Terrorist Attack in Pittsburgh

[Wilber]

Time to move on to California folks, you are one mass shooting behind.

Edited November 9, 2018 by Wilber

[eyeball]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

He gave a generic answer

First you said he refused to comment now you're saying he did in fact gave an answer.

Its no wonder the point of your opening post is so freakin' retarded. 

[Rue]

14 hours ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

That's nice of you.

You whine about the thread being made about you but ou insist on drawing attention to yourself. The comments were not for you and based on a general discussion as to the kind of phrasing that can lead to negative generalizations.

Can you grow up and stop trying to get my attention with insipid remarks. If you have nothing to contribute, be quiet and go bait someone else.

[DogOnPorch]

5 minutes ago, Rue said:

You whine about the thread being made about you but ou insist on drawing attention to yourself. The comments were not for you and based on a general discussion as to the kind of phrasing that can lead to negative generalizations.

Can you grow up and stop trying to get my attention with insipid remarks. If you have nothing to contribute, be quiet and go bait someone else.

 

You're free to interpret Islam as peaceful all you wish...for whatever reason.

I hear Islam loves Jews, too.

[Rue]

12 hours ago, eyeball said:

First you said he refused to comment now you're saying he did in fact gave an answer.

Its no wonder the point of your opening post is so freakin' retarded. 

No what he said was:

"He (Trudeau)  gave a generic answer, not the specific condemnation which was appropriate."

The generic answer did not answer and in fact avoided the answer by remaining generic. For it to have been an actual answer it would have had to contain the specific condemnation.

The generic answer was a posed answer that in fact contained no answer and in fact a voided providing an answer,

There is nothing "retarded" in the post he provided. I also don't think it woild ne appropriate to suggest  you response above is "retarded" for missing his point.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Rue]

11 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

You're free to interpret Islam as peaceful all you wish...for whatever reason.

I hear Islam loves Jews, too.

 

Misquoting what I said and continuing with the insipid comments means what now.

Do you want to make a blanket statement that all Islamic doctrine is evil and Islam hates Jews. Say so. Don't respond to me with passive aggressive snide comments.

Spit it out or be quiet,

My point remains any blanket generalization of any ideology is inevitably going to fuel inaccurate assumptions, labels and stereotypes and precisely the kinds that fuel

the anger in mass shooters.  Your last comment was idiotic. You hear? Did you hear Islam loves you or just Jews? Its not sarcastic, its just drivel.

[DogOnPorch]

Just now, Rue said:

 

Misquoting what I said and continuing with the insipid comments means what now.

Do you want to make a blanket statement that all Islamic doctrine is evil and Islam hates Jews. Say so. Don't respond to me with passive aggressive snide comments.

Spit it out or be quiet,

My point remains any blanket generalization of any ideology is inevitably going to fuel inaccurate assumptions, labels and stereotypes and precisely the kinds that fuel

the anger in mass shooters.  Your last comment was idiotic. You hear? Did you hear Islam loves you or just Jews? Its not sarcastic, its just drivel.

 

Oddly enough, I do not take orders from you.

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Rue said:

No what he said was:

"He (Trudeau)  gave a generic answer, not the specific condemnation which was appropriate."

The generic answer did not answer and in fact avoided the answer by remaining generic. For it to have been an actual answer it would have had to contain the specific condemnation.

The generic answer was a posed answer that in fact contained no answer and in fact a voided providing an answer,

There is nothing "retarded" in the post he provided. I also don't think it woild ne appropriate to suggest  you response above is "retarded" for missing his point

What he said, unequivocally, is that Trudeau bears responsibility for the Pittsburgh massacre.

That's as fucking retarded as the day is long. 

[taxme]

19 hours ago, Rue said:

1-I probably have yes but the reason I challenge your words and its your words I challenge and your positions you state you defend and agree with, that I challenge.

2-This is not about "throwing something in that maybe should not have been said....". Don't pose as an innocent victim under attack for  your views. Wear what you write.

