Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Article in today's Ottawa Citizen via Daily Telegraph:

Republican presidential hopefuls ready to take Iran to war

Obama's handling of Tehran's nuclear ambitions called 'weak'

Republican presidential hopefuls have promised to go to war to stop Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon, painting Barack Obama's handling of Tehran as the most serious of a string of overseas failures.

Mitt Romney, the favourite to clinch the party's candidacy, said he would direct U.S. forces to pre-emptively strike Iran's nuclear facilities if "crippling sanctions" failed to block their ambitions.

"If all else fails, if after all of the work we've done, there's nothing else we could do besides take military action," Romney said at a debate on foreign policy in South Carolina.

The former Massachusetts governor's pledge was echoed by Newt Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House of Representatives who, over the weekend, rose to second place in some national opinion polls.

"You have to take whatever steps are necessary to break its capacity to have a nuclear weapon," said Gingrich, who also proposed covert actions such as "taking out their scientists," to applause.

...

Romney said: "If we re-elect Barack Obama, Iran will have a nuclear weapon. If you elect Mitt Romney, Iran will not have a nuclear weapon."

War drums bum-bum-bum-bum...

Puts more pressure on Obama to act hawkish with Iran.

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted

Also read this from same article:

BRITAIN READY IF IRAN BECOMES A THREAT

Britain has plans "in the locker" to strike Iran if it becomes a threat, the head of the Armed Forces said.

General Sir David Richards said Sunday that the Ministry of Defence had "all sorts of contingencies" that would allow the U.K. and its allies to deploy force "quickly and efficiently."

Richards, Chief of the Defence Staff, said: "We have got, as you would expect, I hope, a lot of plans in the locker."

bum-bum-bum...

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted

Article in today's Ottawa Citizen via Daily Telegraph:

War drums bum-bum-bum-bum...

Puts more pressure on Obama to act hawkish with Iran.

Why should the leadership of Iran give a damn? Nobody can react fast enough to prevent their launching a first strike on Israel. At that point, it becomes a fait accompli. Israel is GONE!

No western power will retaliate with nukes on behalf of Israel. That would only escalate the problem and kill not just the nutbar ayatollahs but perhaps millions of innocent Iranians who had nothing to do with deciding to nuke Israel. They don't get to vote to choose their leaders so how could they be held responsible?

There might be an invasion and/or a forced regime change but to the mullahs, they themselves have already said such a scenario would be worth it! Iran might suffer damage but over the years would rebuild.

Israel would be dead and gone!

As for any nearby Palestinians, the Iranian leaders have never given a damn for them before so why would they care now?

"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."

-- George Bernard Shaw

"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."

Posted

Why should the leadership of Iran give a damn? Nobody can react fast enough to prevent their launching a first strike on Israel. At that point, it becomes a fait accompli. Israel is GONE!

why would they launch a nuclear strike when doing so will bring an equal nuclear strike from israel?
No western power will retaliate with nukes on behalf of Israel. That would only escalate the problem and kill not just the nutbar ayatollahs but perhaps millions of innocent Iranians who had nothing to do with deciding to nuke Israel. They don't get to vote to choose their leaders so how could they be held responsible?
why would any nation do what israel itself will do?
There might be an invasion and/or a forced regime change but to the mullahs, they themselves have already said such a scenario would be worth it! Iran might suffer damage but over the years would rebuild.

talk is cheap, every nation does it...
As for any nearby Palestinians, the Iranian leaders have never given a damn for them before so why would they care now?
other than your own opinion you have cite to back that up???

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

Posted

Article in today's Ottawa Citizen via Daily Telegraph:

War drums bum-bum-bum-bum...

Puts more pressure on Obama to act hawkish with Iran.

election jibber jabber to appease the hard right nutters, it'll all disappear after the election...

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

Posted

They don't get to vote to choose their leaders so how could they be held responsible?

they do get to vote and stories of vote rigging are purely speculative...

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

Posted

Why should the leadership of Iran give a damn? Nobody can react fast enough to prevent their launching a first strike on Israel. At that point, it becomes a fait accompli. Israel is GONE!

