Five of swords

Moving goalposts? Didn't you just say there are no genetics associated with psychotic behavior? Now you want to argue frequency instead? Maybe you should just accept you are wrong and I showed you are wrong, and try something else after that.

Uh...invasions are usually a result of people seeking 'greener pastures'. That was the motive for Europeans colonizing most of the planet, in fact. And of course the native people we conquered resisted with whatever military strength they could muster. Which wasn't much and ultimately failed, but I certainly would not condemn those people for actually fighting. You don't expect Canadians to do the same? Should they not fight to protect their sovereignty over their homeland? I think it is pretty radical to demand that they do not...but it does seem like the 'mainstream' perspective. The mainstream is just completely insane.

Well argue with geneticists, I guess. There is a gene called MAOA which has been associated with aggression and psychotic behavior. And a particular variant of the gene which is most harmful is distributed highest among black people. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933872/#:~:text=A rare genetic disorder caused,is known as Brunner syndrome.

I want people to thrive, don't i?

Homosexuality was criminal under the nsdap, but the punishment was not generally execution. Under Stalin, it was.

Actually Stalin executed gays and the germans did not

Allah loves the people who would kill you for being gay. In fact no people have ever thrived if they failed to kill homosexuals.

The modern usa is fake and gay. So citing a ything from thr modern usa is just stupid. People love to get hysterical over stupid things. Palestinians, however will kill you for being gay. And I haveno problem with that at all.

No, I really don't care. And I think you are wrong about 'Maga' being 'homophobes'. You know who were homophobes? Everyone before 1960. And I actually have empathy for those people, unlike you.

Dude, I am not going to bother with any of your Google sources, and I don't care. Every celebrity is homosexual. The only people who can be homophobic are enemies of the us empire.

Pardon? How would measuring the skull prove that?

Republicans are fine with trans people all long as they are more passing and they act less spastic than Dylan muvaney. Homosexuals tend to be less tolerant of trans people than Republicans are. 'Christian nationalism' is incoherent because Christianity isn't a nation. But if it makes you happy to try to figure out what the hell it is, then you can do that. It doesn't matter since they have no political power. So it is kinda silly for you to even worry about it. But I eould assume that most people who call themselves 'Christian nationalist' would simply say that they should love homosexuals the way Jesus loves homosexuals. That is, as long as homosexuals support Israel, then they should be allowed to partake in Bacha bazi boy sex slaves.

Jews are prone to certain behavior and survival strategy by blood. In the same ways you are likely to see cows eating grass and lions eating gazelle. It does not require a centralized command structure...and indeed jews are adapted to not having that...being historically scattered all over the worldand lacking such infrastructure. This is why they focus more on law and speech and constructs like strict dietary rules meant to make it more difficult to 'break bread' with the gentiles. Indeed, in order for a people to survive for centuries despite losing their homeland (which basically never happens...think of extinct people's such as the etruscans, sarmations, samnites, thacians, etc.), certain traits are developed and passed down through the generations. Tolerance for diversity being an important one, since they never had a choice but to be foreigners themselves, while also having a certain level of ethnocentrism which could resist the natural process of assimilation into the broader culture. So many ideas and strategies propagate in a similar manner that religious teachings did. There may be a sort of modern secular version of a rabbinical leader...or often literally just rabbinical leaders...giving the main talking points as well as the most common responses to predictable criticism. Indeed, the majority of jews are probably involved in some mailing list, especially in the era of social media, basically signaling what the correct opinion should be and what they should promote in their community. On the other hand? Because there is advantages to centralized commands jews certainly have that. I guess I need to remind you that organizations such as the world jewish congress, Aipac, the adl, etc do in fact exist. And I can assure you that they have meetings where they discuss what to do about Muslims who don't like jews coming in large numbers to western countries. Ideas discussed there do generally become official western policies, as jewish donors to politicians inform those politicians what the shot is. And if you want to be an active participant in the Jewish community, I have no doubt that you could attend such meetings and voice your concern about Muslim immigration to the west and how it will impact jews. And I have no doubt that wiser jews will inform you that actually I am correct...that to be a jew has always been to face persecution and jews should never consider themselves safe, except in the country of Israel which is their haven, so what is good for Israel is good for the jews. And if Israel needs to relocate arabs into the west, where they will forget their homeland and become corrupted by western 'values' and hedonism, (or learn to be tolerant), then that is the correct move.

I have not seen Republicans having any issue with homosexuality. In fact, I think homosexuals are more likely to be Trump voters.

I bet you never met hitler

According to skynet logic such a thing is not possible, right?

What is a master race?

It makes me laugh when people are so afraid of one guy, Hitler, who was such a tiny percent of thr global population.

Well the opinions of catholics and protestants just don't matter unless they are racially jewish. Because the only collective tribal power that actually exists in the western world is jewish. Everyone else is simply an 'individual'. And the jews who do want to start destabilizing wars in the middle east and then send millions of refugees to Europe or Canada or whatever are clearly the ones who won whatever 'debate' you might imagine jews had among eachother...just like the boksheviks ultimately defeated the mengsheviks...despite both groups being significantly jewish. But again, you will probably not be able to find one single jew say that historically white countries ought to remain white...because the people with French or English white American blood should have their own countries and have control over their collective identity, since they will ultimately share a common destiny. No jew ever considers that right to any white gentile, despite demanding it for themselves. And it is only people who consider such self determination to be a moral right who can even begin to argue against the current genocidal policy...because there simply is no other argument against it.

Well black people just have higher frequency of psychotic dna.

Well obviously jews disagree with you, bro. Jews themselves believe, and say so explicitly, that it would be good for jews if the Arab people around Israel were relocated to the west. And it also just seems obviously true from common sense. I think it would be good for Europeans if all their Muslims were relocated to Israel, despite the fact some Europeans live in israel...

Because mass shooting stats show that they occur when Black people have guns. If you filtered out Black people from the stats, there would not be anything close to the mass shooting problem in the usa. If you filtered out blacks and mestizos, our gun crime Stat would be on par with Switzerland, which has about the same rate of gun ownership as the usa.

Uh...it's obvious. The problem isn't guns, the problem is guns plus black people. That is the proper interpretation of the stats.

Majority black

Well no, lol. I think a severely retarded person us just likely to be wrong about things, including which people they are more clever than. It isn't a difficult concept for people who aren't severely retarded, but I can see why it confused you.