Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

1. Conservative party has to adopt proportional representation system and officially add it in their program.

2. Conservatives and PPC should negotiate and conclude an election pact to avoid splitting the vote.

3. They can negotiate an agreement with other interested parties: NDP, BQ, Greens for introduction of proportional system by the next Conservative government, majority or minority.

Otherwise, there may not be any reasonable prospects.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted

I don’t think the PPC has much of a future.  The vast majority of their support came from anti-covid policy, which going forward will be less and less relevant.

Posted (edited)

hopefully otoole sticks around  while i won't vote for the conservatives even with him there  i still perfer him in charge of the party  and wouldn't be 2 worried if he won a minority  compared to  a westerner right wing  con who will only play to the west of ontario.

Edited by EastCanada90
Posted

The problem is simply 2 out of 3 Canadians are left wing loonies.  There is no getting around that so 34% is pretty much the top for any conservative party.  I would have really loved to shiny pony in the unemployment line.  Oh well.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Faramir said:

The problem is simply 2 out of 3 Canadians are left wing loonies.  There is no getting around that so 34% is pretty much the top for any conservative party.  I would have really loved to shiny pony in the unemployment line.  Oh well.

Do you think everyone who is “left leaning” is actually a looney?

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Do you think everyone who is “left leaning” is actually a looney?

Is this a trick question ? Do you think the greens platform is based in reality or good for the country? , do you agree that the NDP platform that will cost an addition 238 bil to implement is that platform based in reality or is good for the nation at this time ?  ... Then there is Justins liberals, which yes we all know is not looney but lacking in character, moral /values. 

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

Is this a trick question ? Do you think the greens platform is based in reality or good for the country? , do you agree that the NDP platform that will cost an addition 238 bil to implement is that platform based in reality or is good for the nation at this time ?  ... Then there is Justins liberals, which yes we all know is not looney but lacking in character, moral /values. 

Maybe we have different definitions of “looney”.   I would think the term looney tends to refer to someone who can’t use logic and reason to form their opinions.  It was stated that 2/3 Canadians are “looney”.

Do you think that’s a fair generalization?

Or are you defining “looney” as anyone who is not of your political stripe?  In that case, I would agree with you…. 2/3 Canadians are not of your political stripe, and are thus “looney” as you define it.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Maybe we have different definitions of “looney”.   I would think the term looney tends to refer to someone who can’t use logic and reason to form their opinions.  It was stated that 2/3 Canadians are “looney”.

Do you think that’s a fair generalization?

Or are you defining “looney” as anyone who is not of your political stripe?  In that case, I would agree with you…. 2/3 Canadians are not of your political stripe, and are thus “looney” as you define it.

Yes!  2/3rds of Canadians can't think for themselves.  They gobble up the news without any attempt at applying logic or their own skepticism.  They vote the way their Dad did.  Or how their friends tell them to vote.

Posted
58 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Maybe we have different definitions of “looney”.   I would think the term looney tends to refer to someone who can’t use logic and reason to form their opinions.  It was stated that 2/3 Canadians are “looney”.

Do you think that’s a fair generalization?

Or are you defining “looney” as anyone who is not of your political stripe?  In that case, I would agree with you…. 2/3 Canadians are not of your political stripe, and are thus “looney” as you define it.

I like your first definition, perhaps you can explain to me how anyone can look at the green platform and tell me it is realistic and will not drastically effect our current economy. 

The NDP platform is planning to expand on our already historical debt by adding 268 billion to would you say that was logical or reasonable in todays terms.

The liberals sorry i can not fathom electing a guy several times over, that constantly lies, many ethical breaches, scandal after scandal, a person who throws people under the bus to deflect scandal or image problems... Sorry but this is the man who represents our country across the globe, we don't have very high standards for leadership, nor do liberal voters seem to much faith into honesty, integrity, loyalty to the country not the party. So to answer your question yes there loony/ 

Don't get me wrong there has been loony conservatives as well it is not limited to the liberal party... we as voters should be calling them out all the time, MAD MAX is one of those. who is now just chasing a dream at the cost of those traits i already discussed. 

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
1 hour ago, Faramir said:

Yes!  2/3rds of Canadians can't think for themselves.  They gobble up the news without any attempt at applying logic or their own skepticism.  They vote the way their Dad did.  Or how their friends tell them to vote.

