Moonbox

They're only conspiracy theories because people make them into that with goofy out-of-context quotes, or straight up make-believe. Talking about eating ze bugs, nobody is actually mandating or pushing for it. There's no agenda to make it happen. Bug protein is just something someone talked about at some point, and the conspiracy clownosphere ran with it it and turned into something ridiculous. As for limiting beef, do you not agree that North Americans could...uh...lay off on the McDonald's a bit?

Unsurprisingly you missed/avoided the point. Are you, or are you not, a WEF attendee? You seemed to imply this was necessary to provide an opinion, and since you've already provided yours, we should expect you've some experience to draw from? Of course not. What you consider "logic" never points inwards, only outwards. 🥱

As I was saying: CRY FOR HELP 🤣

Speaking of mental health issues... + 14,000 (posts) / 12 (months) = A CRY FOR HELP

So Poland and Germany agreeing not to attack each other is not only comparable to, but actually worse than, Germany and Russia agreeing to invade Poland together...just because it happened 5 years prior. That tracks for sharkman, I guess. 🫠

Like you and all of the reddit/4chan Andies? Right!? 🙄

The only thing that you proved was that you didn't have a good grasp of basic history. Riddle me this, what was the USSR's justification for invading Poland alongside Hitler in 1939? 🤔

The WEF is the same thing it's always been - a forum where world leaders and rich people go to touch champagne glasses and talk about things they feel good about. The only thing that's changed is that it became a goofy conspiracy theory from the far-right during COVID, and Pierre Poilievre is echoing the rage about it back to the conspiracy rabble. It's a silly and worthless campaign promise meant to assuage the deluded concerns of silly, unserious voters.

You asked me for evidence of a Putin lie, I gave you one, and now you're asking for evidence of a planned attack on NATO by Russia? You're definitely a Tucker Carlson fan. 🤣

It would be easier to discuss the things he says about Ukraine that are true. His entire justification for the war was false, including the make-believe promises of NATO not expanding, which Mikhail Gorbacheck (the USSR leader at the time) has confirmed were never made. The topic of “NATO expansion” was not discussed at all, and it wasn’t brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not a singe Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn’t bring it up, either. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/28/candace-owens/fact-checking-claims-nato-us-broke-agreement-again/ Carlson's trusted by retards, and nothing but.

You believe anything Putin (and especially Tucker Carlson) says, no matter how easily disproven and retarded it is. Russia pulled back their forces from Kiev because they were defeated in humiliating fashion, just like they were in Kharkiv and Kherson...unless there were peace deals being negotiated for both those withdrawals too? 🤣 I'm not sure why you're spamming pictures of other fired/disgraced journalists here. Who's talking about them? Do they make Tucker Carlson's followers less retarded? I can't see why they would.

According to no-life incels. Those aren't sources. No.

We know what Putin's designs were for Eastern Ukraine because he tried to capture Kiev, lol. Who's Brandon? The only people who trust Tucker Carlson are retards.

It contrasts with the fantasy-history Putin tortured little Tuck Tuck with while he was emasculating him.

The USSR invaded Poland in 1939.

"National Post publishes another culture-war story, from nobody-professor of religious studies". If it's worth anything, I don't disagree with the premise, but the study is a joke, from a barely-professor.

Lol no. This just highlights how dysfunctional the current system is. We no only have an entrenched and overpaid public bureaucracy that provides little of value to begin with, but they're so useless that we have to outsource what they should be doing but can't. No doubt. I'm not advocating for using contractors. I'm advocating for some accountability and expectations from our fat bureaucracy.

No, because they're not interested in a unionized public sector environment where their talents and advancements are stunted by seniority, and office/diversity politics. No, because it's poor logic. 🙃 The pay floor for our public servants is stupidly high, (back in Kevin Paige's day it was an average of around $113,000/y with benefits). They don't care about the job security, benefits and pay floor. They can do better on their own, and thus we need to hire them as contractors. Meanwhile, we're left overpaying the folk who wouldn't cut it elsewhere.

You'd think, but the bureaucracy is often as nepotistic as it is incompetent and unaccountable.

The problem the government has (and especially with anything advanced or tech-related), is that high-performers and those with the most expertise have no interest in working for the bureaucratic public service, even if the benefits are wonderful. As a result, the public service is chronically short of actual expertise and know-how. For something like ArriveCan, the people on-staff in the public service are so woefully inadequate to the task that they wouldn't even know where to start on something of that scale, or where to even find the people who would, nevermind managing and directing them. This story begins and ends with a bloated, ineffective bureaucracy being bureaucratic and wasting our money, and our time.

Calling it biased, and then citing in another thread shortly thereafter! 🤣 This guy is a living, breathing self-memer.

So you're saying you don't appreciate it when people bring up how often you contradict yourself? Your cite proves that your gauge on whether a source is reliable is based on whether you like what it's saying at the time. To call a news outlet biased and woke garbage, but then in the same day cite it in your latest spam thread is freaking dumb. 🫠

I was cheering for SF as well, until a few of my friends started complaining about Taylor Swift and Kelce and Biden etc. 🫡

It's funny how ready you are to cite a woke garbage biased newspaper (as you call it) when you figure the article is critical of the Liberals. 🙃

The timeline is irrelevant. Surely you can understand the difference between two countries agreeing not to attack each other (Poland's 1934 agreement with Germany), vs two countries agreeing to attack and divide up another country together (Germany and USSR literally allying with each other to attack Poland).