cybercoma Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 (edited) That's funny because mental health professionals don't call transgender people mentally ill anymore, yet you insist that they are as though it's a fact. Edited May 25, 2016 by cybercoma Quote
Bryan Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 That's funny because mental health professionals don't call transgender people mentally ill anymore, yet you insist that they are as though it's a fact. That is actually a perfect example of left-wing bias on display in academia. Reality doesn't fit the "progressive" narrative, so they just change the definition to suit the agenda. Quote
cybercoma Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 Riiight. Anything that disagrees with your right wing views must be biased. Quote
TimG Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 (edited) That's funny because mental health professionals don't call transgender people mentally ill anymore, yet you insist that they are as though it's a fact. From the DSM-5 http://www.ifge.org/?q=DSM-5/Sexual_and_Gender_Identity_Disorders APA DSM-5 Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders Gender Identity Disorders 302.6 Gender Identity Disorder in Children 302.85 Gender Identity Disorder in Adolescents or Adults 302.6 Gender Identity Disorder Not Otherwise Specified People can play games with words and replace 'disorder' with 'disphoria' but it means the same thing. The bottom line is no mentally healthy person would seek radical surgery to deal with a problem in their mind. No amount of politically correct nonsense can change that. Edited May 25, 2016 by TimG Quote
cybercoma Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 Hey, tell me how biased science is because it contradicts the bible. Quote
eyeball Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 I guess it all depends on one's definition of the word biased. It could mean anything. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
cybercoma Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 From the DSM-5 http://www.ifge.org/?q=DSM-5/Sexual_and_Gender_Identity_Disorders People can play games with words and replace 'disorder' with 'disphoria' but it means the same thing. The bottom line is no mentally healthy person would seek radical surgery to deal with a problem in their mind. No amount of politically correct nonsense can change that. Get back to me when you actually read your link. Quote
TimG Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 Get back to me when you actually read your link.There is nothing that contradicts my statements although there is some politically correct wording designed to obscure the issues. Quote
cybercoma Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 Right, no bias from you whatsoever. Mental health professionals recommend changes to the wording, very important changes that speak to a better understanding of the issue, and to you that's just politically correct pandering. Because that's what doctors do. They pander.Anyway, you're making my point for me. Bias to you is whatever doesn't agree with your worldview. If it's not issues involving transgender people, it's your radical climate denial to which you claim the scientists are just biased and whitewashing the data. You'll have to forgive me for choking on my coffee when you get all high and mighty about bias. Quote
TimG Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 (edited) Mental health professionals recommend changes to the wording, very important changes that speak to a better understanding of the issue, and to you that's just politically correct pandering. Because that's what doctors do. They pander.In this case they do. The change was driven entirely by activists who complained about being labelled as mentally ill. Doctors obliged as much as they could but felt that it still had to be in the DCM because a diagnosis is necessary for people to access treatment. The change from disorder to disphoria is no different than the change from 'crippled' to 'disabled' to 'whatever PC name they have now'. None of this changes the fact that people who are mentally healthy don't need psychiatric help. Anyway, you're making my point for me.You are making my point for me. You have no evidence that my description of the process is wrong. You simply insist that it is wrong because, in your opinion, doctors don't pander. You then use your *opinion* to assert I am denying reality. I could not have found a better example of how left wing thinkers confuse their opinions with facts. Edited May 25, 2016 by TimG Quote
marcus Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 I said it had a left wing bias. Evidence of Fish Farm Disease Detected in BCThe only bias in the above is the biased towards the truth. Your reaction and responses is yet another low-browed auto-dismissal of any source that pokes the bubble of the talking points. Stop with the "the media is after us" victim card and allow your brain to be challenged. Quote "What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.
TimG Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 The only bias in the above is the biased towards the truth.You posted 10 links and you pick one. Why don't we go through each one and look at the blatant left wing bias in each? Take the breathless praise of the 'affordable housing plan' which would reward a small number of people with government subsidized housing paid for with punitive taxes on the rest. I find it amazing that people on the left are so unable to recognize their own biases. Quote
marcus Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 You posted 10 links and you pick one. Why don't we go through each one and look at the blatant left wing bias in each? Take the breathless praise of the 'affordable housing plan' which would reward a small number of people with government subsidized housing paid for with punitive taxes on the rest. I find it amazing that people on the left are so unable to recognize their own biases. As I mentioned, some of the articles are opinion pieces, which should be taken as such. The Tyee has published some of the best investigated reports that I have seen. Just because you're so offended by an opinion piece, it doesn't take away from the good journalism that happens there. Quote "What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.
marcus Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 I recommend that you suspend your usual approach and have a read of this piece: http://thetyee.ca/Culture/2016/05/23/Right-You-Are-An-Idiot/ Quote "What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.
Bryan Posted May 25, 2016 Report Posted May 25, 2016 I recommend that you suspend your usual approach and have a read of this piece: http://thetyee.ca/Culture/2016/05/23/Right-You-Are-An-Idiot/ That article is one of the greatest pieces of unintentional comedy that I think I've ever seen. Quote
SpankyMcFarland Posted September 26, 2016 Report Posted September 26, 2016 The newspapers used to fulfill this role but they are dying now. There are good individuals all over the place in TV, print and blogland trying to do their best. Terry Milewksi was a good guy - ruffled lots of feathers over the years on the interview side and did some good digging too on Air India etc. The British style is more abrasive. Quote
SpankyMcFarland Posted September 26, 2016 Report Posted September 26, 2016 There is nothing that contradicts my statements although there is some politically correct wording designed to obscure the issues. Dysphoria. Quote
Big Guy Posted September 26, 2016 Report Posted September 26, 2016 Finally found a credible news site: Real News Quote Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.
SpankyMcFarland Posted January 12, 2017 Report Posted January 12, 2017 On 5/25/2016 at 0:12 AM, Bryan said: National Post is the least bad, but their overall bias is still decidedly left. One editorial from the publisher once every four years doesn't even come close to balancing the thousands of stridently anti-conservative and/or pro-liberal articles that they publish all year long. What? Is my leg being pulled here? Quote
?Impact Posted January 12, 2017 Report Posted January 12, 2017 2 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said: What? Is my leg being pulled here? at least the Rebel wasn't cited. Quote
Moonlight Graham Posted January 15, 2017 Report Posted January 15, 2017 On 2016-05-24 at 10:42 PM, Bryan said: National Post is the least bad, but their overall bias is still decidedly left. One editorial from the publisher once every four years doesn't even come close to balancing the thousands of stridently anti-conservative and/or pro-liberal articles that they publish all year long. Go read through all the editorials on NP right now and tell me they aren't biased to the right. Postmedia papers put a conservative advertisement ON THE ENTIRE FRONT PAGE of their newspapers only A FEW DAYS before the last election in 2015. Easily one of the most disgusting and unethical things I've ever seen a major Canadian news publisher do in my entire life. When I picked up my newspaper that morning I almost fell off my chair. I then cancelled my subscription. Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
-1=e^ipi Posted January 20, 2017 Report Posted January 20, 2017 There are no credible news sources. Be skeptical of everything and get your information from multiple sources. Quote
eyeball Posted January 20, 2017 Report Posted January 20, 2017 I think it's probably the credibility of the audience that's most compromised these days. We should rename our planet Babel. 1 Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.