Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's good to see an official stance that is a also a principled one...Mayor Ford's unreflective whining aside.

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

  • Replies 322
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

There was a visual protest staged at Vancouver's rainbow crosswalks at Davie and Bute, as a recreation of the Beatles' Abbey Road album cover but with naked men carrying Putin masks.

If you scroll down a third of the way of this article, you'll see the pic. It's great!

http://www.straight.com/blogra/583201/canadian-cities-fly-pride-flags-lgbt-russians-rob-ford-balks

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

Which would you prefer: Canada wins hockey but doesn't top the medal-table or Canada tops the medal-table but gets knocked out of hockey in the quarter-finals?

Posted

Just sayin'...(whistles and rolls eyes)

That was an IOC decision. A BC Supreme Court judge ruled that the IOC was indeed discriminating but the court had no authority over the IOC in this matter.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

Which would you prefer: Canada wins hockey but doesn't top the medal-table or Canada tops the medal-table but gets knocked out of hockey in the quarter-finals?

I'd prefer winning hockey, but finishing 2nd 3rd or 4th in total medals.

Posted

Which would you prefer: Canada wins hockey but doesn't top the medal-table or Canada tops the medal-table but gets knocked out of hockey in the quarter-finals?

The second option because I don't think the Canadians or Americans are going to do very well anyway. They both have a crappy record on the big ice. Hope I'm wrong but my money is on the Ruskis. Big ice, home court.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted (edited)

I also think finishing first in medals would be a much bigger deal. We have won golds in hockey before so it wouldn't be a huge surprise. We have never done better than 3rd in medals and that was Vancouver. Think of where we were in Calgary. Not even one gold and 13th in medals

Edited by Wilber

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

It would be really sad if Canada got knocked out of the quarter-finals. Come on, are you kidding me? That would be devastating!

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

I also think finishing first in medals would be a much bigger deal. We have won golds in hockey before so it wouldn't be a huge surprise. We have never done better than 3rd in medals and that was Vancouver. Think of where we were in Calgary. Not even one gold and 13th in medals

Canada was first place in the medal table in Vancouver. But that wouldn't have meant a damn thing if we didn't win the men's hockey gold. Winning hockey is a much bigger deal than even winning a single other medal, let alone winning the medal table.

Posted

Better consider it at least. The last Olympics on the big ice surface they came seventh, the time before that they came fourth. Canada has never won a gold on the large ice. A couple of silvers though so it is not out of the question.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

Wilber I think the reason on the past lack of success was arrogance. (at least I hope so)

I think this team, and all the players, know its a tight race at the top and any slacking will show up in the results.

Not saying they will win (both men and women) but I feel an honest showing will result in medals for both.

Posted

The main problem with the 2006 team was they couldn't score. I can't see that being a problem here. The Art Ross trophy winner from last year was a substitute. The Norris Trophy winner from last year barely made the team.

This team is stacked. The only weakness could be at net but I think the players struggles are more due to the team they play for then how well they've been performing this season.

Posted

Better consider it at least. The last Olympics on the big ice surface they came seventh, the time before that they came fourth. Canada has never won a gold on the large ice. A couple of silvers though so it is not out of the question.

Go back and look at the history of all the men's hockey medalists. There's no pattern as to who wins on what size ice. Besides, have you ever played on Olympic sized ice? One of the rinks in my league has the "big ice", and there is nowhere near as much difference as many in the media try to make it seem. It takes less than 5 minutes to get used to it.

Posted

Not at that level of play, it makes a huge difference, unquestionably

Seeing as though all the best teams have a lot of nhl plsyers on them, who all play on the smaller ice surface, I really don't think it's a big deal. Everyone is going to have to adjust.

Posted

Go back and look at the history of all the men's hockey medalists. There's no pattern as to who wins on what size ice. Besides, have you ever played on Olympic sized ice? One of the rinks in my league has the "big ice", and there is nowhere near as much difference as many in the media try to make it seem. It takes less than 5 minutes to get used to it.

Then why hasn't a non European team won gold on the big ice since 1952, long before pros were allowed to play.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

Seeing as though all the best teams have a lot of nhl plsyers on them, who all play on the smaller ice surface, I really don't think it's a big deal. Everyone is going to have to adjust.

The Europeans grew up playing on the big surface and many still play in leagues like the Russian and Swedish elite leagues. I'm no saying Canada can't win, just that is a much bigger job than a lot of people think.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...