Moonbox

and here you are, battling it out with an apparent bot, but still somehow managing to look stupid doing it. Even the "bot" can recognize when you've made up something to argue against...with yourself. I'm not sure what would be more embarrassing...that this is a bot and that it was still able to point out your foolishness, or that it's not a bot and you've spent the last few days trying to convince everyone it is. 🤣

It's the only topic-relevant question you asked. What you're referring to is just a wimpy insult, disguised with a question mark. 🥱 I can do that too: Is it utter loneliness or complete failure that you drive you to spend all day, every day, battling on the internet? Is it both? Now what do you have to say about Justice Mosely's assessment of the trucker protest? Anything?

For someone who's so focused on it, you don't seen to have anything concrete to say about it. The BTFP was a short-term emergency measure. I suspect when it ends, things will proceed much as they did before it was implemented. What do you think will happen?

You need to work more subtly, comrade. It doesn't work if you're this obvious about who pays you. 🤡

Who's Brandon, again?

Who's taking a pro child-porn position here? Is that something you just made up, to argue with yourself about...again? 🤡 A quiet, silent pushback. There are hardly going to be a lot of dudes getting in front of mics to complain about having to show ID to watch their porn. Think of all the poor incels...🤣

It's almost too dumb to believe.

Man...I stand corrected on Pierre Poilievre's pivot. I have no words, other than LOL.

Yeah so reluctant that it's the only real job he's ever had, he's been doing it for the last 16 years, has gone through multiple elections, and is refusing to step down despite most of Canada wanting him to. No I did not, but this is the sort of super-important thing that we must all be concerned about. Please provide a link so I can provide my valued input.

Yes, the bar is very, very low for the Conservatives to beat. Self-destruction is the path to defeat for Pierre Poilievre. If my original assumptions about him are correct, now that the real dumdums from the base have fallen in line behind him, I suspect he'll pivot away from their delusions and start talking more like Harper. One can hope. 🥺

Spectacularly dumb perhaps under a critical/realistic/intellectual lens, but not from that of the audience for which he's performing. Railing about the WEF and central banking etc, and repeating simple slogans is very appealing to a certain type... I'll probably end up voting conservative next election, but I'll do so knowing that Pierre Poilievre is a performer and a career politician, just like Trudeau. I'm just hopeful that there's more under the hood in his case.

Labradoodles and Komodo Dragons also have similarities and differences which can be outlined. The reason nobody compares them is because it's absurd. The same is true for comparing Trudeau and Putin, but lazy thinking and emotional bias can make this an appealing crutch. Uh, yes? They get assassinated.

Almost impossible. Ask John Tory or Tim Hudak from Ontario if you need to find ways to lose impossible-to-lose of elections. I think the idea that the Liberals would call an election is farcical. Trudeau is so deeply unpopular now, and has show himself to be so incredibly out of touch and ineffective, that this would be the worst time possible to call the election. The Liberals need something to change before an election, and I suspect it's just a passive and desperate hope for something external. Maybe Trump wins the US election and changes sentiment here. Maybe Poilievre says/does something spectacularly dumb. They can only wait and hope, because after 9 years it's doubtful that Trudeau can win over new minds. At best all he can hope is that someone disgusts the voting population even more than him...somehow.

Hahahahaha...you're talking about approval ratings, in the coming election pageantry that Russia holds, where Putin is guaranteed to win and only approved stooges are allowed to "run" against him. But sure...Navalny is a CIA plant, Zelensky is a Jewish Nazi, Trump won the election and mind control vampire-aliens from Zeta Reticuli are pulling the strings on all of it. 🤡

Communicating with you on this forum is like talking to a primitive AI chat-bot. Your outputted responses have little/nothing to do with whatever inputs I provide, and you repeat variations of the same phrases over and over and over and over again. Why do you keep saying, "You Americans" for example? It's unintelligible nonsense, and you're making a very good case for just going on ignore. Gosh, who else is surprised that Nationalist is criticizing Navalny, top critic of his hero. 🙄

People who draw comparisons between Trudeau and Putin are being lazy thinkers, in my estimation. Acknowledging that Putin is "much worse" is a pretty flimsy qualification whilst trying to say they're similar. "Yeah, like, Putin's critics all fall out of balconies, get shot on the streets, die of nerve agent and radioactive poisons, or their plans hit the ground prematurely, but Justin Trudeau demoted JWR from her cabinet position!" Oooof.

I don't know. Presumably you have thoughts, if you're saying we should watch what happens to it...🤔

What do you think will happen to Japan? 🤔

I did answer your question: You obviously didn't like the answer, and had no response to offer beyond falling back on your default-state of limp jackassing. He says, with his 40th battle-post of the day, and his 14000th of the last 12 months...🤣🤣🤣

There was no subject to change. Nationalist was talking about emotionalism, while being emotional himself. I never said Russia was collapsing, but rather it's army. I started this thread less than a year and a half ago, and did so while the Russian donkey-peasant soldiers were fleeing en-masse out of entire provinces from the much smaller Ukrainian army. Russia's "attacks" since then have consisted of little more than attritional meat assaults, whilst most of their soldiers hide like rats in trenches. Is it an army? I guess so.

Maybe you should ask yourself that? We were talking about rights to protest, peaceful assembly, and the trucker convoy. Now you're avoiding that topic, and instead asserting the absolutely "vital" fact that bank accounts can indeed be considered assets, and that I absurdly disputed it. Did the apparently necessary change in subject come out of a desire to save face, or general confusion?

Yes, everyone else is emotional here, not the smooth-brain spamming caps and exclamation marks. 🤡

The fact that both Biden and Trump are still alive and running against each other in a free election answers your retarded question for you.

Everyone can see that you're absurdly insisting I argued a bank account isn't an asset. Says Supreme Court Justice Mosley, in his ruling against the Liberal government: "I considered the events that occurred in Ottawa and other locations in January and February 2022 went beyond legitimate protest and reflected an unacceptable breakdown of public order". I never said Justin didn't do anything wrong. In fact I agreed that the Emergencies Act invocation was wrong. This is just you arguing with yourself again. 🤡 The protestors needed to be removed. It was right to remove them. The problem is how they were removed, which was wrong.

No, the quote's still there and unedited. Whether you choose to misinterpret it again so that you can argue with yourself about another point that was never made is up to you. 🥱 The legal peril Justin faces is his use of the Emergencies Act, which was reckless, unnecessary and unconstitutional. Whether or not the protestors should have been removed is not in question. They didn't have the "right" to blockade the Ambassador Bridge, or gridlock Ottawa for weeks, and that is a simple fact, established by Canadian case law. Even the Justice who ruled against the Liberals specifically stated the protests "reflected an unacceptable breakdown of public order".