If the vast majority of Canadians hold a different opinion than you, could it possibly be you that has the issue?  

Is it just a small percentage of the people who know the real truth and the rest are just “loonies” and sheep?

Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

I like your first definition, perhaps you can explain to me how anyone can look at the green platform and tell me it is realistic and will not drastically effect our current economy. 

The NDP platform is planning to expand on our already historical debt by adding 268 billion to would you say that was logical or reasonable in todays terms.

The liberals sorry i can not fathom electing a guy several times over, that constantly lies, many ethical breaches, scandal after scandal, a person who throws people under the bus to deflect scandal or image problems... Sorry but this is the man who represents our country across the globe, we don't have very high standards for leadership, nor do liberal voters seem to much faith into honesty, integrity, loyalty to the country not the party. So to answer your question yes there loony/ 

Don't get me wrong there has been loony conservatives as well it is not limited to the liberal party... we as voters should be calling them out all the time, MAD MAX is one of those. who is now just chasing a dream at the cost of those traits i already discussed. 

So 2/3 people are loony but you hold the truth?  

Hmmm….  

Do you find yourself on the fringes of public opinion a lot?

Edited by TreeBeard
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

That is what i said yes they are bat shit loony.... perhaps you can explain to me how the green or NDP platforms are good all round platforms for the nation. And then tell me how following a man that constantly lies to Canadians, has set records breaking ethics rules, scandal after scandal , throwing his fellow party members under the bus to deflect any harm to his image , tell me how those people have good morals and values...perhaps you can explain why liberals follow Justin ? 

If you think my opinion is on the fringes of public opinion  your free to do so, much as i have said that 2/3 of Canadians are bat shit loony ...

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
12 hours ago, Army Guy said:

tell me how following a man that constantly lies to Canadians, has set records breaking ethics rules, scandal after scandal , throwing his fellow party members under the bus to deflect any harm to his image , tell me how those people have good morals and values...perhaps you can explain why liberals follow Justin ? 

Uh, you just described William Lyon (Rex) MacKenzie King, the most successful Prime Minister in history. He served as Prime Minister longer than any Prime Minister in the history of the British Empire. 

A Conservative stands for God, King and Country

Posted

Canadians are weak and mostly lazy, mostly in central and eastern CanaDUH. it wasn’t always this way. The focus seems to be centred on goodies, perks and corruption about what they can get out of it rather than put into it. You can identify an Eastern import here in an instant they open their mouth. They stand out like sore thumbs and don’t “fit”.

Ive thought much of my adult life that this is really five or six countries pretending to be one. It doesn’t work and would have collapsed long ago without money extorted from you know where by colonialists in central CanaDUH.

There are many places in the world, even in our times who’ve faced reality and come to their senses. Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Soviet Union, etc.

Posted
1 minute ago, RedDog said:

Canadians are weak and mostly lazy, mostly in central and eastern CanaDUH. it wasn’t always this way. The focus seems to be centred on goodies, perks and corruption about what they can get out of it rather than put into it. You can identify an Eastern import here in an instant they open their mouth. They stand out like sore thumbs and don’t “fit”.

Ive thought much of my adult life that this is really five or six countries pretending to be one. It doesn’t work and would have collapsed long ago without money extorted from you know where by colonialists in central CanaDUH.

There are many places in the world, even in our times who’ve faced reality and come to their senses. Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Soviet Union, etc.

lots of eastern canadian   fit in fine out west and are hard workers you  sir are an A hole..  no wonder the east doesnt suport the west  and vote with them when getting attacked by people like you

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, RedDog said:

1. Canadians are weak and mostly lazy, mostly in central and eastern CanaDUH.

2.  The focus seems to be centred on goodies...

3. You can identify an Eastern import here in an instant they open their mouth. They stand out like sore thumbs and don’t “fit”.

4. It doesn’t work and would have collapsed long ago without money extorted from you know where by colonialists in central CanaDUH.

5. There are many places in the world, even in our times who’ve faced reality and come to their senses. Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Soviet Union, etc.

