Argus Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 I know people who were quite astonished when they got their cancellation notices. These notices came out of the blue, as they were led to believe that they would be able to keep them. Cry me a river. They weren't actually insured. They had the kind of insurance that, if it was car insurance, would be cancelled the first time you put in a claim and the claim refused. "Oh, you were DRIVING the car? No, no, that's not allowed under your policy! You're only covered if it sits in the driveway!" Would we allow people to drive with such insurance? Nope. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Guest American Woman Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 Except... Except - I didn't claim they did, did I? Quote
Guest American Woman Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 (edited) Cry me a river. They weren't actually insured....Cry you a river? What does any of it have to do with you? FYI, the fact is, Obama lied. That was my point, and that's a fact. But, yeah. They actually were insured. They had the kind of insurance that, if it was car insurance, would be cancelled the first time you put in a claim and the claim refused. "Oh, you were DRIVING the car? No, no, that's not allowed under your policy! You're only covered if it sits in the driveway!" Would we allow people to drive with such insurance? Nope. Since you're apparently unaware of it, there are different types of car insurance and different levels of car insurance and different deductibles and different standards of car insurance state to state - and it's not even a requirement to have car insurance in New Hampshire. Edited October 30, 2013 by American Woman Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 No, it's not about that. Most people don't understand that a lifetime cap exists, Nope....the lieftime caps are plain to see and clearly posted on web site accounts for eligibility, membership, annual benefits, and lifetime maximums....when the web site actually works !! If you need more than $1 million in lifetime coverage, you may as well be dead. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Shady Posted October 30, 2013 Author Report Posted October 30, 2013 Nope....the lieftime caps are plain to see and clearly posted on web site accounts for eligibility, membership, annual benefits, and lifetime maximums....when the web site actually works !! If you need more than $1 million in lifetime coverage, you may as well be dead.In Canada we don't have to worry about lifetime caps, because at that point, the powers that be will decide you no longer are worthy of treatment, and the plug is pulled. Quote
waldo Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 I talk to actual people I know, I don't just listen to people on the news Your personal experiences don't speak for the whole Except - I didn't claim they did, did I? with the second of the above quotes, MLW member eyeball simply pointed out your contradiction... a continuing one you regularly make through assorted threads. Apparently, your personal experience and anecdotal reference is not open to question/challenge, particularly when you apply it broadly to suggest it is representative of the greater whole. Alternatively, you regularly chastize other MLW members for, rightly or wrongly (in your estimation), applying broader "whole attachment" to statements/claims. It's a very convenient double-standard you regularly apply. Quote
waldo Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 In Canada we don't have to worry about lifetime caps, because at that point, the powers that be will decide you no longer are worthy of treatment, and the plug is pulled. gasp! Do we have death panels, Shady? Quote
Shady Posted October 30, 2013 Author Report Posted October 30, 2013 gasp! Do we have death panels, Shady? You didn't know? Quote
waldo Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 You didn't know? not to sully this most important thread of yours... cause, remember... we're still waiting for you to actually address the OCare plan itself... but, really, you should start a "Canadian healthcare - death panels" thread. Quote
Wilber Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 In Canada we don't have to worry about lifetime caps, because at that point, the powers that be will decide you no longer are worthy of treatment, and the plug is pulled. Bullshit, the patient or if unable, the family has the final say on that call. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
guyser Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 Bullshit, the patient or if unable, the family has the final say on that call. Now wilber, there is no room for facts when countering a shady post. Its better to make it all up, such as he does. Death panels.... Quote
Shady Posted October 30, 2013 Author Report Posted October 30, 2013 You people are so ignorant that it's hard to even want to bother to post sometimes. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/10/canada_has_death_panels_and_that_s_a_good_thing.html Quote
