Catchme

http://www.canada.com/topics/bodyandhealth...1a1&k=24128&p=1 Nice of them to try to hide information, that we the tax payer paid for, to have ourselves better informed with the truth, eh?!

Until religion is abolished off the face of the earth people will use it for their own "ends". ESPECIALLY when those "ends" mean wiping out or converting everyone else to the one "true" faith. Yet we have the British Empire which was by definition ruled by the head of the Church of England waged war to abolish slavery, ruled countless of millions of non believers and for the most part, ruled benignly...establishing hospitals, schools etc etc...and requiring no conversion of faith... 2 points: 1st - Drea the topic title does no match the commentary. Religion and God are actually 2 separate things. I would say religion is poison, but not God. 2nd - MDancer, well that was a wonderful reduction of the British Empire in historical harmless nothingness, when in actual fact in is not even close to being accurate. Take a step outside of the confines of the Hicks and Combee "Christian" historical textbooks, perhaps?

The Dominionists may be a minority, but they, with support of the Bush admin, have been systemically dismantling the US Constitution and infrastructure with their power under Bush's regime. The following expose on how they got ramped up is as follows: http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/Th...ngOfAmerica.htm The person that tried to scoff it off as the link being 3 years old, and Bush just wanted to get rid of Clinton's bunch is in grievous error. We can SEE it occuring, and have seen it occuring. BTW, The US Attorney's were systematically fired from 2004 onward. And hiring 150 people for 1 dept, who graduated from the same university, the 4th rate Pat Robertson's Regent University, that teaches Dominionism as its fundamental premise, is quite abnormal and says a great deal on it's own. Including Monica Goodling, Director of Public Affairs for the United States Department of Justice, Little snippet regarding this as follows: http://news.bostonherald.com/politics/view...rticleid=199099

Oh, please those that pretend not to know what Dominionists are, when clearly they inhabit the nether regions of "Freedominon", are stretching their innocence ploy by far to far. For those that do not know in truth all they need do is ACTUALLY, read the links provided. Well, then if you are going to call the left "communists" that means that the right are then "fascists" eh? As it seems you only see in black and white. Jim Jones, was certainly not a communist he was religious right wing whack job. And right wingers too have communes btw, even Israel has them. But hey, nice try at deception. The simpliest way to curb population growth, is to stop having children. It seems the people on the right think that because they want extermination of others, others must be wanting it too. Nothing could be further from the truth.

http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/Co...torationAct.htm And now we see in the USA there is a Investigation regarding stacking the USA Judiciary system with 150 whacked out indoctinated graduates from Pat Robertson's Regent University, includiing Monica Goodling, who pleaded the fifth when questioned, regarding their attempted dismantling of of the US Judicial system to impliment theocracy. Iti s real, its true and it is whacked, right out there. And perhaps you did not really what Moyers speaks out about it from scribblet's 1st post above. The Domionists can no longer try to operate in stealth mode and lying in denial. There are simply way too many avenues of proof, from their own lips. http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/Th...ngOfAmerica.htm

Well what would you call getting rid of a few billion people. The left has track record of around a 100 million in the last century of mostly death by government. Neither articler said a word about getting rid of anyone, and what lower population rates mean is responsable reproduction ratios that are sustainable. The left has no track record of genocide. It is shear Domionists reverse, or preverse thinking, they want the world of "others" eliminated, so they think the others want them eliminated, truely lunatic fringe thinking actually. Jim Jones showed the freaks and evil doer leaders in the Dominionist camp how gullible some people were in following those who lie and profess they have the word of God. Showed them how right down to allowing themselves to be murdered, or comitt suicide, by his word.

http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/Th...ngOfAmerica.htm

Nope, it is absolute fact, the invasion of Iraq had absolutely NOTHING to do with 911.

There is nothing in those articles about genocide, and when has the "left" ever partook in any genocide, anymore than "right" has? That is pure lunatic ravings by the Dominionists.

The war on terror was conceived only hours after the 9/11 attack. The invasion of Iraq is the continuation of the war on terror. The search for Bin Laden started it and the war continues today in Iraq, in the West Bank, in Syria and in Afghanistan. In fact, all around the world where Muslims dwell. Unfortunately, the coalition of the willing has lost its resolve. It's unlikely we'll do the right thing and move into Iran. The so-called Axis of Evil still exists. Don't ever imagine that this is over. The only question is, will there be a will to see it through. If not, we'll pay a dear price. The invasion of Iraq was NOT an extension of the WAR on TERROR, nice try at re-writing history but you are again in error. Your thinking and verbage is truly "dominionist" in nature. And the real danger is those who will see see through the "dominist" lies.

