trade Deal was a bad idea that was Mulroney's deal the NAFTA deal with Mexico did not come until 1994 that was Chretien, not Mulroney Quote
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 furthermore it is now the Americans who have decided that Canada is a competitor Canada is a subsidized competitor dumping into the American market so now it is the Americans who want to end Free Trade with Canada that is going to be a shock, Canada is in no way prepared to get frozen out of the American markets and the Liberals plan to replace the Americans with Communist China not only is that lunacy, but the Chinese are also becoming protectionist now Quote
ExFlyer Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 31 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: nah, the Arrow was a dumb idea the F-15 Eagle was coming in 1972 the Arrow was already obsolete in 1959 they had no chance of competing with the Americans, that was a silly idea ......... in terms of Mulroney & Free Trade ? the alternative was to stay outside the American economy and try to beat them head to head and Canada was getting its ass kicked in that competition ....so it was basically an "if you can't beat them, give it to them" scenario The scrapping of the Arrow was at American request. We got Bomarc missiles in return (worst deal ever). The Arrow was far from obsolete, it was so advanced it had yet to demonstrate all it's capability. Scared the shit out of the Americans. We got bought. NAFTA was basically a deal to do away with tariffs between US, Mexico and Canada. We (Canada) eventually allowed (or enabled or scared off, depending who you talk to)manufacturing to US and Mexico. It was another case of Conservatives ass kissing the Americans. "so it was basically an "if you can't beat them, give it to them" scenario" Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 1 minute ago, ExFlyer said: The scrapping of the Arrow was at American request. We got Bomarc missiles in return (worst deal ever). The Arrow was far from obsolete, it was so advanced it had yet to demonstrate all it's capability. Scared the shit out of the Americans. myth the Arrow was a straight line interceptor, only good for intercepting Soviet bombers the Soviet bomber threat was replaced by ICBMs/SLBM's over the pole the Arrow was not a turning fighter and by the time it would have entered service finally the market would have been switching to the F-15 Eagle but it never would have gone into service, since it was so massively over budget if the Conservatives hadn't have cancelled it the Liberals certainly would have when they gutted the whole military in 1968 the Americans just knew it was going nowhere, so they told the Canadians to get real already Quote
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 (edited) like I laugh at how the people who embrace the Arrow myth ignore the part about the Liberals, who were the ones funding the Arrow subsequently have gone on to destroy the whole Canadian military right down to the wood to the point where these lunatics now say that the role of the Canadian military is "to fight systemic racism & misogyny" if you want to talk about the Americans scuttling a Canadian military project entirely for their own interests ? that was the Americans refusing to allow Canada to buy nuclear powered submarines because the real threat to Canadian sovereignty in the arctic is American freedom of navigation it is the Americans who deny Canada's sovereignty over the Northwest Passage so the last thing they wanted was Canadian SSN's up there following their submarines around and even tho the Americans are giving SSN's to Australia they still wouldn't let Canada have them, for this reason again tho, since Canada has completely dismantled its own military clearly Canadians don't care about sovereignty nor national security at all Canada doesn't even have its own culture nor politics anymore Canadians are totally absorbed into American culture & politics, replacing their own so what would even be the point of defending Canada's independence ? Justin Trudeau is running for Prime Minister of California not Prime Minister of Canada Canadians are so blinded by America now, they don't even know who they are anymore Canada is an American protectorate, Canadians have no interest in national defence whatsoever let's just move on already Edited July 30, 2022 by Dougie93 Quote
Aristides Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 27 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: The scrapping of the Arrow was at American request. We got Bomarc missiles in return (worst deal ever). The Arrow was far from obsolete, it was so advanced it had yet to demonstrate all it's capability. Scared the shit out of the Americans. We got bought. NAFTA was basically a deal to do away with tariffs between US, Mexico and Canada. We (Canada) eventually allowed (or enabled or scared off, depending who you talk to)manufacturing to US and Mexico. It was another case of Conservatives ass kissing the Americans. "so it was basically an "if you can't beat them, give it to them" scenario" There was no way Canada could afford such a project without export sales. We were not only designing and building the airframes but the engines, avionics and weapons as well. No one else wanted it. The Arrow was designed as an interceptor to go after manned bombers. ICBM's and SLBM's made those aircraft pretty much redundant. The rest of the world went for their own creations if they had them or aircraft like F-4. We bought F101's and F104's as well as the Bombarc's. Quote