You came on this forum back in 2016  to say you support David Duke the former head of the KKK and a crack pot anti semite called Brother Nathaniel. You made a point of advertising that.  Then you denied your KKK connection. You asked me for the words. I showed them. You said you wrote them and stand by them. Then in the next breath claim I am a liar suggesting you support neo Nazism and the KKK which is exactly what Duke does. Anyone can go on the internet and find his connection to neo Nazi movements, wearing Nazi uniforms in public, being deported from Czechoslovakia and Italy for neo Nazi rallies-supporting the neo Nazi Ernst Zundel in Canada, on and on.

You came on this thread and decided to use it to respond to the innocent of killing of Jews by stating Jews victimize people. That is called inversion. Christians are being shot dead in churches, Jews in synagogues, Muslims in Mosques. Responding to that by suggesting Muslims victimize or Jews victimize is being called out as it should be. It's not material or relevant to why this person attacked innocent people. Using your reasoning women who are raped have no right to challenge rape because other women have abused men or women. Using your argument, the killing of innocent Christians in church should not be discussed because other Christians are in the KKK or attack people. Using your argument innocent Muslims being killed is not to  be discussed because other Muslims are terrorist extremists. You use such divisive generalizations and are challenged on them. Every time you assign any group you identify as a group with negative generalizations or characteristics, you engage in the very same behavioural process as that killer and I will challenge that kind of hateful cognitive processing. Period.

3-That point being made by me  isn't making you dizzy. You just don't like being called out for your views.  Duke continues as we speak to promote the white genocide conspiracy theory and says claims we Jews are "organising white genocide. Of course I challenge you and he for such views and call you out on this thread for what you are saying about Jews.

Why would that make you dizzy?

Here is a quote from Duke:

"They're  (Jews)  trying to exterminate our race. I think, probably in a moral sense, the Jewish people have been a blight. I mean as a whole, not every Jew. And they probably deserve to go into the ashbin of history. But saying that and actually shooting or killing people in masses, are two different things. I'm not advocating extermination. I think the best thing is to resettle them in someplace where they can't exploit others. And I don't think they can live among themselves, I really don't."

Finally why do you call yourself a patriotic conservative? Why are you afraid to call yourself a white supremacist. Do you deny you think whites are superior to blacks and Jews? Go on say it. Say you love Jew Christ killers, blacks, Muslims,  Catholics, Siekhs. Say it. Lol.  Why do you tell people to learn from David Duke and then utter you are a patriotic conservative and not a KKK or neo Nazi supporter? Does it sound  better for you? You think it hides you follow the views and  agenda of Duke against Jews that you told us we can learn from?

Anyone can call themselves as liberal, a conservative, a socialist. Quite frankly we all throw out the words on this forum loosely. All of us. However unlike you I don't tend to read or learn from David Duke like you do. I prefer people who make me dizzy when I read.

I don't doubt you get dizzy when someone tries to explain to you fiscal conservative does not want governments spending out of control and incurring huge debts as Trudeau is doing.....or if they tell you  a bio-conservative has great concerns about certain kinds of technological advances, i.e., cloning, mutation of seeds and food sources, genetic engineering, artificial intelligence.....or that an environmental conservative has great concerns that we are not preserving our ecosphere and obeying  the rules of nature which they believe an inherent set of rules we humans must follow or by rejecting face extermination of not just our life form but many others on this planet.....or if they tell you  a classic conservative  believes the  individual is given the gift of free will and that political freedom can't exist without economic freedom and so this is why they prefer market driven economies than centrally controlled or communist state run  economic markets....or that while  they support certain institutional values such as the rule of law, having a constitution, having traditions that encourage law and order, stability, peace,  it does not mean it  prevents or  suspends individual rights.

Your attempts to create inversion and suggest Jews are victimizers on a thread discussing killing innocent Jews is just a variation of the bullcrap inversion anti semites engage in over the holocaust and attacks in history on Jews for thousands of years. This is why you claim Jews killed Christ. This then suits your  inversion argument that Jews are not murdered buyt are murderers and so deserve to be murdered. Oh I get it Taxme.

