Eyrie Posted January 5, 2013 Report Posted January 5, 2013 After 24 long days, Prime Minister Harper has agreed to meet with Theresa Spence and other native chiefs. Get the details here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NizXRctt-s4 As always, thank you for viewing this post, and have a great day Quote
Smallc Posted January 5, 2013 Report Posted January 5, 2013 (edited) He hasn't actually agreed to meet with her. He's agreed to meet with a delegation that now happens to include her. They're pretty much forcing her upon him. Edited January 5, 2013 by Smallc Quote
The_Squid Posted January 5, 2013 Report Posted January 5, 2013 This is just spam, unless you are actually willing to discuss on this forum rather than simply advertise your own YouTube videos. Am I not correct? Quote
Smallc Posted January 5, 2013 Report Posted January 5, 2013 I would think so. I was just pointing out that it's wrong, whatever it is. Quote
The_Squid Posted January 5, 2013 Report Posted January 5, 2013 I would think so. I was just pointing out that it's wrong, whatever it is. Understood. My post was totally to do with the new poster, not a reflection on your reply or even the OP, which is certainly relevant. Quote
jbg Posted January 5, 2013 Report Posted January 5, 2013 This is just spam, unless you are actually willing to discuss on this forum rather than simply advertise your own YouTube videos. Am I not correct? Especially if you check out this thread (link). Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
August1991 Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 My first reaction is that Harper made a mistake: many people want to speak to a politician for a favour. The politician's job is to say no. My second reaction was that Harper was simply agreeing to a pre-arranged meeting with Aboriginals. My third reaction was to learn that Theresa Spence was supposedly in the party. Was Harper conned? (The exaggerated comparison would be Lucien Bouchard agreeing to meet Moms Bouchard. I still think that Harper was wrong to agree to any meeting.) ----- My final, fourth, reaction was to understand that Harper is federal PM, and I'm not. Trudeau and Mulroney, Catholics, changed Canada abruptly like Lesage. Harper will change it slowly, like Bill Davis. Quote
betsy Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 (edited) Some pundits (including Craig Oliver and that reporter from CBC) are questioning the fact that she says she'd keep her hunger strike going. The pundits say it is unclear what she's actually aiming for. Will she keep her hunger strike until Harper agrees to their demands? They said Spence has turned herself as someone who gets to "approve" the result of the meeting. They were critical of her....and it doesn't help when media starts getting very critical. Edited January 7, 2013 by betsy Quote
PIK Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 She is trying to keep the heat off herself and her boyfriend. And why no noise from the peopole most effected by this poverty, rumours have it they are not allowed to speak. She is a thief and a scam artist and I am hoping she and her BF will be in jail at the end of all this. And it makes me puke to see the libs showing up for photo ops, when they never did a thing to help. At least harper gave the school appoligy, something esle the libs would not even do. And who the hell does martin think he is by saying she is a inspiration to all canadians? Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
Michael Hardner Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 She is trying to keep the heat off herself and her boyfriend. And why no noise from the peopole most effected by this poverty, rumours have it they are not allowed to speak. She is a thief and a scam artist and I am hoping she and her BF will be in jail at the end of all this. I severely doubt that would happen. In any case, if the band projects were well managed I doubt that the compensation would be an issue. The real issue is that there's a perception that things aren't being done. And it makes me puke to see the libs showing up for photo ops, when they never did a thing to help. At least harper gave the school appoligy, something esle the libs would not even do. And who the hell does martin think he is by saying she is a inspiration to all canadians? Welcome to politics. The Liberals don't get chances like this very often. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
DogOnPorch Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 I severely doubt that would happen. In any case, if the band projects were well managed I doubt that the compensation would be an issue. The real issue is that there's a perception that things aren't being done. Hundreds of millions apparently up in smoke as per Cheech y Chong. That would be the issue. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Michael Hardner Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 Hundreds of millions apparently up in smoke as per Cheech y Chong. That would be the issue. Agreed. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
jbg Posted January 23, 2013 Report Posted January 23, 2013 Trudeau and Mulroney, Catholics, changed Canada abruptly like Lesage. Harper will change it slowly, like Bill Davis. Isn't Lesage an airport year Quebec City, coded CYQB? Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.