Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
 
I'm on page 480 of 574 of The Impossible Railway, by Pierre Berton. I am almost finished reading this book. What can I say? This book is overlooked epic of the building of a great country as much as the building of a great railroad and a great nation.

I'll start with the shortcomings of the country highlighted in the book. Quebec demonstrated its ability to dominate Parliament out of proportion to its numbers, And also, in a mixed socialist-capitalist system, the potential for corruption.
And the love/hate relationship with Americans and the U.S.
 
Now for the greatness. It is obvious. A destitute country that was barely in existence (six years) when it embarked on a Herculean nation-building project. Think what you will about the Riel Rebellion but it demonstrated the need to be able to move across the country expeditiously. And Canada built the railroad successfully through some extremely hostile terrain. Frankly, it dwarfs my country's accomplishment in building its railroad.
Edited by jbg
Add space after period.
  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, jbg said:
 
I'll start with the shortcomings of the country highlighted in the book. Quebec demonstrated its ability to dominate Parliament out of proportion to its numbers, And also, in a mixed socialist-capitalist system, the potential for corruption. And the love/hate relationship with Americans and the U.S.

Which both continue to this day. Quebec's insular attitude and tribal vote have given it considerably more power within confederation than Ontario, despite the latter's larger size and wealth. And Quebec has always been the most corrupt of our provinces.

Quote

 Now for the greatness. It is obvious. A destitute country that was barely in existence (six years) when it embarked on a Herculean nation-building project. Think what you will about the Riel Rebellion but it demonstrated the need to be able to move across the country expeditiously. And Canada built the railroad successfully through some extremely hostile terrain. Frankly, it dwarfs my country's accomplishment in building its railroad

This must be quite an old book. The Canadian chattering classes (artists, writers, academics, media) no longer talk about Canadian greatness. Instead the narrative is Canada is a horrifically awful country populated by the racist descendants of cruel, evil, exploitive, murderous, racist, homophobic butchers and barbarians. There is nothing good about Canada's past and if you try to say otherwise you're obviously immoral.

Welcome back, btw.

Edited by Argus
  • Like 2

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
31 minutes ago, Argus said:

Which both continue to this day. Quebec's insular attitude and tribal vote have given it considerably more power within confederation than Ontario, despite the latter's larger size and wealth. And Quebec has always been the most corrupt of our provinces.

My general view as a history buff (and former college history major) is the more things change the more they stay the same. There are revolutionary developments such as the development of steam, electricity, telecommunications or the Internet. But they engraft themselves onto established cultural habits.

Quote

This must be quite an old book. The Canadian chattering classes (artists, writers, academics, media) no longer talk about Canadian greatness. Instead the narrative is Canada is a horrifically awful country populated by the racist descendants of cruel, evil, exploitive, murderous, racist, homophobic butchers and barbarians. There is nothing good about Canada's past and if you try to say otherwise you're obviously immoral.

The book is 1972 copyright. There are many old-style aspects to the book. The book is not "ra-ra" pro-Canadian. But it is balanced and objective. The modern fixation on self-flagellation bothers me to now end.

Quote

Welcome back, btw.

Thanks. I do pop in every now and then and spend time on the Canadian sections of other boards.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted
6 hours ago, jbg said:
 
I'm on page 480 of 574 of The Impossible Railway, by Pierre Berton. I am almost finished reading this book. What can I say? This book is overlooked epic of the building of a great country as much as the building of a great railroad and a great nation.

I'll start with the shortcomings of the country highlighted in the book. Quebec demonstrated its ability to dominate Parliament out of proportion to its numbers, And also, in a mixed socialist-capitalist system, the potential for corruption.
And the love/hate relationship with Americans and the U.S.
 
Now for the greatness. It is obvious. A destitute country that was barely in existence (six years) when it embarked on a Herculean nation-building project. Think what you will about the Riel Rebellion but it demonstrated the need to be able to move across the country expeditiously. And Canada built the railroad successfully through some extremely hostile terrain. Frankly, it dwarfs my country's accomplishment in building its railroad.

A great accomplishment balanced by a great disaster: Some win, some lose. 

http://activehistory.ca/2013/12/an-unsettling-prairie-history-a-review-of-james-daschuks-clearing-the-plains/

Posted
1 hour ago, jacee said:

A great accomplishment balanced by a great disaster: Some win, some lose. 

That's the way of the world.  And we have institutionalized this by allowing trade to decimate industries, for the greater good, by playing off one win over another loss.

 

Manufacturing goes down, other industries gain... if they have a competitive advantage etc.  And now it's time for oil to die... I'm sad for those impacted but...

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

...Manufacturing goes down, other industries gain... if they have a competitive advantage etc.  And now it's time for oil to die... I'm sad for those impacted but...

 

...except for the Canadian Miracle that is moving far more oil by rail:

 

fg-c6-eng.jpg?w=590&quality=60&strip=all

 

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/will-more-pipelines-stop-oil-trains-and-the-growing-risk-of-derailments

Edited by bush_cheney2004

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

...except for the Canadian Miracle that is moving far more oil by rail:

 

Perhaps the Progressives will make the oil industry die in Canada, but oil is far from dead, as there is no replacement, not even close, and America is now producing over 10 million barrels a day, exceeding the previous all time high in 1970.