Except it will take a long time before Iran could match Israel in nuclear capability. Israel also has second strike capability in the form of submarine mounted cruise missiles. Israel might be gone but Iran would also be toast within a few hours.

Would Iran martyr itself in order to take out Israel?

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

Would Iran martyr itself in order to take out Israel?

I highly doubt it. Even if Iran came out and specifically said "we'd love to nuke Israel", talk is one thing but doing it is another (considering they'd be dead from it).

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted

Would Iran martyr itself in order to take out Israel?

IMO...nope...

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

Posted

Article in today's Ottawa Citizen via Daily Telegraph:

War drums bum-bum-bum-bum...

Puts more pressure on Obama to act hawkish with Iran.

Complete nonsense. If you want peaceful measures to work, you can't take military action off the table. If you don't establish military action as a possible and realistic course of action, Iran really doesn't have anything to worry about.

Posted (edited)

These types of war scenarios have been talked about and discussed at lengthy level here and elsewhere. It started from the Rest of the world first involving Israel attacking Iran. The goalposts then got shifted to get Canada on board to help Israel in Federal politics section and now it appears here in US politics...

Personally, I think this guy Mitt Romney wants to make a name for himself, buy votes and fulfill the appetite for some hawkes and sabre rattlers.

It is inconceivable why Iran would want to attack Israel without being attacked first. It just doesn't stack up why a country like Iran with no history of attacking another country would want to attack Israel conventionally or potentially by nuclear. I just get a sense there are many people on this forum that are trying very hard from every different angle to get canadians to go to war with Iran for Israel...

Edited by kactus
Posted

The goalposts then got shifted to get Canada on board to help Israel in Federal politics section and now it appears here in US politics...

...and just exactly what is it that Canada can do for Israel that it can't already do by itself (and better)?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

I highly doubt it. Even if Iran came out and specifically said "we'd love to nuke Israel", talk is one thing but doing it is another (considering they'd be dead from it).

It's time for at least regime change in Iran. Eliminating Mossadegh was a great idea. High time we did it to his linear descendants.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

Eliminating Mossadegh was a great idea.

The democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran? How was it a great idea?

When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they can seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall. Think of it--always. Gandhi

Posted

How many of these world leaders where around when the US dropped the bomb on Japan? None or very little of them and so with that fact, anyone of these guy would drop the bomb, out of little information from the past of how it kills and destroys people and areas. IF Israel and Iran did start a nuke war, once that bomb is dropped no other country would send troops in there for sure. it would be suicide. How many countries would be affected by the fallout? This kind of talk, maybe its time to rebuild those nuke shelters again.

Posted

Complete nonsense. If you want peaceful measures to work, you can't take military action off the table. If you don't establish military action as a possible and realistic course of action, Iran really doesn't have anything to worry about.

If we want peace there must be war!!! We must bomb them for peace and stability!! Oh ffs.

Tell me who is doing the destabalizing?

Google : Webster Griffin Tarpley, Gerald Celente, Max Keiser

ohm on soundcloud.com

Posted

How many of these world leaders where around when the US dropped the bomb on Japan? None or very little of them and so with that fact, anyone of these guy would drop the bomb, out of little information from the past of how it kills and destroys people and areas.

No, I am pretty sure they know what the effects would be...that's why everybody is so excited! ;)

IF Israel and Iran did start a nuke war, once that bomb is dropped no other country would send troops in there for sure. it would be suicide. How many countries would be affected by the fallout? This kind of talk, maybe its time to rebuild those nuke shelters again.

Rebuild? Never should have taken yours apart! Cue Donald Fagen video now:

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

The democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran? How was it a great idea?

It just wasn't followed up on very well. The actions of Mossadegh and the Ayatollahs were and are inconsistent with property rights and safety of others.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted (edited)

It just wasn't followed up on very well. The actions of Mossadegh and the Ayatollahs were and are inconsistent with property rights and safety of others.

Please explain.

Iran's oil was the property of someone else? What did Mossadegh do that put people's safety in danger?

Edited by Hudson Jones

When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they can seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall. Think of it--always. Gandhi

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,843
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    beatbot
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Radiorum went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Venandi earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...