1.  Nice.  Your prejudice about Eastern Canadians seems to be the basis for your political views.  It really doesn't give us much to work with, sorry.
2. You mean goodies like government subsidies for oil and gas ?  Pipelines purchased by Federal and Provincial governments ?  
3. Don't "fit"...  Sorry but politics involves discussion and exchange of ideas.  Sorry if the idiots back east have this dumb idea, we should just listen to your words I guess...
4. Your ideas are Marxism, modified to put Eastern Canada as the capitalists.  Do better.
5. Simplified political theory for simpletons.  We get the same from the Left when they compare Harper, Scheer, O'Toole to Hitler.

Why exactly are you on a message board if you think there are so many morons on it ?

You worked in advertising by your own admission which means you took advantage of idiots your whole career I guess...

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/21/2021 at 3:07 PM, Faramir said:

The problem is simply 2 out of 3 Canadians are left wing loonies.  There is no getting around that so 34% is pretty much the top for any conservative party.  I would have really loved to shiny pony in the unemployment line.  Oh well.

Proportional system would provide sufficient ground for a conservative coalition of several parties. The current system is simply incapable of representing complex and diverse society.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
5 hours ago, RedDog said:

Canadians are weak and mostly lazy, mostly in central and eastern CanaDUH. it wasn’t always this way. The focus seems to be centred on goodies, perks and corruption about what they can get out of it rather than put into it. You can identify an Eastern import here in an instant they open their mouth. They stand out like sore thumbs and don’t “fit”.

Ive thought much of my adult life that this is really five or six countries pretending to be one. It doesn’t work and would have collapsed long ago without money extorted from you know where by colonialists in central CanaDUH.

There are many places in the world, even in our times who’ve faced reality and come to their senses. Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Soviet Union, etc.

Hi RedDog I remember you from defunct Free Dominion days :)

The lack of initiative makes it unlikely Canada will ever break apart,,,for ill or good

Posted
5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

1.  Nice.  Your prejudice about Eastern Canadians seems to be the basis for your political views.  It really doesn't give us much to work with, sorry.
2. You mean goodies like government subsidies for oil and gas ?  Pipelines purchased by Federal and Provincial governments ?  
3. Don't "fit"...  Sorry but politics involves discussion and exchange of ideas.  Sorry if the idiots back east have this dumb idea, we should just listen to your words I guess...
4. Your ideas are Marxism, modified to put Eastern Canada as the capitalists.  Do better.
5. Simplified political theory for simpletons.  We get the same from the Left when they compare Harper, Scheer, O'Toole to Hitler.

Why exactly are you on a message board if you think there are so many morons on it ?

You worked in advertising by your own admission which means you took advantage of idiots your whole career I guess...

 

So where are you if not on the left?  I agree we are looking at it all too simply by making it a regional thing.  The reality is more specifically urban centers vs the rest of the nation.  And the real issue, IMVHO, here the USA and the world, is IDEOLOGY.  Not class.  Not race.  Not region.  We saw this in California, where there was an opportunity for liberal California to select an African American to replace Newsom.  You think just be reflexive virtue signaling they would have done that.  But IDEOLOGY is King, and despite the failures and corruption of Newsom, they kept their man.

Posted
1 hour ago, myata said:

Proportional system would provide sufficient ground for a conservative coalition of several parties. The current system is simply incapable of representing complex and diverse society.

No we as conservative benefit from the first past the post system where four leftist parties split the vote.  A PS would doom us as 60% or so would select liberal representation.

Posted
1 minute ago, Faramir said:

So where are you if not on the left?  I agree we are looking at it all too simply by making it a regional thing.  The reality is more specifically urban centers vs the rest of the nation.  And the real issue, IMVHO, here the USA and the world, is IDEOLOGY.  Not class.  Not race.  Not region.  We saw this in California, where there was an opportunity for liberal California to select an African American to replace Newsom.  You think just by reflexive virtue signaling they would have done that.  But IDEOLOGY is King, and despite the failures and corruption of Newsom, they kept their man.

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

Uh, you just described William Lyon (Rex) MacKenzie King, the most successful Prime Minister in history. He served as Prime Minister longer than any Prime Minister in the history of the British Empire. 

Here is what i don't understand, This behavior is not tolerated any where else, any other work place, or at home, nor is it reflected in most Canadian morals and values, So why do we tolerate it in our government , which all the members should be setting the example while doing their jobs and while on their time off as well. We just sent a general packing because of an unproven allegation , because it is not the behavior a General should be setting, and yet Justin had allegations brought up against him and the whole story is buried. 

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...