Gingerteeth Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 1 hour ago, DogOnPorch said: The Arabs STARTED the war. Started by that man. A Nazi. Continued by HIS nephew. A terrorist. Germany would certainly LIKE to have Pomerania and East Prussia back. But Poland is going to keep them...thanks. You are still dodging my question by putting one red herring after the other.
DogOnPorch Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 1 minute ago, Gingerteeth said: You are still dodging my question by putting one red herring after the other. You're really too naive to discuss anything with. Sorry. History is not your friend. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Gingerteeth Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 5 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said: You're really too naive to discuss anything with. Sorry. History is not your friend. Red herrings do not help your position.
Gingerteeth Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 1 hour ago, Bonam said: And? What did the UN do when the Arabs rejected the partition plan and invaded Israel? Did they help Israel to protect its borders and safeguards its people against this aggression? Did the UN help the hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing persecution in Arab countries after the founding of Israel? In later years, did the UN even so much as lift a finger to deter Hezbollah from arming itself and committing acts of aggression against Israel? No, no, and no. The UN does nothing regardless of what the Arabs do, but condemns Israel again and again. The UN has zero credibility on the Arab-Israeli conflict, and therefore is irrelevant. The partition plan isn't legally binding it is a suggestion by the UN. If one side says no then it is back to the drawing board.
DogOnPorch Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, Gingerteeth said: Red herrings do not help your position. Non-sequiturs don't help yours. Your understanding of the Arab-Israeli Conflict = zero Edited January 9, 2018 by DogOnPorch Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
DogOnPorch Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 Just now, Gingerteeth said: The partition plan isn't legally binding it is a suggestion by the UN. If one side says no then it is back to the drawing board. The Arabs went to war, rejecting the UN Partition. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Gingerteeth Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 3 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said: Non-sequiturs don't help yours. Your understanding of the Arab-Israeli Conflict = zero What part of my argument is a non sequitur? Your opinion on my knowledge of the conflict doesn't matter. 6 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said: The Arabs went to war, rejecting the UN Partition. UN doesn't see it that way.
DogOnPorch Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 Just now, Gingerteeth said: What part of my argument is a non sequitur? Your opinion on my knowledge of the conflict doesn't matter. UN doesn't see it that way. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Partition_Plan_for_Palestine Start reading newb. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Gingerteeth Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 14 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Partition_Plan_for_Palestine Start reading newb. Doesn't change what I said.
DogOnPorch Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 Just now, Gingerteeth said: Doesn't change what I said. You haven't said anything other than reject every response I give you. Perhaps take up your questions with Jordan who got you into this mess. Or toss a few rocks at the IDF. That always gets their attention. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Gingerteeth Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 3 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said: You haven't said anything other than reject every response I give you. Perhaps take up your questions with Jordan who got you into this mess. Or toss a few rocks at the IDF. That always gets their attention. Your responses are red herrings. The mufti being a Nazi doesn't change Palestinian's land claims. Your next set of responses were attempts to paint me in a false lights. I didn't fall for it and now you are calling me naive, claimed I haven't responded and so on.
DogOnPorch Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 1 minute ago, Gingerteeth said: Your responses are red herrings. The mufti being a Nazi doesn't change Palestinian's land claims. Your next set of responses were attempts to paint me in a false lights. I didn't fall for it and now you are calling me naive, claimed I haven't responded and so on. There are only land claims in your head from wars in the distant past. If you knew where East Prussia was and why it isn't there anymore...you'd know. But you don't. So just go ask Jordan why you don't have a home. Do yourself a favor... Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Gingerteeth Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 8 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said: There are only land claims in your head from wars in the distant past. If you knew where East Prussia was and why it isn't there anymore...you'd know. But you don't. So just go ask Jordan why you don't have a home. Do yourself a favor... The UN disagrees or else it wouldn't be making a fuss with Israel over it today. East Prussia has nothing to do with it.
Army Guy Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 It does if a precedent was set previously....say like Prussia. 1 We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
Army Guy Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 1 hour ago, Gingerteeth said: UN doesn't see it that way. How does the UN see it....Because the UN can not change history can it.... 1 We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
marcus Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: ...and they sure as hell do not respond to you in Canada. Or to you. They only respond to their masters. Those who bank roll their elections, like Sheldon Adelson and Haim Saban. 2 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: The Jerusalem Embassy Act was passed over 20 years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_Embassy_Act Yes. The Zionist money has been controlling congress for a long time. But for the first time, the 'very stable genius' had to show what a loyal dog he is to his financiers, the Israeli Firster billionaires. "What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 4 minutes ago, marcus said: Yes. The Zionist money has been controlling congress for a long time. Good...I like Zionists. I like AIPAC too. Go Israel !! 1 Economics trumps Virtue.
Gingerteeth Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 1 hour ago, Army Guy said: How does the UN see it....Because the UN can not change history can it.... Didn't say it could change history. The UN still see Palistinian's have a claim to parts of Israel.
DogOnPorch Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 4 hours ago, Gingerteeth said: Didn't say it could change history. The UN still see Palistinian's have a claim to parts of Israel. You couldn't find Israel on a map, I fear. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Gingerteeth Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 5 hours ago, DogOnPorch said: You couldn't find Israel on a map, I fear. Ah you abandoned your position entirely.
DogOnPorch Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 1 hour ago, Gingerteeth said: Ah you abandoned your position entirely. Can you find it on a map? Doubt it. I really do. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Bonam Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 16 hours ago, Gingerteeth said: The partition plan isn't legally binding it is a suggestion by the UN. If one side says no then it is back to the drawing board. We're well past that at this point, obviously. The point of my post was to explain to you that the UN is not seen as a credible or neutral or balanced authority when it comes to the Arab-Israeli conflict or the issue of Palestine. Therefore there's no point for you to keep referring to the UN doing something or saying something, because no one who disagrees with you cares. You have to come up with your own argument, rather than the "UN said so". 1
Gingerteeth Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 58 minutes ago, Bonam said: We're well past that at this point, obviously. The point of my post was to explain to you that the UN is not seen as a credible or neutral or balanced authority when it comes to the Arab-Israeli conflict or the issue of Palestine. Therefore there's no point for you to keep referring to the UN doing something or saying something, because no one who disagrees with you cares. You have to come up with your own argument, rather than the "UN said so". Thay is my argument. The UN doesn't agree the arab war ended palestinian land claims in israel. If they did they wouldn't be making an issue of it.
Bonam Posted January 9, 2018 Report Posted January 9, 2018 6 minutes ago, Gingerteeth said: Thay is my argument. The UN doesn't agree the arab war ended palestinian land claims in israel. If they did they wouldn't be making an issue of it. Ok, good for the UN.
Recommended Posts