The Hypocrisy of the "Scheer Should Step Down" Articles in the Media

[bush_cheney2004]

Just now, eyeball said:

Because the discussion includes the retardedness of an increasingly popular right-wing conservative conspiracy theory.

 

It's not a theory...."right wing" populism made strong gains on both sides of the pond....before Trump.

Scheer had good results, just not enough to capitalize on the right wing wave at the provincial level.

Of course the winning seems retarded to the leftist losers.

[eyeball]

Just now, bush_cheney2004 said:

It's not a theory...

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Cannucklehead said:

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/globalnews.ca/news/6294905/andrew-scheer-private-school-funds/amp/

 

Well that's going to be bad for conservatives for quite a while.  

This obviously has deep-state media-party fake-news written all over it.  

[godzilla]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

This obviously has deep-state media-party fake-news written all over it.  

whatever... it was an inside job!!! this only comes out _after_ he loses the election? inside job. the Conservatives wanted him out.

 

[WestCanMan]

On 12/13/2019 at 2:03 PM, eyeball said:

Of course that's why they were leaving.  I'm agreeing with you but I'm wrong. Why on Earth do you insist on being so stupid about this?  I'll tell you why, it's because your belief in the existence of a Deep-State is making you retarded.

That's a straw-man if I've ever seen one. I never once have used the word deep state here, even regarding the US scenario where that is obviously the case, nor have I ever accused the Canadian gov't of of having any such thing going on.

I'm accusing the CBC and CTV Newz of having a ridiculous level of bias. That's it. When Harper may have committed a single minor ethics breach it was headline news for 3 years. When Trudeau obvioulsy committed 2 major ethics breaches and obstructed justice in more ways than one it wasn't a big deal. It's been a lot less than 3 years since SNC etc, and it's like a distant memory on our newz.

Quote

An even better question would have been to ask why so many other members didn't leave or question their leadership.

There were a lot of first-term MPs in the Lib Party last time around. They don't earn a pension until their 5th year. Trudeau had all of those guys over a barrel. 

CBC never questioned Trudeau's leadership, his ethics, nothing. They'd never publish an article which cast Trudeau in such a negative light.

Quote

Maybe the Conservative Party needs a Deep-State of its own so it can start countering the advances of the Liberal Party's Deep-State. What do you think?

Another straw man. Get a life.

[Zeitgeist]

So who should be Conservative leader?  I like Rona Ambrose.  She’s strong, smart, experienced, and electable.  Kenny endorses her.  I hope Peter MacKay doesn’t win. I still remember his fake weeping apology in the Parliament over Belinda Stronach.  He couldn’t throw her under the bus fast enough.  Also his weird double standard prostitution policy.  Imagine it being legal to produce and sell weed but not to smoke it?  That’s our current law: Prostitution remains underground and in the hands of organized crime because while earning money for sex isn’t illegal, paying for it is.  This is MacKay, a fake self-righteous hypocrite.  No thanks.  

Edited December 14, 2019 by Zeitgeist

[Shady]

19 hours ago, godzilla said:

whatever... it was an inside job!!! this only comes out _after_ he loses the election? inside job. the Conservatives wanted him out.

 

Nah, it was Vladimir Putin.

[mowich]

On 12/12/2019 at 2:49 PM, Argus said:

Names which have been brought up as possible replacements so far:

Rona Ambrose
Bernard Lord
Peter McKay
Caroline Mulroney
Pierre Polievre
Michele Rempel
 

 

Rona Ambrose is my one and only choice for our party.