Patriotic conservatism no.  Its called Jew hate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can challenge my words all you want too. But I will do the same and challenge anything you say that appears to me to be lies. Live with it. 

It is you who always likes to make it appear as though you are the victim and are always under attack. 

You sure are an exercise in futility. I do not believe that I have ever said that I support David Duke. I may have gone to his website to read what he has to say. That does not mean that I am a KKK member for doing so. I try to get both sides of the story which you are always unwilling to do. I just pointed Dukes name out for reference. It is you who keeps trying to make it appear as though I support Duke. Ernst Zundel was hounded and deported by the many anti free speech Zionist organizations that there are in Canada. All Zundel did was questioned and challenged those Zionists which should have been his right to do so in a supposedly free country which today Canada is not. There are certain sacred cow and taboo subjects that will just not be allowed to be discussed or debated in this so called freedom loving Canada. Our Canadian politicians and the MSM know that and know better than to challenge their superiority if they want to keep their careers going. In Canada one can pretty much question or deny anything they want too. But when it comes to Judaism or Israel well that is a big fat no-no. You already know that, don't you?

You can be such an emotional wreck at times. You need to chill out and actually take the time and read as to what is being said instead of always showing us your usual tantrums once more and trying to take things I say out of context. Your accusations that I am a KKK/Nazi member and supporter is bloody ridiculous and you know it. You lie. On the contrary, it is you who does not like to be called out on your views. Your word is supposed to be gospel and mine are supposed to be supporting racism and Nazism. I have never received anything from you as yet as to where is your proof that I have promoted hatred or violence towards anyone or promoted racism or Nazism here. That is what you are trying to promote here. Again you lie. You still make me dizzy. 

[taxme]

On 11/7/2018 at 12:40 PM, Rue said:

Your attempt to revive the concept that Jews are responsible for the murder of Christ on this thread speaks for itself. It has nothing to do with the topic and everything to do with you trying to rationalize your hatred of Jews. You want to start a thread in the religious section blaming all Jews for killing Jesus go ahead. Wind yourself up.

What is your problem here and what are you not getting yet? It's a well known fact that the Jews were involved in Christ's death. It's in the Bible. Or are you about to declare that everything written in the Bible is all lies and anti-Jewish?

The only ones that need to be hated here are the Zionists who are as a matter of fact are using the Jewish people as cover for their lies. David Duke, Ernst Zundel or Jarod Taylor have already made this fact known. All gentiles and Jews are just pawns on their Zionist chessboard. You need to get that thru your thick skull. No one is blaming all Jews for Christ's death no more than all white people should be blamed for what some white guy killing a black guy or all gun owners are accomplices in some whacko going out and shooting someone.

That memo was sent out years ago. Try and get with the program, will you. 

[taxme]

19 hours ago, Rue said:

Yes I saw the "memo" you wrote on this forum and reproduced it and you now try deny it. You stated on Oct. 2, 2016 in a response to the thread "  Israel War Crimes Part 2", the following words:

"You should listen to Brother Nathaniel, David Duke and James Edwards for a change. You might learn something like I have."

You did in fact tell people to listen to Duke and learn from him.

You clearly don't stand behind your words and opinions. As quick as you say you do, you deny them. Clearly you are afraid. Your closet is where you hide is in fact under a cloak called "patriotic conservatism".

 

If you did get the drift and did get the memo all I was saying was that there are always two sides too every story. And those names mentioned above do have another side of the story to tell. Brother Nathaniel was once a Jew and then converted to Christianity. So, I suppose now that his words are all just anti-semetic talk, eh?  The Bro appears to be quite knowledgeable about what he is talking about. You do not appear to know as to what you are talking about at all most times. Just a bunch of babble coming from you as usual. You do lie. 

