-
Posts
8,884 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
40
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Moonbox
-
If Trump Wins He Will Abandon NATO
Moonbox replied to robosmith's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Yes, but this was mostly lip-service. By the time Trump's term had ended, I think there were two countries outside of the US meeting the spending target. That number is 13 now (not Canada, lol) and mostly a result of the Russia invasion. No argument there. -
What I read was that Trudeau was trying to recruit Carney. My guess (or hope?) is that Carney is smart enough not to board this rotten, sinking ship.
-
If Trump Wins He Will Abandon NATO
Moonbox replied to robosmith's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Did Trump do it, or did the Russian invasion of Ukraine? This is one of the few areas on which I agree with Trump (especially from the Canadian perspective), but I think you give him too much credit here. -
Right...so in your mind, a Rumble video carries the same weight as validated and widely sources news. I suppose claims made on Reddit are also valid for citation now? 🙄
-
If we liken the Ukrainian war to a game of Chess, then Russia's strategy is to lose both knights and 3 pawns to take out 1 of the enemy's pawns, and "advance" 1 square on the board. The idea that there's some greater strategy at work here, and that the schwerpunkt will later become clear is a joke. These are meat assaults, because meat assaults are all the Russian military is capable of. We haven't seen this level of military incompetence and ineffectiveness probably since Santa Anna and the Alamo. Because Putin is desperate. Manpower is the only real advantage Russia has, and Putin hopes that he can convince gullible dupes in the West that this is a sustainable, war-winning tactic. Russia isn't China or India. They can't afford to lose to lose 1000 troops a day, and this big spring/summer offensive was meant to take advantage of the delays in western support, which has started arriving but still mostly to come. "Advancing is advancing" though...battalions of dead Russian soldiers to capture a few square kilometers is apparently sound and war-winning military doctrine. 🙄
-
What is you opinion on career Politicians?
Moonbox replied to CrazyCanuck89's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Yes, a lot of them go nowhere, and he compulsively derails even his own threads with his fragile performances, but the derailing is the bigger issue. Unless you move to a different topic, you can't avoid him. He's always there. You can hardly have a discussion here without him puking all over the place, and he requires no particular dance partner. As soon as the first person disagrees with his 10-IQ reasoning, the performative jackassing begins, and the thread is no longer about anything but fragile Fox's ego. -
Okay that's better. At least now we have something specific to talk about. Now let's put it into context. If yesterday and the day before were "slow days" as you say, are we to assume that today was not? If we combine this with the past two days' gains, we're looking at an area equal to 2-3 average sized Canadian farms, taken after 3 days of fighting (and presumably ~3000 casualties), on a 1000 km war front. What military doctrine teaches "advancing is advancing", and that losing entire battalions worth of soldiers is worth a single farmer's field? 🤔
-
What is you opinion on career Politicians?
Moonbox replied to CrazyCanuck89's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Normally I would, but he's like a malaria carrier. I can spare myself the direct effect of his belligerent stupidity, but not from infecting every other part of the forum I'd still see all of his topic spam. He'd still be derailing every thread he joins with his fragile blustering and desperate need for acknowledgement. His puke would still be everywhere, ignore feature or not. -
What is you opinion on career Politicians?
Moonbox replied to CrazyCanuck89's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
LOL. You don't make anyone cry. The only thing that's notable about you on this forum is how much of a deadbeat loser you are. There are plenty of other people just as stupid as you here, but nobody has less going on in their life than you. You're just a pest. -
Did you? Because the word "could" only showed up a single time, in three different sources. That doesn't matter for you though, because clownworld works differently than reality. 🤡🤡🤡
-
Gaining ground, yes. KMs a day, definitely not. We're talking meters. YOU ARE READING IT WRONG. I already explained how this is WRONG, and I even showed you a screenshot, with the legend. HERE'S ANOTHER ONE. Either you're color blind, or you're bad at reading maps. You tell us. This heroic success is about 200m, and it's one of only two such instances on the entire 1000km front line. This is the progress Russia is making daily, and all for the low-low cost of ~1000 casualties a day.
-
What is you opinion on career Politicians?
Moonbox replied to CrazyCanuck89's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Wasn't a typo. You reasoned it out and everything! 🤣 Chalk it up as another example of you being a blustering buffoon. 👌 You're the biggest no-life loser this forum has ever seen, and it's not even close: -
What is you opinion on career Politicians?
