Moonbox

Highlighting how obnoxiously pedantic you are? Yep! 🫡 You say this as if they weren't already doing it, and didn't start 8 years ago. The only difference is that the legal system operates on objective reasoning and provable fact, and Donald's shameless and compulsive lying faceplant in that arena.

Because the Iranian general population already hates Hamas and doesn't support them. Defunding Hamas/Hezbollah/Houthis has been part of the protest movement from 2022 onward. The Iranians go without proper water/electricity because their theocratic dictatorship prioritizes destabilizing the region over looking after its citizens.

That's not what he said. He praised their resilience, grit and character. I don't disagree with any of your points, but you should choose your words more carefully. 😐

What does it matter? The point was clear, so I'm not sure what you think you're accomplishing with this sort of pedantic word-mongering. It would be best if you chose your lines of reasoning better. This one's a loser.

The only exaggeration here is the comically elevated importance you place on an insincere, perfunctory tweet made by that fat orange baboon long after chaos and violence erupted. It's the equivalent of whispering, "Guys, please stay calm" after a bar brawl you've instigated erupts, while you fade into the background watching it unfold, bottles smashing everywhere. I'm saying he spent two months riling up his retards, who he collected on January 6th and then sent off to the Capitol shouting "Fight for Trump! Fight for Trump!" He then tried to join them, even attempting to grab the steering wheel of his car away from his Secret Service detail when they refused to let him. Rather than condemn the Jan 6 rioters, he praised and lauded them after the fact. In what clownworld do you figure he had nothing to do with the riot, or that he was trying to stop it?

Michael Yeadon hasn't worked for Pfizer for 13 years, never worked with vaccines and was an asthma and allergy researcher. 🤣 What a dumb f**king OP.

You're holding the government to account by not even knowing what you're holding them to account for? It's like you're auditioning to be Pierre Poilievre's fluffer or something. 🤣

I'm throwing your buffoonish nitpicking back in your face. It is pathetic. If you figure your winning argument is that Trump didn't literally say nothing, then sure, I'll concede that brilliant point to you. 🤣 A casual tweet saying "be peaceful" somehow balances out the fact that Trump whipped the mob up in the first place, threw gas on the fire with further deranged rhetoric as it unfolded, and sat around watching it on TV for hours while law enforcement, republican colleagues and even his family begged him to put a stop to it. Maybe in alternate reality that makes sense...

So you don't actually want to debate anything meaningful here. You just want to be a petty word-monger, and (according to those standards) you've proven yourself a liar anyways. 🙄

As we all know, Great Leader has uncovered and mastered mystical esoteric knowledge, which has allowed the his hilariously poor glorious and heroic industrial base to out produce Europe and North America.

You're wrong because Jagger cried foul about treason, and you said he didn't. Yet another clueless quick-take by our resident know-nothing. 🤡

Not really. The only reason it ever could is if the info ops convinces enough western mooks towards your arguments. For Russia to maintain this war, they have to turn theirs into a war economy, spending well over 10% of their GDP on it but probably a lot more (since Russian numbers are as accurate as their history). Meanwhile, an economic bloc that dwarfs Russia (like truly dwarfs it) can donate their obsolete/surplus equipment (which is still miles better than Russian garbage) and help dismantle one of their biggest geopolitic military threats for pennies on the dollar. No, the only way a war of attrition favors Russia is if Putin convinces enough donkeys to believe it.

He evidently did not teach you much about European history, common sense or articulate communication.

No, I proved that you were full of shit again, with a 10 second Google Search: "Singh says report shows some MPs are ‘traitors to the country,’ accuses Trudeau of accepting foreign interference"

Nonono. If we're playing puerile games of pedantic reasoning, you said: I never said that. That makes YOU a liar. .... .... Do you see how useless this sort of argument is? 🙄

You didn't demonstrate anything. You just sort of puked on yourself and then declared you were right, which is all you ever really do here. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-ndps-jagmeet-singh-says-classified-version-of-foreign-interference/ Singh says report shows some MPs are ‘traitors to the country,’ accuses Trudeau of accepting foreign interference Way to make a fool out of yourself again. 👍

Untrue, as evidenced by Jagger coming out and crying "Treason!"

It is the same thing if the "risk" is that you'll break your trust. 🤡 Put more marbles in your mouth and try again.

Two problems: First, your argument is pedantic. Your are absolutely right that Trump didn't do "nothing". In the over three hours the riot (that he instigated) unfolded, he watched it turn violent, he watched the capitol building get stormed, he sent a useless tweet after the fact about being peaceful, and then he probably ate some McDonald's, took a shit, and watched another hour or so of the coverage on Fox News. So yeah...he didn't do "nothing" - just nothing positive, nothing serious, nothing worthwhile. Second, I never even made the claim. 🙃

It's the same thing. 🤡

No, at 2:38, when Trump earnestly and valiantly lifted his fat fingers and sent his useless Tweet. The point the damage was that the damage was already done, the Capitol was overrun, violence had already erupted, and Trump's limply tweeting "Be peaceful" after the fact. Yes. I wonder if she'd yet been able to read Dear Leader's heroic message of peace yet on Twitter. 🙄🙄🙄

Well you said he's not being briefed because he apparently can't trust himself to not slip, so why should anyone trust that he won't do that as Prime Minister? The absurdity of your reasoning on this note is stunningly simple. If he signs the document then he can still talk about it. He just can't reveal state and intelligence secrets. His preference is to be able to talk shit in ignorance, and that's typical. Talking shit is all he's ever been good for. No wonder you have such a boner for him.

So when he becomes Prime Minister, he's going to avoid being briefed on anything sensitive to avoid so he's not in the position to slip? 😑 No argument there, though I'd say you're understating the problem.

Yes, but if you're an MP what's your job? Is it to serve the public, or make sure you and your buddies get a golden pension that will cost Canada 120 million? The idea that we're moving it for Diwali is full-stop retarded.