Moonbox

You asked me to provide evidence of my claim but never intended to and refused to look at it, on the basis that I was stating an opinion vs a fact. This is the limpest and most useless thing you can say on an online debate forum, but in the little time you've been here, you've already been busy repeating it other threads. Now we have your measure. Thanks for the self-vetting. A real moderator would likely have problems with your compulsion for drive-by sniping, and your cringeworthy attempts at smug trolling. "Salted-tears, Moonbuckethead etc?" Physician, heal thyself.... As opposed to the angry, screeching donkeys who drown the forum with the all-day spam threads that you're constantly upvoting? Your assessment of behavior on this forum is based on whether you share the posters' worldviews, and little else. 🙃

I think you're falling back on kindergarten defense mechanisms. You asked for proof that it's conspiracy garbage, I provided evidence, you refuse to look at it or comment, and continue to demand evidence. That's a mighty fine self-reinforcing delusion mechanism you have there, sir. 🙃

...with one exception. If you're under 40, and a 0.0097% chance of myocarditis terrifies you, get the Pfizer vaccine instead 🤣. No, my own link continues to promote the vaccine for virtually all age groups and demographics, and concludes that myocarditis risks are higher for the unvaccinated than the vaccinated (with the sole exception of men under 40 who received a second does of the Moderna vaccine 🫡). What you've said, on the other hand, is just another bullshit conclusion you've synthesized out of thin air from sources that don't say anything remotely close to what you say they do...as usual.

and I acknowledge that a certain type of mind has trouble distinguishing between a good source and a bad one, and information vs misinformation. Your article was nonsense, and comes from a website that peddles in unhinged rants and conspiracy theories. The only thing you've spread awareness of is that you're susceptible to the above. You say that, as you continue to respond. Notably, you don't appear to have any comment on the Druthers piece I quoted. I suspect even you'd have trouble trying to defend that stupidity.

My conclusions are what they're saying, pulled directly from their quotes. I can provide more as well, from more direct quotes (as opposed to your dopey conjurations): "The analysis showed people infected with COVID-19 before receiving a vaccine were 11 times more at risk for developing myocarditis within 28 days of testing positive for the virus. But that risk was cut in half if a person was infected after receiving at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine." https://www.heart.org/en/news/2022/08/22/covid-19-infection-poses-higher-risk-for-myocarditis-than-vaccines#:~:text=COVID-19 infection poses higher risk for myocarditis than vaccines,-By American Heart&text=The overall risk of myocarditis,new study in England shows. Looks like you fell on your face and look stupid. Whoops.

The fact that I was calling it garbage was your first hint that it was opinion, one informed by nonsensical rants like: https://druthers.ca/public-notice-to-the-global-covenant-mayor-of-the-united-nations-un/ Do you have any comments on this piece? Am I guilty of High Treason for not rising up against Guelph's mayor and unincorporating my city? Does your argument go any further than, "That's, like, your opinion, man?"

No, they didn't post the data that you, brilliant and totally well-informed doctor/scientist that you are, decided was required for them to make their conclusions. 🤡 No you didn't, anywhere, ever. Not only did your research article not show that, you've never shown it anywhere else either. You've posted a study, and then drawn a dopey hot-take conclusion from it all of your own making.

Coming from our resident drive-by trolling expert? Rich puddin'. Who's talking about forum rules here, other than you? 🤡

Very good! Yes, but you obviously don't. There's nothing fallacious about calling a person who drives a bus a bus-driver, is there?

Because they are posting conspiracy garbage, like that the Global Deep State is controlling my mayor through secret international agreements in order to implement population control on my community, and that he's guilty of High Treason. 🤡

and yet the quote is still there with the link provided...which I apparently didn't provide? I don't have to. They took myocarditis cases and broke them down by whether there'd been: A ) A recent unvaccinated COVID cases B ) A recent second-dose vaccine administered The folks in column "B" would include the presumably small number who got COVID shortly after a booster vaccination. I can keep my posts succinct and on-topic. You can't. Who's having a hissy-fit here? 🤣

If you think I need to disprove that the Global Deep State is controlling my mayor through secret international agreements in order to implement population control on my community, and that he's guilty of High Treason, then you've proven that you're ridiculous and not worth seriously engaging with. 🙄

No, I don't need to disprove the Global Deep State is controlling my mayor through secret international agreements in order to implement population control on my community, and that he's guilty of High Treason, just because some online Karen said so. The claim is retarded at face-value, and asking me to prove it isn't is like asking me to prove Joe Biden isn't an alien reptile.