Moonbox replied to CrazyCanuck89's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
-
From Russian soldiers and deserters: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/01/18/theyre-just-choosing-where-to-die-when-russias-poorly-trained-stormtroopers-retreat-russian-barrier-troops-gun-them-down/ https://www.businessinsider.com/russian-soldiers-say-blocking-units-placed-behind-them-stop-retreat-2023-3 https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/human-wave-tactics-are-demoralizing-the-russian-army-in-ukraine/ MSM FAKE NEWS right? If it's not from Russia Today, or Tucker Carlson, it just ain't true in clownworld.
-
What is you opinion on career Politicians?
Moonbox replied to CrazyCanuck89's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
-
This is what's funny. These soldiers are so motivated that Russian commanders employ blocking units behind their assaults that shoot their own retreating soldiers. Russia has low morale, but highly motivated troops 😆...that's good shit.
-
I suppose it's easy for you to feel that way when you just ignore and blow past any criticism of your reasoning, without even acknowledging it. Evidently, that's also what you seem to do when confronted with facts that contradict your chosen narrative. See below: YOU picked that place on the map, and it's ironically the place where the Russians are making the most progress. Anywhere else, and the "gains" are even more underwhelming. You cannot do the same to make your point, because what you're claiming is not real. Now, instead of rambling off another useless 5 paragraph essay, nut up and show us a place where the Russians are advancing kilometers per day, as you've claimed. Alternatively, you can save yourself some time and acknowledge that your misinformed on that.
-
The obvious and public examples lends credibility to the ones behind closed doors. As you say, he's a circus clown that attacks people. He also has literally zero credibility, so it's fascinating to see people like you try to rationalize why you'd give him the benefit of the doubt. The endless parade of critics he has from his former inner circle should raise questions for a reasonable mind, but instead: I couldn't have said that better myself.
-
The whole point of a debate is to read what the other person is saying, and respond to that. You're not doing that. You're just full-quoting me and repeating yourself, without even acknowledging my arguments about your (IMO) poor reasoning. As as an example of your bad conclusions, just refer to anything regarding these maps and the near-zero progress the Russians are making. You're definitely not reading these right. Here's an example of "recent gains" in the last 24 hours. They barely ever show up on these maps, because they're hard to confirm in that short a time span. As for Chasiv Yar, the place where Russia is concentrating hardest, here is the ACTUAL progress Russia is making, according to YOUR SOURCE. In 65 days, the Russians have moved forward 2.7km. That's 41m a day, and this is where Russia is advancing the fastest, and concentrating the hardest. Sad Vlad is throwing away 1000+ of his worthless donkey soldiers daily, so the Russian army can advance the distance I walk to go have a beer across the street on my neighbor's porch. At this pace, it will be two years before Russia reaches Kramatorsk, the closest city of any importance, and they'll lose over 600,000 more soldiers (4x the population of Kramatorsk itself). "Advancing is advancing" is utter bullshit, and I think you know that. I've said it multiple times before, and you've ignored it over and over, but Russia runs out of manpower and equipment long before Ukraine runs out of land at this rate - and this is with US aid delays.
-
They're meters per day. I offered to review those maps with you and show you, because you keep referring to them but can't seem to read them properly.... Unsurprisingly, you ignored my offer, just like you avoided any of the other points I made. 🤷♂️
-
Sure. I'm just telling you that you're not going to get any intelligent responses from him. He's literally a paid Russian troll, and he's been caught before copypasting the same garbage on other Western country's forums. "Something something, Anglo-Khazarian Nazi something something..." You can tell when he posts here that he's just copypasting trollfarm content, just because of the format of the text he uses. Athos buddy, you need to work harder. Mother Russia is disappointed in your feeble efforts.
-
Your sources and the information they provide are not the problem. It's the conclusions that you draw from them. That's a pretty goofy thing to say when you're not even acknowledging the points I'm making. No it really didn't. The map you provided was an interactive present-day outline of the battlefront. That's it. It doesn't illustrate "recent gains". They do archive previous days' maps, however, so we can do that comparison for ourselves. I'll tell you what. Why don't you pick a point on that map, anywhere, and I'll go dig up the old ones from June so we can compare them side to side. How does that sound? Let's see how great you're doing backing up your posts with your sources....