A true and real patriotic conservative Canadian will be the only ones that will save this country from this zionist ilk that is trying very hard to destroy this once great conservative Christian British/European nation from communism. Canadians are not as free as they think they are. There are so many hate laws on the books that one can be pretty much arrested and charged for daring to question or challenge the many taboo and sacred cow subjects that Canadians are not supposed to be able to talk about and there are many. Try preaching Christianity in the streets and watch what happens to you. The police will be on you very quickly like flies on chit. Ezra Levant once had to try and defend some preacher in court in Toronto for daring to preach Christianity. Yet some Muslim Imam can say "kill the infidel" right here in Canada and they are never charged for that crime of preaching hatred. You really do need to get with the program. 

[taxme]

16 hours ago, Wilber said:

Time to move on to California folks, you are one mass shooting behind.

It will never end in America thanks in part to the liberal demoncrats who are always trying to promote hatred and division in America. Maxine Waters is a prime example of someone who is always trying to promote hatred and violence towards innocent people who's only crime to her was that they either work or voted for Trump. Have you ever seen a Republican do the same thing? Never. Yes, there is a problem Suzzy Q, and it is called liberalism. Believe it or not. 

Edited November 9, 2018 by taxme

[WestCanMan]

17 hours ago, eyeball said:

First you said he refused to comment now you're saying he did in fact gave an answer.

Its no wonder the point of your opening post is so freakin' retarded. 

I said he refused to comment on that incident specifically. It's in this thread ten times. 

Take thefollowing letters out of your last sentence and it makes perfect sense :  "ts no wonder the point of your opening post is so freakin'".

 

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I said he refused to comment on that incident specifically. It's in this thread ten times. 

Yes but the time you said he shares responsibility for the massacre is ten times more retarded.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Yes but the time you said he shares responsibility for the massacre is ten times more retarded.

The fact that you can’t understand what this thread is about is what we’re talking about here.

 

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

The fact that you can’t understand what this thread is about is what we’re talking about here.

What isn't there to understand, you spelled it out pretty clearly in your opening post - you said Trudeau was responsible for the Pittsburgh massacre. Apparently because he didn't address a comment verbatim from the script running thru your head.

Has there been some suggestion from Candice Bergen that aligns with your OP?

[WestCanMan]

On 11/9/2018 at 7:56 PM, eyeball said:

What isn't there to understand, you spelled it out pretty clearly in your opening post - you said Trudeau was responsible for the Pittsburgh massacre. Apparently because he didn't address a comment verbatim from the script running thru your head.

Has there been some suggestion from Candice Bergen that aligns with your OP?

You made a straw man argument, congrats! It’s a big step up from your usual barrage of baseless accusations and personal attacks. 

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You made a straw man argument, congrats! It’s a big step up from your usual barrage of baseless accusations and personal attacks. 

Wtf are you babbling about now?

[Michael Hardner]

Another synagogue shooting today in San Diego  Horrific terrorism, which needs to be stopped NOW.
 

[bush_cheney2004]

39 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Another synagogue shooting today in San Diego  Horrific terrorism, which needs to be stopped NOW.
 

 

Really ?    Six people were shot dead and another six wounded in Chicago on Friday.

Horrific terrorism ?

 

[Michael Hardner]

31 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 Six people were shot dead and another six wounded in Chicago on Friday.

When you put it that way, life seems kind of fleeting and cheap in the land of big burgers and excitement.

[bush_cheney2004]

12 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

When you put it that way, life seems kind of fleeting and cheap in the land of big burgers and excitement.

 

Correct...and that makes it a very poor example to support leftist causes in "white supremacy" Canada.

[Michael Hardner]

1 minute ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

...and that makes it a very poor example to support leftist causes in "white supremacy" Canada.

What an odd thing to say.  

[bush_cheney2004]

5 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

What an odd thing to say.  

 

Sorry, but incidents in foreign countries all have their own context....poor ammo for your culture wars north of the border.

Maybe find your own ammunition ?

[Michael Hardner]

4 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

1. Sorry, but incidents in foreign countries all have their own context....poor ammo for your culture wars north of the border.

2. Maybe find your own ammunition ?

1. Isn't Canada 'foreign' to you ?  What are you doing here then if I'm not allowed to comment on another shooting in your nation ?

2. Sorry - metaphor doesn't work the same in the northern context.