Five of swords

My position is that if people decide they cannot have a baby because they cannot provide for it, then you have no solution for that problem. I did not cause us to live in a world with finite resources. I merely notice and accept that I do. If you want to blame somebody for forcing you to live in a world you are too soft to handle, then blame your parents. Maybe you should have been aborted.

But Hitler had no interest in taking poland or england.

Sounds like your biggest gripe with Trump is that he isn't a billionaire.

Seriously, find a person of average intelligence to read the thread and explain to you my position.

No, the question was answered before you asked it. I made my point very clearly and if you need help understanding what I said, ask so.eone with average reading comprehension to help you.

I don't believe that you are confused. And I am always honest. I could just repeat the point again that I have made a million times, that you always try to avoid. But I don't see why i should. Either address my point or give up. Stop trying to obfuscate.

They have plenty to do with each other. People in Ethiopia are starving because the country lacks the resources to feed them. If they aborted more babies it would help solve that issue

Simply accepting that resources are limited and conflict/competition over such resources is inevitable is not the same thing as being 'just fine with killing others'. There is no logical reason for you to conflate these things and without question the only reason you are trying to is because you lost the argument so you are desperately searching for some way to frame me as a 'bad person' which would absolve you of showing that my facts are not correct. What you don't realize in this strategy of yours is how obvious it is, and it only makes you look more absurd.

My thoughts are that elections change nothing. If elections could change anything, then they wouldn't be legal. An elected politician is just like casting a movie. Do you want Robert deniro playing prime minister or do you want Billy crystal? They will still be speaking the same script. You have no say in the script or the producer or the director. But you do get to pretend you have a say in government and blame all the people who vote wrong for all the issues in the country.

Plenty of people would love to just kill me and take my stuff. I prefer to resist such a thing, because I love myself more than I love random strangers.

I've repeated myself a million times, and you just constantly try to change the subject and go on deeply flawed illogical arguments that are not even relevant until you forget what my point was. The point is, if there are not enough resources available to provide for every human being that is the product of every sexual encounter, then there aren't enough resources. Got it? It's real simple. People die anyway because of lack of resources. Youcan cry about there not being resources, but I am not personally the reason there aren't enough resources, so there is no way I can help you. Most people choose to not have a child because they cannot provide for that child. That is obviously a major reason for abortion. So unless you can solve the problem of scarcity of resources (which would include the cost of transportation and distribution), people will die anyway. Do you have that solution? Communism, perhaps?

This is like saying there isn't a lack of food because there is free land to frow food on, if someone would only do it. Transportation and availability is also a resource, and it isn't free, either. The desert island is too poor to afford it. Same thing. That's logic.

So you don't believe anyone on earth ever starves?

Ironic, because it is exactly the opposite. If you insist that everyone must live, then you need to die. People are starving so why would you eat? Give that food to the hungry.

I believe scarcity exists ergo I must die? That's funny logic. But I can tell you are unable to handle reality, therefore.

Why would they need to be stabbed? What if they just fall off a ladder? If your ultimate goal Herr is some sort of jeremy benthem 'do the most goodness possible for the world' then I would think you would have different priorities. Especially because the truth is, assuming scarcity is still a thing, (which is why money exists at all), then I don't think humans could possibly afford to provide for a new baby whenever sex happens. Some compromise would have to be made. Are you interested in solving a problem? Or just signaling that you are ethicalenough to care about babies? (As if that is some rare quality)

Actually dude, it really was over 90% in Southern states. But also, the exact % doesn't matter. Because you are severely retarded you don't understand that the point is that culture follows law...as it always does. And the polls in that event certainly reflected that. Why did people convert to Christianity? Because the king did. Law. Culture. Follows. Law.

Over 90% of people in the south, who would be most affected, disapproved. That's when soldiers with bayonets were called to escort children to school. If such a radical attitude change was possible about segregation, why not pedophilia?

In no universe? Darling, when segregation was made illegal in the usa, over 90% of the population wanted segregation. Within a generation it became unthinkable to prefer segregation. If pedophilia was made legal people would quickly accept it as normal. That is human nature.

You mean like black people?

Other than memes and talk, what would make you suspect that he would do anything different than Trudeau? Both of them are just politicians following elite ideology.

Culture is downstream from law. Law is downstream from money

This is exactly how the people who rule the usa like to engineer the society. Half the population blames the other half for all the problems and nobody is accountable. Nothing important is discussed because of the constant false dialectic. 'Republicans' basically support the foreign policy and free market that jews like while 'democrats' provide the tolerance for degenerate and race mixing, which jews also like. Then we pretend to 'compromise' and jews get everything they want. There will never be socialized health care, and there will never be a country for white people. And everyone will blame the other party rather than the people who actually rule.

Taylor swift is irrelevant, but far more relevant than a labor union.

How can you be an expert on dementia when someone suffering from severe dementia has double your iq?