Who doesn't know that???? How often does that need to be repeated?Yes, we're there to help them rebuild! Which also involves participating in combat missions! No, actually, it doesn't have to. You see, just because you think that way, doesn't mean I think that way. First of all, why would I expect any humane treatment from the Taliban? They're not signatory of the Geneva Conventions! Uh, but we are signatories, and yet you are okay with what is happening to detainees. This makes no sense. What about how the Karzi government treats the Afghan people? Why would that be? That is what the Geneva Convention does, actually, protects enemies from abuses by by one another. This is a bunch of emotional rhetoric, that has no substance or reality. That is being looked after by Human Rights people and NATO, I believe. And???? So what is you point saying this? That does not excuse any such actions, and WE ARE part of NATO Well, you've just lost your argument here. This is nothing more than an irrational anti-Bush rant! Absolute complete nonsense, there was no rant, and speaking out against the actions of the Bush government considering the autrocites they have committed, what their other actions are/were, is not "anti-Bush" rant. It is exposing truth, to those who would gloss over human rights abuses.

Might explain the unprecendted attacks on May by CPC supporters on this thread. Yes, in part, I am sure, as well, as the comments against fundamentalist Evangelicals. There is a clear split occuring, in that area, and Ms May wedged it further open.

This actually nothing contradictory about these positions of the NDP's at all. There are no environmental caps in place other than the tax consumers of fossil fuels pay. Yet consumer pricing have soared even when Oil is making record profits. Now if you add this articialially high gouging by Oil, and more environmentally based increases, consumers will be paying double/triple/quadruple the amount they should be. There is collusion, there has always been collusion, in pricing, only there is little need of it anymore as there really are just a handful of Oil company owners, they just use different Oil Company names.

Please, sexualizing actions in a rhetorical way really does not need to occur. If you wish to denounce him do so, but leave the sexual constructs out of it. Plus, he was not "cuckolded" and driving his kids around instead of an actual chauffer doing it, is is actually him being a good father, and NOT something to demean him over. He does not need a therapist IMO, his ex-wife is the mother of his children, they will always have a relationship because of it. Those who build distance and anonomousity between their exec's and dragging the children in it, or be absentee fathers, are the one's who need to see therapists, actually, not the other way around. And I would say his grasp on the reality of what his daughter's need from their father is quite accute.

Harper supporters?The NDP/rabble.ca crowd direct a venom at May that is worthy of a Stalinist/Trotskyite purge, show trial, axe. This rhetoric is a bit over the top, and beyond the pale actually. If you choose to use this style of discourse, then stating that the way Harper and the CPC attack the Liberals is of Hitler, Mussolini and the fascist regime shows trials and mass murders, of those 2. Well you can't really have it both ways now can you? I mean first off you liken the NDP to communists, then in the next breath you say they left the union leftist behind, which is it? Oh yes, it is pure rhetoric designed to provoke emotions rather than, actual critical thinking dialetic analysis. More rhetoric designed to promote an emotional derogatory mental image that is inacccurate to the nth degree. After all, just what is "too 80's"? But you are correct May is nothing more than a representative of a lobby group in heading the greens, just as she was when she headed the Sierra Club. There is no bleeding off of the NDP to Green Party, as such, that comment is purely internal belief constructs. Oh yes, let's compare the ROC to how the French in France and PQ are feeling! Especially when it is evident that everyone is pretty much split on how they are feeling. There are no majorities of thought action going on. Plus, the Greens are after all doing oh so well, now they're back down to their 7%, which is actually more like 3% when push comes to shove at voting time. everyone knows the NDP are by far ahead of the Green Party environmentally speaking, as well as every other level. Those who do not viote NDP will be voting Liberal, not Green. In one area the Greens make grow and that is with, disenfranchised from the CPC, Albertans, who may actually park their votes with the Greens though, as there is actual bleed off there.

How many radical islamists do you know? How can you claim to know their mindset? being open to scrutiny never stopped the Bush Administration from making up false stories or making false claims. also, these guys you doubt would make something up; other than their being open to scrutiny (what scrutiny are they under btw) - what else do you know about them? have they credentials as journalists? are they linguists? Excellent points guthrie, the article, and the thread title are little more than unsubtle attempts to create feelings of fear and anxiety that may not need to be.

I disagree.

