-1=e^ipi Posted May 5, 2016 Report Share Posted May 5, 2016 The government has said that whatever NEW woman gets to be on a dollar bill will have to be safely dead first. Pretty dumb rule, given that the most qualified women are primarily alive. For example: http://www.science.ca/scientists/scientistprofile.php?pID=419 Oh well, what do you expect from a government that rejects enlightenment values like equality between men, women and non-binary people? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Guy Posted May 5, 2016 Report Share Posted May 5, 2016 (edited) Pretty dumb rule, given that the most qualified women are primarily alive. For example: http://www.science.ca/scientists/scientistprofile.php?pID=419 Oh well, what do you expect from a government that rejects enlightenment values like equality between men, women and non-binary people? Many organizations have been "burned" when they honor some live person and later that persons behavior changes or they do something that makes them unworthy of the honor - but it is too late - the honor has been published. Also In this case (Dead for over 25 years) allows for time for some secret transgression to have been aired before the person is honored. Edited May 5, 2016 by Big Guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overthere Posted May 10, 2016 Report Share Posted May 10, 2016 Did anybody nominate Naomi Klein yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Squid Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 Did anybody nominate Naomi Klein yet? Has she been dead for 25 years? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overthere Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 Has she been dead for 25 years? Klein has been brain dead for about 45 years. Is there a formula to account for that reality? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacee Posted May 13, 2016 Report Share Posted May 13, 2016 (edited) Klein has been brain dead for about 45 years. Is there a formula to account for that reality?Formula for brains: K = 2ot Or ot = .5K :-) . Edited May 13, 2016 by jacee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted May 14, 2016 Report Share Posted May 14, 2016 I demand we put an atheist on the money! Too many Christians! I demand we put a gay person on the money! Too many straight people. .....do we have any LGBT asian-black that came from Syria? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Squid Posted May 14, 2016 Report Share Posted May 14, 2016 .....do we have any LGBT asian-black that came from Syria? Racist and homophobic... You cover all the religious bigot stereotypes... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted May 14, 2016 Report Share Posted May 14, 2016 Putting a performer or artist of any sort on our currency is just plain stupidity. But instead we have the Queen.... should have Mr Fred Mercury on there instead. I like The Squids idea to have Emily Carr on the notes ... Buffy St Marie would be welcome also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal 9000 Posted May 15, 2016 Report Share Posted May 15, 2016 But instead we have the Queen.... should have Mr Fred Mercury on there instead. I like The Squids idea to have Emily Carr on the notes ... Buffy St Marie would be welcome also. It brings us back to the thought, we can't even think of anybody, let alone agree on someone - so why bother? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted May 15, 2016 Report Share Posted May 15, 2016 It brings us back to the thought, we can't even think of anybody, let alone agree on someone - so why bother? To show how enlightened Liberals are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msj Posted May 15, 2016 Report Share Posted May 15, 2016 It brings us back to the thought, we can't even think of anybody, let alone agree on someone - so why bother? There's a rarely use logical fallacy. Usually it's an appeal to numbers: lots of people agree with this position so it's right (but then Christians found out that there are more Muslims so it lost favour). Of course there is the logical fallacy I raised earlier in this thread about the appeal to perfection (or nirvana fallacy) which certainly seems related here too. But I want to focus on the "hasty generalization" form of fallacy. This is where one leaps to a conclusion based on a small sample of people. I like to thank those who get their knickers in a knot over who may grace our notes for providing these opportunities for exploring logical fallacies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archduke al-Qaddafi Posted June 11, 2016 Report Share Posted June 11, 2016 First Lady Sophie Gregoire-Trudeau Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 11, 2016 Report Share Posted June 11, 2016 Dana Scully Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 11, 2016 Report Share Posted June 11, 2016 It brings us back to the thought, we can't even think of anybody, let alone agree on someone - so why bother? With all the great Canadian women throughout our history this is more evidence of our ignorance and male dominated culture than a lack of deserving candidates. Personally, I would like to see Roberta Bondar but Nellie McClung or Laura Sabia would be great choices. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 With all the great Canadian women throughout our history And you name a pair of social activists and an astronaut. LOL :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 You don't find leaders in a struggle for equality or a rock star scientist important? That's alright, it was my list. Who would you name? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 (edited) You don't find leaders in a struggle for equality or a rock star scientist important? That's alright, it was my list. Who would you name? I've already made my opinion clear. By any logical assessment of the PEOPLE who were in prominent positions of influence in the building of Canada, no woman is anywhere near the equal of scores of men. And I'm not paternalistic enough to want to promote a woman for something she doesn't deserve. Edited June 13, 2016 by Argus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overthere Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 With all the great Canadian women throughout our history this is more evidence of our ignorance and male dominated culture than a lack of deserving candidates. Personally, I would like to see Roberta Bondar but Nellie McClung or Laura Sabia would be great choices. McLung gets nixed because of her enthusiasm for eugenics. Well maybe not, similar beliefs did not diminish the love for Tommy Douglas. How about Louise McKinney? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 (edited) How about Louise McKinney? As one of the first female legislators I'd say she would make a decent candidate, though I am certainly not a fan of her temperance work. Paws off my beer, lady! Still, I would prefer Bondar. Edited June 13, 2016 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overthere Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 Remind me what Bondar contributed on the level of the Social pioneers post WW1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted December 8, 2016 Report Share Posted December 8, 2016 You probably never heard of her, along with 99.99% of Canadians. But the Liberals searched high and low, through every record and historical archive in desperate, painfully earnest search for a woman who could be admired by progressives (meaning not white) and came up with Viola Desmond. Her claim to fame is apparently that she once was fined $26 for refusing to get out of the white section of a movie theater in Nova Scotia, and started a beauty shop. She will replace a white guy named John MacDonald who had no real accomplishments of note, and besides, is white, and a guy (eewww!). You are not to consider this to be a smug, smirking, paternalistic gift to womankind. Nor are you to suggest a woman with so few life accomplishments would have booted Johnny Macdonald off the bill if she weren't Black and the Liberals weren't desperate to show how progressive they are. http://business.financialpost.com/news/economy/viola-desmond-will-be-first-woman-other-than-the-queen-featured-on-canadian-currency Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted December 8, 2016 Report Share Posted December 8, 2016 OTOH perhaps they were just searching for a woman that would cause right-wing conservatives to respond true to form. The biggest boon to Liberals has always been conservatives who like to step in it before they stick it in their mouth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted December 8, 2016 Report Share Posted December 8, 2016 57 minutes ago, eyeball said: OTOH perhaps they were just searching for a woman that would cause right-wing conservatives to respond true to form. Sure if by "true form" you mean an intelligent reaction to a pretty shallow selection. It's an insult women to tell them that the best they could find for a woman worthy of being on the Canadian money, was  a lady that once got uppity in a theatre. It sends the message loud and clear that the Liberals don't believe that women actually have contributed anything of value to the country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted December 8, 2016 Report Share Posted December 8, 2016 No that's not the true form I meant all. Liberals only believe in doing what contributes to Liberal fortunes. Conservatives help their buddy's Liberals help themselves. It's always been that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.