No, I listed 4 front-page articles promoting commonly-peddled conspiracy theories, along with a truly deranged rant about the Global Covenant Mayor of the United Nations (aka Guelph Mayor Cam Guthrie) and about how we should unincorporate our city. 🤡

So what? What does this mean? Are you capable of anything beyond zombie-posting the doomporn links that show up on your feeds? When you proclaim vague and imminent catastrophe all the time, you're not actually predicting anything.

Gosh, let's see: On the front page, we have articles about: -"The Grand Deception" oooooh 🙄 - Bill Gates buying up farmland, and how the Deep State is trying to starve us - How western medicine (or Big Pharma) is developing drugs to make people sick on purpose - Fluoride in water (can it get more cliché)? and then, to top it all off, a PUBLIC NOTICE about the Mayor of Guelph, or rather the "GloBAL CoVENanT MAyOR of thE UnITEd NaTiONS". That was a fun exercise. Druthers is a clown site, and after a two minute investigation, it's way worse than I thought.

It's definitely peculiar. I don't care if the head of state visits, or doesn't, or whether we keep the monarchy at all. I guess if the head of state never even bothers to visit, it probably makes a better case for abolishing the monarchy. It doesn't change much of anything for us here.

It does if you're asking us to discuss a link/article you said you agreed with, from a conspiracy clownpaper that starts off with: "Statist propaganda in the West tries to convince us that we live in a democracy...but this is gaslighting". 🙄 Talking about pathocracy might be interesting on its own, but when you're sourcing garbage, and the tone and intent of the garbage is so transparent, you're not going to get any serious traction. There's an ignore feature. It's pretty neat.

Like the flu shot? Except I do. When I make a specific claim, I actually have a direct quote on-deck to support it. You should try it. According to the CDC, among males aged 12 to 17, about 22 to 36 per 100,000 experienced myocarditis within 21 days after receiving a second vaccine dose. Among unvaccinated males in this age group, the incidence of myocarditis was 50.1 to 64.9 cases per 100,000 after infection with the COVID-19 virus. https://news.yale.edu/2023/05/05/yale-study-reveals-insights-post-vaccine-heart-inflammation-cases Whoops.

They haven't spent $200 Billion. They've committed to spending $200B last year.

Yes, which is why the boosters are recommended. The various health ministries aren't telling anyone a single dose grants permanent immunity, are they? ...as is the number of them who died from myocarditis, though it's nearly twice as high from getting a COVID-19 infection than getting the vaccine. The same goes for myocarditis. The study you posted wasn't restricted to only healthy males, was it? Where does the report you posted say anything of the sort? Let's see who has a 'hissy fit' now? 🤣

I'm just saying our speculating is kind of pointless. Visits from our head of state are...also kind of pointless.

Unsurprisingly, a really dumb analogy. You were saying this time last year that the economy was unravelling, and that we'd see when the Jan 30, 2023 investor quarterly/annual reports came out. You faceplanted on that, just like you're faceplanting here. What sort of donkey do you have to be to be talking about a BRICS currency when one of the largest partners in the group says they're not even talking about it? Why don't you tell us what you think that means, or rather what your Twitter feed is telling you it means? 🙄

Outpatient therapy can mean aggressive chemo and radiation. Maybe they need to shrink the tumor before operating, or maybe there's no tumor at all. Fact is that we don't know anything, and even an oncologist doctor wouldn't be able to intelligently speculate based on the information we have. Regardless, Harry is coming to visit him from across the Atlantic, so it's obviously not unlikely to just be a benign skin lesion.

But it isn't. Your assessment of the analogy, or analogy in general perhaps, is false. An analogy is not comparing two of the same things, but rather two things that share some similarities. In this case, (I think) August is bringing up the point that there's no free ride when it comes to debt. The fact that government can take longer to pay it back wasteful debt spending and hoist the burden on future generations is about as smart as borrowing to buy big screens. Feels good now, not so good later.