Actually it is cultural Marxism which has its roots in 1920 Germany and can be traced to the (Frankfurt school) is to blamed for the western worlds current deterioration, and feminism is but of the corner stones of cultural Marxism. That's just as erroneous as blamming women for societals ills. Maybe we should reverse that so you can have a look at it. Maybe then it is men's fault for masculinizing women? After all, in order to build a country called Canada, or indeed the USA, a woman had to work side by side with her partner for them to servive. They knew they we equal to to their spouses, in a way perhaps women had not realized for a long time. Then men had to hold their succcessive wars, again who stepped up in to former masculine roles but women, they had to. They had to keep those farms and ranches functioning to feed the war effort. They became active spies, nurses and even fighters. In later wars, the women were the ones in the factories making arms and equipment. No, in fact oner could say this masculization of women is the men's fault, eh, making the decline in society morals as evidenced supposedly by the shooting in Virgina Tech etc, their fault as well. People really need to stop listening to the nonsense poured out of the Trinty Broadcast Network, and its subsiduaries, and start thinking clearly and critically.

It's a pretty simply concept, Dancer: Students are not 'in school' when they are not in school. Like when they're at home. There are set school hours of the day that govern when a student is a student and as such in control of the scholol act rules. 8-4pm in BC, which means that acts of bullying before school at lunch and after school until 4pm make the student in breach. After 4pm, the child is no longer a "student" and cannot be in breach of anything regarding the school regulations, unless said child is at a school event, outting etc. The teenager should have been charged legally, by the teachers in question, as opposed to this activity by the school. It might have made even more of an impact to teenagers undertaking to commit lander against their teachers, in a broader scope even, as the media level would've be high. Perhaps even a case against facebook would've been in order and it would force them to be a bit more in contact with their own rules.

Interesting, as the Canadians who are upset appear to be in the majority and they believe this is a mountain, not a molehill They do! Well, by your comments, you would be fine with having the military pulled today from there then eh? Because we sure as heck are over there doing more than imposing morality and not just in this instance now aren't we? Moreover, if we are NO position to tell them how to treat prisoners we hand over, although there is a signed agreement specifying how they are to be treated, then we are in NO position to tell them to how do anything at all, and as such our military should be leaving immediately. You can't have it both ways. Canadians have every right to demand and expect that ALL prisoners, that were transfered by our representatives there, be treated correctly, and we are absolutely right about it. Those who do not give a damn are the ones who have it wrong, and really need to examine their own personal reality and morality, or lack thereof.

You are actually speaking of something other here than the topic and have used the topic to attack those on the left with erroneous rhetoric. Also, the covert and erroneous talking points using any connotation to Neville Chamberlain and Hitler identify Blackwell, the Crouches, LaHaye et al, as the real speakers behind that thought form that was posted. Peace, and the desire to have it, has nothing at all to do with desiring status quo btw.

NOTE: Hillier does not say who they are "pissed off" at. http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2007/05/02/hillier-abuse.html

Yes, and the fundamentalist Christian right uses both the Neville Chamberlain quote and the Nazis analogy quite often, when speaking about ALL other people other than their rarified selves. Plus in a much worse way. Any people from that camp, requesting May to recall her words, are hyprocrits of the worst order. But of course they instinctually know that. I think you are absolutely correct, and more than instinctually, they undetsand it cognitively. Perhaps they do not like having the shoe on the other foot either, eh? Of course he does, he is a fundamentalist, and apparently I have read elsewhere, the CPC use Nazis and this kinda Nazis talk quite frequently in the HOC. Perhaps be back later with some examples.

Well the CPC=Liberal=the Greens, so really I do not see a lesser of any evils in those 3 parties. But the drop down to 30% by the CPC must be really shaking the one man show in Ottawa, eh? The MP's may have kept a low profile doing nothing without Harper's say prior, when numbers were not bad. Now the knives must be coming out, and it won't be pretty.

I grew up in Ottawa and saw it change with large group of welfare indolets came in and ruined the city. It's unreal how much trouble they got in with the police. Cop cars and so many domestic disputes. It was unreal. They were almost like animals. How could we ever allow this to happen to ourselves? How do you know they were on welfare? The sights and sounds he decribes could be any city that I have been in, recently. And it was "white" people doing all that stuff. I have a hard time believing this over the top rhetoric and likening people to animals. It might be okay to voice those things in your peer group, but perhaps that where it should stay? As it sounds as if it is straight out of the Rushdooney, Dobson, Blackwell et al handbooks of fostering hate through indoctrination..