ExFlyer Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 16 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: myth the Arrow was a straight line interceptor, only good for intercepting Soviet bombers the Soviet bomber threat was replaced by ICBMs/SLBM's over the pole the Arrow was not a turning fighter and by the time it would have entered service finally the market would have been switching to the F-15 Eagle but it never would have gone into service, since it was so massively over budget if the Conservatives hadn't have cancelled it the Liberals certainly would have when they gutted the whole military in 1968 the Americans just knew it was going nowhere, so they told the Canadians to get real already Yes, it was designed to be an interceptor for the threat at the time. It was never designed or claimed to be a fighter. No myth, everyone in aviation knows that. Canada had none and never got any ICBM and the Bomarc barley could get out of North Bay Ontario. It had no range. LOL The Eagle F15 was not introduced till 1976 and that was in the US. We had the F86 Sabre and the CF100 Canuck at the time of the Arrow. Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 Just now, ExFlyer said: Yes, it was designed to be an interceptor for the threat at the time. It was never designed or claimed to be a fighter. but it wouldn't have entered service until the 1970's when those types of interceptors were totally obsolete although it wouldn't have made it to the 1970's since the Liberals scrapped the entire Canadian military in 1968 Quote
ExFlyer Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 2 minutes ago, Aristides said: There was no way Canada could afford such a project without export sales. We were not only designing and building the airframes but the engines, avionics and weapons as well. No one else wanted it. The Arrow was designed as an interceptor to go after manned bombers. ICBM's and SLBM's made those aircraft pretty much redundant. The rest of the world went for their own creations if they had them or aircraft like F-4. We bought F101's and F104's as well as the Bombarc's. Cannot say no one wanted it as it had yet to prove itself. Having said that, the Arrow was an interceptor and missiles were cheaper. We got the Voodoo in 1961 as the Americans gave us priority. The CF 104 came online in 1962 and again, by the grace of the Americans Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
Michael Hardner Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 1 hour ago, Aristides said: Tell that to the people who are starving because they can't get access to Ukraine and Russian grain. How would protectionism help this situation? 1 Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 bear in mind the whole Arrow plan was not that Canada was going to buy the Arrow Canada didn't plan to buy many of them at all the whole plan was that Canada was going to export these fighters around the world in a competition against the Americans, British & French we are talking about Canada here, the whole idea was ridiculous Diefenbaker was right, it was just a big Liberal boondoggle which was never intended to succeed Quote
ExFlyer Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: but it wouldn't have entered service until the 1970's when those types of interceptors were totally obsolete although it wouldn't have made it to the 1970's since the Liberals scrapped the entire Canadian military in 1968 Yeah , who knows. It has certainly become the same as the mythical Unicorn Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 3 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: It has certainly become the same as the mythical Unicorn I don't think that is healthy for Canada Canada is in serious f8cking trouble there's way too many unicorns, and no practical plans at all and this is ultimately what makes Canada totally subservient to the Americans Canada can't even run its own economy without asking Washington for permission Quote
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Aristides said: There was no way Canada could afford such a project without export sales. exactly and not only would Canada never have the logistics and economies of scale to pull that off none of the customers would have ever defied their benefactors in Washington to buy Canadian Canada would not have sold a single Arrow if the Americans were not 100% behind it Edited July 30, 2022 by Dougie93 Quote
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 (edited) the latest Canadian Unicorn which is going to fail is the ridiculous shipbuilding boondoggle Canada will build exactly zero new Frigates Canada will be sailing the FFH-330's into the 2040's then they will rust out, and Canada won't have any frigates at all anymore never mind warships, Canada can't even make enough CADPAT uniforms nor sleeping bags Canada can buy the F-35 but only because that is a turnkey solution the Americans run everything, Canada just provides the pilots to the American training center Canada is simply not capable of running its own defence programs anymore if it's not plug & play with everything run by the Americans, it's not happening Edited July 30, 2022 by Dougie93 Quote
