WestCanMan Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 Just now, BubberMiley said: It's an honorary title. He's a private citizen now with no relationship with the government. But if it's a big deal and what you say is true, I guess he can be impeached too? No, but if election meddling is a big deal to Americans then their former Presidents shouldn't be engaging in it, at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 Just now, Cannucklehead said: It was argued by some that the surface-to-air guided missile, with a range of 640 km, would be an effective replacement for the manned interceptor Avro Arrow, which the Diefenbaker government had scrapped. The missiles would theoretically intercept any Soviet attacks on North America before they reached the industrial heartland of Canada. that's brilliant, shoot down nukes with nukes. None the less, it wasn't JFK forcing Canada to take the nukes, it was Canada's plan, made in Canada, by idiot Canadian cretins. Same then as it is now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannucklehead Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: None the less, it wasn't JFK forcing Canada to take the nukes, it was Canada's plan, made in Canada, by idiot Canadian cretins. Same then as it is now. Wrong. Please re-read the articles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 1 minute ago, Cannucklehead said: Wrong. Please re-read the articles. The thing that really makes Canada pathetic, beyond Canadian need to pretend that Canada's shit don't stink like everybody else, is that Canada doesn't even have the courage of its own convictions. Canada is not only a gutless free rider who tries to blame its pathetic state of affairs on America, Canada doesn't even do it's own thing. Like all the fapping leftist fantasies about Middle Power and Peacekeeping, Canada doesn't even do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 (edited) The funny thing about giant retarded baby Canada is that it is its own worst enemy. Even when you come to despise Canada as I have, you don't have to do anything about it, because Canada is so good at self harm. Canadians cut their own throats, Canada shoots itself in the foot, pathologically. All you need to do is just see it for what it is and then you don't have to love it anymore, and then you are free. F@ck Canada; so liberating. It's actually as Canadian as Tourtiere and the Fleur de Lis to say it, F@ck Canada is the essence of Confederation Edited October 17, 2019 by Dougie93 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 7 hours ago, BubberMiley said: I'll say it again because it remains true: Working with foreign citizens who are foreign government officials to influence an election is a crime. No it isn’t. Where in the hell did you get that from? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 (edited) Where have you people been? You're just denying things are crimes now because you failed at pretending they didn't happen? https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33265.pdf Edited October 17, 2019 by BubberMiley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, BubberMiley said: Where have you people been? You're just denying things are crimes now because you failed at pretending they didn't happen? Things aren’t crimes just because you think they should be. Besides, influence is a very broad term. Anything more specific? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 Read the link. It's clearly a crime even though you wish it wasn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 6 minutes ago, BubberMiley said: Where have you people been? You're just denying things are crimes now because you failed at pretending they didn't happen? https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33265.pdf The Logan Act has nothing to do with influence, the Logan Act is about conducting diplomacy, has nothing to do with elections, dummy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 Just now, BubberMiley said: Read the link. It's clearly a crime even though you wish it wasn't. You're a moron, you don't even know what the Logan Act is about, it has nothing to do with elections, why don't you read it, since you obviously haven't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 You're too easy to defeat. "Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 Just another reason to despise Canadians; supposed know it alls who fancy themselves to be advised, but actually have no clue what they are prattling on about 99% of the time. Americans at least don't try to pretend to know what they don't know, Canadians and their fake news links to the internet, bunch of cretins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 1 minute ago, BubberMiley said: You're too easy to defeat. "Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both." Whenever one of you clowns on this forum go to oversized text, that's the dead giveaway that you need a smokescreen. Logan Act has nothing to do with election interference, moron, try again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 The funny thing is how Blubber is so desperate to find something to throw a smokescreen up with, he's feeling the sting of being caught talking shit apparently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 Just now, Dougie93 said: Whenever one of you clowns on this forum go to oversized text, that's the dead giveaway that you need a smokescreen. Logan Act has nothing to do with election interference, moron, try again. I copied and pasted from the Logan Act, which you were obviously unaware of. Yes, fair elections are, among other initiatives, measures of the U.S. as defined. How could they not be? I await your non-moronic answer, but I haven't seen anything of substance yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, Dougie93 said: The funny thing is how Blubber is so desperate to find something to throw a smokescreen up with, he's feeling the sting of being caught talking shit apparently. I realize you don't have anything. I wasn't expecting you would. Edited October 17, 2019 by BubberMiley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted October 17, 2019 Report Share Posted October 17, 2019 Just now, BubberMiley said: I realize you don't have anything. I wasn't expecting you would. I asked you to find the law you were invoking, knowing full well it doesn't exist, you should have seen that coming, instead you took the bait and threw up a smokescreen Suckah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Dougie93 said: I asked you to find the law you were invoking, knowing full well it doesn't exist, you should have seen that coming, instead you took the bait and threw up a smokescreen Suckah. How is what I cited not a law? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, BubberMiley said: How is what I cited not a law? You were asked to back up your assertion with a law prohibiting influence in elections by foreign governments, the Logan Act has nothing to do with that. Edited October 18, 2019 by Dougie93 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 6 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: You were asked to back up your assertion with a law prohibiting interference in elections by foreign governments, the Logan Act has nothing to do with that. The words I cited say it does. What have you to counter that, other than insults? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 Just now, BubberMiley said: The words I cited say it does. What have you to counter that, other than insults? The Logan Act is a law about conducting diplomacy without the assent of the Executive Branch, has nothing to do with elections. You got caught by your Trump Derangement Syndrome again, shitpump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Dougie93 said: The Logan Act is a law about conducting diplomacy without the assent of the Executive Branch, has nothing to do with elections. You got caught by your Trump Derangement Syndrome again, shitpump. Got a cite, other than your ass? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 (edited) Canadian political parties also use American social media platforms (e.g. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube) to "interfere" in the election. Google refused to play Canada's half-ass political advertising registration games, but the Liberals still begged them anyway: Quote Democratic Institutions Minister Karina Gould says she's going to try to persuade Google to change its mind about refusing to run election advertising during the upcoming federal campaign. Speaking in an interview with CBC News, Gould suggested that Google's decision to stop accepting political advertising during the upcoming federal election, instead of developing an online ad registry, may not be final. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/google-election-advertising-gould-1.5044364 Edited October 18, 2019 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 26 minutes ago, BubberMiley said: You're too easy to defeat. "Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both." None of that applies. It had nothing to do with any policy. You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.