Shady Posted October 30, 2013 Author Report Posted October 30, 2013 not to sully this most important thread of yours... cause, remember... we're still waiting for you to actually address the OCare plan itself... but, really, you should start a "Canadian healthcare - death panels" thread.I've already discussed plenty regarding the unaffordable care act. And how it's forcing people off of the plans they like, and wanted to keep. Unlike what the lying liar in the White House had promised. No wonder he waited until after the election to implement it. Quote
bleeding heart Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 You people are so ignorant that it's hard to even want to bother to post sometimes. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/10/canada_has_death_panels_and_that_s_a_good_thing.html What a tease. Quote “There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver." --Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007
guyser Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 You people are so ignorant that it's hard to even want to bother to post sometimes. Well.....we at least know about there not being any death panels. Your ignorance stems from what? Quote
bleeding heart Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 The closest thing to "death panels" are the private insurers. Quote “There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver." --Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007
sharkman Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 You people are so ignorant that it's hard to even want to bother to post sometimes. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/10/canada_has_death_panels_and_that_s_a_good_thing.html It's funny. People will believe anything or nothing at all depending on who's doing the talking, and that includes media members of course. What is the truth? Does it depend on who's saying it? Being able to tell the BS from the real deal is a rare gift indeed. Quote
BubberMiley Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 I don't find it too difficult to tell when Shady is full of BS. You just have to read the article he cited and decide whether that really constitutes a "death panel." Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
waldo Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 I don't find it too difficult to tell when Shady is full of BS. You just have to read the article he cited and decide whether that really constitutes a "death panel." or the actual Supreme Court of Canada decision Quote
Shady Posted October 30, 2013 Author Report Posted October 30, 2013 (edited) Now the classless punk in the white house is trying to blame Mitt Romney for the Obamacare rollout disaster. Apparently the buck stops everywhere but his desk in the oval office. What a leader! Anyways, if you haven't seen enough of the most incompetent and juvenile administration in the history of American governance, we get a "whatever" from the HHS secretary at the congressional hearing today. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srufFKrnku0 Edited October 30, 2013 by Shady Quote
cybercoma Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 In Canada we don't have to worry about lifetime caps, because at that point, the powers that be will decide you no longer are worthy of treatment, and the plug is pulled. Maybe read the news every now and again, Shady. The Supreme Court decided that doctors can't unilaterally decide to end life support. Quote
cybercoma Posted October 30, 2013 Report Posted October 30, 2013 I would much rather have doctors deciding when treatment will no longer be effective than insurers condemning people by refusing to fund care. Quote
Shady Posted October 30, 2013 Author Report Posted October 30, 2013 I would much rather have doctors deciding when treatment will no longer be effective than insurers condemning people by refusing to fund care. False choice. Quote
Shady Posted October 30, 2013 Author Report Posted October 30, 2013 Show me Your utter lack of curiosity when it comes to pretty much any Obama policy is getting quite comical. Anyways.... Under the Affordable Care Act, plans being sold on new government-run exchanges are grouped into four tiers—bronze, silver, gold and platinum—whose monthly premiums reflect the percentage of covered benefits, with the bronze having the lowest premiums. As a rule, the cheaper a plan's monthly premiums, the higher its deductible and other out-of-pocket costs. "I was looking at Texas earlier today," Pollitz said. "They had a bronze Blue Cross plan that was $250 a month ... for a 40-year-old. The bronze had a $6,000 deductible, http://www.cnbc.com/id/101113730 Quote
Argus Posted October 31, 2013 Report Posted October 31, 2013 Cry you a river? What does any of it have to do with you? FYI, the fact is, Obama lied. That was my point, and that's a fact. But, yeah. They actually were insured. No, he didn't. What he said was you'd be able to keep your plan. And it's pretty much true. However crappy your plan was, if it hasn't significantly changed since the ACA was passed, it can be grandfathered and you can keep it. If it HAS significantly changed, then hey, it's not your old plan any more anyway! But Obama didn't make any promise, nor could he, that every single insurance company would continue to offer the same policies that were in place before the Affordable Care Act was passed. Policis change all the time. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.