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 (edited) 48 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Canada had none and never got any ICBM and the Bomarc barley could get out of North Bay Ontario. It had no range. LOL the much more significant aspect was that the Americans were willing to give Canada nuclear weapons obviously they saw the Arrow as being pie in the sky it's not that they feared the Arrow, they just saw it as diverting resources which Canada did not have on the other hand, they were willing to hand Canada nuclear warheads yet of course, Canada didn't want them the peacenik Canadian political class went into conniption fits never mind that Canada was fully bombed up to drop NATO B61's in Europe never mind that Canada was fully integrated at Cheyenne Mountain never mind that Canada gave India nukes with the CANDU plutonium Canada simply would not accept the American gift of making Canada into a nuclear power without knee jerk self righteous Anti-Americanism, there is no Canada Edited July 30, 2022 by Dougie93 Quote
ExFlyer Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: the much more significant aspect was that the Americans were willing to give Canada nuclear weapons obviously they saw the Arrow as being pie in the sky it's not that they feared the Arrow, they just saw it as diverting resources which Canada did not have on the other hand, they were willing to hand Canada nuclear warheads yet of course, Canada didn't want them the peacenik Canadian political class went into conniption fits never mind that Canada was fully bombed up to drop NATO B61's in Europe never mind that Canada was fully integrated at Cheyenne Mountain never mind that Canada gave India nukes with the CANDU plutonium Canada simply would not accept the American gift of making Canada into a nuclear power without knee jerk self righteous Anti-Americanism, there is no Canada I was stationed in Comox in the early 70's. Canada had nukes. Well sort of. We had Voodoos armed with nukes in the QRA's (quick reaction areas hangars). 2 voodoos loaded and ready all the time. There was a contingent of American military police and weapons specialists. We had them in North Bay and Bagotville as well. It was always an open secret but no one would admit or say for sure. I think they left in 1984. Oh and, the range of the Bomarcs was something like 500 miles. What they were doing positioned in North Bay made no sense to anyone. maybe to protect Canada;s main NORAD base?? Edited July 30, 2022 by ExFlyer Quote Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
Dougie93 Posted July 30, 2022 Report Posted July 30, 2022 5 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: I was stationed in Comox in the early 70's. Canada had nukes. Well sort of. We had Voodoos armed with nukes in the QRA's (quick reaction areas hangars). 2 voodoos loaded and ready all the time. There was a contingent of American military police and weapons specialists. We had them in North Bay and Bagotville as well. It was always an open secret but no one would admit or say for sure. I think they left in 1984. Oh and, the range of the Bomarcs was something like 500 miles. What they were doing positioned in North Bay made no sense to anyone. maybe to protect Canada;s main NORAD base?? American nukes on Canadian soil, cue the Canadian pearl clutching and fainting spells defending North Bay was likely the only purpose North Bay was the only target worth the Soviets effort to concentrate on NORAD alternate command post Quote
Dougie93 Posted July 31, 2022 Report Posted July 31, 2022 (edited) I was on course at Borden once, and they actually put us in the nuclear bunker there as barracks it was pretty cool actually, I was surprised how well maintained it was it seemed fully operational to me, ready to accept politicians at any moment those bunkers are actually overbuilt by today's standards the vast majority of warheads now, are in the 100-200 kiloton range those bunkers were built for multimegaton yields only the Chinese have any of those left, and they wouldn't waste one on Camp Borden Edited July 31, 2022 by Dougie93 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted July 31, 2022 Report Posted July 31, 2022 9 hours ago, Nefarious Banana said: There's a lot of things you 'don't get' . . . . China trying to takeover Saskatchewan's potash industry comes to mind . . . Who owns it now though? It's 'institutional investors ' I guess? Better than the Wheat Board I suppose. 1 Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Aristides Posted July 31, 2022 Report Posted July 31, 2022 3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: How would protectionism help this situation? Well, we should know by now that allowing other countries to gain control of strategic resources generally turns out badly. China has made a point of doing exactly that and Europe is finding out to its reliance on Russia for energy wasn't such a great idea. The idea that a country should willingly give up the ability to feed itself doesn't get much more short sighted. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted July 31, 2022 Report Posted July 31, 2022 1 hour ago, Aristides said: Well, we should know by now that allowing other countries to gain control of strategic resources generally turns out badly. China has made a point of doing exactly that and Europe is finding out to its reliance on Russia for energy wasn't such a great idea. The idea that a country should willingly give up the ability to feed itself doesn't get much more short sighted. I don't know what the specifics are here though. Food protectionism is limited at some point, how would you do it? Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.