Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Dougie93 said:

I wouldn't be intimidated by the rifle, sir.  

The shotgun is by far and away the harder weapon to master and the most difficult to employ tactically for the non operator, whereas a NATO battle rifle is inherently accurate and easy,  point and click.

 

Meh....I trained our crews for nuclear weapons security and they were far more proficient with the Remington 870 riot gun than the M14.   Sight alignment and trigger control is less of an issue with shotguns.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:

Bear in mind, NATO rifles are designed to be employed by conscript teenagers, shotguns are exotic weapons for masters of arms.

 

We use shotguns for high school competition, not NATO rifles.  

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Meh....I trained our crews for nuclear weapons security and they were far more proficient with the Remington 870 riot gun than the M14.   Sight alignment and trigger control is less of an issue with shotguns.

But I could kill them all easily with the M14 and they'd never get a shot off near me.

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:

But I could kill them all easily with the M14 and they'd never get a shot off near me.

 

Good for you...most civilians (including my wife) are not trained killers with marksmanship medals.

M14s are not very practical below decks in a submarine.

Edited by bush_cheney2004

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

Good for you...most civilians (including my wife) are not trained killers with marksmanship medals.

M14s are not very practical below decks in a submarine.

Shotgun is harder to master for a female.  My wife is much more accurate with the C8 than she is with the 870.

Posted
1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:

Shotgun is harder to master for a female.  My wife is much more accurate with the C8 than she is with the 870.

 

My shorty prefers the shotgun....she has her own "youth" model.    Doesn't like the Bushmaster either.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
Just now, bush_cheney2004 said:

My shorty prefers the shotgun....she has her own "youth" model.    Doesn't like the Bushmaster either.

It is of course at your prerogative, sir, but in my estimation, any American who is not rocking at least one battle rifle, is not doing their duty to the State Militia.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

It is of course at your prerogative, sir, but in my estimation, any American who is not rocking at least one battle rifle, is not doing their duty to the State Militia.

 

Those are for shooting deer in my neck of the woods.

Canadians shooting for the first time in 'murica:

 

 

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Shooting deer with a battle rifle?  That's sick.  What's the point of hunting deer if you don't give them a chance?  Shooting deer with battle rifles is not hunting, that's liquidation.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

Shooting deer with a battle rifle?  That's sick.  What's the point of hunting deer if you don't give them a chance?  Shooting deer with battle rifles is not hunting, that's liquidation.

 

That's the idea....our wolf population just isn't getting the job done.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

Shooting deer with automatic rifles.  Sad!

 

Semi-auto....automatic rifles are "illegal" if manufactured after 1986.   Special registration and taxes are required.  

...bump stocks are easier/cheaper.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:

Automatic rifles are for hunting the Homo Sapiens Sapiens Apex Predator, shooting deer on repetition is sickening.

 

Yeah...that's why Americans have both in large quantities.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

All my American kin hunt deer with bolt action or black powder.   Deer hunting being a sport, where you give the deer a chance to get away, so that it is, sporting.

 

Deer culls have nothing to do with a sporting good time.   They even use suppressors.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

Like, why would you pump a twenty round mag into a deer?  If they are so numerous that you have to cull them, what's wrong with .308 bolt to the head?

 

Depends on the contractor...some use .243 with suppressors at night, because people are usually not around.    It's not about "pumping" twenty rounds.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted (edited)

Well battle rifles are for maximum volume of repetition fire downrange, there's no need for a battle rifle to shoot deer, unless you are want to pepper these deer with a hail of fire.

I mean, I don't think deer have much of an inner life, but I do think they feel pain.

Edited by Dougie93
Posted
3 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

Well battle rifles are for maximum volume of repetition fire downrange, there's no need for a battle rifle to shoot deer, unless you are want to pepper these deer with a hail of fire.

I mean, I don't think deer have much of an inner life, but I do think they feel pain.

 

Some people have only one semi-automatic rifle, so one size fits all.   They shoot all kinds of varmints.    Not sure why deer are so special besides Bambi and permit fees to harvest in season.

 

 

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
Just now, Dougie93 said:

 I certainly don't go through the woods lighting up does and calfs with an M16. Cause that would be sickening.

 

 

M16s are military kit....apples vs. oranges.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,923
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheUnrelentingPopulous
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...