Moonbox

This is a foolish opinion by a man with a poor grasp of history.

There was never any doubt. Kansas City Chiefs, Super Bowl champs!

Germany signed a non-aggression pact with Poland, which is nothing more than an agreement to not attack each other. The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, on the other hand, was a secret pact between Nazi Germany and the USSR to jointly attack Poland and divide it between them. It was the Soviet Union that cooperated and colluded with Hitler, but that history doesn't line up with Putin's exercises in make-believe.

Wow, it's almost like anyone who argues with him notices this - no cites, no numbers, just donkey-logic and straw-man arguments he's made up to debate against. 🤡

He did plenty of exactly that. For example, despite the fact that Stalin and Hitler had signed a pact to both invade and then divide Poland between them, Putin absurdly argued that Poland collaborated with Hitler. It makes absolutely no sense, but most folks watching Tucker Carlson wouldn’t know any better and as you say, good liars bullshit eloquently and seamlessly. What was really cringe about it was how Tucker Carlson just sat there nodding his head the whole time like a sycophantic bobblehead.

I’m not disagreeing with you. I’m just saying that beyond nukes, Russia has no capability to really threaten NATO Baltic states. They’re fully committed faceplanting into a country 1/4 their size fighting with NATO surplus gear.

Because his army is a joke. 😉

Why would you quote me here? It has nothing to do with what I said, nor with the thread in general. You're posting nonsense, and it's getting really boring. Pretty soon you'll just go on ignore.

It says that the chances of getting post-covid myocarditis is higher for unvaccinated men under 40 than for the same group after getting the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines - circled in blue, green and red. That's why they say: "But the risk of myocarditis associated with the vaccine was lower than the risk associated with COVID-19 infection before or after vaccination – with one exception. Men under 40 who received a second dose of the Moderna vaccine had a higher risk of myocarditis following vaccination." The ONE exception being the Moderna vaccine, with numbers circled in purple. If you have a problem with their numbers, let's hear it, otherwise we can safely conclude that you're caught red-handed bullshitting...again.

Yes, they can. The chart's here, showing the opposite of what you're saying, as usual. This is peak CdnFox performative jackassing.

Poor, fragile little muppet.

You ain't seen nothing yet. 😉

Now you're just outright lying! 🤣 As usual, you can't scurry away fast enough from the numbers that prove that not only your conclusion wrong, but also your limp and desperate re-imagined meaning of the quote you keep repeating.

So again, you're saying the numbers make you look like an clown, so you're going to continue to avoid talking about them. Got it. 👌 "But the risk of myocarditis associated with the vaccine was lower than the risk associated with COVID-19 infection before or after vaccination – with one exception. Men under 40 who received a second dose of the Moderna vaccine had a higher risk of myocarditis following vaccination." On the chart, circled in purple, is the ONE exception they talk about, and it's exactly what they say it is. No matter how much you wriggle and insist that phrases mean what you need them to so you can avoid looking like a bullshitting fool, the numbers will continue to prove that you are.

This is a beautiful point.

He won't. The contradictions inherent in so many of his positions are irrelevant to the screeching donkeys in his base. They have an air-tight, infallible defense against all of it:

So what you're saying here is that you won't discuss the numbers in the chart because they prove that you're wrong, so instead you're uselessly bloviating. Got it. 🙄👌

Look at the numbers on the chart. Your self-serving misinterpretations of language is based on what you need things to mean to not look dumb, but they don't change the numbers being cited. 🤡

It's not a problem for the US to resolve, but rather the poorly governed basket cases from which people are fleeing. The reason there are so many people willing to flee to the US is because they can. I'm about as anti-Trump as anyone, and think the GOP is a clownshow, but that doesn't mean border security isn't a real issue that needs fixing.

At a certain point, we have to accept that rehabilitation isn't happening. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me 21 times...ummm, what planet am I on?

No, it has not. "higher in young men in general" means that it's higher in young men than in the general population, not higher than unvaccinated people. Sure, here are the numbers broken down, from the study we're talking about: As you see, the risk is higher among unvaccinated people, in all age groups, except for the ONE exception of under 40 men who received 2 doses of Moderna. The answer to your dumb question is that the health experts recommended young men get vaccinated because the myriad of benefits overwhelmingly outweigh the risks, and even for the one microscopic risk you're peeing your pants about, some Tylenol was all that was required to treat it and you generally faced the same risk or worse from being unvaccinated and getting COVID. 🤡

But the risk of myocarditis associated with the vaccine was lower than the risk associated with COVID-19 infection before or after vaccination – with one exception. Men under 40 who received a second dose of the Moderna vaccine had a higher risk of myocarditis following vaccination. One exception means one exception, and this one is specifically stated. Obfuscation is your superpower. I can keep my posts trim and tight. The question is based on a false conclusion, so it doesn't merit an answer. Every publication we've referred to in this thread continues to advocate vaccination for all age groups, and continues to assess that the benefits outweigh the essentially microscopic risk of myocarditis.

Myocarditis risk is substantially increased during and after being infected with COVID, but the risk for those who've been vaccinated is roughly half that of the unvaccinated.

Yeah, silly me thinking that the guy posting conspiracy clown articles was reasonable enough to be asking for me to support my position. You sure got me there. 🥱

No, males under 40, getting their second dose of Moderna. Every source I've cited here is still promoting the vaccine for all age groups (other than kids under 5), and none of the sources you've posted have advised against them. What questions were those? Nobody reads the majority of the stuff you pound out on your keyboard, and certainly not when you start jackassing about hissy fits and muffins and whatnot. 🤡