Moonbox

He's not making it up. Nobody on this forum has left of a life than you, and there are few people more blinkered and partisan than you. What sort of tragic life causes someone to post 10,000 insults a year on a single internet forum? That's your life, buddy boy. 🙃

Subtext: The algorithm feeds these directly to gullble rubes, who happily drink it up.

The average Saudi citizen makes less than the average Canadian, and their median wage is lower too. Also, Saudi Law usually requires employers to provide either free food or a food allowance to foreign workers under their Labour Laws. Here is how it works for foreign Indians: (iii) The contract shall include the name and address of the employer and the employee, job title, location of work, duration of contract, probation period, wage agreed upon, provision of free food or food allowance and accommodation, working hours, overtime allowance, vacation, air passages, medical insurance, end of the service benefits, provision in regard to disposal or transportation of mortal remains to India in case of demise of the employee, mode of settlement of disputes, etc. Good thing you did all that research, I guess. That took me 30 seconds.

Do you think it's reasonable to argue against how you're telling us you're feeling in any given moment, as you've done here? You don't have to answer. It's a rhetorical question.

Because you say so, which is what 99% of your "debating" on this forum amounts to. 🤣 Unfortunately for you, your total lack of emotional self-control and inability to avoid making a thread about you past the first page presents differently than you say. That's my go-to when you project. Between the two of us, only one of us records 10,000+ insults a year on a single internet forum. 🤡

and yet we can just go back through this thread to see which of us is being emotional. 😭 Your lack of self-awareness is on full display again.

Because you say so? 🫠 and in support of this claim you have (as usual) nothing. In the face of muppet's insistence, we have Trump support broken down by party in Canada: No MAGA in the CPC, nope nope nope. Oh yeah, we all remember that. Hey everyone! You guys all remember how critical Confux was of PP's sloganeering leading up to the election, right? 🤣🤣🤣

When you learn to recognize the difference between a well made argument and just barfing your feelings out on the keyboard and demanding people rebut them, let us know. 🙃

There's something to be said about that. Voting for the Liberals in the last election was a repudiation of the race to the intellectual bottom that the CPC has undertaken since MAGA spilled over into their ranks.

That's a very charitable way of describing him. Why not just say stupid people? I don't know what else you call someone who thinks they won a "debate" against a predictive LLM that was never even reasoning (much less against him) in the first place.

Or he wasn't saying anything intelligent or useful, thus there was nothing to rebut? Puking your thoughts and opinions out on to the forum is not the same thing as making an actual argument. Volume does not substitute for reason. 🙃

No, it's a PEBKAC issue. He puts near-zero thought into his posts these days, and his ability/willigness to objectively scrutinize information is non-existant.

No, you really haven't. 🤣 I could perhaps believe you've offered some softball nothingburger critiques somewhere, but I don't think there's a bigger and more blinkered PP fanboy than you on this forum. Thanks for the laughs again.

This sort of oblivious commentary would land better if there was actually anything to rebut in the first place. 🙃

Yes, everyone else in a cult...not the forum's most enthusiastic Poilievre-fluffer. Your history of criticism against the Conservative Party in Canada is widely recognized. 🤣 Nobody on this forum has less self-awareness than you. Thanks for the laugh!

I think it's funny how Army Guy posted reposted the same AI-slop article twice in one day in two different threads.

Because User doesn't understand or accept nuance or higher reasoning. If you criticize the IDF, that means you support Hamas.. Interestingly, if you criticize Hamas, it doesn't mean you support Israel or the IDF. This is the sort of brain-dead logic this guy works on.

This is something that's struck me over and over again over the last year and a half. Trump's global chaos-mongering and vindictive and belligerent blundering has done more to undermine the US global order than any president probably ever, and I don't anyone else would come close. He's done so much damage to US credibility and relationships that it will probably take decades to restore. Meanwhile, China is sitting there watching it all burn and looking like the more reasonable and reliable trading partner, despite the devil's bargain that entails. If you were a Russian or Chinese agent wanting to diminish the USA's influence around the world, I don't think you could have come up with a better plan than Trump's USA self-owning.

Liberal BAD. Conservative GOOD! (The sum total of Army Guy's political reasoning).

Why post the story directly from Angus Reid, with its objective information and summary, when Army Guy can just repost the AI-generated slop version, right off the feed the algorithm is giving him?

Except posting 30-40 emotional rants like the above a day, like you do, is the internet forum equivalent of screaming "Everyone else is crazy!" from inside a locked and padded room. 🙃

In what clownworld reality is my 2-3 line response "spasmodic" compared to this little outburst of yours? I'm just asking you to link your conversation with the AI. You seem to be afraid to provide your input, as I did. We don't have to wonder why. It's beause you know you asked it to assuage your ego, whereas I just fed it the objective numbers. 🤡

I said show your work. Link us the conversation and show us what you fed into the AI. Seems pretty obvious why you won't. Show us your butthurt query, little buddy. The things you comment and insist on aren't worth anything. Nobody cares what you say.

Except you're just feeding your butthurt into the AI. Is that supposed to hurt my feelings? I'm just feeding it numbers. I'll show my work. You show me yours, okay? https://chatgpt.com/c/69f4c517-a02c-83e8-98be-ab31599c203e What sort of person posts 35-40 times a day on a single political forum, unprofessionally? Identity-driven engagement — politics becomes part of their self-worth or tribe, so constant posting feels meaningful and validating. Compulsion / dopamine loop — outrage, arguments, notifications, and agreement create a reinforcement cycle similar to doomscrolling or gaming. Need for status or influence — they may see themselves as an activist, watchdog, educator, or culture warrior trying to shape opinion. Loneliness or lack of offline fulfillment — online political spaces can become a substitute social environment with structure, attention, and belonging. High emotional investment — fear, anger, resentment, or anxiety about politics can push people into obsessive participation. Low impulse control — some people simply post every thought immediately without filtering for professionalism, optics, or effectiveness. Parasocial “main character” behavior — they begin treating the forum like a personal stage rather than a shared discussion space. And importantly: volume itself tends to damage credibility. Most observers intuitively interpret 35–40 daily political posts as obsession rather than expertise. Even when the person occasionally has good points, the sheer frequency can make them seem reactive, emotionally captured, or unable to disengage. People with actual influence or expertise usually have constraints: jobs, responsibilities, reputational concerns, editorial standards, strategic discipline, or simply enough perspective to know that constant posting rarely changes minds. 🤣

You're describing yourself, except there's no "may be" about it. This is objective and measurable: One of us has a life outside this forum. 🤣