Posted
17 hours ago, jacee said:

A great accomplishment balanced by a great disaster: Some win, some lose. 

http://activehistory.ca/2013/12/an-unsettling-prairie-history-a-review-of-james-daschuks-clearing-the-plains/

Generally in a confrontation between primitive and advanced societies the outcome is tragic for the more primitive ones. It's sad but true.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted
21 minutes ago, jbg said:

Generally in a confrontation between primitive and advanced societies the outcome is tragic for the more primitive ones. It's sad but true.

That might have been a foregone conclusion in the past but nowadays so-called primitive societies are figuring out how to use the legal systems of so-called advanced societies meaning the outcome is still a moving target.  To everyone's betterment.

The only way out for advanced societies is to go back to being primitive and doing things the olde-fashioned way.  Tragic but true.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
1 hour ago, eyeball said:

That might have been a foregone conclusion in the past but nowadays so-called primitive societies are figuring out how to use the legal systems of so-called advanced societies meaning the outcome is still a moving target.  To everyone's betterment.

The only way out for advanced societies is to go back to being primitive and doing things the olde-fashioned way.  Tragic but true.

The better approach would be for the non-primitive societies to be more self-confident and less self-destructive. There is no reason to let hijackers, for example, use an airplane they couldn't have built to destroy buildings they couldn't have built.

  • Like 2
  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted
22 minutes ago, jbg said:

The better approach would be for the non-primitive societies to be more self-confident and less self-destructive.

True enough.

Quote

There is no reason to let hijackers, for example, use an airplane they couldn't have built to destroy buildings they couldn't have built.

Well....there was a reason for that and I guess a non-primitive society that persists acting primitively is taking it's chances in today's world.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Well....there was a reason for that and I guess a non-primitive society that persists acting primitively is taking it's chances in today's world.

Echoing Chretien's views. And by the way I finished the book on the train riding into NYC today.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted (edited)
On 3/2/2020 at 7:40 PM, Michael Hardner said:

Manufacturing goes down, other industries gain... if they have a competitive advantage etc.  And now it's time for oil to die... I'm sad for those impacted but...

We have no replacement for fossil fuels either as an energy source or in the source for the petrochemical industry whose products are in 95% of the things we build, own and wear. Wind and solar make up less than 1% of world energy, and most of that is heavily subsidized. No one seems to want nuclear, despite it being a far 'cleaner' energy source, and hundreds and hundreds of coal plants are continuing to be built around the world. One presumes that eventually those plants will be replaced by oil or natural gas.

The blithe predictions of the end of the need for oil are many decades in advance of any reality. 

Edited by Argus
  • Like 1

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
6 hours ago, eyeball said:

That might have been a foregone conclusion in the past but nowadays so-called primitive societies are figuring out how to use the legal systems of so-called advanced societies meaning the outcome is still a moving target.  To everyone's betterment.

The only way out for advanced societies is to go back to being primitive and doing things the olde-fashioned way.  Tragic but true.

Or we could just change the constitution to remove all special native rights. That'd be good too. Natives could then be just Canadians like the rest of us.

  • Like 1

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
29 minutes ago, Argus said:

Or we could just change the constitution to remove all special native rights. That'd be good too. Natives could then be just Canadians like the rest of us.

Ok. We'll have reached the end of the need for oil by then so...planet saved. Thanks.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
3 hours ago, jbg said:

 I finished the book on the train riding into NYC today.

I read his book, The Last Spike: The Great Railway many years ago. Back when I was still reading things... I don't recall much about it, but it was a good read. I do recall the references he makes to the connections between nation building, and the railway. Rails of steel united the provinces, allowing for the convenient trade of goods and the movement of people. In one sense the railway is the very backbone upon which this country was built. And that is also why, when Mohawk natives choose to block the rails they understand all to well the effect of what they are doing. Evidently a history lesson about trains we have forgotten, but they haven't.

Posted (edited)
On 3/2/2020 at 12:03 PM, jbg said:
 
I'm on page 480 of 574 of The Impossible Railway, by Pierre Berton....

The CBC made it into a TV series:

The National Dream

William Hutt was a good gin-drinking Macdonald.

====

PS. This series should be available for the world to see, without paywall. Heck, I paid for it years ago. 

 

Edited by August1991
Posted
11 hours ago, August1991 said:

The CBC made it into a TV series:

The National Dream

William Hutt was a good gin-drinking Macdonald.

====

PS. This series should be available for the world to see, without paywall. Heck, I paid for it years ago. 

 

One of my favorite songs, Canadian Railroad Trilogy, I believe was written for this show:

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted
On 3/5/2020 at 10:28 PM, August1991 said:

Palm hit.

Gordon Lightfoot did not write this song for a video.

The CBC, once upon a time, created content.

For what was Gordon Lightfoot commissioned to write this song?

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, jbg said:

For what was Gordon Lightfoot commissioned to write this song?

Uh, he wasn't commissioned.

In Canada, in Quebec - indeed America - people write such songs because they are free to do this:

 

Edited by August1991
Posted
On 3/2/2020 at 7:40 PM, Michael Hardner said:

That's the way of the world.  And we have institutionalized this by allowing trade to decimate industries, for the greater good, by playing off one win over another loss.

 

Manufacturing goes down, other industries gain... if they have a competitive advantage etc.  And now it's time for oil to die... I'm sad for those impacted but...

 Oil is not dying. I hope the kids realize that if oil does goes, their new phones will be 20 grand each. lol

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...